Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:39:36.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Integrated design of fluidic flight controls for a flapless aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

W. J. Crowther ,
P. I. A. Wilde ,
K. Gill  and
S. M. Michie
W. J. Crowther
Affiliation:
[email protected]
P. I. A. Wilde
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
K. Gill
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
S. M. Michie
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fluidic flight controls enable forces and moments for flight vehicle trim and manoeuvre to be produced without use of conventional moving surface controls. This paper introduces a methodology for the design of Circulation Control (CC) and Fluidic Thrust Vectoring (FTV) as fluidic controls for roll and pitch. Work was undertaken as part of the multidisciplinary FLAVIIR project, with the goal of providing full authority fluidic flight controls sufficient for a fully flapless flight of an 80kg class demonstrator aircraft known as DEMON. The design methodology considers drag, mass, volume and pneumatic power requirements as part of the overall design cost function. It is shown that the fundamental flow physics of both CC and FTV are similar, and hence there are strong similarities to the design approach of each. Flight ready CC and FTV hardware has been designed, manufactured and ground tested. The CC system was successfully wind tunnel demonstrated on an 85% scale half model of the DEMON. The design condition of a control ΔCL of 0·1 was achieved with a blowing coefficient of 0·01, giving a useable control gain of 10. The FTV system was static tested using a micro gas turbine source. The control characteristic was ‘N’ shaped, consisting of an initial high gain response in a negative sense (gain = −30) followed by a low gain response in a positive sense (gain = +3) at higher blowing rate. CC and FTV control hardware directly contributes to around 6% to the overall mass of the flight vehicle, however provision of pneumatic power carries a significant mass penalty unless generated as part of an integrated engine bleed system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1149 , November 2009 , pp. 699 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Joslin, R.D. and Jones, G.S., Applications of Circulation Control Technology. AIAA, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics Series, 2006.Google Scholar
2. Englar, R.J., Circulation control for high lift and drag generation on STOL aircraft, J Aircr, 1975, 12, (5), pp 457–463.Google Scholar
3. Englar, R.J., Development of the A-6/circulation control wing flight demonstrator configuration, Taylor, D.W., Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD, USA, DTNSRDC/ASED-79/01, 1979.Google Scholar
4. Englar, R.J. and Huson, G.G., Development of advanced circulation control wing high-lift airfoils, J Aircr, 1984, 21, (7), pp 476–483.Google Scholar
5. Englar, R.J., Trobaugh, L.A. and Hemmerly, R.A., STOL potential of the circulation control wing for high-performance aircraft, J Aircr, 1978, 15, (3), pp 175–181.Google Scholar
6. Loth, J.L., Circulation control STOL aircraft design aspects, N88-17610, NASA Circulation Control Workshop, 1986.Google Scholar
7. Loth, J.L., Fanucci, J.B. and Roberts, S.C., Flight performance of a circulation controlled STOL aircraft, J Aircr, 1976, 13, (3), pp 169–173.Google Scholar
8. Asbury, S.C. and Capone, F.J., Multiaxis thrust-vectoring characteristics of a model representative of the F-18 high-alpha research Vehicle at angles-of-attack from 0 deg to 70 deg, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-3531, USA, 1995.Google Scholar
9. Bare, E.A. and Reubush, D.E., Static internal performance of a two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzle with thrust vectoring, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-2721, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
10. Berrier, B.L. and Re, R.J., A review of thrust-vectoring schemes for fighter applications, AIAA-1978-1023, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Society of Automotive Engineers, Joint Propulsion Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 25-27 July, 1978.Google Scholar
11. Berrier, B.L. and Taylor, J.G., Internal performance of two nozzles utilising Gimbal concepts for thrust vectoring, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-2991, USA, 1990.Google Scholar
12. Re, R.J. and Leavitt, L.D., Static Internal Performance including thrust vectoring and reversing of two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzles, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-2253, USA, 1984.Google Scholar
13. Deere, K.A., Summary of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Research Conducted at NASA Langley Research Center, AIAA-2003-3800, 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 23-26 June 2003.Google Scholar
14. Gill, K., The Development of Coflow Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Systems, PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
15. Mason, M.S. and Crowther, W.J., Fluidic thrust vectoring for low observable air vehicles, AIAA-2004-2210, 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 28-1 June 2004.Google Scholar
