Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:30:48.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostics of power setting sensor fault of gas turbine engines using genetic algorithm

Part of: ISABE 2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Yi-Guang Li
Yi-Guang Li*
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gas path diagnostics is one of the most effective condition monitoring techniques in supporting condition-based maintenance of gas turbines and improving availability and reducing maintenance costs of the engines. The techniques can be applied to the health monitoring of different gas path components and also gas path measurement sensors. One of the most important measurement sensors is that for the engine control, also called the power setting sensor, which is used by the engine control system to control the operation of gas turbine engines. In most of the published research so far, it is rarely mentioned that faults in such sensors have been tackled in either engine control or condition monitoring. The reality is that if such a sensor degrades and has a noticeable bias, it will result in a shift in engine operating condition and misleading diagnostic results.

In this paper, the phenomenon of a power-setting sensor fault has been discussed and a gas path diagnostic method based on a Genetic Algorithm (GA) has been proposed for the detection of power-setting sensor fault with and without the existence of engine component degradation and other gas path sensor faults. The developed method has been applied to the diagnostic analysis of a model aero turbofan engine in several case studies. The results show that the GA-based diagnostic method is able to detect and quantify the power-setting sensor fault effectively with the existence of single engine component degradation and single gas path sensor fault. An exceptional situation is that the power-setting sensor fault may not be distinguished from a component fault if both faults have the same fault signature. In addition, the measurement noise has small impact on prediction accuracy. As the GA-based method is computationally slow, it is only recommended for off-line applications. The introduced GA-based diagnostic method is generic so it can be applied to different gas turbine engines.

Keywords

Gas turbinesensordiagnosticsenginegenetic algorithm
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Special Issue 1242: The International Society of Air-breathing Engines (ISABE) 2017 Conference Special Issue , August 2017 , pp. 1109 - 1130
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper will be presented at the ISABE 2017 Conference, 3-8 September 2017, Manchester, UK.

References

REFERENCES

1. Li, Y.G. Performance-analysis-based gas turbine diagnostics: a review, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2002, 216.Google Scholar
2. Singh, R. Advances and opportunities in gas path diagnostics, ISABE-2003-1008, ISABE, 2003, Cleveland, Ohio, US.Google Scholar
3. Jaw, L.C. Recent advances in aircraft engine health management (EHM) technologies and recommendations for the next step, GT2005-68625, ASME Turbo Expo, 2005, Reno, Nevada, US.Google Scholar
4. Urban, L.A. Gas path analysis applied to turbine engine condition monitoring, AIAA 72–1082, AIAA/SAE 8th Joint Propulsion Specialist Conference, 1972, New Orleans, Louisiana, US.Google Scholar
5. Doel, D.L. An assessment of weighted-least-squares-based gas path analysis, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1994, 116, (2).Google Scholar
6. Volponi, A.J. Gas path analysis: An approach to engine diagnostics, 35th Symposium of Mechanical Failures Prevention Group,1982, Gaithersburg, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
7. Provost, M.J. COMPASS: A generalized ground-based monitoring system, AGARD-CP-449, 1988.Google Scholar
8. Li, Y.G. and Singh, R. An advanced gas turbine gas path diagnostic system – PYTHIA, ISABE-2005-1284, 2005, ISABE, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
9. Li, Y.G. Gas turbine performance and health status estimation using adaptive gas path analysis, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2010, 132, (4).Google Scholar
10. Denney, G. F16 jet engine trending and diagnostics with neural networks, Proceedings of the SPIE, 1993, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ogaji, S.O.T. and Singh, R. Gas path fault diagnosis framework for a three-shaft gas turbine, J Power and Energy, 2003, 217.Google Scholar
12. Tan, H.S. Fourier neural networks and generalized single hidden layer networks in aircraft engine fault diagnostics, J of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2006, 128, (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Zedda, M. and Singh, R. Gas turbine engine and sensor fault diagnosis using optimization techniques, J Propulsion and Power, 2002, 18, (5).Google Scholar
14. Gulati, A., Zedda, M. and Singh, R. Gas turbine engine and sensor multiple operating point analysis using optimization techniques, AIAA 2000–3716, AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama, US, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wallin, M. and Grönstedt, T. A comparative study of genetic algorithms and gradient methods for RM12 turbofan engine diagnostics and performance estimation, GT2004-53591, ASME Turbo Expo, 2004, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
16. Ganguli, R. Application of fuzzy logic for fault isolation of jet engines, 2001-GT-0013, ASME Turbo Expo, 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana, US.Google Scholar
17. Martis, D. Fuzzy logic estimation applied to newton methods for gas turbines, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2007, 129, (1).Google Scholar
18. Eustace, R. A real-world application of fuzzy logic and influence coefficients for gas turbine performance diagnostics, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, (6).Google Scholar
19. Romessis, C. and Mathioudakis, K. Bayesian network approach for gas path fault diagnosis, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2006, 128, (1).Google Scholar
20. Li, Y.G. A gas turbine diagnostic approach with transient measurement, J Power and Energy, 2003, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Surender, V.P. Adaptive myriad filter for improved gas turbine condition monitoring using transient data, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127, (2), 2005.Google Scholar
22. Ogaji, S.O.T., Singh, R. and Probert, S.D. Multiple-sensor fault diagnoses for a 2-shaft stationary gas turbine, Applied Energy, 2002, 71, pp 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Romesis, C. and Mathioudakis, K. Setting up of a probabilistic neural network for sensor fault detection including operation with component faults, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2003, 125, pp 634–641.Google Scholar
24. Palme, T., Fast, M. and Thern, M. Gas turbine sensor validation through classification with artificial neural networks, Applied Energy, 2011, 88, (11), pp 3898–3904.Google Scholar
25. Aretakis, N., Mathioudakis, K. and Stamatis, A. Identification of sensor faults on turbofan engine using pattern recognition techniques, Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12, pp 827–836.Google Scholar
26. Mehranbod, N., Soroush, M. and Panjapornpon, C. A method of sensor fault detection and identification, J Process Control, 2005, 15, (3), pp 321–339.Google Scholar
27. Courdier, A. and Li, Y.G. Power setting sensor fault detection and accommodation for gas turbine engines using artificial neural networks, ASME GT2016-56304, Turbo Expo, 2016.Google Scholar
28. MacMillan, W. Development of a Modular Type Computer Program for the Calculation of Gas Turbine Off Design Performance, PhD thesis, 1974, Cranfield Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
29. Michalewicz, Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programmes, 3rd ed, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.Google Scholar
30. Li, Y.G., Pilidis, P. and Newby, M. An adaptation approach for gas turbine design-point performance simulation, J of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, October 2006, 128, pp 789–795.Google Scholar
31. Li, Y.G., Abdul Ghafir, M.F., Wang, L., Singh, R., Huang, K., Feng, X. and Zhang, W. Improved multiple point non-linear genetic algorithm based performance adaptation using least square method, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, March 2012, 134, pp 031701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Dyson, R.J.E. and Doel, D.L. CF-80 condition monitoring – the engine manufacturing's involvement in data acquisition and analysis, AIAA-84-1412, 1987.Google Scholar