Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:27:18.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-socialist micro-politics: Kilimanjaro, 1993

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

In what sense are current African politics explicable as efforts to ‘domesticate’ modernity? In Tanzania the post-socialist liberalisation has opened space for new forms and objects of competition. A scramble for control and for resources in the Kilimanjaro—Mem area in 1993 is described here. The variety of competitive activities involved is encapsulated in events in four radically different organisational arenas: in Chadema, a new national political party; in the Lutheran Church; in a sub-village on Kilimanjaro; and in a local patrilineage. These organisational frameworks are approached as partially autonomous, locally specific, sites of political activity. Each is visibly marked by a historical past while also being rapidly propelled to respond to immediate changes of circumstance in a large environment. The details suggest that classical theoretical definitions of ‘modernity’ do not always stand up as useful analytic devices.

Résumé

Dans quel sens est la politique africaine courante explicable en tant qu'effort de domestiquer la modernité? En Tanzanie, la libéralisation post-socialiste a ouvert un espace pour de nouveaux objets et formes de competition. La bousculade pour le contrôle et les ressources dans l'endroit de Kilimanjaro-Meru en 1993 est décrite ici. La variété d'activités compétitives qui se produisent est encapsulée dans des évènements dans quatre arènes organisationnelles radicalement différences: au sein de Chadema, un nouveau parti politique national; dans l' église Luthérenne; dans un village du sud sur le Kilimanjaro; et dans un patrilénage local. Ces structures organisationnelles sont considérées comme étant des lieux d'activités politiques partiellement autonomes et spécifiques à leurs localités. Chacune de ces structures sont visiblement marquées par un passé historique tout en étant aussi poussées à répondre rapidement aux changements de circonstances immediats dans un environnement plus général. Les détails suggèrent que les définitions théoriques classiques de modernité ne se prètent pas toujours à des formules analytiques utiles.

Type
When the old structures have failed
Information
Africa , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 587 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayart, Jean François. 1989. L'État en Afrique: la politique du ventre. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Order of Things. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1992. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, (trans. Lawrence, F. G.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, David. 1995. ‘Latticed knowledge’, in Fardon, Richard (ed.), Counterworks. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1986. ‘Representations are social facts: modernity and post-modernity in anthropology’, in Clifford, James and Marcus, George E. (eds.), Writing Culture. Berkeley and Los Angeles, Cal.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warnier, Jean-Pierre. 1993. L'Esprit d'entreprise au Cameroun. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles, Cal., and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar