Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:17:04.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birds and Aircraft: A Problem at Auckland’s New International Airport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. K. Saul
E. K. Saul*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Service, Department of Internal Affairs, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:—

The bird hazard to aircraft at Auckland International Airport, Mangere, NZ (Lat 37° 00’ 30” S, Long 174° 47’ 30” E) is examined. Geographical features affecting the hazard are explained and the history of the hazard recounted, and the groups and component species of birds, their daily movement patterns and seasonal abundances discussed. The greatest potential danger is from the waders, but gulls are the greatest actual danger possibly because gulls live irregular, opportunistic lives in comparison with the strict, tide-governed existence of the waders. An analysis of the bird incident figures for a year tends to confirm this view, in spite of the comparative rarity of incidents.

Measures taken or projected against the birds are reviewed. Special reference is made to unorthodox methods—the provision of alternative high water roosting sites, experiments with a radio-controlled model simulating the hawk shape, and the use of gull corpses as scaring agents. While worthwhile reductions have been made to the hazard, continued work and constant vigilance is necessary.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 677 , May 1967 , pp. 366 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aldrich, J. W., Robbins, C. S. and Dykstra, W. W. Bird Hazard to Aircraft. Branch of Wildlife Research, US Department of the Interior, 1961.Google Scholar
2.Anon. Meeuwen Verloren het Gevecht. Katholieke Illustratie, Holland, pp 32–34, 7th October 1961.Google Scholar
3.Bird, W. H. Bird Strike Hazards Can be Reduced. Engineering Research and Development Department, Air Canada, Montreal, 1965.Google Scholar
4.Kuhring, M. S.An Outline of the Bird Problem in Canada and What is Being Done About It. Colloque surle Problème des Oiseaux sur les Aérodromes, Nice. Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
5.Lorenz, K.Vergleichende Verhaltensforchung. Zool Anz, Suppl Bd 12, pp 69–102, 1939.Google Scholar
6. Ministry of Aviation, England. Bird Dispersal from Aerodromes: Guide to Co-ordinators. Directorate of Aerodromes (Technical) Paper No 14, 1965.Google Scholar
7. Associate Committee on Bird Hazards to Aircraft. National Research Council, Canada. Field Notes, Nos 1-38, and various other unpublished papers, 1963 onwards.Google Scholar
8.Tinbergen, N.Social Releasers and the Experimental Method Reauired for their Study. Wilson Bull, Vol 60, pp 6–52, 1948.Google Scholar