Book contents
- Women, Language and Politics
- Women, Language and Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Transcription Conventions
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gender and Language in Political Institutions
- 3 Women’s Linguistic Participation in a Traditional Male-Dominated Forum – The UK House of Commons
- 4 Women’s Linguistic Participation in the New Devolved Assemblies of the UK
- 5 Barriers to Women’s Participation in Politics
- 6 Case Study: Theresa May
- 7 Case Studies: Julia Gillard and Hillary Clinton
- 8 Women, Language and Politics
- Book part
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 May 2020
Book contents
- Women, Language and Politics
- Women, Language and Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Transcription Conventions
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gender and Language in Political Institutions
- 3 Women’s Linguistic Participation in a Traditional Male-Dominated Forum – The UK House of Commons
- 4 Women’s Linguistic Participation in the New Devolved Assemblies of the UK
- 5 Barriers to Women’s Participation in Politics
- 6 Case Study: Theresa May
- 7 Case Studies: Julia Gillard and Hillary Clinton
- 8 Women, Language and Politics
- Book part
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Women, Language and Politics , pp. 283 - 314Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Acton, E. K. and Potts, C., 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (1), 3–31.Google Scholar
Adams, K. L., 1992. Accruing power on debate floors. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 1–10.Google Scholar
Adams, K. L., 1999. Deliberate dispute and the construction of oppositional stance. Pragmatics, 9 (2), 231–248.Google Scholar
Adams, K. L., 2015. Governors debating: The role of situational, discourse and transportable identities. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–250.Google Scholar
Adcock, C., 2010. The politician, the wife, the citizen, and her newspaper. Feminist Media Studies, 10 (2), 135–159.Google Scholar
Adelswärd, V., 1989. Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12 (2), 107–136.Google Scholar
Agha, A., 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23 (3), 231–273.Google Scholar
Agha, A., 2007. Language and Social Relations: Structure, Use and Social Significance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ahrens, K., ed., 2009. Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ahrens, P., Celis, K., Childs, S., Engeli, I., Evans, E., and Mügge, L., 2018. Editorial: Politics and gender: Rocking political science and creating new horizons. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 3–16.Google Scholar
Alexander, M., 2016. The metaphorical understanding of power and authority. In Anderson, W., Bramwell, E. and Hough, C., eds., Mapping English Metaphor through Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–207.Google Scholar
Allen, P. and Childs, S., 2018. The grit in the oyster? Women’s parliamentary organizations and the substantive representation of women. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321718793080.Google Scholar
Alter, C., 2016. Trump faced his toughest opponent: Megyn Kelly. Time Magazine. http://time.com/4247405/donald-trump-megyn-kelly-debate-opponent/ [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Angouri, J., 2011. ‘We are in a masculine profession…’: Constructing gender identities in a consortium of two multinational engineering companies. Gender and Language, 5 (2), 373–403.Google Scholar
Angouri, J., 2018b. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed or holistic research? Combining methods in linguistic research. In Litosseliti, L., ed., Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 35–55.Google Scholar
Anitha, S. and Gill, A., 2009. The illusion of protection? An analysis of forced marriage legislation and policy in the UK. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31 (3), 257–269.Google Scholar
Appleby, R., 2015. Julia Gillard: A murderous rage. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149–168.Google Scholar
Archer, D., 2015. Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences, 52, 82–97.Google Scholar
Archer, D., 2018. Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences, 68 (July), 22–41.Google Scholar
Asenbaum, H., 2019a. Making a difference: Toward a feminist democratic theory in the digital age. Politics & Gender, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18001010 [accessed 25 June 2019].Google Scholar
Asenbaum, H., 2019b. Subject to Change: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age. London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
Ashley, J., 2004. Bullied, patronised and abused – women MPs reveal the truth about life inside Westminster. The Guardian, 7 December. www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/dec/07/uk.gender [accessed 25 June 2018].Google Scholar
Asterhan, C. S. C., 2018. Exploring enablers and inhibitors of productive peer argumentation: The role of individual achievement goals and of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54 (July), 66–78.Google Scholar
Aston, H., 2012. Gillard’s father died of shame: Alan Jones. The Age. www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/gillards-father-died-of-shame-alan-jones-20120929-26soa.html [accessed 24 October 2018].Google Scholar
Atanga, L. L., 2010. Gender, Discourse and Power in the Cameroonian Parliament. Oxford: African Books Collective.Google Scholar
Atchison, A. L., 2018. Towards the good profession: Improving the status of women in political science. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 279–298.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M., 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J., 1999. Jefferson’s transcript notation. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N., eds., The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, 158–166.Google Scholar
Azari, J., 2015. Questions of authenticity are really questions about race, class, and democracy. Vox. www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2015/10/1/9431367/authenticity-race-gender-democracy [accessed 7 November 2018].Google Scholar
Bäck, H., Debus, M., and Müller, J., 2014. Who takes the parliamentary floor? The role of gender in speech-making in the Swedish Riksdag. Political Research Quarterly, 67 (3), 504–518.Google Scholar
Badham, V., 2013. Who will win my bogan vote? The Guardian, 27 May 2013. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/27/bogan-test-abbott-gillard [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Ball, M., 2016. What kind of a man is Donald Trump? The Atlantic, 8 October 2016. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-and-the-women/503402/ [accessed 10 October 2018].Google Scholar
Banwart, M. C. and McKinney, M. S., 2005. A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies, 56 (4), 353–373.Google Scholar
Barrueco, J., 2016. The real reason people question if Hillary Clinton is human. Cosmopolitan. www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a6963161/hillary-clinton-unlikable-human-robotic/ [accessed 7 November 2018].Google Scholar
Bates, S. R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C., and Stanley, L., 2014. Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs, 67 (2), 253–280.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 1999. Teaching girls to speak out: An investigation of the extent to which gender is a pertinent discourse for describing and assessing girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 2006. Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 2010. The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan and Springer.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 2017. Freeing women political leaders from their gender stereotypes. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 173–194.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 2018. Women Leaders and Gender Stereotyping in the UK Press: A Poststructuralist Approach. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
BBC, 2015. BBC Two – Inside the commons. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0522z48 [accessed 25 June 2018].Google Scholar
BBC News, 2018. MPs condemn ‘vile’ abuse of Theresa May. BBC News Website. www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45938754 [accessed 22 October 2018].Google Scholar
Beal, F. M., 2008. Double Jeopardy: To be black and female. Meridians, 8 (2), 166–176.Google Scholar
Beard, M., 2017. Women and Power: A Manifesto. London: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Beattie, G., 2016. How Donald Trump bullies with his body language. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/how-donald-trump-bullies-with-his-body-language-66468 [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Beckwith, K., 2007. Numbers and newness: The descriptive and substantive representation of women. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 40 (1), 27–49.Google Scholar
Beinart, P., 2019. There’s a reason many voters have negative views of Warren – But the press won’t tell you why. The Atlantic, 2 January. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/elizabeth-warren-unpopular-it-depends-who-you-ask/579247/ [accessed 28 January 2019].Google Scholar
Bejarano, C. E., 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bennister, M., 2016. The oratory of Hillary Clinton. In Crines, A. and Moon, D., eds., Democratic Orators from JFK to Barack Obama. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 239–260.Google Scholar
Bergvall, V., 1999. Towards a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language in Society, 28 (2), 273–293.Google Scholar
Bicquelet, A., Weale, A., and Judith, B., 2012. In a different parliamentary voice? Politics & Gender, 8 (1), 83–121.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Leech, G., 2002. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Billig, M., 2000. Towards a critique of the critical. Discourse & Society, 11 (3), 291–292.Google Scholar
Bird, K., 2005. Gendering parliamentary questions. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7 (3), 353–370.Google Scholar
Bird, S., 1996. Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 10 (2), 120–132.Google Scholar
Biressi, A. and Nunn, H., 2017. Transforming the politics of gender and voice: Strategies of expertise and experience. In Sabido, R. S., ed., Representing Communities: Discourse and Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–53.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, A. P. E., 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, E. and Murray, R., 2018a. Critical perspectives on men and masculinities in politics: Introduction. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 264–265.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, E. and Murray, R., 2018b. Revisiting forms of representation by critically examining men. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 265–270.Google Scholar
Blaxill, L. and Beelen, K., 2016. A feminized language of democracy? The representation of women at Westminster since 1945. Twentieth Century British History, 27 (3), 412–449.Google Scholar
Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., and Burkley, M., 2017. The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119 (December), 189–193.Google Scholar
