Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:17:53.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landing gear ground manoeuvre statistics from automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast transponder data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2021

J. Hoole Open the ORCID record for J. Hoole [Opens in a new window] ,
P. Sartor Open the ORCID record for P. Sartor [Opens in a new window] ,
J.D. Booker Open the ORCID record for J.D. Booker [Opens in a new window] ,
J.E. Cooper Open the ORCID record for J.E. Cooper [Opens in a new window] ,
X.V. Gogouvitis  and
R.K. Schmidt
J. Hoole*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering University of BristolBristolUK
P. Sartor
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering University of BristolBristolUK
J.D. Booker
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering University of BristolBristolUK
J.E. Cooper
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering University of BristolBristolUK
X.V. Gogouvitis
Affiliation:
Safran Landing SystemsGloucesterUK
R.K. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Safran Landing SystemsAjax, OntarioCanada
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landing gear are exposed to cyclic loads from the ground manoeuvres that aircraft perform in-service. Variability is observed in the loading magnitude associated with ground manoeuvres, along with the per-flight variability in ground manoeuvre occurrence and sequencing. Whilst loading magnitude variability has been widely characterised, significant assumptions are required regarding manoeuvre occurrence and sequencing when constructing landing gear load spectra for fatigue design. These assumptions are required due to the limited availability of data concerning ground manoeuvre occurrence and sequencing relating to aircraft in-service and require validation to facilitate the design of more efficient components. ‘Big-Data’ approaches, employing Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) transponder data, enable aircraft ground tracks to be identified. This paper presents a methodology to characterise the variability in ground manoeuvre occurrence and sequencing using ADS-B data sourced from Flightradar24® for a wide-body aircraft fleet. Using statistics generated for the fleet, it was identified that significant variability exists in the occurrence and sequencing of turning and braking manoeuvres. The statistics also validate existing assumptions, including that the proportional share of left and right turning manoeuvres is equal. Finally, this paper discusses the utility of ADS-B datasets for constructing landing gear load spectra and monitoring of landing gear in-service.

Keywords

ADS-BLanding GearFatigueLoading SpectraManoeuvre StatisticsBig-DataData Analytics
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1293 , November 2021 , pp. 1942 - 1976
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schmidt, R.K. and Sartor, P. Landing gear, Encyclopedia on Structural Health Monitoring (Eds. Boller, C., Chang, F. and Fujino, Y. ), 2009, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ladda, V. and Struck, H. Operational loads on landing gear, Landing Gear Design Loads - AGARD Conference Proceedings CP484, 1990.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, O. Landing gear loads of civil transport aircraft, Aircraft Fatigue in the Eighties - Proceedings of the ICAF-Symposium, 1981.Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration. DOT/FAA/AR-02/129 - Side Load Factor Statistics from Commercial Aircraft Ground Operations, 2003.Google Scholar
Weibul, J.P. Undercarriage loadings of three aircraft: Porter PC-6, Venom DH-112 and Mirage IIIS, Proceedings of Aircraft Fatigue: Design, Operational and Economic Aspects Symposium (Eds. J.Y. Mann and I. Milligan), 1967, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, G., Sartor, P., Reed, S., Southern, P., Worden, K. and Cross, E. Prediction of landing gear loads using machine learning techniques, Struct. Health Monit., 2016, 15, (5), pp 568–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.K. Is ‘Safe-Life’ Safe Enough?, 2017, MSc, Cranfield University.Google Scholar
Hoole, J., Sartor, P. and Cooper, J.E. Safe-life fatigue and sensitivity analysis: a pathway towards embracing uncertainty?, Royal Aeronautical Society 5th Aircraft Structural Design Conference, 2016, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Air Accident Investigations Branch. Report on the accident to McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 EC-FXI at Liverpool Airport on 10 May 2001, 2003.Google Scholar
