Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:20:24.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia

The Philippines

From ‘People Power’ to Democratic Backsliding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

Mark R. Thompson
Mark R. Thompson
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong

Summary

This Element explores how in the Philippines a 'whiggish' narrative of democracy and good governance triumphing over dictatorship and kleptocracy after the 'people power' uprising against Ferdinand E. Marcos in 1986 was upended by strongman Rodrigo R. Duterte three decades later. Portraying his father's authoritarian rule as a 'golden age,' Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. succeeded Duterte by easily winning the 2022 presidential election, suggesting democratic backsliding will persist. A structuralist account of the inherent instability of the country's oligarchical democracy offers a plausible explanation of repeated crises but underplays agency. Strategic groups have pushed back against executive aggrandizement. Offering a 'structuration' perspective, presidential power and elite pushback are examined as is the reliance on political violence and the instrumentalization of mass poverty. These factors have recurrently combined to lead to the fall, restoration, and now steep decline of democracy in the Philippines.
Get access

Keywords

Philippinesdemocratic backslidingpatronagepolitical violencedevelopment
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia
Online ISBN: 9781009398466
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 25 May 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abinales, P. N. 1996. When a Revolution Devours Its Children before Victory: Operasyon Kampanyang Ahos and the Tragedy of Mindanao Communism. In Abinales, P. N., ed., The Revolution Falters: The Left in Philippine Politics after 1986. Ithaca: Cornell University, 154–179.Google Scholar
Abinales, P. N. 2015. Digong’s Mouth. Rappler (December 6): www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/115071-duterte-mouth-censorship/.Google Scholar
Abinales, P. N. 2017. Political Science and the Marcos Dictatorship. Social Transformations Journal of the Global South (April): https://ajolbeta.ateneo.edu/stjgs/articles/93/1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abinales, P. N. & Amoroso, D. J.. 2017. State and Society in the Philippines, Second Edition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Abueva, J. V. 1971. Ramon Magsaysay: A Political Biography. Manila: Solidaridad.Google Scholar
Africa, J., Raquiza, M., Ursua, E. & Jimenez, E.. 2017. Reforming Philippine Poverty Policy. Quezon City: National Anti-Poverty Commission.Google Scholar
Agpalo, R. E. 1981. The Philippines: From Communal to Societal Pangulo Regime. Philippine Law Journal 56(1): 56–98.Google Scholar
Agpalo, R. E. 1996a. Leadership and Types of Filipino Leaders: Focus on Ferdinand E. Marcos and Corazon C. Aquino. In Agpalo, R. E., ed., Adventures in Political Science. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 251–269.Google Scholar
Agpalo, R. E. 1996b. The Organic-Hierarchical Paradigm and Politics in the Philippines. In Agpalo, R. E., ed., Adventures in Political Science. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 163–194.Google Scholar
Agojo, K. N. M. 2021. Policing a Pandemic: Understanding the State and Political Instrumentalization of the Coercive Apparatus in Duterte’s Philippines. Journal of Developing Societies 37(3), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, F. V. 2019. Political Conjuncture and Scholarly Disjunctures: Reflections on Studies of the Philippine State under Marcos. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints 67(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Aim, S. 2016. How Duterte Won the Election on Facebook. New Mandala (May 12): www.newmandala.org/how-dutertewon-the-election-on-facebook/.Google Scholar
Albert, J. R. G., Dumagan, J. C. & Martinez, A. Jr. 2015. Inequalities in Income, Labor and Education: The Challenges of Inclusive Growth. Philippine Institute of Development Studies, Discussion Paper Series No. 2015–2001.Google Scholar
Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M.. 2017. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2), 211–236.Google Scholar
Allard, T. & Lema., K. 2020. Exclusive: “Shock and Awe” has Failed in Philippines’ Drug War, Enforcement Chief Says. Reuters (February 7): www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-drugs-performance-exclusi-idUSKBN2010IL.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2019. “They Just Kill”: Ongoing Extrajudicial Executions and Other Violations in the Philippines’ “War on Drugs.” Amnesty International: www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1180791/download.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1988. Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Origins and Dreams. New Left Review I/169, 3–31.Google Scholar
Aning, J. 2022. Bongbong Marcos’ First SONA: It’s All About Economy. Philippine Daily Inquirer (July 25): https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1633568/marcos-first-sona-its-all-about-economy#ixzz7a8h8EXbK.Google Scholar
Arcellana, E. Y. 1961. Quezon’s Gift: A Dream of Social Justice: “Not for a Few Alone, but for All, Especially the Poor.” Philippines Free Press (August 19): https://philippinesfreepress.wordpress.com/1961/08/19/quezons-gift-a-dream-of-social-justice-august-19–1961/.Google Scholar
Arguelles, C. V. 2019. “We Are Rodrigo Duterte”: Dimensions of the Philippine Populist Publics’ Vote. Asian Politics & Policy 11(3), 417–437.Google Scholar
Arguelles, C. V. 2021. The Populist Brand Is Crisis: Durable Dutertismo Amidst Mismanaged COVID-19 Response. In Daljit Singh and Malcolm Cook, eds., Southeast Asian Affairs, 257–274.Google Scholar
Arguelles, C. V. 2022. The Triumph of the Marcos-Duterte Leviathan. The Medium (May 10): https://medium.com/@clevearguelles/the-triumph-of-the-marcos-duterte-leviathan-f8b8165b9759.Google Scholar
Arugay, A. A. & Slater., D. 2019. Polarization without Poles: Machiavellian Conflicts and the Philippines’ Lost Decade of Democracy, 2000–2010. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arguillas, C. 2011. Maguindanao: The Long Shadow of the Ampatuans. In Chua, Y. & Rimban, L., eds., Democracy at Gunpoint: Election-Related Violence in the Philippines. Makati: The Asia Foundation, 1–26.Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat. 2019. ASEAN Key Figures 2019. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank. 2005. Poverty in the Philippines: Income, Assets and Access. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E. & Mietzner, M.. 2019. Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy 30(4), 104–118.Google Scholar
Balisacan, A. M. 2001. Did the Estrada Administration Benefit the Poor? In Doronila, A. & Abueva, J. V., eds., Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis. Pasig: Anvil, 98–112.Google Scholar
Barry, C. 2006. The Limits of Conservative Church Reformism in the Philippines, Democratic. In Cheng, T. & Brown, D., eds., Religious Organizations and Democratization: Case Studies from Contemporary Asia. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 157–179.Google Scholar