Bongiorno, F., 2012. What we talk about when we talk about bogans. Inside Story. https://insidestory.org.au/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-bogans/ [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Bortoluzzi, M. and Semino, E., 2016. Face attack in Italian politics. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 4 (2), 178–201.Google Scholar
Boryczka, J. M., 2018. WANTED: Hillary Clinton, suspect citizen. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 121–127.Google Scholar
Boxer, D., Jones, L. M., and Cortés-Conde, F., 2017. Cracking the concrete ceiling in male-dominated societies: A tale of three ‘Presidentas’. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 195–219.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. S., 2012. Reframing the American dream: Conceptual metaphor and personal pronouns in the 2008 US presidential debates. In Cap, P. and Okulska, U., eds., Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 297–320.Google Scholar
Boyle, K., 2019. What’s in a name? Theorising the inter-relationships of gender and violence. Feminist Theory, 20 (1), 19–36.Google Scholar
Bradley-Geist, J. C., Rivera, I., and Geringer, S. D., 2015. The collateral damage of ambient sexism: Observing sexism impacts bystander self-esteem and career aspirations. Sex Roles, 73 (1), 29–42.Google Scholar
Brescoll, V. L., 2011. Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 (4), 622–641.Google Scholar
Brescoll, V. L., 2016. Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 415–428.Google Scholar
Brewis, J., 2001. ‘Telling it like it is?’ Gender, language and organizational theory. In Westwood, R. and Linstead, S., eds., The Language of Organization. London: Sage, 283–309.Google Scholar
Brown, A., 2000. Designing the Scottish parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 53 (3), 542–556.Google Scholar
Brown, A., 2005. Women and the new Scottish parliament: Making a difference? (Research Summary) ESRC End of Award Report. R000223281 Swindon: ESRC.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, B. C., Wright, P. E., and Fowler, A. R., eds., 2018. House of Representatives Practice. 7th ed. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7 [accessed 15 October 2018].Google Scholar
Bull, P., 2013. The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition: Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal. Language and Dialogue, 3 (2), 254–272.Google Scholar
Bull, P., 2016. Theresa May has a very special technique for avoiding questions. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/theresa-may-has-a-very-special-technique-for-avoiding-questions-67424 [accessed 24 September 2018].Google Scholar
Bull, A. and Allen, K., 2018. Introduction: Sociological interrogations of the turn to character. Sociological Research Online, 23 (2), 392–398.Google Scholar
Bull, P. and Mayer, K., 1988. Interruptions in political interviews: A study of Margaret Thatcher and Neil Kinnock. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7 (1), 35–46.Google Scholar
Bull, P. and Strawson, W., 2019. Can’t answer? won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s questions. Parliamentary Affairs, Online First. http://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsz003/5307955 [accessed 12 February 2019].Google Scholar
Bull, P. and Waddle, M., 2019. Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7 (1), 56–78.Google Scholar
Bull, P. and Wells, P., 2012. Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31 (1), 30–48.Google Scholar
Burnett, D., 2011. PM must de-bogan to get attention. Sunshine Coast Daily, 19 July. www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/pm-must-de-bogan-her-accent-to-get-us-listening/909174/ [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Butler, J., 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 1992. ‘Not gender difference but the difference gender makes’ – Explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 94 (1), 13–26.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 1996. The language-gender interface: Challenging co-optation. In Bergvall, V. and Bing, J. M., eds., Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman, 31–55.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 1997a. Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. H., eds., Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 47–64.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 1997b. Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics: Questions of sex and gender. In Wodak, R., ed., Gender and Discourse. London: Sage, 21–37.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 2000. Good to Talk? Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 2003. Gender and language ideologies. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 447–467.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., 2016. On banter, bonding and Donald Trump. Language: A feminist guide. https://debuk.wordpress.com/2016/10/09/on-banter-bonding-and-donald-trump/ [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., and Richardson, K., 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., McAlinden, F., and O’Leary, K., 1988. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D., eds., Women in Their Speech Communities. Harlow: Longman, 74–93.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. and Shaw, S., 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. and Shaw, S., 2020. Constructing women’s “different voice”: Gendered Mediation in the 2015 UK General Election. Journal of Language and Politics, 19 (1), 143–159.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., 2011. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Vol. 2: Power to the People 1997–99. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Campbell, J., 2012. Warning women: Don’t read this. The Sydney Morning Herald, 14 October.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. K., 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her: A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. K., 1998. The discursive performance of femininity: Hating Hillary. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Carlin, D. B. and Winfrey, K. L., 2009. Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage. Communication Studies, 60 (4), 326–343.Google Scholar
Carter, A., Croft, A., Lukas, D., and Sandstrom, G., 2018. Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLOS ONE, 13 (9), e0202743. http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10985 [accessed 3 January 2019].Google Scholar
Catalano, A., 2009. Women acting for women: An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007. Politics & Gender, 5 (1), 45–68.Google Scholar
Celis, K. and Childs, S., 2018. Conservatism and women’s political representation. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 5–26.Google Scholar
Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., and Krook, M. L., 2008. Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44 (2), 99–110.Google Scholar
Celis, K. and Erzeel, S., 2015. Beyond the usual suspects: Non-Left, male and non-feminist MPs and the substantive representation of women. Government and Opposition, 50 (1), 45–64.Google Scholar
Celis, K., Erzeel, S., Mügge, L., and Damstra, A., 2014. Quotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection. International Political Science Review, 35 (1), 41–54.Google Scholar
Celis, K. and Lovenduski, J., 2018. Power struggles: Gender equality in political representation. European Journal of Politics and Gender. 1 (1–2), 131–147.Google Scholar
Chaney, P., 2004. The post-devolution equality agenda: The case of the Welsh assembly’s statutory duty to promote equality of opportunity. Policy and Politics, 32 (1), 63–77.Google Scholar
Chappell, L., 2006. Comparing political institutions: Revealing the gendered ‘logic of appropriateness’. Politics & Gender, 2 (2), 223–235.Google Scholar
Chappell, L. and Waylen, G., 2013. Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration, 91 (3), 599–615.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J., 2009. Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 139–165.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J., 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J., 2017. Competition metaphors and ideology: Life as a race. In Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Oxford: Routledge, 202–217.Google Scholar
Childs, S., 2000. The new labour women MPs in the 1997 British parliament: Issues of recruitment and representation. Women’s History Review, 9 (1), 55–73.Google Scholar
Childs, S., 2004. New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, S., 2016. The good parliament. University of Bristol/ESRC. www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/news/2016/july/20%20Jul%20Prof%20Sarah%20Childs%20The%20Good%20Parliament%20report.pdf [accessed 23 July 2018].Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Dahlerup, D., 2018. Increasing women’s descriptive representation in national parliaments: The involvement and impact of gender and politics scholars. European Journal of Politics and Gender. 1 (1–2), 185–204.Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Krook, M. L., 2006. Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Politics & Gender, 2 (4), 522–530.Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Webb, P., 2011. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Withey, J., 2004. Women representatives acting for women: Sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament. Political Studies, 52 (3), 552–564.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. A., 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christie, C., 2003. Politeness and the linguistic construction of gender in parliament: An analysis of transgressions and apology behaviour. Sheffield Hallam Working Papers: Linguistic Politeness and Context. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/christie.htm [accessed 27 August 2015].Google Scholar
Cliff, M., 2016. Theresa May and Hillary Clinton wear matching outfits. Mail Online, 13 July. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3688798/Theresa-wears-yellow-black-ensemble-just-like-Hillary-Clinton.html [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar
Clune, B., 2013. Playing the ‘gender card’? As if Julia Gillard has a choice. The Guardian, 12 June. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/12/menu-quail-julia-gillard-liberal [accessed 16 October 2018].Google Scholar
CNN, 2016. Full 3rd presidential debate. https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/10/20/trump-clinton-entire-las-vegas-debate-sot.cnn [accessed 12 November 2018].Google Scholar
Coates, J., 1989. Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D., eds., Women in Their Speech Communities. Harlow: Longman, 94–121.Google Scholar
Coates, J., 1994. The language of the professions: Discourse and career. In Evetts, J., ed., Women and Career: Themes and Issues In Advanced Industrial Societies. London: Routledge, 72–86.Google Scholar
Cockcroft, R., Cockcroft, S., Hamilton, C., and Downing, L. H., 2014. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cole, H., 2017. PM-snooze: Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn bore everyone to tears with another repetitive PMQs squabble on the NHS. 22 February. www.thesun.co.uk/news/2927654/theresa-may-and-jeremy-corbyn-bore-everyone-to-tears-with-another-repetitive-pmqs-squabble-on-the-nhs/ [accessed 21 September 2018].Google Scholar
Collier, C. N. and Raney, T., 2018. Understanding sexism and sexual harassment in politics: A comparison of Westminster parliaments in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25 (3), 432–455.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H., 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. and Bilge, S., 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Parliament, 2018. Infosheet 1 – Questions. Parliament of Australia. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_1_-_Questions [accessed 15 October 2018].Google Scholar
Connell, R. W., 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. and Messerschmidt, J. W., 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19 (6), 829–859.Google Scholar
Copland, F. and Creese, A., 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cortès-Conde, F. and Boxer, D., 2015. Breaking the glass and keeping the ceiling: Women presidentas’ discursive practices in Latin America. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–66.Google Scholar
Costa, R., Balz, D., and Rucker, P., 2016. Donald Trump wanted to put Bill Clinton’s accusers in his family box. Debate officials said no. The Independent, 10 October. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/presidential-debate-donald-trump-tried-to-get-the-woman-accusing-bill-clinton-of-sex-abuse-sat-in-a7353466.html [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Cotter, C., 2011. Women’s place at the Fourth Estate: Constraints on voice, text, and topic. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2519–2533.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowburn, A., 2018. Speaker John Bercow accused of calling Andrea Leadsom a ‘stupid woman’. Independent, 18 May. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/john-bercow-andrea-leadsom-stupid-woman-house-of-commons-bullying-accusations-a8357071.html [accessed 29 July 2018].Google Scholar
Cox, L., 2018. The bullying and harassment of house of commons staff: Independent inquiry report. Independent Inquiry Report. www.cloisters.com/images/Bullying-Harassment-HOC-Staff-Oct-2018.pdf [accessed 5 January 2019].Google Scholar
Crace, J., 2016. Theresa struggles to take back control – from her Maybot. The Guardian, 8 November. www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/08/theresa-may-struggles-take-back-control-maybot-india-brexit [accessed 25 September 2018].Google Scholar
Crace, J., 2018. I, Maybot: The Rise and Fall. 2nd ed. London: Guardian Faber Publishing.Google Scholar
Cracknell, R. and Keen, R., 2014. Women in parliament and government – Commons library standard note. UK Parliament. www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN01250/women-in-parliament-and-government [accessed 18 March 2015].Google Scholar
Creedon, P., 2018. Media narratives of gender in the contentious conservative age of Trump. In Gutsche, R. E. Jr., ed., The Trump Presidency, Journalism, and Democracy. New York: Routledge, 156–178.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K., 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K., 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299.Google Scholar
Crewe, E., 2005. Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Crewe, E., 2010. An anthropology of the house of lords: Socialisation, relationships and rituals. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16 (3), 313–324.Google Scholar
Crewe, E., 2014a. Ethnographic research in gendered organizations: The case of the Westminster parliament. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 673–678.Google Scholar
Crewe, E., 2014b. Westminster parliamentarians: Performing politics. In Rai, S. M. and Johnson, R. E., eds., Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 40–59.Google Scholar
Crewe, E., 2015. The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349–367.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. M., Crandall, H. M., and Dare, A. M., eds., 2017. Gender, Communication, and the Leadership Gap. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Curry, T. J., 1991. Fraternal bonding in the locker room: A profeminist analysis of talk about competition and women. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8 (2), 119–135.Google Scholar
Curry, T. J., 1998. Beyond the locker room: Campus bars and college athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 15 (3), 205–215.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, D., 1988. From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11 (4), 275–298.Google Scholar
Daly, M., 1977. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, K., 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9 (1), 67–85.Google Scholar
De Smet, H., 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change, 28 (1), 83–102.Google Scholar
De Swert, K. and Hooghe, M., 2010. When do women get a voice? Explaining the presence of female news sources in Belgian news broadcasts (2003–5). European Journal of Communication, 25 (1), 69–84.Google Scholar
Deacon, D., Downey, J., Smith, D., Stanyer, J., and Wring, D., 2017. A tale of two leaders: News media coverage of the 2017 general election. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D. and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth: PSA/Bournemouth University, 40–41.Google Scholar
Deacon, M., 2017. The real reason Tories call Emily Thornberry ‘Lady Nugee’... and it isn’t sexist. The Telegraph, 12 July. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/12/real-reason-tories-call-emily-thornberry-lady-nugee-isnt-sexist/ [accessed 29 June 2018].Google Scholar
DeFrancisco, V. L., 1991. The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society, 2 (4), 413–424.Google Scholar
Demmen, J., Jeffries, L., and Walker, B., 2018. Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G., eds., Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–104.Google Scholar
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., and Ellemers, N., 2016. The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 456–469.Google Scholar
Dionne, A. M., 2010. Women, Men and the Representation of Women in the British Parliaments: Magic Numbers? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Dirks, D., 2016. Progress would be accepting that Trump’s ‘locker room talk’ illustrates ‘rape culture’. New York Times, 13 October. www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/10/13/what-did-donald-trump-reveal-about-progress-for-women/progress-would-be-accepting-that-trumps-locker-room-talk-illustrates-rape-culture [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar
Dodson, D. L., 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, J., Deckman, M. M., and Swers, M. L., 2017. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Updated 3rd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Donaghue, N., 2015. Who gets played by ‘the gender card’? Australian Feminist Studies, 30 (84), 161–178.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dovi, S., 2018. Misogyny and transformations. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 131–147.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A., 2018. Case study research in Applied Linguistics. In Litosseliti, L., ed., Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 305–330.Google Scholar
Eades, D., 2000. I don’t think it’s an answer to the question: Silencing Aboriginal witnesses in court. Language in Society, 29 (2), 161–195.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. L., 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Heilman, M. E., 2016. Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 349–353.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Steffen, V., 1986. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100 (3), 309–330.Google Scholar
Eakins, B. and Eakins, R. G., 1976. Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In Dubois, B. L. and Crouch, I., eds., The Sociology of the Languages of American Women. San Antonio: Trinity University, 53–62.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, L. and Merolla, J. L., 2017. Shaping perceptions of Sarah Palin’s charisma: Presentations of Palin in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38 (2), 103–127.Google Scholar
Eckert, P., 1998. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, J., ed., Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 64–75.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 1992a. Communities of Practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Group. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 88–89.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 1992b. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21 (1), 461–488.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 2013. Language and Gender. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. and Adams, K., 1990. Creating inequality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9 (3), 171–190.Google Scholar
Edmondson, C. and Lee, J. C., 2019. Meet the new freshmen in congress. New York Times, 3 January. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/28/us/politics/congress-freshman-class.html [accessed 14 January 2019].Google Scholar
Elgot, J., 2018. Bercow bullying claims are a witch-hunt, says serjeant at arms. The Guardian, 13 June. www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/13/bercow-bullying-claims-are-a-witch-hunt-says-serjeant-at-arms [accessed 29 July 2018].Google Scholar
Elgot, J. and Walker, P., 2018. Jeremy Corbyn to MPs: I did not call Theresa May a ‘stupid woman’. The Guardian, 19 December. www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/19/jeremy-corbyn-accused-of-calling-theresa-may-a-stupid-woman [accessed 30 December 2018].Google Scholar
Enli, G., 2015. Mediated Authenticity: How the Media Constructs Reality. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Erskine May, T., 2015. A Treatise upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. and Lampert, M. D., 1992. Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 108–117.Google Scholar
Esposito, E., 2017. The mother’s picong: A discursive approach to gender, identity and political leadership in Trinidad and Tobago. Discourse & Society, 28 (1), 24–41.Google Scholar
Evans, E., 2016. Diversity matters: Intersectionality and women’s representation in the USA and UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 69 (3), 569–585.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3 (2), 193–217.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. and Fairclough, I., 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R., 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk, T. A., ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–284.Google Scholar
Falk, E., 2010. Women for President: Media Bias in Nine Campaigns. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Falk, E., 2013. Clinton and the playing-the-gender-card metaphor in campaign news. Feminist Media Studies, 13 (2), 192–207.Google Scholar
Fawcett Society, 2015. Views not shoes. Fawcett Society. www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/views-not-shoes [accessed 2 August 2018].Google Scholar
Feld, V., 2000. A new start in Wales: How devolution is making a difference. In Coote, A., ed., New Gender Agenda: Why Women Still Want More. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 74–80.Google Scholar
Felice, R. D. and Garretson, G., 2018. Politeness at work in the Clinton email Corpus: A first look at the effects of status and gender. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 (3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Feng, W. and Wu, D., 2015. Discourses of female leaders in postcolonial Hong Kong. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251–274.Google Scholar
