Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T03:00:45.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2025

Susanne Wiborg
Susanne Wiborg
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Who Controls Education?
The Rising Power of Vested Interests in Europe
 , pp. 199 - 222
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Åberg, P., Einersen, S. & Reuter, M. (2019). Think tanks: New organizational actors in a changing Swedish civil society. Volutans, 32, 634–648.Google Scholar
Agius, C. (2007). Sweden’s 2006 Parliamentary Election and After: Contesting or consolidating the Swedish model. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4), 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, N. (2007). The Europeanisation of education policy: Researching changing governance and ‘new’ modes of coordination. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(2), 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, N. (2014). Policy learning and Europeanisation in education: The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In Nordin, A. and Sunberg, D., eds., Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: The Making and Governing of Knowledge in the Education Policy Field. Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 123–140.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, N. & Lange, B. (2014). Europeanization the National education space?: Adjusting to the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) in the UK. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, C. U. (2015). The EU Education Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era: A Comprehensive Approach. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ambler, J. S. (1987). Constraints on policy innovation in education: Thatcher’s Britain and Mitterrand’s France. Comparative Politics, 20(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambler, J. S. (1991). Educational pluralism in the French Fifth Republic. In Hollifield, J. F. and Ross, G., eds., Searching for the New France. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 193–220.Google Scholar
Ambler, J. S. (1994). Why French education policy is so often made on the streets. French Politics and Society, 12(2/3), 41–64.Google Scholar
Ambler, J.S. (1985) Neocorporatism and the politics of French education. West European Politics. 8(3), 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J. (2006). Between Growth and Security: Swedish Social Democracy from a Strong Society to a Third Way. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthonsen, M. & Lindvall, J. (2009). Party competition and the resilience of corporatism. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthonsen, M. and Lindvall, J. (2013) Party Competition and the resilience of corporatism. Government and Opposition. 44(2), 167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthonsen, M., Lindvall, J. & Schmidt-Hansen, U. (2011). Social democrats, unions and corporatism: Denmark and Sweden compared. Party Politics, 17(1), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, S. F. (2013). Timing and Turnout: How Off-cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnesen, A.-L. & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive education policies in the Nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arreman, I. E. & Holm, A.-S. (2011). Privatisation of public education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinwall, M. & Greenwood, J. (1998). Conceptualising collective action in the European Union: An introduction. In Greenwood, J. and Aspinwall, M., eds., Collective Action in the European Union: Interests and the Politics of Associability. London: Routledge, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Auld, E. & Morris, P. (2016). PISA, policy and persuasion: Translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice’. Comparative Education, 52(2), 202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. (1994). Who Rules Our Schools?. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Baldi, G. (2022) Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics in Postwar Britain and Germany. New York: Palgrave MacMillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. (1990) The sociological implications of the education reform act. British Journal of Sociology of education. 11(4), 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. J. (1998). Big Policies/Small World: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2008). The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2009a). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state’. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2009b). The Governance Turn!. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 537–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. (1992). Education and the Teacher Unions. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. (2015). The Spiral of Silence – How Anti-TTIP Groups Dominate German Online Media and Set the Tone for TTIP Opinion. European Center for Political Economy, January. Available at: http://ecipe.org/blog/anti-ttip-german-online-media (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Bauer, M. (2016). Manufacturing Discontent: The Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups. European Center for International Political Economy, Occasional Paper 02/2016.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R. (1996). Public interest groups in France and the United States. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 9(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (1998) Basic Interests. The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R. & Mahoney, C. (2008). The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue-definition in the EU. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, C. & Chitty, C. (1997). Thirty Years On: Is Comprehensive Education Alive and Well or Struggling to Survive? 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bennett, P. (1995). Teacher unions, special education, and Europe: A study in international policy-making. In Potts, P., Armstrong, F. and Masterson, M., eds., Equality and Diversity in Education 2: National and International Contexts for Practice and Research. London: Routledge, pp. 131–138.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J. & Lowery, D. (2008). Counting organized interest in the European Union: A comparison of data sources. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhagen, P. & Mitchell, N. J. (2009). The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics, 10(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukel, E. (2001). Educational policy: Institutionalization and multi-level governance. In Andersen, S. S. and Eliassen, K. A., eds., Making Policy in Europe, 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J. (2002). Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations. European Journal of Political Research, 41(5), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J. (2008). Policy issues, organisational format and the political strategies of interest organisations. West European Politics, 31(6), 1188–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Eising, R, and Maloney, WA, eds., (2010) Interest group politics in Europe. Lessons from EU studies and Comparative Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beyers, J., Eising, R. & Maloney, W. (2008a). Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? West European Politics, 31(6), 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Eising, R. & Maloney, W. (2008b). Conclusion: Embedding interest group research. West European Politics, 31(6), 1292–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J. & Kerremans, B. (2012). Domestic embeddedness and the dynamics of multilevel venue shopping in four EU member states. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(2), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biezen, I. V., Mair, P. & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. S. (2014). Legislatures, lobbying, and interest groups. In Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. and Strøm, K. W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford Academic, pp. 526–542.Google Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. S. & Rasmussen, A. (2015). Comparing the domestic and the EU lobbying context: Perceived agenda-setting influence in the multi-level system of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 552–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J. (2000). Still corporatism in Scandinavia? A survey of recent empirical findings. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(2), 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, L. (1985). Teacher unions: Some Swedish perspectives. In Lawn, M., ed., The Politics of Teacher Unionism: International Perspectives. London: Croom Helm, pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, W. (1977). Die Berufsorganisation der Lehrer und die ‘pädagogische Selbstrolle’ Zur Professionalisierungs- und Deutungsfunktion der Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft und des Deutchen Philologenverbandes 1949–1974. In Heinemann, M., ed., Der Lehrer und seine Organisation. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag, pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
Bruno, I., Jacquot, S. & Mandin, L. (2006). Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination…toolbox or Pandoras’s box? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, S. (2009). Reforming federalism in Germany: Incremental changes instead of the big deal. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(2), 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, M.R. (2009) Social Democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. Journal of European Public Policy. 16(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampush, C. (2011). Review article: Comparative political science and the study of education. British Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 413–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitty, C. (1989). Towards a New Education System: The Victory of the New Right? London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Chitty, C. (2014) Education policy in Britain. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, C. & Dobbins, M. (2016). Increasing school autonomy in Western Europe: A comparative analysis of its causes and forms. European Societies, 18(4), 359–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, P. M. & Rommetvedt, H. (1999). From corporatism to lobbyism? Parliaments, executives, and organised interests in Denmark and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(3), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, T. (2005). The European commission. The European executive between continuity and change. In Richardson, J., ed., European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
Christiansen, PM, Nørgaard, AS., Rommetvedt, H., Svenson, T., Thesen, G., öBerg, PO. (2010) Varieties of Democracy: Interest Groups and Corporatist Committees in Scandinavian Policy Making. Voluntas. (21), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, P. (2017). Curriculum reform in lower-secondary education in France. Fortunes and misfortunes: 1988–1989. Revue Française de pédagogie, 199(2), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, R. D. (1972). Teachers’ Unions and Interest Group Politics: A Study in the Behaviour of Organised Teachers in England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coen, D. (1991). The European business interest and the nation state: Large firm lobbying in the European Union and member states. Journal of Public Policy, 18(2), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coen, D. J. (1991). Lobbying Structure and Its Implications for Trade Policy: A European Perspective (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Cole, A. (2001). The new governance of French education? Public Administration, 79(3), 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. & John, P. (2001). Governing education in England and France. Public Policy and Administration, 16(4), 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. and John, P (2001) Governing education in England and France. Public Policy and Administration. 16(4), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. (2017) French Politics and Society. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxall, WN. (2001) Pressure Groups in British Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2001). Report from the Commission. The Concrete Future Objectives of Education Systems. Brussels 31.01.2001.Google Scholar
Compton, M. F. & Weiner, L. (2008). The Global Assault on Teaching, Teachers, and Their Unions: Stories for Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coombs, F. S. (1978). The politics of educational change in France. Comparative Education Review, 22(3), 480–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cram, L. (1998). The EU Institutions and Collective Action: Constructing a European Interest. In: Collective Action in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M. & Hanegraaf, M. (2019). The funding of interest groups in the EU: Are the rich getting richer? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, C. (2002). Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union. European Union Politics, 3(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, D. (2002). Local authorities and comprehensivisation in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Education, 28(2–3), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, D. (2013). Politics, politicians and English comprehensive schools. History of Education, 42(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, A. S. Exley, Sashia, A., Tough, S., and Whitty, G. (2008) The Academies programme: Progress, problems and possibilities. A report for the Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
Dale, R. (2009). Contexts, constraints and resources in the development of education space and European education policy. In Dale, R. and Robertson, S., eds., Globalisation and Europeanisation in Education. Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. & Derout, J.-L. (2012). The Europeanization of educational policies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(4), 150.Google Scholar
Dale, R. & Robertson, S. (2002). The varying effects of regional organization as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bièvre, D. (2007). Falsification in theory-guided empirical social research: How to change a tire while riding your bicycle. In Gschwend, T. and Schimmelfennig, F., eds., Research Design in Political Science: How to Practice What They Preach. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bièvre, D. & Dür, A. (2005). Constituency interests and delegation in European and American trade policy. Comparative Political Studies, 38(10), 1271–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gruchy, N. (2013) History of the NASUWT 1919–2002. The story of a battling minority. Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
