We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part II - Data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2017
This chapter applies the hypothesis developed through the study of the BSP to three other ethnic parties in India: the pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in India's 1991 parliamentary elections (section I); the pro-Tamil Dravida Munnetra Kazagham(DMK)in the state of Tamil Nadu in the 1967 legislative assembly elections (section II); and the pro-Jharkhand Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), a regionalist party that called for the creation of a new state of Jharkhand out of the state of Bihar and its neighbours, in the 2000 legislative assembly elections in Bihar (section III). I rely for these analyses mainly on several excellent secondary studies of these parties and their vote bases. The data available from these studies are not sufficiently precise to permit a systematic evaluation of the argument. Instead, I hope to show only that in each case, the hypothesis proposed in this book generates a more plausible explanation than the alternatives for an otherwise puzzling outcome.
I select these three parties in order to maximize the range of variation in the data, keeping the condition of patronage-democracy constant. The three parties differ, first, in the type of category that they sought to mobilize. The BJP in 1991 targeted the religion-based category “Hindu.” TheDMK defined its target ethnic category in 1967 as a linguistic/regional category of Tamil speakers in Tamil Nadu. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha defined its target ethnic category in 2000 as “Jharkhandis,” by which it meant all inhabitants of the Jharkhand region. Second, they differ in the relative size of their target ethnic categories: Hindus in India and Tamil speakers in Tamil Nadu are both majority categories, while Jharkhandis constituted a regionally concentrated minority within Bihar. Third, they differ in the size of the political arena in which they operated: The BJP in 1991 was a nationwide party; theDMKin 1967 concentrated its efforts in the southern state of Tamil Nadu; and the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha in 2000 contested in the state of Bihar. Finally, the three parties differ in the type of elections and the time period chosen for analysis.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