Fenton-Smith, B., 2008. Discourse structure and political performance in adversarial parliamentary questioning. Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (1), 97–118.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E., 2018. ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is ...’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society, 29 (5), 495–513.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A., Weizman, E., and Berlin, L. N., eds., 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
First Republican Primary Debate, 2016. Cleveland: Fox News Channel: Quicken Loans Arena. https://video.foxnews.com/v/4406746003001/?#sp=show-clips [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Fisher, V. and Kinsey, S., 2014. Behind closed doors! Homosocial desire and the academic boys club. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29 (1), 44–64.Google Scholar
Formato, F., 2014. Language use and gender in the Italian parliament. PhD thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/71736/ [accessed 30 April 2018].Google Scholar
Formato, F., 2019. Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fracchiolla, B., 2011. Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate – The Royal–Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2480–2488.Google Scholar
Franceschet, S., 2011. Gendered institutions and women’s substantive representation: Female legislators in Argentina and Chile. In Krook, M. L. and Mackay, F., eds., Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 58–78.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. N. and Norton, P., eds., 1993. Parliamentary Questions. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freed, A. F., 1996. Language and gender in an experimental setting. In Bergvall, V. and Bing, J. M., eds., Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman, 55–76.Google Scholar
Freeman, H., 2016. Theresa May, Margaret Thatcher: Spot the difference – and the sexism. The Guardian, 23 July. www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/commentisfree/2016/jul/23/theresa-may-margaret-thatcher-spot-the-difference-uk-politics-hadley-freeman [accessed 8 April 2018].Google Scholar
Frenkel, D., 2011. Drop the Gillard twang: It’s beginning to annoy. The Sydney Morning Herald, 20 April. www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/drop-the-gillard-twang-its-beginning-to-annoy-20110420-1dosf.html [accessed 11 October 2018].Google Scholar
Friedman, A., 2013. Hey ‘ladies’. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/112188/how-word-lady-has-evolved [accessed 30 September 2018].Google Scholar
Gains, F. and Lowndes, V., 2014. How is institutional formation gendered, and does it make a difference? A new conceptual framework and a case study of police and crime commissioners in England and Wales. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 524–548.Google Scholar
Gal, S., 1991. Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In di Leonardo, M., ed., Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley: University of California Press, 175–203.Google Scholar
Gal, S., 1995. Language, gender and power: An anthropological review. In Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M., eds., Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. London: Routledge, 170–182.Google Scholar
Gal, S., 2018. Registers in circulation: The social organization of interdiscursivity. Signs and Society, 6 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Galea, N. and Gaweda, B., 2018. (De)constructing the masculine blueprint: The institutional and discursive consequences of male political dominance. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 276–282.Google Scholar
Gardner, B., 2014. From ‘shrill’ housewife to Downing Street: The changing voice of Margaret Thatcher, 25 November. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11251919/From-shrill-housewife-to-Downing-Street-the-changing-voice-of-Margaret-Thatcher.html [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar
Gawne, L., 2011. Accent on politicians’ speech misses the point. The Sydney Morning Herald, 28 November. www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/accent-on-politicians-speech-misses-the-point-20111128-1o360.html [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Gershon, S., 2012. When race, gender, and the media intersect: Campaign news coverage of minority congresswomen. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33 (2), 105–125.Google Scholar
Ghitis, F., 2016. The ‘shrill’ smear against Hillary Clinton. CNN. www.cnn.com/2016/02/08/opinions/hillary-clinton-sexism-ghitis/index.html [accessed 13 November 2018].Google Scholar
Gill, R., 2011. Sexism reloaded, or, it’s time to get angry again! Feminist Media Studies, 11 (1), 61–71.Google Scholar
Gill, R. and Orgad, S., 2018. The amazing bounce-backable woman: Resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberalism. Sociological Research Online, 23 (2), 477–495.Google Scholar
Gillard, J., 2013a. Interview with Julia Gillard. www.nowtolove.com.au/celebrity/celeb-news/julia-gillard-why-shes-knitting-for-the-royal-baby-9786 [accessed 12 June 2018].Google Scholar
Gillard, J., 2013b. Julia Gillard’s resignation speech. http://rescu.com.au/julia-gillards-speech-video-transcript/ [accessed 5 January 2019].Google Scholar
Gillard, J., and Summers, A., 2013. “Julia Gillard and Anne Summers.” Big Ideas, ABC Radio National. www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/Julia-gillard-26-anne-summers/4978214 [accessed 7 February 2020]Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glaze, B., 2018. How stubborn May stumbled into leadership fight thanks to blunder after blunder. Daily Mirror. www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/how-stubborn-theresa-ploughed-no-13724406 [accessed 15 February 2019].Google Scholar
Gleason, S. A., 2019. Beyond Mere presence: Gender norms in oral arguments at the U.S. supreme court. Political Research Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1065912919847001.Google Scholar
Goldstein, D. M. and Hall, K., 2017. Postelection surrealism and nostalgic racism in the hands of Donald Trump. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1), 397–406.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. M., 2003. Women’s political effectiveness: A conceptual framework. In Goetz, A. M. and Hassim, S., eds., No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. London: Zed Books, 29–80.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A., 2013. Unfinished business: Sex, freedom and misogyny. Quarterly Essay, 50 (1), 1–79.Google Scholar
Goodsell, C. T., 1988. The architecture of parliaments: Legislative houses and political culture. British Journal of Political Science, 18 (3), 287–302.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, K., Gordon, R., and Nabor, A., 2017. The reinforcement of hegemonic masculinity through gender frames during the 2016 election. Global Tides, 11 (8), 1–16.Google Scholar
Goren, L. J., 2018. Authenticity and emotion: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s dual constraints. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 111–115.Google Scholar
Gorman, T., 1993. The Bastards: Dirty Tricks and the Challenge to Europe. London: Pan.Google Scholar
Graham, K., Bernards, S., Abbey, A., Dumas, T. M., and Wells, S., 2017. When women do not want it: Young female Bargoers’ experiences with and responses to sexual harassment in social drinking contexts. Violence Against Women, 23 (12), 1419–1441.Google Scholar
Graham, R., 2019. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Representatives 1890 to 1950: A community of practice perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 149 (August), 14–24.Google Scholar
Grant, J., 2018. A left feminist comment on supporting Hillary Clinton. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 106–111.Google Scholar
Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. and Katz, R., 2019. When a man debates a woman: Trump vs. Clinton in the first mixed gender presidential debates. Journal of Gender Studies. doi:10.1080/09589236.2019.1566890.Google Scholar
Green, J. and Bloome, D., 1997. Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In Flood, J., Heath, S. and Lapp, D., eds., A Handbook for Literacy Educators. New York: Macmillan, 181–202.Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. and Caracelli, V. J., 2003. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed-method practice. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C., eds., Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 91–110.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J., 1987. Philosophy and aggression. Radical Philosophy, 47 (Autumn), 18–20.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. H., 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of Communications. New York: Holt McDougal.Google Scholar
Haack, S., 2003. Truth, truths, ‘truth’, and ‘truths’ in the law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 26 (1), 17–21.Google Scholar
Hall, L. J. and Donaghue, N., 2013. ‘Nice girls don’t carry knives’: Constructions of ambition in media coverage of Australia’s first female prime minister. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52 (4), 631–647.Google Scholar
Hall, R. M. and Sandler, B. R., 1982. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED215628 [accessed 4 July 2018].Google Scholar
Haraldsson, A. and Wängnerud, L., 2019. The effect of media sexism on women’s political ambition: Evidence from a worldwide study. Feminist Media Studies, 19 (4), 525–541.Google Scholar
Harmer, E., 2017. Online election news can be bloody difficult (for a) woman. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D., and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media Voters and the Campaign. Poole: Bournemouth University, Political Studies Association/Centre for Politics and Media Research, 39.Google Scholar
Harrington, K., Litosseliti, L., Sauntson, H., and Sunderland, J., eds., 2008. Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harris, S., 1984. Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1984 (49), 5–28.Google Scholar
Harris, S., 2001. Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12 (4), 451–472.Google Scholar
Haywood, C., Johansson, T., Hammarén, N., Herz, M., and Ottemo, A., 2018. The Conundrum of Masculinity: Hegemony, Homosociality, Homophobia and Heteronormativity. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hazarika, A. and Hamilton, T., 2018. Punch and Judy Politics: An Insiders’ Guide to Prime Minister’s Questions. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., 1983. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298. https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/sex-bias-in-work-settings-the-lack-of-fit-model.Google Scholar
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., and Pujolar, J., 2018. Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues That Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S., 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (4), 725–740.Google Scholar
Henderson, B., 2016. Donald Trump makes rare apology after video emerges of him making sexually aggressive comments about women. The Telegraph, 7 October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/07/donald-trump-on-groping-and-kissing-women-when-youre-a-star-they/ [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar
