Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:37:12.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Threat and Political Tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

George E. Marcus
Affiliation:
Williams College, Massachusetts
John L. Sullivan
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Elizabeth Theiss-Morse
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Sandra L. Wood
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Get access

Summary

Or in the night, imagining some fear, How easy is a bush suppos'd a bear!

William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night's Dream

A puzzle prompted our research. As we noted in Chapter 2, earlier survey research indicated that the single variable most strongly related to tolerance, perceptions of threat, is exogenous (Sullivan et al., 1982). This suggested that threat perceptions may be a contemporary judgment formed by relying on contemporary information, not an earlier acquired antecedent consideration. The findings in Chapter 4 are consistent with this hypothesis. Exposure to threat in the form of normative violations caused subjects to modulate their current tolerance judgments.

The 1978 NORC national study (shown in Figure 2.2) measured threat perceptions by asking respondents to describe on a seven-point scale their least-liked group using a list of polar adjectives. The adjective pairs were selected to represent a variety of familiar terms that respondents might find relevant in describing their appraisal of the objectionable group they confronted. Table 5.1 presents the bivariate correlations between political tolerance and these measures of threat, including a further measure, “How likely do you think it is that (group named) will be more popular in the future: very likely, somewhat likely, or very unlikely?”

There are two clusters of threat measures. The top group contains measures that reflect negative or positive normative evaluations. People judged the group to be trustworthy or untrustworthy, violent or nonviolent, and so forth.

Type
Chapter
Information
With Malice toward Some
How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments
, pp. 101 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×