Batalla, E. V. C. 2016. Divided Politics and Economic Growth in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3), 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batalla, E. V. C., Sta. Romana, M. & Rodrigo, K.. 2018. The Judiciary under Threat. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 107–117.Google Scholar
Bautista, G. M. 2003. An Assessment of the Philippine Economy. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia 4 (October): https://kyotoreview.org/issue-4/an-assessment-of-the-philippine-economy/.Google Scholar
Beissinger, M. 2007. Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5(2), 259–276.Google Scholar
Bello, W. 2009. The Anti-Development State: The Political Economy of Permanent Crisis in the Philippines. London: Zen Books.Google Scholar
Bello, W. 2016. The Left under Duterte. Jacobin (August 7): www.jacobinmag.com/2016/06/walden-bello-philippines-duterte-dignidad-coalition-akbayan/.Google Scholar
Bello, W. 2017. Why It’s Time for Progressives in the Duterte Cabinet to Leave. Rappler (August 20): www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/179285-time-progressives-duterte-cabinet-leave-drug-war-killings.Google Scholar
Bello, W. 2019. Duterte’s Revolt against Liberal Democracy. Global Dialogue 8(3): https://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/dutertes-revolt-against-liberal-democracy/.Google Scholar
Beltran, M. 2020. In the Philippines, a Label Can Take Your Life: Accusation as a Communist – “Red-Tagging” – Is a Potential Death Sentence, Which Doesn’t Stop Some from Using It. The Interpreter (December 3): www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/philippines-label-can-take-your-life.Google Scholar
Berlin, D. L. 1982. Prelude to Martial Law: An Examination of Pre-1972 Philippine Civil-Military Relations. PhD dissertation, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Bernardo, J. 2022. Academics Defend Historian Ambeth Ocampo vs. “Smear Campaign.” ABS-CBN News (July 11): https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/07/11/22/history-is-not-gossip-academics-defend-historian-ambeth-ocampo.Google Scholar
Berner, E. 2001. Kollektive Strategien, Herrschaft und Widerstand: Zur Relevanz einer Theorie strategischer Gruppen in der Entwicklungssoziologie. In Schrader, H., Kaiser, M. & Korff, R., eds., Markt, Kultur, Gesellschaft: Zur Aktualität von 25 Jahren Entwicklungsforschung. Münster: LIT Verlag, 113–132.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. 2016. On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
Bloomberg. 2021. The Covid Resilience Ranking: The Best and Worst Places to Be as We Learn to Live with Delta. Bloomberg (September 28): www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-resilience-ranking/.Google Scholar
Bolongaita, E. Jr. P. 1995. Presidential versus Parliamentary Democracy. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints 43, 105–123.Google Scholar
Bonner, R. 1987. Waltzing with a Dictator: The Marcoses and the Making of American Policy. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Borras, S. M. 2007. Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Brillantes, A. B. 1987. Dictatorship and Martial Law: Philippine Authoritarianism in 1972. Manila: Great Books.Google Scholar
Boudreau, V. 2009. Elections, Repression and Authoritarian Survival in Post-Transition Indonesia and the Philippines. The Pacific Review 22(2), 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, J. K. 1993. The Political Economy of Growth and Impoverishment in the Marcos Era. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
Cabañes, J. & Cornelio, J.. 2017. The Rise of Trolls in the Philippines (and What We Can Do about It). In Curato, N., ed., A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early Presidency. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press, 231–250.Google Scholar
Casiño, T. 2017. Duterte’s Falling Out with the Left. Rappler (Sept. 9, 2017): www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/duterte-falling-out-left.Google Scholar
Castañeda Anastacio, L. 2016. The Foundations of the Modern Philippine State: Imperial Rule and the American Constitutional Tradition in the Philippine Islands, 1898–1935. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claudio, L. E. 2013. Taming People’s Power: The Edsa Revolutions and Their Contradictions. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Claudio, L. E. 2017a. Defending Liberalism in the Global South: Notes from Duterte’s Philippines. The Global South 11(2), 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claudio, L. E. 2017b. Liberalism and the Postcolony: Thinking the State in 20th-Century Philippines. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Claudio, L. E. 2019. Jose Rizal: Liberalism and the Paradox of Coloniality. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Claudio, L. E. & Abinales, P. N.. 2017. Dutertismo, Maoismo, Nasyonalismo. In Curato, N., ed., A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early Presidency. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press, 93–110.Google Scholar
Collier, K. 1995. Bringing Civil Society Back In: Rectification in the Philippine Revolutionary Movement and the Idiom of Resistance in Davao. South East Asia Research 3(1), 92–119.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2016a. Development First: Multilateralism in the Post-“War on Drugs” Era. In After the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy. London: London School of Economics, 9–18: https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-After-Drug-Wars.pdf.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2016b. Why the Philippines’ New War on Drug Users Will Fail. Business World Online (August 2): www.bworld.online.com/content.php?section=Opinion&title=why-the-philippines-new-war-on-drug-users-will-fail&id=131265.Google Scholar
Combinido, P. 2019. When Illiberal Social Media Takes Over Democratic Philippines. New Mandala (February 6): www.newmandala.org/when-illiberal-social-media-takes-over-democratic-philippines/.Google Scholar
Combinido, P. & Curato, N.. 2021. Curing “Patient Zero”: Reclaiming the Digital Public Sphere in the Philippines. In Aim, S. & Tapsell, R., eds., From Grassroots Activism to Disinformation: Social Media in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS, 19–42.Google Scholar
Contreras, A. P. 2020. Rodrigo Duterte as Ideology: Academic vs. Social Media Myths and Representations and Their Implications to Political Order. Philippine Political Science Journal 41, 48–72.Google Scholar
Corpus, V. N. 1989. The Silent War. Quezon City: VNC Enterprises.Google Scholar
Coronel, S. 2017. Are Priests Duterte’s Fiercest Foes? The New York Times (August 4): www.nytimes.com/2017/08/04/opinion/are-priests-dutertes-fiercest-foes.html.Google Scholar
Crispin, S. W. 2018. Duterte Leads Tri-Pronged Attack on Press Amid Condemnation of Controversial Policies. Committee for the Protection of Journalists (July 5): https://cpj.org/blog/2018/07/mission-journal-duterte-leads-tri-pronged-attack-o.php.Google Scholar
Curaming, R. A. 2020. Power and Knowledge in Southeast Asia: State and Scholars in Indonesia and the Philippines. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curato, N. 2016. Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3), 91–109.Google Scholar
Curato, N. 2017. Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47(1), 142–153.Google Scholar
Curato, N. 2021. Democratic Expressions amidst Fragile Institutions: Possibilities for Reform in Duterte’s Philippines. Democracy in Asia (January 22): www.brookings.edu/articles/democratic-expressions-amidst-fragile-institutions-possibilities-for-reform-in-dutertes-philippines/.Google Scholar
Curato, N. 2022. The Return of a Marcos to Power in the Philippines Is a Warning to the World. The Guardian (May 18): www.theguardian.com.Google Scholar
Curato, N. & Ong, J.. 2018. Who Laughs at a Rape Joke? Illiberal Responsiveness in Rodrigo Duterte. University of Massachusetts Amherst, ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, Communication Department Faculty Publication: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=communication_faculty_pubs.Google Scholar
Dañguilan, M. 2018. The RH Bill Story: Contentions and Compromises. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
David, R. 2016. Dutertismo. Philippine Daily Inquirer (May 1): https://opinion.inquirer.net/94530/dutertismo.Google Scholar
de Dios, E. S. & Hutchroft, P. D.. 2003. Political Economy. In Balisacan, A. M. & Hill, H., eds., The Philippine Economy: Development, Policies, and Challenges. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 45–73.Google Scholar
Deinla, I., Taylor, V. & Rood, S.. 2018. Philippines: Justice Removed, Justice Denied. The Interpreter (May 17): www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/philippines-justice-removed-justice-denied.Google Scholar
Dohner, R. S. & Intal, P. Jr. 1989. The Marcos Legacy: Economic Policy and Foreign Debt in the Philippine. In Sachs, J. D. & Collins, S. M., eds., Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, vol. 3: Country Studies – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 373–400.Google Scholar
Doronila, A. 1985. The Transformation of Patron-Client Relations and Its Political Consequences in Postwar Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 16(1), 99–116.Google Scholar
Dreisbach, J. 2018. Social Media and Blogging: The Changing Philippine Media Landscape under the Duterte Regime. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia (August 23): https://kyotoreview.org/yav/social-media-blogging-under-duterte-regime/.Google Scholar
Dressel, B. & Bonoan, C. R.. 2019. Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Duterte versus the Rule of Law. Journal of Democracy 30(4), 134–148.Google Scholar
Evangelista, R. E. 2015. Who Were Really behind Makati’s Yellow Confetti Rallies? Rappler (September 24): www.rappler.com/moveph/106976-makati-confetti-rallies-marcos/.Google Scholar
Evers, H.-D. 1973. Group Conflict and Class Formation in South-East Asia. In Evers, H.-D., ed., Modernization in South-East Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 108–131.Google Scholar
Evers, H.-D., Schiel, T. & Korff, R.. 1988. Strategische Gruppen: Vergleichende Studien zu Staat, Bürokratie und Klassenbildung in der Dritten Welt. Berlin: D. Reimer.Google Scholar
Evers, H.-D. & Gerke, S.. 2008. Strategic Group Analysis. Center for Development, Bonn: Bonn University (November 9).Google Scholar
Fegan, B. 1979. Folk-Capitalism: Economic Strategies of Peasants in a Philippine Wet-Rice Village. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Fernandez, G. M. 2021. Rise of Illiberal Democracy, Weakening of the Rule of Law, & Implementation of Human Rights in the Philippines. American University International Law Review 36(2): https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2061 &context=auilr.Google Scholar
Ferrara, F. 2015. The Political Development of Modern Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franco, J. & Abinales, P.. 2007. Again, They’re Killing Peasants in the Philippines – Lawlessness, Murder and Impunity. Critical Asian Studies 39(2), 315–328.Google Scholar
Garcia, M. G. 2005. The “Spanish Colonial Past” in the Construction of Modern Philippine History: A Critical Inquiry into the (Mis)use of Spanish Sources. PhD dissertation, National University of Singapore: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48645937.pdf.Google Scholar
Garrido, M. 2022. The Ground for the Illiberal Turn in the Philippines. Democratization 29(4), 673–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavilan, J. & Talabong, R.. 2020. Policing a Pandemic: Philippines Still Stuck with Drug War Blueprint. Rappler (May 1): www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/policing-coronavirus-pandemic-philippines-still-stuck-drug-war-blueprint.Google Scholar
Gera, W. 2020. Heightened Contradictions: Duterte and Local Autonomy in the Era of COVID-19. New Mandala (June 5): www.newmandala.org/heightened-contradictions-duterte-and-local-autonomy-in-the-era-of-covid-1/.Google Scholar
Gera, W. & Hutchroft, P. D.. 2021. Duterte’s Tight Grip over Local Politicians: Can it Endure? New Mandala (February 19): www.newmandala.org/dutertes-tight-grip-over-local-politicians-can-it-endure/.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, B. 2015. Murder Most Foul: Marcos’ Youthful Exuberance. ABS-CBN News (September 9): https://news.abs-cbn.com/blogs/opinions/09/09/15/murder-most-foul-marcos-youthful-exuberance.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. M. 1938. Juan Sumulong: Dreamer, Not Demagogue. Philippines Free Press (September 17): https://philippinesfreepress.wordpress.com/tag/juan-sumulong/.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, J. 2021. Ex-Mayor on Duterte’s “Narco Politician” List Is Killed. New York Times (June 17): www.nytimes.com/2021/06/17/world/asia/philippines-mayor-dead-drugs.html.Google Scholar
Habito, C. 2013. Inequity, Initiative and Inclusive Growth. Philippine Daily Inquirer (March 11): http://opinion.inquirer.net/48623/inequity-initiative-and-inclusive- growth.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. 2018. Developmental States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapal, K. 2021. The Philippines’ COVID-19 Response: Securitising the Pandemic and Disciplining the Pasaway. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 40(2), 224–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hau, C. S. 2016. What Is Crony Capitalism? Emerging State Project (April 8). Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies: www3.grips.ac.jp/~esp/en/event/what-is-%E2%80%9Ccrony-capitalism%E2%80%9D/index.html.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y., Quisumbing, A. R. & Andriano, L. S.. 1990. Toward an Alternative Land Reform Paradigm: A Philippine Perspective. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Hedman, E.-L. E. 2001. The Spectre of Populism in Philippine Politics and Society: Artista, Masa, Eraption! South East Asia Research 9(1), 5–44.Google Scholar