Hewitt, R., 1997. ‘Boxing out’ and ‘taxing’. In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. H., eds., Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 27–46.Google Scholar
Holland, J. and Wright, K. A., 2017. The double delegitimatisation of Julia Gillard: Gender, the media, and Australian political culture. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 63 (4), 588–602.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., 1992. Women’s talk in public contexts. Discourse and Society, 3 (2), 121–150.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., 2006. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., 2017. Leadership and change management: Examining gender, cultural and ‘hero leader’ stereotypes. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 15–43.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Marra, M., 2002. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (12), 1683–1710.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., 1999. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28 (2), 173–183.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M., 2003. ‘Feminine’ workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 573–600.Google Scholar
Hoyt, C. L. and Murphy, S. E., 2016. Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 387–399.Google Scholar
Hughes, R., 1996. English in Speech and Writing: Investigating Language and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hundleby, C., 2013. Aggression, politeness and abstract adversaries. Informal Logic, 33 (2), 238–262.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S., 2005. The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60 (6), 581–592.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H., 1972a. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. H., eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H., 1972b. Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events. In Giglioli, P., ed., Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 21–44.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H., 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, C., 2010. Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (4), 885–911.Google Scholar
Ilie, C., 2013. Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments. Democratization, 20 (3), 501–521.Google Scholar
Ilie, C., 2015. Follow-ups as multifunctional questioning and answering strategies in Prime Minister’s Questions. In Fetzer, A., Weizman, E. and Berlin, L. N., eds., The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–218.Google Scholar
Ilie, C., 2018. Behave yourself, woman! Journal of Language and Politics, 17 (5), 594–616.Google Scholar
Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., 2017. Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse: Power, Management and Gender. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Inside the Commons, 2015. Episode 1, lifting the lid, inside the commons – BBC Two. Open University and BBC. www.open.edu/openlearn/tv-radio-events/tv/inside-the-commons?episode=18178#episode-details [accessed on 4 February 2015].Google Scholar
Jacobson, L., 2017. Did Elizabeth Warren break the rules? Plus 5 other questions about Rule 19. PolitiFact. www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/feb/08/did-elizabeth-warren-break-rules-plus-5-other-ques/ [accessed 22 December 2018].Google Scholar
Jacobsen, R. R., 2019. Interruptions and co-construction in the First 2016 Trump–Clinton US presidential debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 148 (July), 71–87.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H., 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, M. M., 1985. ‘What’s so funny?’ Joking among women. In Bremner, S., Caskey, N. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Proceedings of the First Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 135–151.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., and Reichard, R. J., 2008. The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106 (1), 39–60.Google Scholar
Jones, A. R., 1987. Nets and bridles: Early modern conduct books and sixteenth century women’s lyrics. In Armstrong, N. and Tennenhouse, L., eds., The Ideology of Conduct: Essays on Literature and the History of Sexuality. New York: Methuen, 39–72.Google Scholar
Jones, J. J., 2016. Talk ‘like a man’: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (3), 625–642.Google Scholar
Jones, L. M., 2015. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: Media’s ‘Ma Ellen’ or the ‘Iron Lady’ of West Africa? Textual discourse and the brand of a leader. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344.Google Scholar
Kammoun, R., 2015. Gender and political discourse in Tunisia. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–148.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J. and Disch, L. J., 1993. Sexual violence and the reproduction of male power in the locker room: The ‘Lisa Olson incident’. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10 (4), 331–352.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, C. F. and Mendelberg, T., 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kathlene, L., 1994. Power and influence in state legislative policy making: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88 (3), 560–576.Google Scholar
Kathlene, L., 1995. Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor? In Duerst-Lahti, G. and Kelly, R., eds., Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 167–193.Google Scholar
Kelly, R., 2018. Independent complaints and grievance scheme. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8369 [accessed 19 January 2019].Google Scholar
Khazan, O., 2016. What criticisms of Hillary’s voice say about our hidden biases. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/hillarys-voice/493565/ [accessed 13 November 2018].Google Scholar
King, M., 2005. A critical assessment of Steenbergen et al’s Discourse Quality Index. Roundhouse: A Journal of Critical Theory and Practice, 1 (1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Kirkup, J., 2008. David Cameron fails to end ‘Punch and Judy’ politics. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/1908155/David-Cameron-fails-to-end-Punch-and-Judy-politics.html [accessed 19 January 2019].Google Scholar
Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., and Peters, S., 2012. Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279 (1738), 2698–2704.Google Scholar
Klofstad, C. A., Nowicki, S., and Anderson, R. C., 2016. How voice pitch influences our choice of leaders. American Scientist; Research Triangle Park, 104 (5), 282–287.Google Scholar
Knight, H. M., 1992. Gender interference in transsexuals’ speech. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 312–317.Google Scholar
Koller, V. and Semino, E., 2009. Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–35.Google Scholar
Kram, K. and Hampton, M. M., 2003. When women lead: The visibility-vulnerability spiral. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G. and Scully, M. A., eds., Reader in Gender, Work and Organization. Oxford: Blackwell, 211–223.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L., 2015. Empowerment versus backlash: Gender quotas and critical mass theory. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3 (1), 184–188.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L., 2017. Violence against women in politics. Journal of Democracy, 28 (1), 74–88.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L., 2018. Westminster too: On sexual harassment in British politics. The Political Quarterly, 89 (1), 65–72.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L. and Mackay, F., 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kulick, D., 1993. Speaking as a woman: Structure and gender in domestic arguments in a New Guinea village. Cultural Anthropology, 8 (4), 510–541.Google Scholar
Larson, B. N., 2016. Gender/genre: The lack of gendered register in texts requiring genre knowledge. Written Communication, 33 (4), 360–384.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. G. and Rose, M., 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Lazar, M. M., 2005. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Legman, G., 2006. Rationale of the Dirty Joke: An Analysis of Sexual Humor. 2nd ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Levon, E., 2015. Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9 (7), 295–308.Google Scholar
Lim, E. T., 2009. Gendered metaphors of women in power: The case of Hillary Clinton as Madonna, unruly woman, bitch and witch. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 254–269.Google Scholar
Loke, J., Harp, D., and Bachmann, I., 2011. Mothering and governing: How news articulated gender roles in the cases of Governors Jane Swift and Sarah Palin. Journalism Studies, 12 (2), 205–220.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J., 2014a. The institutionalisation of sexism in politics. Political Insight, 5 (2), 16–19.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J., 2014b. Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual at Westminster. In Rai, S. M. and Johnson, R. E., eds., Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 132–162.Google Scholar
Luff, D., 1999. Dialogue across the divides: ‘Moments of rapport’ and power in feminist research with anti-feminist women. Sociology, 33 (4), 687–703.Google Scholar
Lünenborg, M. and Maier, T., 2015. Governing in the gendered structure of power: The media discourse on Angela Merkel and her power-driven leadership style. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275–292.Google Scholar
Maas, M. K., McCauley, H. L., Bonomi, A. E., and Leija, S. G., 2018. ‘I was grabbed by my pussy and its #NotOkay’: A Twitter backlash against Donald Trump’s degrading commentary. Violence Against Women, 24 (14), 1739–1750.Google Scholar
Mackay, F., 2004. Gender and political representation in the UK: The state of the ‘discipline’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6 (1), 99–100.Google Scholar
Mackay, F., 2010. Gendering constitutional change and policy outcomes: Substantive representation and domestic violence policy in Scotland. Policy and Politics, 38 (3), 369–388.Google Scholar
Mackay, F., 2014. Nested newness, institutional innovation, and the gendered limits of change. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 549–571.Google Scholar
Mackay, F. and McAllister, L., 2012. Feminising British politics: Six lessons from devolution in Scotland and Wales. The Political Quarterly, 83 (4), 730–734.Google Scholar
Mackay, F., Myers, F., and Brown, A., 2003. Towards a new politics? Women and constitutional change in Scotland. In Dobrowolsky, A. and Hart, V., eds., Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 84–98.Google Scholar
Mackay, F. and Waylen, G., 2014. Introduction: Gendering ‘new’ institutions. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 489–494.Google Scholar
Maddox, B., 2019. UK parliament should use renovation to rethink its ways. Financial Times, 6 January. www.ft.com/content/80012468-101a-11e9-b2f2-f4c566a4fc5f [accessed 27 January 2019].Google Scholar
Madill, C., 2011. Nervous not nasal, misunderstood not misleading – Julia’s just trying too hard. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/nervous-not-nasal-misunderstood-not-misleading-julias-just-trying-too-hard-1301 [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Malley, R., 2012. Feeling at home: Inclusion at Westminster and the Scottish Parliament. The Political Quarterly, 83 (4), 714–716.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J., 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J., 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. The Journal of Politics, 61 (3), 628–657.Google Scholar