De Ville, F. & Siles-Brügge, G. (2015). The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dean, D. (1998). Circular 10/65 revisited: The labour government and the ‘Comprehensive Revolution’ in 1964–1965. Paedagogica Historica, 34(1), 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D. & Caiani, M. (2007). Europeanization from below? Social movements and Europe. Mobilization, 12(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derouet, J.-L. (1991). Lower secondary education in France: From uniformity to institutional autonomy. European Journal of Education, 26(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsches PISA Konsortium (2013) Die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
DiGaetano, A. & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative urban governance: An integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 356–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiSalvo, D. (2015). Government against Itself: Public Union Power and Its Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M. (2014). Explaining change and inertia in Swedish and French education: A tale of two corporatism? Policy Studies, 35(3), 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, M. (2017). Teacher unionism in France: Making fundamental reform an impossible Quest? In Moe, T. M. and Wiborg, S., eds., The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M. & Martens, K. (2012). Towards an education approach à la Finlandaise? French education policy after PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, D. & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolton, P. & Robson, M. (1996). Trade union concentration and the determination of wages: The case of teachers in England and Wales. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(4), 539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, F. (2008). French school students maintain protests against Sakozy’s education reforms. World Socialist Web Site, April 26. Available at: www.wsws.org (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Duclaud-Wlliams, R. (1983). Centralisation and incremental change in France: The case of the Haby educational reform. British Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, G. & Richardson, J. (1996). Promiscuous and celibate ministerial styles: Policy change, policy networks and British roads policy. Parliamentary Affairs, 49(4), 566–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. (2008a). Interest groups in the European Union: How powerful are they? West European Politics, 31(6), 1212–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. (2008b). Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology. European Union Politics, 9(4), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. (2015). Interest group influence on public opinion: A survey experiment on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Working paper. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/37435468/Duer_PubOpTTIP-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1650078125&Signature=GDWz0itlKLKjwl-kRT-0b0vLNoZamncpukGUx8cAWS7J6wde1mbGfCW6FqBTdxfQ7honRHqZnFbdoqIaHRNqUNfBeBZUeW0eskS0C8R~ZXzVmPV3rhXIqmJZZ8Y~wZ4Ge4d43oT8pLR7mTrdntPbTShzgqNOxBjxVK2TiE3gw0YEM8F4ZMvDx3urPVYlKfaJqmj1GFEwhGUv5Ne5cyteqr0xMDqONE5d4W7thQJ0rySeUTuuGenaeQvoZ1y9SWz19NLH28VVF35cyDjN-qx964GkHiuTszZM3DTL1q3J9kPFvfHPU1CEAulLXUzw9oKtrxLWEo3M-jrKOkxk5-QoOA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Dür, A. & Bièvre, D. (2007). The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. & Mateo, G. (2010). Choosing a bargaining strategy in EU negotiations: Power, preferences, and culture. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. & Mateo, G. (2014). Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. & Mateo, G. (2016). Insider versus Outsiders Interest Group Politics in Multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebinger, F., Grohs, S. & Reiter, R. (2011). The performance of decentralisation strategies compared: An assessment of decentralisation strategies and their impact on local government performance in Germany, France and England. Local Government Studies, 37(5), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edinger, L. J. (1993). Pressure Group Politics in West Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. D. (2007). Access to protection: Domestic institutions and trade policy in democracies. International Organisation, 61(3), 571–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, E. (2004). Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 7(2), 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, E. (2006). Interest groups and social movements. In Vink, M. and Graziano, P., eds., Europeanisation: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
Eising, E. (2007). Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, E. (2008a). Interest groups in EU policy-making. Living Reviews in European Governance, 3(4). Online article. www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, E. (2008b). Clientelism, committees, pluralism and protests in the European Union: Matching patterns? West European Politics, 31(6), 1166–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, R. (2004). Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union. Governance, 17(2), 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, R. (2007). Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgenius, G. & Wennerhag, M. (2018). The changing political landscape in Sweden. Sociologisk Forskning, 55(2/3), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasson, L. J. (2016). The transatlantic trade and investment partnership: Interest groups, public opinion, and policy. In Garcia-Duran, P. and Millet, M., eds., Different Glances at EU Trade Policy. Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Eliasson, L. J. (2019). Transatlantic trade negotiations, civil society campaigns and public opinion. In Dialer, D. and Richter, M., eds., Lobbying in the European Union. Strategies and Techniques. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvander, N. and Holmlund, B. (1997) The Swedish bargaining system in the melting pot: institutions, norms and outcomes in the 1990s. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstituttet.Google Scholar
Erk, J. (2003). Federal Germany and its non-federal society: Emergence of an all-German educational policy in a system of exclusive provincial jurisdiction. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erk, J. (2007). Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertl, H. & Phillips, D. (2000). Interpreting and implementing EU education and training policy: The examples of Germany and Sweden. World Studies in Education, 1(2), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ETUCE (2007). A Voice for European Teachers: 30 Years of ETUCE Action for Europe’s Teachers and Education. Brussels: Trade Union Committee for Education.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013). EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Trade Cross-cutting Disciplines and Institutional Provisions. EU Commission, Initial position paper July, tradoc 151622.Google Scholar
European Commission: Directorate-General for Education and Culture, Directorate-General for Employikment and Social Affairs. (2002) A European Area of LifeLong Learning, Publication Office.Google Scholar
European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (2018) Education and Training Monitor.Google Scholar