Hedman, E.-L. E. 2006. In the Name of Civil Society: From Free Election Movements to People Power in the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Hedman, E.-L. E. & Sidel, J. T.. 2000. Philippine Politics and Society in the Twentieth Century: Colonial Legacies, Post-Colonial Trajectories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heydarian, R. J. 2018. The Rise of Duterte: A Populist Revolt against Elite Democracy. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hodder, R. 2018. The Civil Service. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. 2016. The Dark Side of Electoralism: Opinion Polls and Voting in the 2016 Philippine Presidential Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3), 15–38.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 2018. Pork Transmorgified: The Unending Story of Particularistic Spending in the Philippines. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 97–106.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2009. “You Can Die Any Time”: Philippines – Dismantle “Davao Death Squad” (April 6): www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. 1998. Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. 2008. The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy 19(1), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. 2011. Reflections on a Reverse Image: South Korea under Park Chung Hee and the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos. In Kim, B.-K. & Vogel, E. F., eds., The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 542–572.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. 2019. Midterm Elections Deepen Duterte’s Domination. East Asia Forum (June 2): www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/06/02/midterm-elections-deepen-dutertes-domination/.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. & Gera, W.. 2022. Strong-Arming, Weak Steering: Central-Local Relations in the Philippines in the Era of the Pandemic. Philippine Political Science Journal 43(2), 123–167.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. & Holmes, R. D.. 2020. A Failure of Execution. Inside Story (April 4): https://insidestory.org.au/a-failure-of-execution/.Google Scholar
Iglesias, S. 2018. Central-Local Dynamics and Political Violence in the Philippines, 2001–2016. PhD dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Institute for Autonomy and Development. 2015. Did You Know? Cost of War in Mindanao? Shaping Public Policy for Peace and Governance (April 6): https://iag.org.ph/news/548-did-you-know-cost-of-war-in-mindanao.Google Scholar
Janjira, S. & Arugay, A.. 2016. Duterte’s War on Drugs: Bitter Lessons from Thailand’s Failed Campaign. The Conversation (September 26): https://theconversation.com/dutertes-war-on-drugs-bitter-lessons-from-thailands-failed-campaign-66096.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. & Hapal, K.. 2018. Police Violence and Corruption in the Philippines: Violent Exchange and the War on Drugs. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37(2), 39–62.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J. V. 2020. Ensuring American Control over the Philippine Economy through the Imposition of the Parity Rights. DLSU Research Congress 2020 (June 17–19): www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2020/TPH-09.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. T. & Fernquest, J.. 2018. Governing through Killing: The War on Drugs in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Law and Society 5(2), 359–390.Google Scholar
Jones, G. R. 1989. Red Revolution: Inside the Philippine Guerrilla Movement. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Judis, J. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Juego, B. 2017. The Philippines 2017: Duterte-Led Authoritarian Populism and Its Liberal Democratic Roots. Asia Maior 28, 129–163.Google Scholar
Kane, J. 2009. The Politics of Moral Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, D. C. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kasuya, Y. 2009. Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines. Pasig City: Anvil.Google Scholar
Kasuya, Y. & Teehankee, J.. 2020. Duterte Presidency and the 2019 Midterm Election: An Anarchy of Parties? Philippine Political Science Journal 41(12), 106–126.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. 2013. The Grim Reality Behind the Philippines’ Economic Growth. The Atlantic (May 7): www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/05/the-grim-reality-behind-the-philippines-economic-growth/275597/.Google Scholar
Kenny, P. 2020. Why Is There No Political Polarization in the Philippines? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (August 18): https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/08/18/why-is-there-no-political-polarization-in-philippines-pub-82439.Google Scholar
Kenny, P. & Holmes, R.. 2020. A New Penal Populism? Rodrigo Duterte, Public Opinion, and the War on Drugs in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies 20(2), 187–205.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, B. J. T. 1977. The Huk Rebellion: A Study of Peasant Revolt in the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. J. 1989. Rebellion and Repression in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kho, K. R. G. 2019. Behavioural Biases and Identity in Social Media: The Case of Philippine Populism, President Duterte’s Rise, and Ways Forward. Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore: https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/case-studies/behavioural-biases-and-identity-in-social-media_1204.pdf?sfvrsn=d3f77a0a_2.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. 2018. Clientelism Revisited. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 17–25.Google Scholar
King, R. 1977. Land Reform: A World Survey. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kirsch, H. & Welzel, C.. 2019. Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe. Social Forces 98(1), 59–92.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, P. 2016. “If They Resist, Kill Them All”: Police Vigilantism in the Philippines. Frankfurt am Main: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt PRIF Report No. 142: www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/prif142.pdf.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, P. 2020. Governors and Mayors in the Philippines: Resistance to or Support for Duterte’s Deadly War on Drugs. Peace Research Institute (PRIF) Report, Frankfurt am Main: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: https://nbnresolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71309-0.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, V. G. & Tasker, R.. 1996. Promises to Keep. Far Eastern Economic Review (February 29), 22.Google Scholar
Kuntz, P. & Thompson, M. R.. 2009. More than the Final Straw: Stolen Elections as Revolutionary Triggers. Comparative Politics 41(3), 253–272.Google Scholar
Kusaka, W. 2017. Bandit Grabbed the State: Duterte’s Moral Politics. Philippine Sociological Review 65, 40–75.Google Scholar
Ileto, R. C. 1985. The Past in the Present Crisis. In May, R. J. & Nemenzo, Francisco, eds., The Philippines after Marcos. London: Croom Helm, 10–22.Google Scholar
Landé, C. H. 1965. Leaders, Factions, and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Politics. New Haven: Southeast Asian Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Landé, C. H. 1996. Post-Marcos Politics: A Geographic and Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Philippine Elections. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Landé, C. H. 2001. The Return of “People Power” in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy 12(2), 88–102.Google Scholar
Lansdale, E. G. 1972. In the Midst of Wars. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lasco, G. 2016. Just How Big Is the Drug Problem in the Philippines Anyway? The Conversation (October 13): https://theconversation.com/just-how-big-is-the-drug-problem-in-the-philippines-anyway-66640.Google Scholar
Lasco, G. 2017. Inside the Philippines’ Long Journey towards Reproductive Health. The Conversation (May 9): https://theconversation.com/inside-the-philippines-long-journey-towards-reproductive-health-72737.Google Scholar