16. Van Der Veer, M.R. and Strykowski, P.J., Counterflow thrust vector control of subsonic jets: continuous and bistable regimes, J Propulsion and Power, 1997, 13, (3), pp 412–420.Google Scholar
17. Raymer, D.P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. 3rd Ed, AIAA Education Series, Reston, VA, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
18. Englar, R.J., Hemmerly, R.A., Moore, W.H., Seredinsky, V., Valckenaere, W. and Jackson, J.A., Design of the circulation control wing STOL demonstrator aircraft, J Aircr, 1981, 18, (1), pp 51–58.Google Scholar
19. Hoerner, S.F., Fluid-Dynamic Drag: Theoretical, Experimental and Statistical Information, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Bakersfield, CA, 1965.Google Scholar
20. Cook, M.V., Buonanno, A. and Erbsloh, S.D., A circulation control actuator for flapless flight control, Aeronaut J, 2008, 112, (1134), pp 483–489.Google Scholar
21. Frith, S., Flapless Control for Low Aspect Ratio Wings, PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2007.Google Scholar
22. Jones, G.S., Pneumatic Flap Performance for a 2D Circulation Control Airfoil, Steady and Pulsed. 2004 NASA/ONR Circulation Control Workshop, Part 2, pp. 845–888 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
23. Woods, P., Flaviir – An integrated programme of research for UAVs, AIAA 2006-3504, 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 5-8 June, 2006.Google Scholar
24. Michie, S.N., A design methodology for circulation control manoeuvre effectors, PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2009.Google Scholar
25. Englar, R.J., Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel investigations of a cambered 30% thick circulation control airfoil, Naval Ship Research and Development Center: Aviation and Surface Effects Dept, Bethesda, MD, USA, TN-AL-201, 1972.Google Scholar
26. Esdu. Program for the calculation of aileron rolling moment and yawing moment coefficients at subsonic speeds, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 2006, 88040(A04), pp 1–10.Google Scholar
27. Esdu. Estimation of Rolling Manoeuvrability, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 1992, EG 8/2.Google Scholar
28. Esdu. Stability Derivative, Lp, Rolling Moment due to Rolling for Swept and Tapered Wings, Engineering Science Data Units, A 06.01.01.Google Scholar
29. Miller, D.S., Internal Flow System, 2nd Ed, BHR Group Limited, 1990.Google Scholar
30. Lytton, A., Fluidic Thrust Vectoring of High Aspect Ratio Underexpanded Jets, PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical, Aeronautical and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2006.Google Scholar
31. Gill, K.G., Wilde, P.I.A. and Crowther, W.J., Development of an Integrated Propulsion and Pneumatic Power Supply System for Flapless UAVs AIAA-2007-7726, 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, 18-20 September 2007.Google Scholar
32. Loth, J.L. and Boasson, M., Circulation controlled STOL wing optimisation, J Aircr, 1984, 21, (2), pp 128–134.Google Scholar
33. Sparks, R., Michie, S., Gill, K., Crowther, W.J. and Wood, N.J., Development of an integrated circulation control/fluidic thrust vectoring Flight Test DEMONstrator, CEIAT 2005-0086, 1st International Conference on Innovation and Integration in Aerospace Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, 4-5 August 2005.Google Scholar
34. Wilde, P.I.A., Gill, K., Michie, S. and Crowther, W.J., Integrated design of fluidic flight controls for a gas turbine powered aircraft, AIAA-2008-164 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 7-10 January, 2008.Google Scholar
35. Wilde, P.I.A., Gill, K.G., Michie, S., Sparks, R. and Crowther, W.J., Integrated design of a model-scale gas turbine powered flapless demonstrator aircraft: A Case Study AIAA-2007-7727, 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Belfast, Ireland, UK, 18-20 September, 2007.Google Scholar
36. Harvell, J.K. and Franke, M.E., Aerodynamic characteristics of a circulation control elliptical airfoil with two blown jets, J Aircr, 1985, 22, (9), pp 737–742.Google Scholar
37. Sobester, A. and Keane, A., Multi-objective optimal design of a fluidic thrust vectoring nozzle, AIAA-2006-6916, 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA, 6-8 September, 2006.Google Scholar
38. Burley, J.R., Circular to rectangular transition ducts for high aspect ratio non-axisymmetric nozzles, AIAA-1985-1346, SAE, ASME & ASEE joint propulsion conference, 1985.Google Scholar
39. Englar, R.J., Investigation into and application of the high velocity circulation control wall jet for high lift and drag generation on STOL aircraft, USA, 1974.Google Scholar
40. Wilde, P.I.A., Crowther, W.J., Buonanno, A. and Savvaris, A., Aircraft control using fluidic maneuver effectors, AIAA-2008-6406, AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 18-21 August, 2008.Google Scholar
41. Fears, S.P., Ross, H.M. and Moul, T.M., Low-speed wind-tunnel investigation of the stability and control characteristics of a series of flying wings with sweep angles of 50°deg, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TM-4640, 1995.Google Scholar