Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:08:00.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community Archaeology at the Trowel's Edge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Laurie E. Miroff*
Affiliation:
Public Archaeology Facility, Science 1, Room 146, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY13902-6000, [email protected]
Nina M. Versaggi
Affiliation:
Public Archaeology Facility, Science 1, Room 146, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY13902-6000, [email protected]
*
([email protected], corresponding author)

Abstract

The Public Archaeology Facility's (PAF) Community Archaeology Program (CAP) at Binghamton University began 25 years ago in response to intense community interest in participating in archaeology. Although non-archaeologists have unlimited access to programming and social media about archaeology, there is more limited access to professionally supervised opportunities. PAF developed CAP to provide non-archaeologists with the opportunity to participate in highly supervised archaeological research projects to share in the process of discovery at the “trowel's edge.” CAP recognizes the challenges and critiques of community programs and mitigates these by creating a climate of ethical practice. Our goal is to educate individuals about the presence of a rich and fascinating past in their own communities and create the sweat equity that can result in advocates for preservation. We operate under the principles that the heritage story embedded in an artifact is worthy of our respect and protection, and that an educated public is more likely to support the preservation of this heritage. Making a connection to people through artifacts builds not only a deeper understanding of the past but also an empathy for preservation. In this article, we introduce the program and reflect on the 25-year history of CAP and future directions.