Marra, M., Holmes, J., and Kidner, K., 2017. Transitions and interactional competence: Negotiating boundaries through talk. In Doehler, S. P., Bangerter, A., de Weck, G., Filliettaz, L., González-Martínez, E., and Petitjean, C., eds., Interactional Competences in Institutional Settings. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 227–251.Google Scholar
Mavin, S., 2006. Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21 (4), 264–276.Google Scholar
Mavin, S., Bryans, P., and Cunningham, R., 2010. Fed‐up with Blair’s babes, Gordon’s gals, Cameron’s cuties, Nick’s nymphets: Challenging gendered media representations of women political leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25 (7), 550–569.Google Scholar
May, T., 2009. Theresa May: My life as a female MP. BBC News, 17 June. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8033607.stm [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar
May, T., 2017a. Theresa May BBC interview with Laura Kuenssberg. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39784170 [accessed 2 June 2018].Google Scholar
May, T., 2017b. Theresa May defends temporary exclusion orders and her record on security. TV. www.itv.com/news/2017-06-06/theresa-may-defends-temporary-exclusion-orders-and-her-record-on-security/ [accessed 15 February 2019].Google Scholar
May, T., 2018a. PM’s vote 100 speech: 6 February 2018. GOV.UK. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-vote-100-speech-6-february-2018 [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar
May, T., 2018b. Theresa May BBC interview with Laura Kuenssberg. TV. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39784170 [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar
May, T., 2018c. Theresa May’s speech to the 2018 conservative party conference. www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/98760/read-full-theresa-mays-speech-2018 [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar
McElhinny, B., 1998. I Don’t smile much anymore: Affect, gender, and the discourse of Pittsburgh police officers. In Coates, J., ed., Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 309–327.Google Scholar
McElhinny, B., 2003. Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 21–42.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. and Pfiester, R. A., 2015. Stereotype threat and the evaluative context of communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34 (2), 111–137.Google Scholar
Mclean, J. and Maalsen, S., 2013. Destroying the joint and dying of shame? A geography of revitalised feminism in social media and beyond. Geographical Research, 51 (3), 243–256.Google Scholar
Medeiros, M., Forest, B., Shah, P., and Juenke, E. G., 2019. Still not there: Continued challenges to women’s political representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7 (2), 386–388.Google Scholar
Media Watch ‘Alan Jones’s chaff bag is filling up fast’, 2012. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/alan-joness-chaff-bag-is-filling-up-fast/9973982 [accessed 23 October 2018].Google Scholar
Mellgren, C., Andersson, M., and Ivert, A.-K., 2018. ‘It happens all the time’: Women’s experiences and normalization of sexual harassment in public space. Women & Criminal Justice, 28 (4), 262–281.Google Scholar
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., and Keller, J., 2018. #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25 (2), 236–246.Google Scholar
Meyjes, T., 2016. Theresa May turned into Margaret Thatcher right before our eyes during first PMQs. Metro. https://metro.co.uk/2016/07/20/theresa-may-turned-into-margaret-thatcher-right-before-our-eyes-during-first-pmqs-6018209/ [accessed 24 September 2018].Google Scholar
Millar, S., Wilson, J., and Boxer, D., 2015. Under fire: Pronominal use and leadership in the discourse of Helle Thorning-Schmidt. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67–92.Google Scholar
Miller, J., 2016. Polls say Hillary Clinton won the debates – will it matter? CBS News: Face the Nation. www.cbsnews.com/news/polls-hillary-clinton-won-debates-election-2016-donald-trump/ [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Mills, S., 1992. Discourse competence: Or how to theorize strong women speakers. Hypatia, 7 (2), 4–17.Google Scholar
Mills, S., 2003. Caught between sexism, anti-sexism and ‘political correctness’: Feminist women’s negotiations with naming practices. Discourse & Society, 14 (1), 87–110.Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Mullany, L., 2011. Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J., 2010. The narcissism of small differences: Scotland and Westminster. Parliamentary Affairs, 63 (1), 98–116.Google Scholar
Mohammed, D., 2018. Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time: Accusation of Inconsistency in Response to Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moir, 2018. You have to admire Theresa May’s resilience and grit. Daily Mail, 17 November. www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-6399497/JAN-MOIR-admire-Theresa-Mays-resilience-grit-fire.html [accessed 22 February 2019].Google Scholar
Mollin, S., 2007. The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2 (2), 187–210.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M., 2001. The uses of authenticity: ‘Speaking from experience’ in a U.K. election broadcast. The Communication Review, 4 (4), 447–462.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M., 2011. The accountability interview: Politics and change in UK public service broadcasting. In Ekström, M. and Patrona, M., eds., Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross Cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–56.Google Scholar
Moore, B., 2019. A new twist in the elusive quest for the origins of the word ‘bogan’ leads to Melbourne’s Xavier College. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/a-new-twist-in-the-elusive-quest-for-the-origins-of-the-word-bogan-leads-to-melbournes-xavier-college-113755 [accessed 27 June 2019]Google Scholar
Moulton, J., 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. B., eds., Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 149–164.Google Scholar
Mower, S., 2016. Theresa May’s style is more than just her shoes. Daily Mail Online, 1 August. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3717301/How-dress-like-grown-s-Theresa-s-style-striking-shoes-fashion-expert-SARAH-MOWER-says.html [accessed 19 November 2018].Google Scholar
Mügge, L., Evans, E., and Engeli, I., 2016. Introduction: Gender in European political science education – taking stock and future directions. European Political Science, 15 (3), 281–291.Google Scholar
Mügge, L., Montoya, C., Emejulu, A., and Weldon, S. L., 2018. Intersectionality and the politics of knowledge production. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 17–36.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M., 1988. On Humor: Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mullany, L., 2007. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mullany, L., 2012. Discourse, gender and professional communication. In Gee, J. P. and Handford, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 509–522.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., 2014. (Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament. Pragmatics and Society, 5 (1), 76–104.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. and Rek, B., 2018. Candidate gender and the media attention in the 2015 UK general election. Parliamentary Affairs. https://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsy019/4963368 [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar
Murray, R., 2014. Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 520–532.Google Scholar
Murtagh, C., 2008. A transient transition: The cultural and institutional obstacles impeding the Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition in its progression from informal to formal politics. Irish Political Studies, 23 (1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Museum of London. Anti-suffrage postcard sent to Christabel Pankhurst in 1909. https://collections.museumoflondon.org.uk/online/object/289813.html [accessed 30 November 2018].Google Scholar
Nichols, D. and Kolankiewicz, V., 2017. Bogan in the eye of the beholder: The curious case of Rebel Wilson. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/bogan-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder-the-curious-case-of-rebel-wilson-78259 [accessed 27 June 2019].Google Scholar
Nicholson, E., 1996. Secret Society: Inside – and Outside – the Conservative Party. London: Indigo.Google Scholar
Nielson, 2016. First Presidential Debate of 2016 Draws 84 Million Viewers. www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2016/first-presidential-debate-of-2016-draws-84-million-viewers [accessed 8 November 2018].Google Scholar
Ochs, E., 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C., eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–359.Google Scholar
Okimoto, T. G. and Brescoll, V. L., 2010. The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (7), 923–936.Google Scholar
Parker, A., 2016. Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton doesn’t have ‘a presidential look’. The New York Times, 6 September. www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-doesnt-have-a-presidential-look.html [accessed 8 November 2018].Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. R., 2012. Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parliament UK, 2010. Equality act 2010. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15 [accessed 27 June 2018].Google Scholar
Parliamentary Report, 2018. Report on an independent complaints and grievance policy. Westminster: Parliament UK. Cross Party Working Group on an Independent Complaints and Grievance Policy. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CDP-2018-0049 [accessed 27 June 2018].Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. and Blackedge, A., 2004. Introduction: New theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. In Pavlenko, A. and Blackedge, A., eds., Negotiations of Identity in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1–33.Google Scholar
Peck, J., 2011. When Julia talks, does her gender speak louder? The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/when-julia-talks-does-her-gender-speak-louder-1342 [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar
Penny, L., 2016. A Tory leadership race between two women is not a feminist revolution. New Statesman, 7 July. www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2016/07/tory-leadership-race-between-two-women-not-feminist-revolution [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar
Phillips, J., 2017. Everywoman: One Woman’s Truth about Speaking the Truth. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F., 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pizzini, F., 1991. Communication hierarchies in humour: Gender differences in the obstetrical/gynaecological setting. Discourse & Society, 2 (4), 477–488.Google Scholar
Puwar, N., 1997. Reflections on interviewing women MPs. http://socresonline.org.uk/2/1/4.html [accessed 28 August 2017].Google Scholar
Puwar, N., 2004b. Thinking about making a difference. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6 (1), 65–80.Google Scholar