Evers, J. & Kneyber, R. (2016). Flip the System: Changing Education from the Ground Up. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evers, A., Van der Heijden, B. & Kreijns, K. (2016). Organizational and task factors influencing teachers’ professional development at work. European Journal of Training and Development, 40, 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exley, S. (2012). The politics of educational policy making under New Labour: An illustration of shifts in public service governance. Policy and Politics, 40(2), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exley, S. & Ball, S. J. (2012) Neo-liberalism and English Education in Turner, D. and Yolcu, H. (eds.) Neo-Liberal Education Reforms: A Critical Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairbass, J. & Jordan, A. (2001). Protecting biodiversity in the European Union: National barriers and European opportunities. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, L. K. (2017). Group Power and Policy Change in Education. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.Google Scholar
Finger, L. K. (2018). Vested Interests and the diffusion of education reform across the states. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, A. & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fomerand, J. (1975). Policy formation and change in Gaullist France. Comparative Politics, 8(1), 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouché, G. (2008). Teachers in France are angry – Sarkozy treats them with scorn. The Guardian, Oct 31. Available at: www.theguardian.com/education/2008/oct/31/france-baccalaureate-sarkozy-strike#:~:text=%22Teachers%20are%20angry.,Trade%20Union%20Federation%20(FSU) (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Franklin, B. M. & MacCulloch, G. (2012). The Death of the Comprehensive High School? Historical, Contemporary, and Comparative Perspectives. Secondary Education in a Changing World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Führ, C. (1997). The German Education System since 1945: Outlines and Problems. Bonn: Inter Nations.Google Scholar
Garritzman, J.L. (2017) How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the opportunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 23(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakakis, D. (2009). The historical and political sociology of the European Union: A uniquely French methodological approach and quest. French Politics, 7(3), 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakakis, D. & Weisbein, J. (2010). From above and from below: A political sociology of European actors. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheyle, N. (2016). Adding fuel to the flames: How TTIP reinvigorated the politicization of trade. In Governance and Integration through Free Trade Agreements. Brussels, Belgium. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8024509 (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Gift, T. & Wibbels, E. (2014). Reading, writing, and the regrettable status of education research in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glänzel, G. (2014). Semi-Autonomous school: Bertelsmann foundation and the largest school development project in German history. In Thümler, E., Bögelein, N., Beller, A. and Anheier, H. K., eds., Philanthropy and Education: Strategies for Impact. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomendio, M. and Wert, J.I. (2023) Dire Straits – Education Reforms: Ideology, vested interests and evidence. OpenBook Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorard, S. (2005). Academies as the ‘future of schooling’: Is this an evidence-based policy? Journal of Educational Policy, 20(3), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornitzka, Å. (2006) The Open Method of Coordination as practice. – A watershed in European education policy? Working paper. No. 16.Google Scholar
Gortanutti, G. (2016). The influence of trade unions and social movements on EU trade policy. Paper presented at: EU Trade Policy at the Crossroads: Between Economic Liberalism and Democratic Challenges, Österreichische Forschungsstiftung für international Entwicklungspolitik, February 4–6.Google Scholar
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R. & Volden, C. (2012). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Policy Studies, 43(3), 673–701.Google Scholar
Gribble, L. (2023) The role of philanthropic foundations in shaping education reform in Germany: A case study using the Bertelsmann, Robert Bosch and Deutsche Telekom foundations. Unpublished Masters’ Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Green, A. (2013). Education and State Formation: Europe, East Asia and the USA, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2001). Welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982–1998: The role of party competition and party consensus. Comparative Political Studies, 34(9), 963–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2002). New management reforms of the Danish and Swedish welfare states: The role of different social democratic responses. Governance: An international Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15(2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest Representation in the European Union, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. & Aspinwall, M. (1998). Collective Action in the European Union: Interests and the New Politics of Associability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grossman, E. & Saurugger, S. (2004). Challenging French interest groups: The state, Europe and the international political system. French Politics, 2(2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, K. H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-shock’: Some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD’s PISA study on the German education system. In Ertl, H., ed., Cross-national Attraction in Education: Accounts from England and Germany. London: Symposium Books, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar
Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (1996). The European Trade Union Committee for education: Opening the door to social dialogue. Industrielle Beziehungen / The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 3(1), 80–101.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, L. R. (2012). What did you learn in school today? How ideas mattered for policy changes in Danish and Swedish Schools 1990–2011. PhD Dissertation. Aarhus University: Forlaget Politica.Google Scholar
Hanberger, A. (2016) Evaluation in local school governance: A Framework for analysis. Education Inquiry. 7(3), 217–236.Google Scholar
Hahn, H. J. (1998). Education and Society in Germany. Hamburg: Berg.Google Scholar