Lasco, G. 2020a. The “Pasaway” as Scapegoat. Philippine Daily Inquirer (April 30): https://opinion.inquirer.net/129356/the-pasaway-as-scapegoat.Google Scholar
Lasco, G. 2020b. Medical Populism and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Public Health 15(10), 1417–1429.Google Scholar
Linantud, J. 1998. Whither Guns, Goons, and Gold? The Decline of Factional Election Violence in the Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia 20(3), 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. J. 2000 [1975]. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lucero, V. & Mangahas, M.. 2016. Big Kill of Small Fry, Puny Drugs Haul, Defies PNP Rules. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (July 25): http://pcij.org/uncategorized/big-kill-of-small-fry-puny-drugs-haul-defies-pnp-rules/.Google Scholar
Luton, H. 1971. American Internal Revenue Policy in the Philippines to 1916. In Owen, N. G., ed., Compadre Colonialism: Studies on the Philippines under American Rule. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, 65–80.Google Scholar
Magcamit, M. & Arugay, A.. 2017. Rodrigo Duterte and the Making of a Populist Demigod: Part 1. Asia Dialogue (March 17): https://theasiadialogue.com/2017/03/17/rodrigo-duterte-and-the-making-of-a-populist-demigod-part-1/.Google Scholar
Marcos, F. E. 1974. The Democratic Revolution in the Philippines. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Maru, D. 2018. CHR Chief: Drug War Deaths Could Be as High as 27,000. ABS-CBN News (December 5): https://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/12/05/18/chr-chief-drug-war-deaths-could-be-as-high-as-27000.Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. R. 2019. Perceived Threat of Crime, Authoritarianism, and the Rise of a Populist President in the Philippines. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 43(3), 207–218.Google Scholar
May, R. J. 1992. Vigilantes in the Philippines: From Fanatical Cults to Citizens’ Organizations. Philippine Studies Occasional Paper, no. 12, Center for Philippine Studies, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Mediansky, F. A. 1986. The New People’s Army: A Nation-Wide Insurgency in the Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia 8(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, A. 1989. Quezon’s Commonwealth. In Paredes, R. R., eds., Philippine Colonial Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 114–160.Google Scholar
McCoy, A. 2001. Dark Legacy: Human Rights under the Marcos Regime. In Memory, Truth-Telling, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Conference on the Legacies of the Marcos Dictatorship. Quezon City: Office of Research and Publications, Ateneo de Manila University, 129–144.Google Scholar
McCoy, A. 2017. Global Populism: A Lineage of Filipino Strongmen from Quezon to Marcos and Duterte. Kasarinlan 32(1–2), 7–54.Google Scholar
McKenna, T. M. 1998. Muslim Rulers and Rebels: Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, D. J. & Thompson, M. R.. 2018. Congress: Separate but Not Equal. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 107–117.Google Scholar
Mendoza, R. 2018. Unmasking Duterte’s Populism: Populist Rhetoric versus Policies in the Philippines. In Echle, C., Kliem, F. & Sarmah, M., eds., Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 67–80.Google Scholar
Mendoza, R. U. & Romano, D. L.. 2020. The Philippines Anti-Terrorism Act: Who Guards the Guardians? The Diplomat (July 6): https://thediplomat.com/2020/07/the-philippines-anti-terrorism-act-who-guards-the-guardians/.Google Scholar
Mercado, M. A., ed. 1986. People Power: The Greatest Democracy Ever Told: The Philippine Revolution of 1986 – An Eyewitness to History. Quezon City: James B. Reuter Foundation.Google Scholar
Mercado, N. A. 2022. Bongbong Marcos: “The Philippines Has No Intention of Rejoining ICC.” Philippine Daily Inquirer (August 1): https://globalnation.inquirer.net/205693/bongbong-marcos-the-philippines-has-no-intention-of-rejoining-icc#ixzz7aicNjWjB.Google Scholar
Mietzner, M. 2014. Indonesia’s 2014 Elections: How Jokowi Won and Democracy Survived. Journal of Democracy 25(4), 111–125.Google Scholar
Mijares, P. 1976. The Conjugal Dictatorship of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos. San Francisco: Union Square.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 2018. Rodrigo Duterte: Fire and Fury in the Philippines. Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, P. 2016. The Globalization of Rage. Foreign Affairs 95(6), 46–54.Google Scholar
Montiel, C. J., Uyheng, J. & de Leon, N.. 2021. Presidential Profanity in Duterte’s Philippines: How Swearing Discursively Constructs a Populist Regime. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 41(4): https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211065780.Google Scholar
Mounk, Y. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, R. H. 1985. The New Khmer Rouge. Commentary (December): www.commentary.org/articles/ross-munro/the-new-khmer-rouge/.Google Scholar
National Historical Institute. 1990. Juan Sumulong. In Filipinos in History: Vol. II. Manila: National Historical Institute, 225–228.Google Scholar
Narag, R. 2017. Failure of the Legal System: A Challenge to Filipino Lawyers. Rappler (August 7): www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/177893-failure-legal-system-challenge-filipino-lawyers.Google Scholar
Nowak, T. & Snyder, K.. 1974. Clientelist Politics in the Philippines: Integration or Instability? The American Political Science Review 68(3), 1147–1170.Google Scholar
Ong, J. C. & Cabañes, J. V. A.. 2018. Architects of Networked Disinformation: Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Communication Department Faculty Publication: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=communication_faculty_pubs.Google Scholar
Ong, J. C. & Cabañes, J. V. A.. 2019. When Disinformation Studies Meets Production Studies: Social Identities and Moral Justifications in the Political Trolling Industry. International Journal of Communication 13(1), 5771–5790.Google Scholar
Ong, J. C., Tapsell, R. & Curato, N.. 2019. Tracking Digital Disinformation in the 2019 Philippine Midterm Election. New Mandala (August): www.newmandala.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Digital-Disinformation-2019-Midterms.pdf.Google Scholar
Ordoñez, M. & Borja, A.. 2018. Philippine Liberal Democracy under Siege: The Ideological Underpinnings of Duterte’s Populist Challenge. Philippine Political Science Journal 39(2), 139–153.Google Scholar
Paredes, R. R. 1989. The Paradox of Colonial Democracy. In Paredes, R. R., ed., Philippine Colonial Democracy. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Parmanand, S. 2020. The Dangers of Masculinity Contests in a Time of Pandemic. Oxford Political Review (April 18): https://oxfordpoliticalreview.com/2020/04/18/the-dangers-of-masculinity-contests-in-a-time-of-pandemic/.Google Scholar
Parreño, E. G. 2019. Beyond Will and Power: A Biography of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte. Lapulapu City: Optima.Google Scholar
Pavin, C. 2019. Why Thailand’s New Military-Monarchy Alliance Is a Bad Sign for Democracy. The Diplomat (June 21): https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/why-thailands-new-military-monarchy-alliance-is-a-bad-sign-for-democracy/.Google Scholar
PCIJ Staff. 2022. Marcos Promises Financial Aid and Land Distribution to Revive Agri Sector. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (July 25): https://pcij.org/article/8998/live-blog-marcos-sona-state-of-the-nation-address.Google Scholar
