Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:10:10.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structuralism as a Conceptual Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Abraham Rosman*
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University, New York City, New York

Extract

I had imagined that the central issue of this symposium would be the contrast between nomothetic, or generalizing, research and idiographic, or particularistic, research in Africa. To what extent are the conclusions of research carried out in Africa limited to a geographic or cultural area: to sub-Saharan Africa, to the Bantu, to the Southeastern Bantu? To what extent are the conclusions generalizable to a certain type of society, no matter where it is found? Such a contrast of approaches would have raised the issues of the culturally distinctive qualities of African cultures and of the unique historical influences upon them. This emphasis is clearly evident in the writing of many anthropologists who have worked in Africa, particularly those with humanistic interests. It stands in contrast to another strategy of research which seeks, not the unique qualities of African cultures, but the general principles, exemplified by African societies as well as by all other societies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Krige, Eileen Jensen. “Property, Cross-Cousin Marriage, and the Family Cycle Among the Lovedu.” In Gray, Robert F. and Gulliver, P. H., eds. The Family Estate in Africa. Boston: Boston University Press, 1964. Pp. 155195.Google Scholar
Krige, E. Jensen and Krige, J. D.. The Realm of a Rain Queen. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Krige, J. D.The Significance of Cattle Exchanges in Lovedu Social Structure.” Africa, XII, 4 (1939), 393424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund Ronald. “The Structural Implications of Matrilineal Cross-Cousin Marriage.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, LXXXI (1951).Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund Ronald. Political Systems of Highland Burma. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Raw and the Cooked. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. Structure and Sentiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R.Introduction” to African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, ed. by Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, Daryll. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1950. Pp. 185.Google Scholar
Richards, A. I.Reciprocal Clan Relationships Among the Bemba of N. E. Rhodesia.” Man, XXXVII, 222 (1937), 188193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A. I.Some Types of Family Structure Amongst the Central Bantu.” In Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, Daryll, eds. African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1950. Pp. 207251.Google Scholar