Sartor, P., Bond, D.A., Staszewski, W.J. and Schmidt, R.K. Value of an overload indication system assessed through analysis of aviation occurrences, J. Aircr., 2009, 46, (5), pp 1692–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engineering Sciences Data Unit. ESDU 75008 - Frequencies of vertical and lateral load factors resulting from ground manoeuvres of aircraft, 1994.Google Scholar
Castrichini, A., Cooper, J.E., Benoit, T. and Lemmens, Y. Gust and ground loads integration for aircraft landing loads prediction, J. Aircr., 2018, 55, (1), pp 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, E., Krauskopf, B. and Lowenberg, M. Continuation analysis of aircraft Ground loads during high-speed turns, J. Aircr., 2013, 50, (1), pp 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartor, P., Worden, K., Schmidt, R.K. and Bond, D.A. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of flight parameters that affect main landing gear yield locations, Aeronaut. J., 2014, 118, (1210), pp 1481–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration. DOT/FAA/AR-06/11 - Statistical Loads Data for the Boeing 777-200ER Aircraft in Commercial Operations, 2006.Google Scholar
Tao, J.X., Smith, S. and Duff, A. The effect of overloading sequences on landing gear fatigue damage, Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, 31, pp 1837–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C.C. Fatigue Design, 1982, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hoole, J., Sartor, P., Booker, J.D., Cooper, J.E., Gogouvitis, X.V., Ghouali, A. and Schmidt, R.K. A framework to implement probabilistic fatigue design of safe-life components, ICAF 2019 - Structural Integrity in the Age of Additive Manufacturing (Eds. A. Niepokolczycki, and Komorowski, J. ), 2020, Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Ocampo, J., Millwater, H., Singh, G., Smith, H., Abali, F., Nuss, M., Reyer, M. and Shiao, M. Development of a probabilistic linear damage methodology for small aircraft, J. Aircr., 2011, 48, (6), pp 2009–2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K., Artim, M. and Daverschot, D. Aircraft fatigue analysis in the digital age, Proceedings of the 29th Symposium of the International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue and Structural Integrity (ICAF2017), 2017, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Mangortey, E., Gilleron, J., Dard, G., Pinon, O. and Marvis, D.N. Development of a data fusion framework to support the analysis of aviation big data, AIAA SciTech Forum, 2019, San Diego, California, U.S.A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SchÄfer, M., Strohmeir, M., Lenders, V., Martinovic, I. and Wilhelm, M. Bringing up Opensky: a large-scale ADS-B sensor network for research, Proceedings of the 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensory Networks (IPSN), 2014, pp 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flightradar24®, https://www.flightradar24.com [accessed 21st October 2020].Google Scholar
RodrÍguez-DÍaz, A., Adenso-DÍaz, B. and GonzÁlez-Torre, P.L. Minimizing deviation from scheduled times in a single mixed-operation runway, Comput. Oper. Res., 2017, 78, pp 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiszer, M., Chen, J. and Stewart, P. A real-time active routing approach via a database for airport surface movement, Transp. Res. Part C, 2015, 58, pp 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benlic, U., Brownlee, A.E.I. and Burke, K. Heuristic search for the coupled runway sequencing and taxiway routing problem, Transp. Res. Part C, 2016, 71, pp 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, A.E.I., Weiszer, M., Chen, J., Ravizza, S., Woodward, J.R. and Burke, E.K. A fuzzy approach to addressing uncertainty in airport ground movement optimisation, Transp. Res. Part C, 2018, 92, pp 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, A., Sieling, J. and Gonzalez-Parra, G. Convergence in airline operations: the case of ground times, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2019, 77, pp 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Liu, J., Hu, R. and Zhu, H. Online four dimensional trajectory prediction method based on aircraft intent updating, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, 77, pp 774–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderienko, G., Anderienko, N., Fuchs, G. and Garcia, J.M.C. Clustering trajectories by relevant parts for air traffic analysis, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 2018, 24, (1), pp 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alligier, R. and Gianazza, D. Learning aircraft operational factors to improve aircraft climb prediction: a large scale multi-airport study, Transp. Res. Part C, 2018, 96, pp 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J., Ellerbroek, J. and Hoekstra, J. Flight extraction and phase identification for large automatic dependent surveillance broadcast datasets, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst., 2017, 14, (10), pp 566–572.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Ellerbroek, J. and Hoekstra, J. Large-scale flight phase identification from ADS-B data using machine learning methods, Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation (Eds. D. Lovell and H. Fricke), 2016.Google Scholar