El Programa de Arqueología Comunitaria (PAC) del Public Archaeology Facility (PAF) de la Universidad de Binghamton comenzó hace 25 años en respuesta al intenso interés por parte de la comunidad en participar en la arqueología. Si bien las personas ajenas a la arqueología tienen un acceso ilimitado a ella a través de programas de televisión y redes sociales, existe una limitación mayor cuando se trata del acceso a oportunidades supervisadas profesionalmente. PAF desarrolló el PAC para proporcionar a las personas ajenas a la arqueología la oportunidad de participar en proyectos de investigación arqueológica altamente supervisados, lo que les permite compartir el proceso de descubrimiento que se desenvuelve al mismo “filo de el paletín.” El PAC reconoce los desafíos y críticas que se plantean hacia los programas comunitarios y los mitiga mediante la creación de un clima de práctica ética. Nuestra meta es educar a los individuos acerca de la presencia de un pasado rico y fascinante en sus propias comunidades, así como estimular el vínculo que surge del trabajo compartido, que a su vez puede contribuir a formar defensores de la preservación. Operamos bajo los principios de que la historia patrimonial incorporada en un artefacto se merece nuestro respeto y protección, y de que un público educado se muestra más inclinado a apoyar la preservación de este patrimonio. Establecer una conexión con la gente a través de los artefactos no sólo construye un entendimiento más profundo del pasado, sino que también crea empatía para su preservación. En este artículo, presentamos el CAP y reflexionamos acerca de sus 25 años de historia, así como de su desarrollo futuro.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Atalay, Sonya 2012 Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jodi A. 2018 Public Archaeology Is Citizen Science in Arkansas. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 5:416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basso, Keith 1996 Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Copeland, Tim 2004 Presenting Archaeology to the Public: Constructing Insights On-Site. In Public Archaeology, edited by Merriman, Nick, pp. 132143. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Derry, Linda, and Malloy, Maureen (editors) 2003 Archaeologists and Local Communities: Partners in Exploring the Past. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Rachel 2005 Confronting a Conundrum. American Archaeology 9(3):3135.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, Katherine H. 2018 Perception and Practice: Doing Public Archaeology. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Ferri, John 2011 Elemental Analysis of Two Projectile Points Types and the Implications for Identifying Communities of Practice in the Late Archaic of New York State. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Grills, Brian 2016 Phase 1 Cultural Resource Survey, Diahoga Trail Project, Athens and Sayre Townships, Bradford County, Pennsylvania (ER# 2015-1580-015). Prepared by the Public Archaeology Facility for the Borough of Sayre, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Grima, Reuben 2016 But Isn't All Archaeology “Public” Archaeology? Public Archaeology 15:5058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Margaret A. 1997 Successfully Integrating the Public into Research: Crow Canyon Archaeological Center. In Presenting Archaeology to the Public: Digging for Truths, edited by Jameson, John H. Jr., pp. 6572. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Inglis, Julian (editor) 1993 Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and Cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge and International Development Research Centre. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Interligi, Blaze Jon 2012 Ephemerality in Sites of Deep Temporal Depth: A Study of “Dwelling” at a Cabin Site on New York's Frontier. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Iseke, Judy 2013 Indigenous Storytelling as Research. International Review of Qualitative Research 6:559577. DOI:10.1525/irqr.2013.6.4.559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, John H. Jr. (editor) 1997 Presenting Archaeology to the Public: Digging for Truths. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Jameson, John H. Jr., and Baugher, Sherene (editors) 2007 Past Meets Present: Archaeologists Partnering with Museum Curators, Teachers, and Community Groups. Springer, Secaucus, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Jordan E. 2006 Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Native Peoples and Archaeology in the Northeastern United States. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
King, Eleanor M. 2016 Systematizing Public Education in Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:415424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Timothy D. 1996a Stage 3 Data Recovery Thomas/Luckey Site (SUBi-888), Town of Ashland, Chemung County, New York. Public Archaeology Facility, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Knapp, Timothy D. 1996b Early Late Woodland Subsistence: A View from the Chemung Valley. Presented at the Archaeobotany in the Northeast Symposium sponsored by the New York Natural History Conference IV. New York State Museum, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Knapp, Timothy D. 2009 Local-Level Analysis of Social Reproduction and Transformation in the Chemung Valley: The Thomas/Luckey Site. In Iroquoian Archaeology and Analytic Scale, edited by Miroff, Laurie E. and Knapp, Timothy D., pp. 70100. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, Stefanie 2016 Excavating the “Who” and the “Why” of Participation in a Public Archaeology Project. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:454464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudrle, Samuel 2014 The John Moore Farm Site: Late Archaic to Transitional Camps at the Confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the New York State Archaeological Association, Oneonta, New York.Google Scholar
Kudrle, Samuel 2015 PIN 9038.08.121, NY 434 Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail, Phase 3 Data Recovery, John Moore Farm Site, (SUBi-2821; NYSM 12178), City of Binghamton, Broome County, New York. Public Archaeology Facility, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Lipe, William D. 2002 Public Benefits of Archaeological Research. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, edited by Little, Barbara J., pp. 2028. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Little, Barbara J. (editor) 2002 Public Benefits of Archaeology. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Lyons, Natasha 2013 Where the Wind Blows Us: Practicing Critical Community Archaeology in the Canadian North. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Adrián 2016 The Serialized Past Archaeology News Online. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:556561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne 2002 What Is Community Archaeology? World Archaeology 34:211219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Carol, and Brock, Terry P. 2015 The Differing Forms of Public Archaeology: Where We Have Been, Where We Are Now, and Thoughts for the Future. In Ethics and Archaeological Praxis, edited by Gnecco, Cristobal and Lippert, Dorothy, pp. 159183. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice No. 1. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P. 2000 Public Education: A Part of Archaeological Professionalism. The Archaeology Education Handbook: Sharing the Past with Kids, edited by Smardz, Karolyn and Smith, Shelley J., pp. 1724. AltaMira Press, Walnut Grove, California.Google Scholar
Miroff, Laurie E. 2002 Building a Village One Household at a Time: Patterning at the Thomas/Luckey Site, New York. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Miroff, Laurie E. 2008 An Archaeological Enigma: The Vestal Phase of the Late Archaic. Presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Eastern States Archaeology Federation, Lockport, New York.Google Scholar
Miroff, Laurie E. 2009 Local-Level Analysis of Social Reproduction and Transformation in the Chemung Valley: The Thomas/Luckey Site. In Iroquoian Archaeology and Analytic Scale, edited by Miroff, Laurie E. and Knapp, Timothy D., pp. 70100. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Miroff, Laurie E., and Knapp, Timothy D. 2010 Late Prehistoric Archaeology at the Iroquoian Southern Door: New York's Chemung Valley. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the New York State Archaeological Association, Ellenville, New York.Google Scholar
Miroff, Laurie E., Wilson, Jeremy, and Versaggi, Nina 2008 Reconsidering Culture-Historic Taxa in the Late Archaic. North American Archaeologist 29:157177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Cath 2015 Heritage and Participation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by Waterton, Emma and Watson, Steve, pp. 346365. Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, Jesse 2018 How Indigenous Knowledge Advances Modern Science and Technology. The Conversation. Electronic document, https://theconversation.com/how-indigenous-knowledge-advances-modern-science-and-technology-89351, accessed May 26, 2020.Google Scholar
Price, Mary, Miroff, Laurie, Knapp, Tim, Rafferty, Sean, and Versaggi, Nina M. 2000 Creating Stewards of the Past: Binghamton University's Community Archaeology Program. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Reetz, Elizabeth, and Quackenbush, William 2016 Creating Collaborative Learning Opportunities for Indigenous Youth with Archaeology-Based Environmental Education. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:492502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Monica L. 2014 Citizen Science in Archaeology. American Antiquity 79:749762.Google Scholar
Stone, Peter G. 1997 Presenting the Past: A Framework for Discussion. In Presenting Archaeology to the Public: Digging for Truths, edited by Jameson, John H. Jr., pp. 2334. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ben, and Langlitz, Meredith Anderson 2016 Archaeology Fairs and Community-Based Approaches to Heritage Education. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:465478.Google Scholar
Thum, Jen, and Troche, Julia 2016 Visitor as Researcher Making Archaeology More Accessible with Broken and Unprovenienced Objects. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:537549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versaggi, Nina M. 2007 Partners in Preservation: The Binghamton University Community Archaeology Program (CAP). In Past Meets Present: Partnerships in the Public Interpretation of Archaeology, edited by Jamison, John H. Jr. and Baugher, Sherene, pp. 203217. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versaggi, Nina M., and Miroff, Laurie E. 2005 What's the Difference? The Lamoka and Vestal Phases in the Southern Tier of New York. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the New York State Archaeological Association, Watertown, New York.Google Scholar