The future of large wetlands: a global perspective

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511542091.014

13 - The future of large wetlands: a global perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2009

L. H. Fraser and

P. A. Keddy

Edited by

Lauchlan H. Fraser and

Paul A. Keddy

Show author details

L. H. Fraser: Affiliation:
Thompson Rivers University
P. A. Keddy: Affiliation:
Southeastern Louisiana University
Lauchlan H. Fraser: Affiliation:
University of Akron, Ohio
Paul A. Keddy: Affiliation:
Southeastern Louisiana University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is a difficult task to write the concluding chapter of The World's Largest Wetlands because one could imagine two quite different audiences drawn to this book. Some will know a great deal about wetland science and will probably use the book for the many examples and descriptions of large wetland systems offered. Others may be encountering the science of wetland ecology for the first time, and perhaps may not have the academic resources readily at hand to interpret the content, or to draw common parallels between the large wetland systems. In reviewing these chapters and considering the two audiences, we constructed four themes that are shared across chapters: (1) threats to wetlands; (2) efforts to save wetlands; (3) wetlands, water, and humans; and (4) moving toward conservation. For somebody already well-versed some, or even all, of this summary may not be needed; but for others it will be a helpful capstone to the discussion of large wetland systems. Keep in mind that there are other wetlands books with much more detail that the reader should go to for a more-thorough reference.

The estimated annual value of wetlands, based on ecosystem services and natural capital, is US$12790 trillion (Constanza et al. 1997); this accounts for over one-third of the total value for the world. Much of the value associated with wetlands is related to the role they play in the hydrological cycle (e.g. water storage and water quality).

Type: Chapter
Information: The World's Largest Wetlands
Ecology and Conservation
, pp. 446 - 468

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542091.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Batzer, D. P. and Resh, V. H. (1991). Trophic interactions among a beetle predator, a chironomid grazer, and periphyton in a seasonal wetland. Oikos, 60, 251–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Belyea, L. R. and Clymo, R. S. (2001). Feedback control of the rate of peat formation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1315–21CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boutin, C. and Keddy, P. A. (1993). A functional classification of wetland plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4, 591–600CrossRef Google Scholar

Chase, T. N., Pielke, R. A. Sr., Kittel, T. G. F., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W. (2000). Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter. Climate Dynamics, 16, 93–105CrossRef Google Scholar

Clymo, R. S. (1970). The growth of Sphagnum: methods of measurement. Journal of Ecology, 58, 13–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Clymo, R. S. and Reddaway, E. J. F. (1971). Productivity of Sphagnum (bog-moss) and peat accumulation. Hidrobiologia (Bucharest), 12, 181–92Google Scholar

Clymo, R. S., Tutunen, J., and Tolonen, K., (1998). Carbon accumulation in peatland. Oikos, 81, 368–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Cody, M. L. (1991). Niche theory and plant growth form. Vegetatio, 97, 39–55Google Scholar

Constanza, R., d'Arge, R., and Groot, R.et al. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260CrossRef Google Scholar

Corti, D., Kohler, S. L., and Sparks, R. E. (1997). Effects of hydroperiod and predation on a Mississippi River floodplain invertebrate community. Oecologia, 109, 154–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Cummins, K. W. and Klug, M. J. (1979). Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 147–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahl, T. E. (1990). Wetlands Losses in the United States, 1780s to 1980s. Washington, DC: US Department the Interior, Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar

Dahl, T. E. (2000). Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 1986–1997. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service

Darras, S., Michou, M., and Sarrat, C. (1999). IGBP-DIS Wetland Data Initiative: A First Step Towards Identifying a Global Delineation of Wetlands. IGB-DIS Working Paper 19. Toulouse, France: International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme: Data and Information SystemGoogle Scholar

Villiers, M. (1999). Water. Toronto, Canada: Stoddart Publishing CoGoogle Scholar

Diamond, J. A. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M.. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press, pp. 342–445Google Scholar

Dugan, P. (1993). Wetlands in Danger. London: Michael Beasley, Reed InternationalGoogle Scholar

Finlayson, C. M. and Davidson, N. C. (1999). Global Review of Wetland Resources and Priorities for Wetland Inventory. Ramsar Bureau Contract 56. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention BureauGoogle Scholar

Foley, J. A., Costa, M. H., Delire, C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. (2003). Green surprise? How terrestrial ecosystems could affect earth's climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 38–44Google Scholar

Fraser, L. H., Bradford, M. E., and Steer, D. N. (2003). Human appropriation and treatment of fresh water: a global hydrology model incorporating treatment wetlands. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2, 174–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Frazier, S. (1999). Ramsar Sites Overview. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wetlands InternationalGoogle Scholar

Gallihugh, J. L. and Rogner, J. D. (1998). Wetland Mitigation and 404 Permit Compliance Study, vol. 1. Burlington, IL: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Region III. Chicago, IL: US Environmental Protection Agency, Region VGoogle Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1939). The individualistic concept of the plant association. American Midland Naturalist, 21, 92–110CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleick, P. H. (2000). The World's Water 2000–2001: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar

Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Grime, J. P., Thompson, K., and Hodgson, J. G. (1997). Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialization in plants. Oikos, 79, 259–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammer, D. A. (1996). Creating Freshwater Wetlands, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PressGoogle Scholar

Hinrichsen, D. (2000). The Oceans are Coming Ashore. Washington, DC: World WatchGoogle Scholar

Holling, C. S. (ed.) (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester, UK: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Kadlec, R. and Knight, R. (1996). Treatment Wetlands. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis PublishersGoogle Scholar

Kaswadji, R. F., Gosselink, J. G., and Turner, R. E. (1990). Estimation of primary production using five different methods in a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 1, 57–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1983). Freshwater wetlands human-induced changes: indirect effects must also be considered. Environmental Management, 4, 299–302CrossRef Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1991). Biological monitoring and ecological prediction: from nature reserve management to national state of environment indicators. In Biological Monitoring for Conservation, ed. Goldsmith, F. B., London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1992). Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 157–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1999). Wetland restoration: the potential for assembly rules in the service of conservation. Wetlands, 19, 716–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (2000). Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. and Fraser, L. H. (2000). Four general principles for the management and conservation of wetlands in large lakes: the role of water levels, nutrients, competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, 5, 177–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A., Lee, H. T., and Wisheu, I. C. (1993). Choosing indicators of ecosystem integrity: wetlands as a model system. In Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, eds. Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G.. Ottawa, Canada: St. Lucie PressGoogle Scholar

Kelman, K. (1981). Cost Benefit Analysis: an Ethical Critique. Regulation (Jan.–Feb.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy ResearchGoogle Scholar PubMed

Kentula, M. E. (1996). Wetland restoration and creation. In National Water Summary on Wetland Resources, J. D. Fretwell, J. S. Williams, and P. J. Redman. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2425, pp. 87–92

Matthews, E. and Fung, I. (1987). Methane emissions from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1, 61–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (1979). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment Disposal Reuse, revised by Tchobanoglous, G.. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar

Mitsch, W. J. and Gosselink, J. G. (1993). Wetlands, 2nd edn. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Mitsch, W. J. and Gosselink, J. G. (2000). Wetlands, 3rd edn. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., and Wisheu, I. C. (1989). Conservation of wetlands: do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority?Biological Conservation, 47, 203–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, M., Prentice, C., and Frazier, S. (1996). A global overview of wetland loss and degradation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of Contracting Parties of the Ramsar Convention, vol. 10, March 19–27, 1996, Brisbane, Australia. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau

Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Novotny, V. (1989). Karl Imhoff's Handbook of Urban Drainage and Wastewater Disposal. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Peckarsky, B. L. and Dodson, S. I. (1980). An experimental analysis of biological factors contributing to stream community structure. Ecology, 61, 1283–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Pianka, E. R. (1980). Guild structure in desert lizards. Oikos, 35, 194–201CrossRef Google Scholar

Population Reference Bureau (1994). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau

Postel, S. (1992). Last Oasis: Facing Water Scarcity. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar

Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., and Ehrlich, P. R. (1996). Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 271, 785–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P.et al. (1992). A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19, 117–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Severinghaus, W. D. (1981). Guild theory development as a mechanism for assessing environmental impact. Environmental Management, 5, 187–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Simberloff, D. and Dayan, T. (1991). The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 115–43CrossRef Google Scholar

US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/dataweb/dams/index.html (accessed February, 2005)

Votteler, T. H. and Muir, T. A. (1996). Wetland protection legislation. In: National Water Summary on Wetland Resources, eds. J. D. Fretwell, J. S. Williams, and P. J. Redman. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2425, pp. 49–56

Ward, B. (1966). Spaceship Earth. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

WCD (World Commission on Dams) (2000). Dams and Development: a New Framework for Decision-Making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd

Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. A. (1995). The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos, 73, 323–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Westoby, M. D., Falster, S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., and Wright, I. J. (2002). Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 125–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science, 293, 451–4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wilson, H. M. and Roxsburgh, S. H. (1994). A demonstration of guild based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds. Oikos, 69, 267–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Wisheu, I. C. and Keddy, P. A. (1992). Competition and centrifugal organization of plant communities: theory and tests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 147–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Woo, I. and Zedler, J. B. (2002). Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca?Wetlands, 22, 509–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G. (1993). Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. Ottawa, Canada: St. Lucie PressGoogle Scholar

Woodward, F. I., Smith, T. M., and Emanuel, W. R. (1995). A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 471–90CrossRef Google Scholar

World Commission on Dams. http://www.dams.org/kbase/survey/ (accessed February, 2005)

World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF. (2000). Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report

WRI (World Resources Institute) (2000). World Resources 2000–01. Washington, DC: WRI