O’kelly, M.E. Air freight hubs in the FedEx system: analysis of fuel use, J. Air Trans. Manag., 2014, 36, pp 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, P. and Li, L. Characterizing air traffic networks via large-scale aircraft tracking data: a comparison between China and the US networks, J. Air Trans. Manag., 2018, 67, pp 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becco, J.A. and Joyce, D. Automated aircraft tracking for park and landscape planning, Landsc. Urban Plan., 2019, 186, pp 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Perez, L.A., Sanchez-Fernandez, L.P., Shaout, A. and Suarez-Guerra, S. Airport take-off noise assessment aimed at identifying responsible aircraft classes, Sci. Total Environ., 2016, 542, pp 562–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacki, M. and Olenjniczak, D. Analysis of Boeing 737 MAX 8 flight in terms of the exhaust emission for the selected flight, Transp. Res. Procedia, 2018, 35, pp 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Live Blackboxes: requirements for tracking and verifying aircraft in motion, 4th Software Challenges in Aerospace Symposium, 2017, Grapevine, Texas, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, X. and Bieber, P. Quantitative assessments of runway excursion precursors using mode S data, Proceedings of ICRAT - International Conference for Research in Air Transportation, 2018, Castelldefels, Spain.Google Scholar
Stone, E.K. A comparison of Mode-S enhanced Surveillance observations with other in situ aircraft observations, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 2018, 144, pp 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAree, O., Aitken, J.M. and Veres, S.M. Quantifying situation awareness for small unmanned aircraft: toward routine beyond visual line of sight operations, Aeronaut. J., 2018, 122, (1251), pp 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J., Ellerbroek, J. and Hoekstra, J.M. WRAP: an open-source kinematic aircraft performance model, Transp. Res. Part C, 2019 98, pp 118–138.Google Scholar
Khadilkar, H. and Balakrishnan, H. A multi-model unscented Kalman filter for inference of aircraft position and taxi mode from surface surveillance data, Proceedings of the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, 2011, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.C. and Runger, G.C. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore Pte.Google Scholar
Garcia, M.A., Dolan, J. and Hoag, A. Aireon’s initial on-orbit performance analysis of space-based ADS-B, Proceedings of the 2017 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), 2017, Herndon, Virginia, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M., Olive, X., Rosenow, J., Fricke, H. and Alam, S. Analysis of airport ground operations based on ADS-B data, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics for Air Transportation (AIDA-AT), 2020, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAE International SAE AIR5914TM - Landing Gear Fatigue Spectrum Development for Part 25 Aircraft, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.K. Monitoring of aircraft landing gear structure, Aeronaut. J., 2008 112, (1131), pp 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jux, B., Foitzik, S. and Doppelbauer, M. A standard mission profile for hybrid-electric regional aircraft based on web flight data, Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), 2018, Chennai, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbraak, T.L., Ellerbroek, J., Sun, J. and Hoekstra, J. Large scale ADS-B data and signal quality analysis, Proceedings of the 12th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2017, Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Ali, B.S., Schuster, W., Ochieng, W. and Majundar, A. Analysis of anomalies in ADS-B and its GPS data, GPS Solut., 2016, 20, pp 429–438.Google Scholar
Behere, A., Bhanpato, J., Puranik, T., Kirby, M. and Mavris, D. Data-driven approach to environmental impact assessment of real-world operations, Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech 2021 Forum, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippone, A., Parkes, B., Bojdo, N. and Kelly, T. Prediction of aircraft engine emissions using ADS-B flight data, Aeronaut. J., 2021, doi:10.107/aer.2021.2.Google Scholar