Håkansson, J. & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2021). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of Educational Change, 23, 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halffman, W. (2005). Science-policy boundaries: National styles?. Science and Public Policy, 32(6), 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (1993). Pluralism and pressure politics in France. In Richardson, J. J., ed., Pressure Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Butler, M. J. & Benington, J. (2002). Local government modernization: UK and comparative analysis from an organizational perspective. Public Management Review, 4(3), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartney, M. & Flavin, P. (2011). From the schoolhouse to the statehouse: Teacher union political activism and US state education reform policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 11(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartney, M. T. (2022). How Policies Make Interest Groups: Governments, Unions, and American Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartney, M. T. (2023). Teachers’ unions and school board elections; a reassessment. In Anzia, S., ed. Interest Groups in U.S. Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hartong, S. (2012). Overcoming resistance to change: PISA, school reform in Germany and the example of Lower Saxony. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, R. (2011). The conservative-liberal democrat coalition government’s ‘free schools’ in England. Educational Review, 63(4), 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearnden, A. (1976). Education, Culture and Politics in West Germany. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, A. J. (1974). The politics of educational reform: Explaining different outcomes of school comprehensivization attempts in Sweden and West Germany. Comparative Education Review, 18(3), 388–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenheimer, A. J. (1977). Achieving equality through educational expansion: Problems in the Swedish experience. Comparative Political Studies, 10(3), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenheimer, A. J. (1978). Major reforms of the Swedish Education System 1950–1975. World Bank staff working paper, no. 290. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Heinemann, M. (1977). Der Lehrer und seine Organisation. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Helboe Pedersen, H. (2013). Is measuring interest group influence a mission impossible? The case of interest group influence in the Danish parliament. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, A. (2018). Academies and Free Schools in England: A History and Philosophy of the Gove Act. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. (1998). The study of the European Union II: The ‘new governance’ agenda and its rivals. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. (2005). The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hodson, D. & Mahler, I. (2001). The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy co‐ordination. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, O. H. & van der Pijl, K. (2003). Structure and process in transnational European business. In Cafruny, A. W. and Ryner, M., eds., A Ruined Fortress? Neoliberal Hegemony and Transformation of Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. (2003). Understanding networks for innovation in policy and practice. In OECD, ed., Networks for Innovation: Towards New Models for Managing Schools and Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 153–164.Google Scholar
Hudson, C. (2007). Governing the governance of education: The state strikes back? European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, C. & Lidström, A. (2002). Local Education Policies: Comparing Sweden and Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husén, T. (1962). Problems of Differentiation in Swedish Compulsory Schooling. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget.Google Scholar
Husén, T. (1965). Educational change in Sweden. Comparative Education, 1(3), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imig, D. & Sidney, T. (2001). Mapping the Europeanization of contestation: Evidence from a quantitative data analysis. In Imig, D. and Tarrow, S., eds., Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
Isling, Å. (1980). Kampen för och emot en demokratisk skola. Stockholm: Sober.Google Scholar
Jakobi, A. P, Martens, K. & Wolf, K. D. (2010). Education in Political Science: Discovering a Neglected Field. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarl, M. & Rönnberg, L. (2010). Skolpolitik. Från riksdagshus till klassrum. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Judge, H. (2001). Three countries: Catholic schools in France today. In Judge, H., ed., Faith-based Schools and the State: Catholics in America, France and England. Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
Keeler, J. & Hall, P. A. (2001). Interest representation and the politics of protest. In Guyomarch, A., Marchin, H., Hall, P. and Hayward, J., eds., Developments in French Politics II. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar
Keiser, A & Vogel, S. (2017). Dynamic de/centralisation in Germany, 1949–2010. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(1), 84–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, A. (2017). The membership development of Swedish trade unions and union confederations since the end of the nineteenth century. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility. Department of Sociology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Klingenschmitt, K.-P (1997). Lehrer in Hessen proben den Aufstand. Taz Archiv. Taz.de. Available at: https://taz.de/Archiv-Suche/!1393604&s=Lehrer%2Bin%2BHessen%2Bproben%2Bden%2BAufstand&SuchRahmen=Print/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Klitgaard, M. B. (2007a). Why are they doing it? Social democracy and market-oriented welfare state reforms. West European Politics, 30(1), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, M. B. (2007b). Do welfare state regimes determine public sector reforms? Choice reforms in American, Swedish and German schools. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(4), 444–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, MB (2008), School vouchers and the new politics of the welfare state. Governance. An international journal of policy, administration, and institutions. 21(4), 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H. (2010). Europeanization of lobbying activities: When national interest groups spill over to the European level. European Integration, 32(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H., Braun, C. & Beyers, J. (2015). Legislative lobbying in context: Towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KMK, Kultusministerkonferenz (2011). The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany 2010/2011. A Description of the Responsibilities, Structures and Developments in Education Policy for the Exchange of Information in Europe. Bonn: KMK.Google Scholar
Knodel, P., Martens, K. & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: Exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11(3), 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. (1975). Educational Policy-Making: A Study of Interest Groups and Parliament. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, H.-G. (2003) Discrepancies between intended and achieved effects of school evaluation in international comparative perspective: empirical evidence and recommendations. Comparative and International Education Review. 71, 126–142.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. & Kynast, B. (2014). Impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) on the Legal Framework for Public services in Europe. Dortmund: Hans Böckler Stiftung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Tresch, A. & Jochum, M. (2007). Going public in the European Union: Action repertoires of Western European collective political actors. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, I. (2010). France: Teachers, student march against education cuts. World Socialist Website, March 17. Available at: www.wsws.org/en/articles/2010/03/fran-m17.html (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Kynaston, D. & Green, F. (2019). Engines of Privilege: Britain’s Private School Problem. