Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:02:06.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the characteristics of a twin-jet STOVL fountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

A. J. Saddington ,
K. Knowles  and
P. M. Cabrita
A. J. Saddington
Affiliation:
[email protected], Aeromechanical Systems Group, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, Swindon, UK
K. Knowles
Affiliation:
[email protected], Aeromechanical Systems Group, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, Swindon, UK
P. M. Cabrita
Affiliation:
[email protected], Aeromechanical Systems Group, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, Swindon, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of multiple jets with the ground is of great importance for the design and operation of short take-off, vertical landing aircraft. The fountain upwash flow, generated by the impingement of two axisymmetric, compressible, turbulent jets onto a ground plane was studied using laser-based particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler velocimetry. Measurements were made with nozzle pressure ratios of between 1·05 and 4, nozzle height-to-diameter ratios of between 2·4 and 8·4, nozzle splay angles of between ±15 degrees and a nozzle spacing-to-diameter ratio of seven. The effect of varying these parameters on the fountain velocity decay, spreading rate and momentum flux ratio are discussed. Mean fountain upwash velocity profiles were found to be self-similar for all test conditions. A distinct frequency of fountain oscillation was identified but only at a nozzle height of 4·4 diameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1140: The International Powered Lift Conference 2008: A Special issue , February 2009 , pp. 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kuhn, R.E., Margason, R.J. and Curtis, P., Jet induced effects: the aerodynamics of jet and fan powered V/STOL aircraft in hover and transition, AIAA, 217, 2006, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
2. Margason, R.J., Review of propulsion-induced effects on aerodynamics of jet/STOL aircraft, 1970, NASA, Technical Note D-5617.Google Scholar
3. Saddington, A.J., Cabrita, P.M. and Knowles, K., Large-scale instabilities in a STOVL upwash fountain, Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 6, 2005, pp 667–676, Rodi, W. and Mulas, M. (Eds), Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
4. Skifstad, J.G., Aerodynamics of jets pertinent to VTOL aircraft, J Aircr, 1970, 7, (3), pp 193–204.Google Scholar
5. Abbott, W.A. and White, D.R., The effect of nozzle pressure ratio on the fountain formed between two impinging jets, 1989, RAE, Technical Memorandum P1166.Google Scholar
6. Hall, G.R. and Rogers, K.H., Recirculation effects produced by a pair of heated jets impinging on a ground plane, 1969, NASA, Contractor Report CR-1307.Google Scholar
7. Gilbert, B.L., Turbulence measurements in a radial upwash, AIAA J, January 1989, 27, (1), pp 44–51.Google Scholar
8. Barata, J.M.M., Fountain flows produced by multi-jet impingement on a ground plane, AIAA J Aircr, 1993, 30, (1), pp 50–56.Google Scholar
9. Behrouzi, P. and McGuirk, J.J., Experimental data for CFD validation of impinging jets in cross-flow with application to ASTOVL flow problems, 1993, AGARD Conference Proceedings CP-534, Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium, 19-22 April 1993, Winchester, UK.Google Scholar
10. Siclari, M.J., Hill, W.G. and Jenkins, R.C., Stagnation line and upwash formation of two impinging jets, AIAA J, October 1981, 19, (10), pp 1286–1293.Google Scholar
11. Wohllebe, F.A. and Siclari, M.J., Fountain and upwash flowfields of multijet arrangements, J Aircr, August 1978, 15, (8), pp. 468–473.Google Scholar
12. Saripalli, K.R., Visualization of multijet impingement flow, AIAA J, April 1983, 21, (4), pp 483–484.Google Scholar
13. Kibens, V., Saripalli, K.R., Wlezien, R.W. and Kegelman, J.T., Unsteady features of jets in lift and cruise modes for VTOL aircraft, 1987, International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibition, 7-10 December 1987, Santa Clara, CA, USA, Paper 872359, pp 543–552.Google Scholar
14. Cabrita, P.M., Saddington, A.J. and Knowles, K., Unsteady features of twin-jet STOVL ground effects, 2002, International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 November 2002, Williamsburg, VA, USA, Paper 2002-6014.Google Scholar
15. Childs, R.E. and Nixon, D., Turbulence and fluid/acoustic interaction in impinging jets, 1987, International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibition, 7-10 December 1987, Santa Clara, CA, USA, pp 447–458, Paper 872345.Google Scholar
16. Knowles, K., Wilson, M.J. and Bray, D., Unsteady pressures under impinging jets in cross-flows, AIAA J, 1993, 31, (12), pp 2374–2375.Google Scholar
17. Kotansky, D.R. and Glaze, L.W., The effects of ground wall-jet characteristics on fountain upwash flow formation and development, 1981, 14th AIAA Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 23-25 June 1981, Paper 81-1294.Google Scholar
18. El-Okda, Y. and Telionis, D.P., Experimental investigation of twin jet impinging on the ground with and without a free stream, 2002, International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 5-7 November 2002, Paper 2002-5976.Google Scholar
19. Elavarasan, R., Venkatakrishnan, L., Krothapalli, A. and Lourenço, L., Supersonic twin impinging jets, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, 10-13 January 2000, Reno, NV, USA, Paper 2000-0812.Google Scholar
20. Bray, D., Jets in Cross-flow and Ground Effect, 1992, PhD thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Shrivenham, UK.Google Scholar
21. Cabrita, P.M., Steady and Unsteady Features of Twin-Jet STOVL Ground Effects, 2006, PhD thesis, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK.Google Scholar
22. Donaldson, C.D. and Snedeker, R.S., A study of free jet impingement. Part 1. Mean properties of free and impinging jets, J Fluid Mech, 1971, 45, (2), pp 281–319.Google Scholar
23. Saddington, A.J., Lawson, N.J. and Knowles, K., An experimental and numerical investigation of under-expanded turbulent jets, Aero J, March 2004, 108, (1081), pp 145–152.Google Scholar
24. Knowles, R.D., Finnis, M.V., Saddington, A. J. and Knowles, K., Planar visualization of vortical flows, IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, Special issue on integrating CFD and experiments in aerodynamics, 2006, 220, (6), pp 619–627.Google Scholar
25. Schach, W., Umlenkungeinesfreien Flussigkeitsstrahles an einer ebenen Platte (The deflection of a free liquid jet on a flat plane), Ingenieur-Archiv, 1934, 5, pp 245–265.Google Scholar
26. Rubel, A., Oblique impingement of a round jet on a plane surface, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (12), pp 1756–1758.Google Scholar
27. Taylor, G., Oblique impact of a jet on a plane surface, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1966, 260A, pp 96–100.Google Scholar
28. Saddington, A.J., Knowles, K. and Cabrita, P.M., Flow measurements in a short take-off, vertical landing fountain: parallel jets, J Aircr, 2008, 45, (5), pp 1736–1743.Google Scholar
29. Krothapalli, A., Rajakuperan, E., Alvi, F.S. and Lourenço, L., Flow field and noise characteristics of a supersonic impinging jet, J Fluid Mech, 392, August 1999, pp 155–181.Google Scholar
30. Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L., A First Course in Turbulence, 1972, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar