Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:56:23.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Yoshihisa Godo
Affiliation:
Meiji Gakuin University and a part-time lecturer at Waseda University
Daisuke Takahashi
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Tim Josling
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Japan's general approach toward agricultural domestic policy reform is one of strict compliance with the domestic support disciplines of the WTO. Japan reduced its AMS support by nearly 80 percent between 1995 and 2000. As a result, by 2000 its Current Total AMS had declined to less than 20 percent of its commitment under the Agreement. Japan launched an extensive agricultural subsidy reform in 2007 that partly reflected the principle of decoupling. An additional expansion of direct payments to farmers, the categorization of which will have to be taken into account in the future, was proposed in 2009 after a shift in control of the government.

This seemingly accommodating attitude on domestic agricultural policy contrasts with a less flexible attitude on border protection for agricultural commodities. Japan's nominal protection rate for agriculture is one of the highest among developed nations. Japan, which is surrounded by the ocean and poorly endowed with natural resources, relies heavily on trade. Nevertheless, its strong resistance to reductions in agricultural border protection has repeatedly hindered trade negotiations with other countries. During the Uruguay Round negotiations, Japan lobbied hard to maintain its rice autarky policy. An inflexible stance on rice imports almost resulted in Japan's failure to join the final agreements.

In consideration of this background, this chapter provides a comprehensive picture of Japan's agricultural policy. Farmland regulations are often manipulated in Japan, bringing financial benefits to farmland owners.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade
, pp. 153 - 188
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Godo, Y. 2007. The puzzle of small farming in Japan. Pacific Economic Papers No. 365. Australian National University, Australia–Japan Research Centre. www.crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/pep/pep-365.pdf.
Godo, Y., and Takahashi, D.. 2008. Japan: Shadow WTO agricultural domestic support. IFPRI Discussion Paper 822.
Hart, C. E., and Beghin, J. C.. 2006. Rethinking agricultural domestic support under the World Trade Organization. In Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, ed. Anderson, K. and Martin, W.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, and Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Honma, M. 2009. Agricultural trade policy reform in Japan. In Agricultural Subsidies in the WTO Green Box: Ensuring Coherence with Sustainable Development Goals, ed. Meléndez-Ortiz, R., Bellmann, C., and Hepburn, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2009. IMF World Economic Outlook – Sustaining the Recovery. Washington, DC .Google Scholar
,MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 1992. Atarashii Shokuryo Nogyo Noson Seisaku no Hoko (New Policy Direction of Food, Agriculture and Rural Policies). Tokyo.Google Scholar
Mulgan, A. G. 2000. Japan's Interventionist State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
,OECD. 2009. Economic Outlook, Paris.Google Scholar
,WTO. 2001. Summary report of the WTO Committee on Agriculture. 26th meeting, 29–30 March. G/AG/R/26.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Japan
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Japan
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Japan
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.006
Available formats
×