Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:27:42.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assisting friendships, combating loneliness: users' views on a ‘befriending’ scheme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2003

GAVIN J. ANDREWS
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada.
NOEL GAVIN
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Studies, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK.
SHEILA BEGLEY
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Studies, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK.
DAVID BRODIE
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Studies, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK.

Abstract

Loneliness and isolation can be a major cause of unhappiness and can contribute towards depression and mental illness in older age. These associations are recognised by academics, policy makers and older people's representative organisations alike in several countries, and many corrective ad hoc and country-specific initiatives have been supported. This study examines the opinions of the users of a local home-visiting befriending service in the United Kingdom. The befrienders are volunteers, and most users were introduced to the service by female relatives or health service professionals. Positive opinions of the service predominated, and users placed a high value on the reliability of their befrienders. The service provided the users with an opportunity to develop a new bond, and many reported friendly reciprocity, which they recognised as an ingredient of ‘real’ friendship. These friendships sometimes developed beyond the agreed rules and remits of the ‘formal’ service, and incorporated various forms of supplementary assistance and social activities. The paper demonstrates the value of befriending services and examines carefully the aspects of their implementation that required exceptional sensitivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)