Book contents
- Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Feminisation of the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- 2 ‘To Join the Bench and Be Decision-Makers’
- 3 Reframing Feminist Imperatives in Adjudication through a Reading of Sri Lankan Jurisprudence
- 4 Women in the Thai Judiciary
- 5 The Promise and Paradox of Women Judges in the Judiciary in Indonesia
- 6 Filipino Women Judges and Their Role in Advancing Judicial Independence in the Philippines
- 7 One Decade of Female Judges in the Malaysian Shariah Judiciary
- 8 Gender on the Bench Matters for Sustainable Development
- 9 Feminising the Indian Judiciary
- 10 Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
10 - Concluding Remarks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Feminisation of the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
- 2 ‘To Join the Bench and Be Decision-Makers’
- 3 Reframing Feminist Imperatives in Adjudication through a Reading of Sri Lankan Jurisprudence
- 4 Women in the Thai Judiciary
- 5 The Promise and Paradox of Women Judges in the Judiciary in Indonesia
- 6 Filipino Women Judges and Their Role in Advancing Judicial Independence in the Philippines
- 7 One Decade of Female Judges in the Malaysian Shariah Judiciary
- 8 Gender on the Bench Matters for Sustainable Development
- 9 Feminising the Indian Judiciary
- 10 Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, Ulrike Schultz summarises the key themes and ideas of the volume on women judges in the Asia-Pacific, and identifies future directions for the field.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific , pp. 291 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bauer, Gretchen and Dawuni, Jarpa J. (2016) Gender and the Judiciary in Africa: From Obscurity to Parity? (New York, Routledge).Google Scholar
Belleau, Marie-Claire and Johnson, Rebecca (2008) ‘Judging Gender: Difference and Dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada’ 15/1–2 International Journal of the Legal Profession 57–71.Google Scholar
Bessière, Céline and Mille, Muriel (2014) ‘The Judge Is Often a Woman: Professional Perceptions and Practices of Male and Female Family Court Judges in France’ 56/ Supplement 1 Sociologie du Travail e43–e68.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna (2003) ‘Lawyers in the Courtroom: Gender, Trials and Professional Performance in Israel’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Women in the World´s Legal Professions (Oxford, Hart) 247–268.Google Scholar
Böning, Anja and Schultz, Ulrike (2018) ‘Juristische Sozialisation’ in Boulanger, Christian and Rosenstock, Julia (eds.) Studienbuch Interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung (Baden-Baden, Nomos).Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee and Martin, Andrew D. (2010) ‘Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging’ 54/2 American Journal of Political Science 389–411.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Monique (2013) ‘The Impact of Women on the Administration of Justice in Syria and the Judicial Selection Process’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Women in the World’s Legal Profession (Oxford, Hart) 191–211.Google Scholar
Chew, Pat und Kelley, Robert (2009) ‘Myth of the Color-Blind Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Harassment Cases’ 86 Washington University Law Review 1117–1166.Google Scholar
Dawson, Brettel, Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, eds. (2016) Gender and Judicial Education (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary (2008) ‘Can Feminist Judges Make a Difference?’ 15/1–2 International Journal of the Legal Profession 7–36.Google Scholar
Lindbekk, Monika and Sonneveld, Nadia, eds. (2017) Women Judges in the Muslim World (Leiden, Brill).Google Scholar
Maktabi, Rania (2017) ‘Enfranchised Minors: Women as People in the Middle East after the 2011 Arab Uprisings’ 6/1 Laws. Evolving Challenges: An International Retrospective on Feminist Legal Theory, special issue edited by Rosemary Auchmuty. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6010004, 1–25.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2009) ‘Asylum in a Different Voice: Judging Immigration Claims and Gender’ in Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Schoenholz, Andrew I. and Schrag, Philip G. (eds.) Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform (New York, New York University Press).Google Scholar
Rackley, Erika (2008) ‘What a Difference Makes: Gendered Harms and Judicial Diversity’ 15/1–2 International Journal of the Legal Profession 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2003a) ‘Women in the World’s Legal Professions: Overview and Synthesis’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Women in the World’s Legal Profession (Oxford, Hart) XXV–LXII.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2003b) ‘Women Lawyers in Germany: Perception and Construction of Femininity’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Women in the World´s Legal Professions (Oxford, Hart) 295–321.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2013) ‘“I Was Noticed and I was Asked …” Women’s Careers in the Judiciary: Results of an Empirical Study for the Ministry of Justice in Northrhine-Westfalia, Germany’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Gender and Judging (Oxford, Hart) 145–166.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2016a) ‘Equal Rights for Men and Women in Germany: How a Constitutional Principle Was Transformed into Reality’ in Heinrich Boell Stiftung South Caucasus (ed.) Fight for the Public Space: When Personal is Political (Tiflis) S. 85–96.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2016b) ‘Sexism in Law and the Impact of Gender Stereotypes in Legal Proceedings’ in Heinrich Boell Stiftung South Caucasus (ed.) Fight for the Public Space: When Personal is Political (Tiflis) 97–108.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2017) ‘Do Female Judges Judge Better?’ in Lindbekk, Monika and Sonneveld, Nadia (eds.) Women Judges in the Muslim World (Leiden, Brill) 23–50.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2019) ‘The Gender and Judging Project: Equity in Germany: Diversity and the Courts’ in Sterett, Susann and Walker, Lee (eds.) Research Handbook on Law and Courts (Northampton, Elgar Publishing).Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2020b) ‘Gender in Socio-Legal Teaching and Research’ 21/ 7 German Law Journal 1345–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2021a) ‘Introduction: Gender and Careers in the Legal Academy: Overview and Synthesis’ in Schultz, Ulrike, Shaw, Gisela, Thornton, Margaret and Auchmuty (eds.), Rosemary Gender and Careers in the Legal Profession (Oxford, Hart) 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike (2021b) ‘Gender and Its Impact on Decision-Making in (International) Arbitration: A View from Germany’ International Journal of the Legal Profession, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, eds. (2003) Women in the World’s Legal Professions (Oxford, Hart).Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, eds. (eds.) (2012) Women in the Judiciary (London: Routledge) (reprint of Special Issue: Gender and Judging, International Journal of the Legal Profession 15/1–2.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, eds. (2013b) ‘Introduction: Gender and Judging: Overview and Synthesis’ in Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela (eds.) Gender and Judging (Oxford, Hart) 3–47.Google Scholar