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J., 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., 2007. Neo-Hymsian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11 (5), 548–607.Google Scholar
Randall, V. and Lovenduski, J., 2004. Gender in contemporary British politics. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6 (1), 1–2.Google Scholar
Rehn, A., 2010. Abbott’s no means no gaffe. The Daily Telegraph, 3 August 2010. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/abbotts-no-means-no-gaffe/news-story/c61d44cfa2e5f40744cc9fcc6628b375 [accessed 22 October 2018].Google Scholar
Reid Boyd, E. J., 2012. Lady: Still a feminist four letter word? Women and Language, 35 (2), 35–52.Google Scholar
Reid, C., 2014. Rhetoric and parliamentary leadership - Prime Minister’s questions. In Atkins, J., Finlayson, A., Martin, J., and Turnbull, N., eds., Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 45–57.Google Scholar
Reingold, B., 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., 2010. Rhetoric of political speeches. In Wodak, R. and Koller, V., eds., Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 243–270.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W., 2005. Everyday life in a ministry: Public administration as anthropology. The American Review of Public Administration, 35 (1), 3–25.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. and Kerr, R., 2018. Women leaders in the political field in Scotland: A socio-historical approach to the emergence of leaders. Leadership, 14 (6), 662–686.Google Scholar
Romaniuk, T., 2016. On the relevance of gender in the analysis of discourse: A case study from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid in 2007–2008. Discourse & Society, 27 (5), 533–553.Google Scholar
Rooney, P., 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation and embattled reason. Informal Logic, 30 (3), 203–234.Google Scholar
Ross, K., 2017. Gender, Politics, News: A Game of Three Sides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ross, K. and Carter, C., 2011. Women and news: A long and winding road. Media, Culture & Society, 33 (8), 1148–1165.Google Scholar
Ross, K. and Comrie, M., 2012. The rules of the (leadership) game: Gender, politics and news. Journalism, 13 (8), 969–984.Google Scholar
Rubtcova, M., Butorina, Y., Nakopia, L., Stepanova, E., and Gallina, S., 2018. The analysis of Theresa May and Justin Trudeau’s Twitter accounts media constituent. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3116711. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3116711 [accessed 4 June 2018].Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A. and Fairchild, R., 2004. Reactions to countersterotypic behaviour: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (2), 157–176.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., and Nauts, S., 2012. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. K. and Haslam, S. A., 2005. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16 (2), 81–90.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., and Peters, K., 2016. Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 446–455.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, T., 2011. Parliamentary questions as instruments of substantive representation: Visible minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17 (3), 271–289.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.Google Scholar
Sanday, P. R., 2007. Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Savigny, H., 2014. Women, know your limits: Cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education, 26 (7), 794–809.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M., 2003. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Malden: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
Savoy, J., 2018. Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33 (1), 143–159.Google Scholar
Sawer, P., 2012. How Maggie Thatcher was remade. 8 January. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/margaret-thatcher/8999746/How-Maggie-Thatcher-was-remade.html [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar
Schreiber, R., 2016. Gender roles, motherhood, and politics: Conservative women’s organizations frame Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Schreiber, R., 2018. Is there a conservative feminism? An empirical account. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 56–79.Google Scholar
Sclafani, J., 2017. Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sealey, A. and Bates, S., 2016. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 104 (October), 18–31.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Second Presidential Debate, 2016. Washington University in St. Louis. www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000004696519/watch-live-second-presidential-debate.html [accessed 12 November 2018].Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K., 1985. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, L., 2006. Men at Bay: The contemporary ‘crisis’ of masculinity. In Whitehead, S., ed., Men and Masculinities: Critical Concepts in Sociology. London: Routledge, 272–281.Google Scholar
Sensales, G. and Areni, A., 2017. Gender biases and linguistic sexism in political communication: A comparison of press news about men and women Italian ministers. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5 (2), 512–536.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., (In Press). Gender, language and elite ethnographies in political institutions. In Angouri, J. and Baxter, J., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2000. Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society, 11 (3), 401–418.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2002. Language and gender in the house of commons. PhD thesis. The Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2006. Governed by the rules? The female voice in parliamentary debates. In Baxter, J., ed., Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–102.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2011. ‘I am not an Honourable Lady!’: Gender and language in the National Assembly for Wales. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 8 (3), 275–294.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2013. An ethnographic investigation into gender and language in the Northern Ireland Assembly. In Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L. and Vinciarelli, A., eds., Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. Berlin: Springer, 39–53.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., 2018. Off the record: The transcription of parliamentary debates for political discourse analysis. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G., eds., Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–126.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., 2015. ‘Thank you for Heckling me’ Hillary Rodham Clinton’s discursive management of her public persona, her political message and the ‘Iron my shirt’ hecklers in the 2008 presidential election campaign. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–216.Google Scholar
Shibamoto-Smith, J. S., 2011. Honorifics, ‘politeness,’ and power in Japanese political debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (15), 3707–3719.Google Scholar
Shor, E., Rijt, A. van de, Ward, C., Blank-Gomel, A., and Skiena, S., 2014. Time trends in printed news coverage of female subjects, 1880–2008. Journalism Studies, 15 (6), 759–773.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23 (3), 193–229.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M., 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, S., 1992. The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1 (2), 101–120.Google Scholar
Smith, A., 2008. Limbaugh returned to ‘testicle lockbox’; claimed Clinton ‘reminds men of the worst characteristics of women’. Media Matters for America. www.mediamatters.org/research/2008/02/15/limbaugh-returned-to-testicle-lockbox-claimed-c/142573 [accessed 7 November 2018].Google Scholar
Smith, G., 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P., Caputi, P., and Crittenden, N., 2012. A maze of metaphors around glass ceilings. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27 (7), 436–448.Google Scholar
Smooth, W., 2006. Intersectionality in electoral politics: A mess worth making. Politics & Gender, 2 (3), 400–414.Google Scholar
Sones, B., Moran, M., and Lovenduski, J., 2005. Women in Parliament: The New Suffragettes. London: Politico’s Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Sorrentino, J. and Augoustinos, M., 2016. ‘I don’t view myself as a woman politician, I view myself as a politician who’s a woman’: The discursive management of gender identity in political leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55 (3), 385–406.Google Scholar
Southern, K. and Spillett, R., 2018. Tory MP allegedly leaves his wife for woman 20 years his junior. Mail Online, 11 January. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5260677/Tory-MP-leaves-wife-woman-20-years-junior.html [accessed 28 January 2019].Google Scholar
Sparrow, A., 2016. PMQs verdict: Has Theresa May got a new gag writer? The Guardian, 7 September. www.theguardian.com/global/2016/sep/07/pmqs-verdict-theresa-may-new-gag-writer [accessed 25 September 2018].Google Scholar
Sreberny-Mohammadi, A. and Ross, K., 1996. Women MPs and the media: Representing the body politic. Parliamentary Affairs, 49 (1), 103–115.Google Scholar
Stanley, A., 1992. Democrats in New York; A softer image for Hillary Clinton. The New York Times, 13 July. www.nytimes.com/1992/07/13/news/democrats-in-new-york-a-softer-image-for-hillary-clinton.html [accessed 13 November 2018].Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., and Steiner, J., 2003. Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1 (1), 21–48.Google Scholar
Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., and Steenbergen, M. R., 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stopfner, M., 2018. Put your ‘big girl’ voice on. Journal of Language and Politics, 17 (5), 617–635.Google Scholar
Stubbe, M., Lane, C., Hilder, J., Vine, E., Vine, B., Marra, M., Holmes, J., and Weatherall, A., 2003. Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies, 5 (3), 351–388.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M., 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Suleiman, C. and O’Connell, D. C., 2008. Gender differences in the media interviews of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37 (1), 33–48.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J., 2007. Contradictions in gendered discourses: Feminist readings of sexist jokes? Gender and Language, 1 (2), 207–228.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. and Litosseliti, L., 2008. Current research methodologies in gender and language studies: Key issues. In Harrington, K., Litosseliti, L., Sauntson, H. and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–20.Google Scholar
Swann, J., 2002. Yes, but is it gender? In Litosseliti, L. and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 43–67.Google Scholar
Swift, D., 2019. From ‘I’m not a feminist, but … ’ to ‘Call me an old-fashioned feminist … ’: Conservative women in parliament and feminism, 1979–2017. Women’s History Review, 28 (2), 317–336.Google Scholar