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoma, E. (2009). The municipal takeover of the school system. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration No. 2011:2, March 11. Available at: https://swoba.hhs.se/hastba/papers/hastba2011_002.pdf (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Landman, T. (2008). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. Florence: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, B. & Alexiadou, N. (2010). Policy learning and governance of education policy in the EU. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Å. (2014). Staten får inte abdikera. Skolvärlden, February 10. Available at: https://skolvarlden.se/artiklar/staten-far-inte-abdikera (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Larsen, L. H. (2014). The Marketisation and Privatisation of Education through the EU’s ‘New Generation’ Free Trade Agreements. MA thesis, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Lawn, M. (1985a). The Politics of Teacher Unionism: International Perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lawn, M. (1985b). Teachers in dispute: The Portsmouth and West Ham strikes. History of Education, 14(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, M. & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education: Governing a New Policy Space. Oxford: Symposium Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, M. & Lindgard, M. (2002). Constructing a European policy space in educational governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, M. & Normand, R. (2014). Shaping of European Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerougetel, A. (2009). France: Teachers and students mobilise to defend education. World Socialist Website, November 25. Available at: www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/11/fran-n25.html (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Lewis, H. D. (1985). The French Education System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. & Crepaz, M. M. (1991). Corporatism and consensus democracy in eighteen countries. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilja, P. (2014). A quest for legitimacy: On the professionalisation policies of Sweden’s teacher unions. Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, J. & Rothstein, B. (2006). Sweden: The fall of the strong state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, J. & Sebring, J. (2005). Policy reform and the decline of corporatism in Sweden. West European Politics, 28(5), 1057–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, C. and Serder, M. (2020) Is PISA more important to school reforms than educational research? The selective use of authoritative references in media and in parliamentary debates. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. 6(3), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralisation, deregulation, quasi-markets – and then what? Journal of Educational Policy, 17(6), 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, L. (2005). A matter of self-governance and control: The reconstruction of Swedish education policy: 1980–2003. European Education, 37(1), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, L., Arreman, I E, Holm, As. and Lundström, U. (2013) Educational marketization the Swedish way. Educational Inquiry. 4(3), 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabut, P. (2011). French teachers protest against savage reduction in teaching posts. World Socialist Website, September 30. Available at: www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/09/fran-s30.html (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Mäding, H. (1989). Federalism and education planning in the Federal Republic of Germany. The Journal of Federalism, 19(4), 115–131.Google Scholar
Mahoney, C. (2004). The power of institutions: State and interest group activity in the European Union. European Union Politics, 5(4), 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, C. & Baumgartner, F. (2008). Converging perspectives on interest group research in Europe and America. West European Politics, 31(6), 1253–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., eds., Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2006). Political parties and party systems. In Graziano, P. and Vink, M. P., eds., Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 154–166.Google Scholar
Male, T. (2019). Governance in multi-academy trusts (MATs) – Evidence from the field. Proceedings of ECER 2019, European Educational Research Association (EERA). Hamburg: Germany, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Male, T. (2021). School Autonomy in England. The impact on democracy. Paper presented at International Conference on Educational Leadership & Management (Virtual), 18 March 2021.Google Scholar
Male, T. (2021) School Autonomy in England – the impact on democracy. In: Proceedings of the Educational Leadership for Public Accountability. The Institute for Educational Administration and Leadership.Google Scholar
Maloney, W. A., Jordan, G. & McLaughlin, A. M. (1994). Interest groups and public policy: The insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manger, M. S. (2009). Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzer, R. A. (1970). Teachers and Politics: The Role of the National Union of Teachers in the Making of National Educational Policy in England and Wales Since 1944. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Marklund, S. (1980). Skolsverige 1950–1975 från reform till reform D. 1, 1950 års reformbeslut. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Marklund, S. (1984). Skolan förr och nu: 50 år av utveclking. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Marks, G. & McAdam, D. (1996). Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. In Marks, G., Scharpf, F. W., Schmitter, P. C. and Streeck, W., eds., Governance in the European Union. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D. (1983). Introduction: Interest groups in Britain: Their access and power. In Marsh, D., ed., Pressure Politics: Interest Groups in Britain. London: Junction Books, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. London: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, K & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22(3), 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. & Ross, G. (2001). Trade union organizing at the European level: The dilemma of borrowed resources. In Imig, D. and Tarrow, S., eds., Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 233–251.Google Scholar
Matringe, G. (2005). Le conceil pedagogique dans Les EPLE, pp. 1–33. Available at: www.inrp.fr.Google Scholar
Mazy, S. & Richardson, J. (2005). Interest groups and EU policy-making: Organisational logic and venue shopping. In Richardson, J., ed., European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 247–269.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. (2016). British Labour Party education policy and comprehensive education: From Learning to Live to Circular 10/65. History of Education, 45(2), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclloy, J. (1998). The enduring alliance? Trade unions and the making of New Labour, 1994–1997. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(4), 537–564.Google Scholar