Peel, M. 2017. Drugs and Death in Davao: The Making of Rodrigo Duterte. Financial Times (February 2): www.ft.com/content/9d6225dc-e805-11e6-967b-c88452263daf.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, T. 2017. Southeast Asia: Voting against Disorder. Journal of Democracy 28(2), 120–131.Google Scholar
Pernia, A. 2021. Authoritarian Values and Institutional Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from the Philippines. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 7(2), 204–232.Google Scholar
Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. 2017. What’s Flawed, Fuzzy with Drug War Numbers? Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (June 8): https://pcij.org/stories/pcij-findings-whats-flawed-fuzzy-with-drug.Google Scholar
Philippine Statistics Authority. 2002. 2000 Family Income and Expenditures Survey (FIES) Final Release on Poverty (April 16): https://psa.gov.ph/content/2000-family-income-and-expenditures-survey-fies-final-release-poverty#:~:text=POVERTY%20INCIDENCE,to%2039.4%20percent%20in%202000.Google Scholar
Prajak, K. 2014. The Rise and Fall of Electoral Violence in Thailand: Changing Rules, Structures and Power Landscapes, 1997–2011. Contemporary Southeast Asia 36(3), 386–416Google Scholar
Pratt, J. 2007. Penal Populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Punongbayan, J. 2019a. How the TRAIN Law Worsened Poverty, Inequality. Rappler (April 25): www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/228952-how-tax-reform- law-worsened-poverty-inequality-philippines.Google Scholar
Punongbayan, J. 2019b. Why the Free Tuition Law Is Not Pro-Poor Enough. Rappler (February 8): www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/222981-analysis-reasons-free-tuition-law-not-pro-poor-enough.Google Scholar
Punongbayan, J. 2020. How Data Debunk Duterte’s Toxic ”Pasaway” Narrative. Rappler (June 22): www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/analysis-how-datadebunk-duterte-toxic-pasaway-narrative.Google Scholar
Putzel, J. A. 1992. A Captive Land: The Politics of Agrarian Reform in the Philippines. New York: Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Putzel, J. A. 2020. The “Populist” Right Challenge to Neoliberalism: Social Policy between a Rock and a Hard Place. Development and Change 51, 418–441.Google Scholar
Quimpo, N. G. 2008. Contested Democracy and the Left in the Philippines after Marcos. Quezon City: Ateneo d Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Quimpo, N. G. 2017. Duterte’s ”War on Drugs”: The Securitization of Illegal Drugs and the Return of National Boss Rule. In Curato, N., ed., A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early Presidency. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press, 145–166.Google Scholar
Quimpo, N. G. 2021. The Limits of Duterte’s Power. Rappler (March 26): www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-limits-duterte-power/.Google Scholar
Raffle, E. 2021. The War on Drugs in Southeast Asia as “State Vigilantism.” International Journal of Drug Policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103114.Google Scholar
Ramos, C. G. 2021. The Return of Strongman Rule in the Philippines: Neoliberal Roots and Developmental Implications. Geoforum (April 18): www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016718521001007.Google Scholar
Ranada, P. 2021a. Some Pro-Duterte Personalities Bash Aquino Even in Death. Rappler (June 24): www.rappler.com/nation/duterte-supporters-bash-noynoy-aquino-even-death/.Google Scholar
Ranada, P. 2021b. Duterte May Cap Term as Most Popular Philippine President. Rappler (June 30): www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/so-what-if-duterte-may-cap-term-as-philippines-most-popular-president/.Google Scholar
Rappler Investigative Team. 2021a. The Lascañas Affidavit – “I killed for Duterte.” Rappler (November 10): www.rappler.com/newsbreak/investigative/arthur-lascanas-icc-affidavit-series-i-killed-for-duterte/.Google Scholar
Rappler Investigative Team 2021b. Duterte as “Superman”: Lascañas Details Davao Death Squad Operations. Rappler (November 16): www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/duterte-superman-arthur-lascanas-details-davao-death-squad-operations.Google Scholar
Raquiza, A. R. 1997. The Social Reform Agenda. Social Watch: www.socialwatch.org/node /10602.Google Scholar
Raquiza, A. R. 2018. The Changing Configuration of Philippine Capitalism. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 235–254.Google Scholar
Raquiza, M. 2018. The Allure of Pantawid Pamilya: The Conditional Cash Transfer Scheme. In Thompson, M. R. & Batalla, E. V. C., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raquiza, M. 2019. SDG 8 and 10: Growth, Labor Productivity and Decent Work: What Needs to Happen to Reduce Poverty and Inequality in the Philippines. In Social Watch Philippines, The PH SDG Agenda: Closing Gaps, Overcoming Policy Incoherence. Quezon City: Social Watch Philippines, University of the Philippines, 10–45.Google Scholar
Regalado, E. 2021. Noy, Rody Ties Date Back to Davao “Yellow Fridays.” The Philippine Star (June 28): www.pressreader.com/philippines/the-philippine-star/20210628/281509344159361.Google Scholar
Regilme, S. S. F. 2021a. Visions of Peace amidst a Human Rights Crisis: War on Drugs in Colombia and the Philippines. Journal of Global Security Studies 6(2) https: ogaa022, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaa022.Google Scholar
Regilme, S. S. F. 2021b. Contested Spaces of Illiberal and Authoritarian Politics: Human Rights and Democracy in Crisis. Political Geography 89: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102427.Google Scholar
Republic of the Philippines Supreme Court. 2018. G.R. No. 234359 (AILEEN ALMORA, ET AL. v. DIRECTOR GENERAL RONALD DELA ROSA, in his capacity as Chief of the Philippine National Police, ET AL.), en banc resolution (April 3): https://lawphil.net/sc_res/2018/pdf/gr_234359_2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Reyes, D. 2016. The Spectacle of Violence in Duterte’s “War on Drugs”. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3), 111–137.Google Scholar
Reyes, D. 2022. The Persistence of Political Violence in the Philippines after the Fall of the Marcos Dictatorship. PhD dissertation, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Reyes, M. P. P. 2019. The Duterte-Marcos Connection. ABS-CBN News (September 30): https://news.abs-cbn.com/spotlight/09/30/19/the-duterte-marcos-connection.Google Scholar
Riedinger, J. M. 1995. Agrarian Reform in the Philippines: Democratic Transitions and Redistributive Reform. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rimban, L. 2011. Breaking the Cycle of Electoral Violence. In Chua, Y. & Rimban, L., eds., Democracy at Gunpoint: Election-Related Violence in the Philippines. Makati: The Asia Foundation, i–xxi.Google Scholar
Robles, A. 2019. The Philippines’ Communist Rebellion Is Asia’s Longest-Running Insurgency. South China Morning Post (September 16): www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3027414/explained-philippines-communist-rebellion-asias-longest-running.Google Scholar
Rodan, G. 2021. Inequality and Political Representation in the Philippines and Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia 51(2), 233–261.Google Scholar
