Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T22:57:11.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An aviation approach to space transportation

(A strategy for increasing space exploration within existing budget streams)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

D. Ashford*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Bristol Spaceplanes, Almondsbury, Bristol, UK

Abstract

This paper presents a strategy for developing the first orbital spaceplane soon and at low cost and risk. The paper then shows how this vehicle will introduce an aviation approach to orbital space transportation to replace the present missile paradigm, leading to far lower costs and improved safety.

To illustrate the potential benefits, the paper presents preliminary sizing and cost estimates of a simple lunar base. Even including the cost of developing the spaceplanes and other vehicles required, the total cost is about ten times less than that of present plans that use large new expendable launch vehicles. Timescales need not be greatly affected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. Ashford, D.M., New commercial opportunities in space, Aeronaut J, February 2007, 111, (1116), p 61.Google Scholar
6. Penn, J.P. and Lindley, C.A., Spaceplane design and technology considerations over a broad range of mission application, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA.Google Scholar
7. Penn, J.P. and Lindley, C.A., Space tourism optimized reusable space-plane designs, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA.Google Scholar
8. White, F., The Overview Effect — Space Exploration and Human Evolution, 1987, Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
10. Lecture by Whitehorn, W, President of Virgin Galactic, to CIM Cheltenham, 6 November 2008.Google Scholar
11. Burt Rutan’s quest for space, Av Week, 21 April, 2003.Google Scholar
12. Smart project Ascender feasibility study final report, Bristol Spaceplanes Report TR 15, June 2004. (This report is at present proprietary).Google Scholar
13. Tolle, H., Review of European aerospace transporter studies, May 1967, SAE Space Technology Conference, Palo Alto, CA. (This paper describes designs by Bac, Bölkow, Bristol Siddeley, Dassault, ERNO, Hawker Siddeley, and Junkers.)Google Scholar
14. A preliminary feasibility study of the Spacecab low-cost spaceplane and of the Spacecab demonstrator, Bristol Spaceplanes Report TR 6, February 1994. Carried out under European Space Agency Contract No. 10411/93/F/TB. Volume 1 reproduced as The potential of spaceplanes, J Practical Applications in Space, Spring 1995 (Journal since renamed Space Energy and Transportation).Google Scholar
15. Letter from Taylor, I., Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Trade and Technology, to Cope, J. MP, March 1995.Google Scholar
16. Martin, J.E., Mayhall, J.A. and Hardy, R., Low-cost boosters, May 1967, Launch Systems Branch, Boeing, SAE Space Technology Conference, Palo Alto, CA, SAE paper 670380.Google Scholar
17. Knaur, J.S., Reusability – the next major launch system development? 14-16 June 1966, Boeing, SAE Publication for Advanced Launch Vehicles and Propulsion Systems Conference, Huntsville, AL.Google Scholar
18. Bell, M.W.J., Space operations and economics, May 1967, Space and Information Systems Div, North American Aviation, SAE Space Technology Conference, Palo Alto, CA. SAE paper 670392.Google Scholar
19. Skin in the game, Av Week, 9 October 2006, p 66.Google Scholar
20. Von Braun, W., Prelude to space travel, 1952, Across the Space Frontier, Ryan, C. (ED), Sidgwick and Jackson, London.Google Scholar
23. Read, W.I.I., To the Moon and beyond, Aerospace Int, February, 2007, 34, (2), p 21.Google Scholar
24. Shuttle decision top priority, Flight Int, 11-17 November, 2008, p 8.Google Scholar