Milner, A. (2017) Bridging the divide: Examining Professional unity and the extended teacher union role in Sweden. Educational Policy. 32(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education and Research (2016). OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resources Use in Schools (School Resources Review). Country Background Report: Sweden. Sweden: Ministry of Education and Research. Available at: www.oecd.org/education/school/CBR_OECD_SRR_SE-FINAL.pdf (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, T. M. (2011). Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America’s Public Schools. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (2015). Vested interests and political institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 130(2), 277–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, T.M. (2019) The Politics of Institutional Reform. Katrina, Education, and the Second Face of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, T. M. & Wiborg, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Comparative Politics of Education. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. & Wiborg, S. (2017). The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mons, N. & Pons, X. (2009). The reception of PISA in France. Knowledge and regulation of the educational system. Report for the Know&Pol project. Paris: Sciences Po, Observatoire Sociologique du Changement.Google Scholar
Montin, S. (2000). Between fragmentation and coordination: The changing role of local government in Sweden. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Morin, J. F., Novotn á, T., Ponjaert, F. & Telò, M. (2015). The Politics of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations TTIP in a Globalized World. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mosher, J. & Trubek, D. (2003). EU governance, EU employment policy, and the European social model. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(1), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, G. (2004). Changing practice: The national literacy strategy and the politics of literacy policy. Literacy, 38(3), 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutsios, S. (2007). The European Union and its education policy. In Kotthoff, H.-G. and Moutsios, S., eds., Education Policies in Europe: Economy, Citizenship, Diversity. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Moutsios, S. (2010). Power, politics and transnational policy-making in education. Journal of Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Union of Teachers (1987). Grant Maintained Schools: The Response of the National Unions of Teachers to the Government’s Consultative Document. London: NUT.Google Scholar
Nikolai, Briken and Nieman, D. (2017) Teacher Unionism in Germany. Fragmented Competitors. In Moe, M.T. and Wiborg, S. (eds.) The Comparative Politics of Education. Teachers Unions and education systems around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolai, R. (2018). Schulpolitik im Wandel. Berlin: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolai, R. (2019). After German reunification: The implementation of a two-tier school model in Berlin and Saxony. History of Education, 48(3), 374–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolai, R. & Dobbins, M. (2019). Der Einfluss von Lehrkräfteverbänden in der Steuerung von Schulsystemen: Deutschland und Frankrich im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 65(4), 564–583.Google Scholar
Nikolai, R. & Koinzer, T. (2017). Long tradition, moderate distribution and growing importance: Private schools in Germany as ‘Change Agents’ of school choice. In Koinzer, T., Nikolai, R. and Waldow, F., eds., Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education: Global Change and National Challenge. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolai, R., Briken, K. & Niemann, D. (2017). Teacher unionism in Germany: Fragmented competitors. In Moe, T. M. and Wiborg, S., eds., The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–143.Google Scholar
Nixdorf, P. (1969). The pace of West German educational reform as affected by land politics. PhD thesis. University of Florida, Departments of Politics.Google Scholar
Nordholm, D., Arnqvist, A. & Nihlfors, E. (2021). Sense-making of autonomy and control: Comparing school leaders in public and independent schools in a Swedish case. Journal of Educational Change, 23, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, R. (2010). Expertise, networks and indicators: The construction of the European strategy in education. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, R. (2012). School improvement and accountability in France: Timid changes, big hopes. In Lindqvist, U. and Pettersson, S., eds., Create Learning for All – What Matters? – CIDREE Yearbook 2012. Stockholm: National Agency for Education/Skolverket, pp. 164–176.Google Scholar
Normand, R. (2015). French principals in secondary education: Towards new roles and responsibilities? Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 11, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, R. (2016). France: Between civil service and republican ethics: The statist vision of leadership among French principals. In Ärlestig, H., Day, C. and Johansson, O., eds., A Decade of Research on School Principals: Cases from 24 Countries. New York: Springer, pp. 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, R. & Deroeut, J.-L. (2017). A European Politics of Education: Perspectives from Sociology, Policy Studies and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nóvoa, A. & Lawn, M. (2002). Fabricating Europe: The Formation of an Education Space. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’TooleJr, L. J. & Meier, K. J. (2014). Public management, context, and performance: In quest of a more general theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, P., Svensson, T., Christiansen, P. M., Nørgaard, A. S., Rommetvedt, H. & Thesen, G. (2011). Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition, 46(3), 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015). Improving Schools in Sweden: An OECD Perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2018). How decentralised are education systems, and what does it mean for schools? Education Indicators in Focus, No. 64. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Östros, T. (2003). Lika rätt till kunskap är förutsättningar för jämlikhet. Skolboken. Tankesmedjan ide & tendens.Google Scholar
Patashnik, E.M. (2008) Reforms at risk. What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paulston, R. G. (1968). Educational Change in Sweden: Planning and Accepting the Comprehensive School Reforms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. H. (2013). Is measuring interest group influence mission impossible? The case of interest group influence in the Danish parliament. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, G. (2007) Min väg, mina val. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. (2003). Policy networks. In Wiener, A. and Diez, T., eds., European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–136.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-Making in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. (1992). Transitions and traditions: Educational developments in the New Germany in their historical context. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 2(1), 121–136.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. (2010). The enduring nature of the tripartite system of secondary schooling in Germany: Some explanations. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(4), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. (2015) Investigating Education in Germany. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2011). The welfare state over the very long run (No. 02/2011). Universität Bremen, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik (ZeS), Bremen.Google Scholar