Ronas, M. C. 2016. The Never Ending Democratization of the Philippines. In Miranda, F. B. & Rivera, T. C., eds., Chasing the Wind: Assessing Philippine Democracy, 2nd ed. Quezon City: Commission on Human Rights and the United Nations Development Programme, 75–106.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. & Desierto., D. A. 2011. Hyper-presidentialism: Separation of Powers without Checks and Balances in Argentina and Philippines. Berkeley Journal of International Law 29, 246–333.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. 1979. Liberty versus Loyalty. In Rosenberg, D., ed., Marcos and Martial Law in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 145–179.Google Scholar
Rufo, A. C. 2013. Altar of Secrets: Sex, Politics, and Money in the Philippine Catholic Church. Manila: Journalism for Nation Building Foundation.Google Scholar
Sanchez, M. 2017. Human Rights and the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines: Religious Opposition to the Marcos Dictatorship, 1972–1986. Kritika Kultura 29, 126–156.Google Scholar
Sarao, Z. G. H. 2021. PH Ranks Last Out of 121 Countries in Global COVID-19 Recovery Index – Nikkei. Philippine Daily Inquirer (October 6): www.newsinfo.inquirer.net/1498167/ph-ranks-last-out-of-121-countries-in-global-covid-19-recovery-index-nikkei.Google Scholar
Scalice, J. P. 2017. Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Scalice, J. P. 2020. First as Tragedy, Second as Farce: Marcos, Duterte and the Communist Parties of the Philippines. Lecture at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (August 26): https://libcom.org/article/first-tragedy-second-farce-marcos-duterte-and-communist-parties-philippines.Google Scholar
Shain, Y. & Thompson, M. R.. 1990. The Role of Political Exiles in Democratic Transition: The Case of the Philippines. Journal of Developing Societies VI, 71–86.Google Scholar
Sidel, J. T. 1999. Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sidel, J. T. 2012. Economic Foundations of Subnational Authoritarianism: Insights and Evidence from Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Democratization 21(1), 161–184.Google Scholar
Sidel, J. T. 2016. The Philippines’ New President: One Step Backward, Two Steps Forward? Europe’s World (June 6): https://europesworld.org/2016/06/06/philippines-new-president-one-stepbackward-two-steps-forward/#.V9Ff9TW3vVI.Google Scholar
Simangan, D. 2018. Is the Philippine “War on Drugs” an Act of Genocide? Journal of Genocide Research 20(1), 68–89.Google Scholar
Slayton, G. & Thompson, M. R.. 1985. An Essay on Credit Arrangements between the IMF and the Republic of the Philippines: 1970–1983. Philippine Review of Economics and Business XXII(1–2), 59–81.Google Scholar
Stations, Social Weather. 2021. Third Quarter 2021 Social Weather Survey: 45% of Filipino Familes Feel Poor, 34% Feel Borderline Poor, 21% Feel not Poor (November 27): www.sws.org.ph/swsmain/artcldisppage/?artcsyscode=ART-20211127144913.Google Scholar
Starner, F. L. 1961. Magsaysay and the Philippines Peasantry: The Agrarian Impact on Philippine Politics, 1953–1956. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stauffer, R. B. 1981. The Politics of Becoming: The Mindanao Conflict in a World-System Perspective. Dependency Series: Third World Studies Center, no. 31. Quezon City: University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, D. 1976. Popular Uprisings in the Philippines: 1840–1940. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Suorsa, O. & Thompson, M.. 2018. Choosing Sides? Illiberal Realignment and Hedging in the Philippines and Thailand. In Panorama – Insights into Asia and European Affairs. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 63–76: www.kas.de/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=22f22081-a5f9-5472-6368-24716055e41f&groupId=288143.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, A. & Thompson, M. R.. 2016. Digong and the Donald: The Indiscreet Charm of Informality in Politics. Rappler (November 16): www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/154066-digong-donald-trump-informality-language/.Google Scholar
Takagi, Y. 2017. Policy Coalitions and Ambitious Politicians: A Case Study of Philippine Social Policy Reform. Philippine Political Science Journal 38(1), 28–47.Google Scholar
Takigawa, T. 1964. Landownership and Land Reform Problems of the Philippines. The Developing Economies 2, 58–77.Google Scholar
Talabong, R. 2020. Over 100,000 Quarantine Violators Arrested in PH since March. Rappler (September 8): www.rappler.com/nation/arrested-quarantine-violators-philippines-2020.Google Scholar
Talamayan, F. 2019. Nostalgia, Conspiracies: The Politics of Recalling the Marcos “Golden Age.” Rappler (December 15): www.rappler.com/voices/imho/opinion-nostalgia-conspiracies-politics-remembering-marcos-golden-age.Google Scholar
Talamayan, F. 2021. The Politics of Nostalgia and the Marcos Golden Age in the Philippines. Asia Review 11(3), 273–304: https://snuac.snu.ac.kr/2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teehankee, J. C. 2016. Weak State, Strong Presidents: Situating the Duterte Presidency in Philippine Political Time. Journal of Developing Societies 32, 293–321.Google Scholar
Teehankee, J. C. 2019. Duterte’s Federalist Project Indefinitely on Hold. East Asia Forum (July 24): www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/07/24/dutertes-federalist-project-indefinitely-on-hold/.Google Scholar
Teehankee, J. C. 2020. Duterte’s COVID-19 Powers and the Paradox of the Philippine Presidency. CSEAS-Kyoto (April 28): https://covid-19chronicles.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp/post-007.html?fbclid=IwAR2-swiSiI-ehgjzSThLj5Tng0mmwhv35T0qi6HeoEt_4zDRRXKH2cYLZ8.Google Scholar
Teehankee, J. C. & Calimbahin, C. A. A.. 2022. Patronage Democracy in the Philippines: Clans, Clients, and Competition in Local Elections. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
Teehankee, J. C. & Thompson, M. R.. 2016. The Vote in the Philippines: Electing a Strongman. Journal of Democracy 27(4), 124–134.Google Scholar
Terami-Wada, M. 1988. The Sakdal Movement, 1930–34. Philippine Studies 36(2), 131–150.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 1995. The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press and Juan J. LinzGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 1998. The Marcos Regime in the Philippines. In Chehabi, H. E., ed., Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 206–229.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2004. Democratic Revolutions: Asia and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2007. Presidentas and People Power in Comparative Asian Perspective. Philippine Political Science Journal 28(51), 1–32.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2008. People Power Sours: Uncivil Society in Thailand and the Philippines. Current History 107 (712), 381–387.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2010. Populism and the Revival of Reform: Competing Narratives in the Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia 32(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2014a. The Politics Philippine Presidents Make: Presidential Style, Patronage-Based or Regime Relational? Critical Asian Studies 46, 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2014b. Aquino’s Reformism Hits a Dead End. East Asia Forum (September 30): www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/09/30/aquinos-reformism-hits-a-dead-end/.