Tamale, S., 1998. When Hens Begin to Crow: Gender and Parliamentary Politics in Uganda. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., 1984. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Relationships. New York: William Morrow & Company.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. A., Smith, A. B., Welch, N. M., and Hardin, R., 2018. ‘You should be flattered!’: Female sport management faculty experiences of sexual harassment and sexism. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 26 (1), 43–53.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. and Yates, C., 2017. Maybot, Mummy or Iron Lady? Loving and loathing Theresa May. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D. and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth: PSA/Bournemouth University, 131. www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2017/section-8-personality-politics-and-popular-culture/maybot-mummy-or-iron-lady-loving-and-loathing-theresa-may/ [accessed 26 June 2017].Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J., 2002. Power Talk: Interaction in Institutional Settings. London: Longman, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., and Henley, N., eds., 1983. Language, Gender, and Society. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tigue, C. C., Borak, D. J., O’Connor, J. J. M., Schandl, C., and Feinberg, D. R., 2012. Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33 (3), 210–216.Google Scholar
Trimble, L., 2016. Julia Gillard and the Gender Wars. Politics & Gender, 12 (2), 296–316.Google Scholar
Trimble, L., 2017. Ms. Prime Minister: Gender, Media and Leadership. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Trimble, L., Wagner, A., Sampert, S., Raphael, D., and Gerrits, B., 2013. Is it personal? Gendered mediation in newspaper coverage of Canadian national party leadership contests, 1975–2012. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18 (4), 462–481.Google Scholar
Troemel-Ploetz, S., 1991. Selling the apolitical. Discourse and Society, 2 (4), 489–502.Google Scholar
Trump, D., 2016a. Donald Trump apologizes for controversial video remarks. Fox News. www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA597Kn5iPk [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Trump, D., 2016b. Statement from Donald J. Trump. Trump-Pence: Make America Great Again. https://web.archive.org/web/20161007210105/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/statement-from-donald-j.-trump [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar
Trump, D., 2016c. Transcript: Donald Trump’s taped comments about women. 8 October. www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar
Tweedy, J., 2017. PM Theresa May unveils new shorter hair style. Mail Online, 20 March. www.dailymail.co.uk/~/article-4331920/index.html [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar
Uchida, A., 1992. When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: A critique of the ‘anti-power-based’ cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society, 21 (4), 547–568.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., 2000. On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration. In Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R., eds., The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 85–103.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., 2004. Text and context of parliamentary debates. In Bayley, P., ed., Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 339–372.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., 2016. Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage, 62–85.Google Scholar
Varney, D., 2017. ‘Not now, not ever’: Julia Gillard and the performative power of affect. In Diamond, E., Varney, D. and Amich, C., eds., Performance, Feminism and Affect in Neoliberal Times. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–38.Google Scholar
Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., and Brescoll, V. L., 2016. A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 400–414.Google Scholar
Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., and Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., 2011. An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (1), 10–21.Google Scholar
Waddle, M., Bull, P., and Böhnke, J. R., 2019. ‘He is just the nowhere man of British politics’: Personal attacks in Prime Minister’s questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38 (1), 61–84.Google Scholar
Wagner, A., Trimble, L., Sampert, S., and Gerrits, B., 2017. Gender, competitiveness, and candidate visibility in newspaper coverage of Canadian party leadership contests. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22 (4), 471–489.Google Scholar
Wagner, I. and Wodak, R., 2006. Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse & Society, 17 (3), 385–411.Google Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, K., 2017. The battle for authenticity. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D., and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth: PSA/Bournemouth University, 69.Google Scholar
Walker, J., 2016. Mom or mum? MP Jess Phillips makes Hansard spell it the Brummie way. birminghammail. www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/mom-mum-mp-jess-phillips-12308391 [accessed 5 January 2019].Google Scholar
Walsh, C., 2001. Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Walsh, C., 2015. Media capital or media deficit? Feminist Media Studies, 15 (6), 1025–1034.Google Scholar
Walter, J., 2017. ‘No loans for ladies’: Julia Gillard and capital denied. In Bennister, M., Worthy, B. and t’ Hart, P., eds., The Leadership Capital Index: A New Perspective on Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–62.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N., 2009. Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wang, V., 2014. Tracing gender differences in parliamentary debates: A growth curve analysis of Ugandan MPs’ activity levels in plenary sessions, 1998–2008. Representation, 50 (3), 365–377.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, L., 2009. Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12 (1), 51–69.Google Scholar
Ward, O., 2017. Intersectionality and press coverage of political campaigns: Representations of Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Female Candidates at the U.K. 2010 General Election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22 (1), 43–66.Google Scholar
Wasburn, P. C. and Wasburn, M. H., 2011. Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society, 33 (7), 1027–1041.Google Scholar
Watt, N., 2014. John Bercow calls for end to ‘orchestrated barracking’ at PMQs. The Guardian, 18 February. www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/18/john-bercow-pmqs-letter-party-leaders [accessed 19 January 2019].Google Scholar
Waylen, G., 2008. Feminist perspectives on transforming global governance: Challenges and opportunities. In Rai, S. M. and Waylen, G., eds., Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. London: Palgrave, 254–275.Google Scholar
Waylen, G., ed., 2017. Gender and Informal Institutions. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Webster, W., 1990. Not a Man to Match Her: The Marketing of a Prime Minister. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
West, C., 2012. Mammy, Jezebel, Sapphire, and their homegirls: Developing an ‘oppositional gaze’ toward the images of Black women. In Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., and Rozee, P. D., eds., Lectures on the Psychology of Women. Long Grove: Waveland Press, Inc, 286–299.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B., 2015. Why are MPs banned from clapping? 28 May. www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-32913113 [accessed 27 January 2019].Google Scholar
Whiting, S. and Braniff, M., 2016. ‘There is no point having a token woman’: Gender and representation in the ‘new’ Northern Ireland. Democratic Audit UK. www.democraticaudit.com [accessed 3 January 2019].Google Scholar
Wicks, R. H., Eubanks, A. D., Dye, R. G., Stewart, P. A., and Eidelman, S., 2017. The 2016 US Presidential debates. Perceptions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton based on presentation style. In Cavari, A. and Powell, R. J., eds., The 2016 Presidential Election: The Causes and Consequences of a Political Earthquake. Lanham: Lexington Books, 43–57.Google Scholar
Williams, M. J. and Tiedens, L. Z., 2016. The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 142 (2), 165–197.Google Scholar
Williams, P. M., 1980. Interviewing politicians: The life of Hugh Gaitskell. Political Quarterly, 51 (3), 303–316.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., 2003. Comment: Sexism with an alibi. The Guardian, 31 May. www.theguardian.com/media/2003/may/31/advertising.comment [accessed 16 November 2018].Google Scholar
Willis, R., 2017. Taming the Climate? Corpus analysis of politicians’ speech on climate change. Environmental Politics, 26 (2), 212–231.Google Scholar
Wilson, J., 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. and Irwin, A., 2015. ‘Why can’t a woman be more like a man?’ Margaret Thatcher and the discourse of leadership. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–42.Google Scholar
Winters, K. and Carvalho, E., 2015. Why did Nicola and Nigel do so well out of the debates? They are authentic and articulate, that’s why. QESB 2015 Blog/The Qualitative Election Study of Britain. https://qesb.info/media-coverage/blog-articles/ [accessed 5 July 2018].Google Scholar
Wodak, R., 1997. Introduction: Some important issues in the research of gender and discourse. In Wodak, R., ed., Gender and Discourse. London: Sage, 1–20.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., 2003. Multiple Identities: The role of female parliamentarians in the EU parliament. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 671–698.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., 2014. Political discourse analysis: Distinguishing frontstage and backstage contexts. A discourse-historical approach. In Flowerdew, J., ed., Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 321–345.Google Scholar
Worth, A., Augoustinos, M., and Hastie, B., 2016. ‘Playing the gender card’: Media representations of Julia Gillard’s sexism and misogyny speech. Feminism & Psychology, 26 (1), 52–72.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. and Reyes, A., 2015. Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, K. A. M. and Holland, J., 2014. Leadership and the media: Gendered framings of Julia Gillard’s ‘sexism and misogyny’ speech. Australian Journal of Political Science, 49 (3), 455–468.Google Scholar
Yoder, J. D., 1991. Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society, 5 (2), 178–192.Google Scholar
Yoong, M., 2019. ‘Where’s our #30peratus’: A feminist critical discourse analysis of Twitter debates on women’s political representation. In Lemiere, S., ed., Minorities Matter: Malaysian Politics and People. Selangor: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre, 21–35.Google Scholar
Yu, B., 2014. Language and gender in congressional speech. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29 (1), 118–132.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. and West, C., 1975. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Thorne, B. and Henley, N., eds., Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, 105–129.Google Scholar
van Zoonen, L., 2006. The personal, the political and the popular: A woman’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9 (3), 287–301.Google Scholar
Zulli, D., 2018. The changing norms of gendered news coverage: Hillary Clinton in the New York Times, 1969–2016. Politics & Gender, 1–23. doi:10.1017/s1743923x18000466.Google Scholar