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2016. Poor Filipinos’ Lives Don’t Seem to Matter. New Mandala (August 12): www.newmandala.org/poor-filipinos-lives-dont-seem-matter/.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2018. Why Duterte Remains So Popular: The Failures of the Philippine’s Liberal Reformism. Foreign Affairs (October 9): www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/philippines/2018-10-09/why-duterte-remains-so-popular.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2019. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy in the Philippines: Duterte’s Early Presidency. In Deinla, I. & Dressel, B., eds., From Aquino II to Duterte (2010–18): Change, Continuity – and Rupture. Singapore: ISEAS, 39–61.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2021. Pushback after Backsliding? Unconstrained Executive Aggrandizement in the Philippines versus Contested Military-Monarchical Rule in Thailand. Democratization 28(1), 124–141.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2022a. Duterte’s Violent Populism: Mass Murder, Political Legitimacy and the ”Death of Development” in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Asia 52(3), 403–428.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2022b. Brute Force Governance: Public Approval despite Policy Failure during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41(3), 399–421: https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221092453.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. R. 2022c. Whatever Happened to the “Aircon Opposition” to Marcos? Or, How the “Yellows” Turned Pink with Embarrassment. In Castañeda Anastacio, L. & Abinales, P. N., eds., The Marcos Era: A Reader. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 178–200.Google Scholar
Tiglao, R. 2013. DBM Data Confirm P100M “Bribe” to 16 Senators Each. Rigobertotiglao (October 3): www.rigobertotiglao.com/2013/10/03/dbm-data-confirm-p100m-bribe-to-16-senators-each/.Google Scholar
Tiglao, R. 2016. Only Binay and Roxas have Electoral Machinery. Manila Times (April 3): www.manilatimes.net/only-binay-and-roxas-have-electoral-machinery/253878/.Google Scholar
Tiglao, R. 2022a. Marcos’ Landslide Victory Inevitable. Manila Times (May 11): www.manilatimes.net/2022/05/11/opinion/columns/marcos-landslide-victory-inevitable/1843198.Google Scholar
Tiglao, R. 2022b. The End of the Yellows and Pinks, and What It Means. Manila Times (May 20): www.manilatimes.net/2022/05/20/opinion/columns/the-end-of-the-yellows-and-pinks-and-what-it-means/1844340.Google Scholar
Tigno, J. V. 2018. Pascual, Ricardo R. (1912–1985): Partyless Democracy. In Tigno, J. V., ed., Twentieth Century Political Thinkers in the Philippines. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 104–112.Google Scholar
Timberman, D. G. 1991. A Changeless Land: Continuity and Change in the Philippines. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Timberman, D. G. 2019. Philippine Politics Under Duterte: A Midterm Assessment. Carnegie Endowment for Peace (January 10): https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/01/10/philippine-politics-under-duterte-midterm-assessment-pub-78091.Google Scholar
Tuminez, A. S. 2007. This Land Is Our Land: Moro Ancestral Domain and Its Implications for Peace and Development in the Southern Philippines. The SAIS Review of International Affairs 27(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
Tupaz, V. 2015. State of Hacienda Luisita. Rappler (July 27): www.rappler.com/moveph/100628-state-hacienda-luisita/.Google Scholar
Tuquero, L. 2022. Duterte “Institutionalized” Disinformation, Paved the Way for a Marcos Victory. Rappler (June 19): www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/duterte-institutionalized-disinformation-paved-way-marcos-jr-victory-2022/.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights. 2020. Situation of Human Rights in the Philippines. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (June 29): www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Countries/PH/Philippines-HRC44-AEV.pdf.Google Scholar
van der Kamp, D. 2021. Blunt Force Regulation and Bureaucratic Control: Understanding China’s War on Pollution. Governance 34(1), 191–209.Google Scholar
van der Kroef, J. M. 1988. The Philippines: Day of the Vigilantes. Asian Survey 28(6), 630–649.Google Scholar
van Krieken, R. 2017. Norbert Elias and Figurational Sociology. In Turner, B. S., ed., The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Hoboken: Wiley -Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vartavarian, M. 2019a. Parsing People’s War: Militias and Counterinsurgencies in the Philippines. Kyoto Review (July): https://kyotoreview.org/trendsetters/militias-and-counterinsurgencies-in-the-philippines/.Google Scholar
Vartavarian, M. 2019b. A Tale of Two Warlords: Andal Ampatuan, Rodrigo Duterte, and the Philippines’ Mutating Politics. Forsea (November 29): https://forsea.co/philippines-tale-of-two-warlords/.Google Scholar
Vera Files. 2022. Vera Files Fact Sheet: Disparity in Body Count of Drug War Victims Explained (December 13): https://verafiles.org/articles/vera-files-fact-sheet-disparity-in-body-count-of-drug-war-victims-explained.Google Scholar
Vitug, M. 2016. The Scrum: Roxas, Binay and the Political Machine. Rappler (April 20): www.rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2016/129982-roxas-binay-political-machine.Google Scholar
Warburg, A. & Jensen, S.. 2018. Policing the War on Drugs and the Transformation of Urban Space in Manila. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38(3), 399–416.Google Scholar
Webb, A. 2017. Why Are the Middle Class Misbehaving? Exploring Democratic Ambivalence and Authoritarian Nostalgia. Philippine Sociological Review 65, 77–102.Google Scholar
Weekley, K. 2001. The Communist Party of the Philippines 1968–1993: A Story of Its Theory and Practice. Quezon City: University of the Philippine Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S. 2018. How the Catholic Church Is Fighting the Drug War in the Philippines. American Magazine (January 25): www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/01/25/how-catholic-church-fighting-drug-war-philippines.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. & de Dios, E. S.. 2014. Has the Philippines Forever Lost Its Chance at Industrialization? The Philippine Review of Economics LI(2), 47–66.Google Scholar
Winters, J. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. 2015. The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wong, E. 2022. In the Philippines, Blinken Vows to Strengthen Military Ties. New York Times (August 6): www.nytimes.com/2022/08/06/world/asia/blinken-philippines-us-asia-tensions.html?searchResultPosition=1.Google Scholar
Wurfel, D. 1958. Philippine Agrarian Reform under Magsaysay. Far Eastern Survey 27(1): https://davidwurfel.ca/philippine-agrarian-reform-under-magsaysay.Google Scholar
Wurfel, D. 1988. Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yap, C. & A. Calonzo. 2022. News Site Run by Nobel Prize Winner Faces Closure in Philippines. Bloomberg (June 29): www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-29/philippine-news-site-rappler-faces-closure-as-sec-order-affirmed#xj4y7vzkg.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Philippines
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Philippines
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Philippines
Available formats
×