Pollit, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – into the Age of Austerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poloni-Staudinger, L. M. (2008). The domestic opportunity structure and supranational activity: An explanation of environmental group activity at the European Union level. European Union Politics, 9(4), 531–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, X. (2016). Tracing the French policy PISA debate: A policy configuration approach. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 580–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, X., Zanten, A. V. & Costa, S. D. (2015). The national management of public and Catholic schools in France: Moving from a loosely coupled towards and integrated system? Comparative Education, 51(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, S. & Whitty, G. (1999) New Labour’s education policy: first, second or third way? Journal of Educational Policy. 14(5), 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princen, S. & Kerreman, B. (2008). Opportunity structures in the EU multilevel system. West European Politics, 31(6), 1129–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, S.-O. & Slapin, J. B. (2010). Parliamentary questions and oversight in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radtke, F.-O. & Weiß, M. (2000). Schulautonomie, Wohlfahrtsstaat und Chancengleichheit. Ein Studienbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangvid, B. S. (2008). Private school diversity in Denmark’s national voucher system. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raschert, J. (1980). Bildungspolitik im cooperative Foederalismus in Bildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: MPI, 103–215.Google Scholar
Reay, D. (2008). Tony Blair, the promotion of the ‘active’ educational citizen, and middle-class hegemony. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, RAW (1990) The hollowing out of state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. Political Quarterly.65(2)Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (1983). Drömmen om en ny skola. Idéer och realiteter I svensk skolpolitik 1945–1950. Skara: LiberFörlag.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (2010). Svensk utbildningshistoria – Skola och Samhälle förr och nu. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (1993). Interest group behaviour in Britain: Continuity and change. Pressure Groups, 48, 86–99.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2000). Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies, 48(5), 1006–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. (2005). Policy-making in the EU: Interests, ideas and garbage cans in the primeval Soup. In Richardson, J., ed., European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2013). Policy Styles in Western Europe (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. (2018) The changing British Policy Style: From Governance to Government? Br Polit. (13): 215–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringarp, J. (2016) PISA lends legitimacy: A study of education policy changes in Germany and Sweden after 2000. European Educational Research Journal. 15(4), 377–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringarp, J. & Rothland, M. (2010). Is the grass always greener? The effect of the PISA results on education debates in Sweden and Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringarp, J. & Waldow, F. (2016). From ‘silent borrowing’ to international argument – legitimating Swedish educational policy from 1945 to the present day. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 16(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1999). State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan: Based on Selected Works. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rönnberg, L. (2007). A recent Swedish attempt to weaken the State control and strengthen school autonomy: The experiment with local time schedules. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosamund, B. (2001). Discourses of globalisation and European identities. In Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K. E. and Wiener, A., eds., The Social Construction of Europe, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1992). Den korporativa staten: interesseorganisationer ocj statsförvaltning i svensk politik. Stockholm: Nordstedts juidik.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1996). The Social Democratic State: The Swedish Model and the Bureaucratic Problem of Social Reforms. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Runnquist, G. & Edblad, I. F. (2007). School inspection in Sweden – Seen from the teachers’ union’s – Lärarförbundet’s – Perspective. In Kotthoff, H.-G. and Böttcher, W., eds., Schulinspektion: Evaluation, Rechenschaftllegung un Qualitätsentwicklund. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Rycroft-Smith, L. & Dutaut, J. L. (2018). Flip the System UK: A Teachers’ Manifesto. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salter, B. & Tapper, T. (1981). Education Politics and the State: The Theory and Practice of Educational Change. London: Grant McIntyre.Google Scholar
Sammons, P. (2008). Zero tolerance of failure and New Labour approaches to school improvement in England. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, K. (2015). Understanding comprehensive school reforms: Insights from comparative-historical sociology and power resources theory. European Educational Research Journal, 14(3–4), 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, K. (2022) The politics of comprehensive school reforms: Cleavages and coalitions. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saurugger, S. (2008). Interest groups and democracy in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(6), 1274–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2002). The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. (1990). Democratising France: The Political and Administrative History of Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. (1996). Loosening the ties that bind: The impact of European integration on French Government and its relationship to business. In Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(2), 223–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. (2000). The changing dynamics of State-Society relations in the Fifth Republic. In Elgie, R., ed., The Changing French Political System. London: Frank Cass, pp. 141–166.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. (1999). National patterns of governance under Siege: The impact of European integration. In Kohler-Koch, B. and Eising, R., eds., The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 155–172.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Discussion paper 99/1, Cologne: Germany.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. & Brende, B. (2014). The Europe 2020 Competitiveness Report: Building a More Competitive Europe. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Seifert, R. V. (1987). Teacher Militancy: A History of Teacher Strikes 1896–1987. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Seldon, A. (1986). The Riddle of the Voucher: An Inquiry into the Obstacles to Introducing Choice and Competition in State Schools. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Sellers, J. M. & Lidström, A. (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(4), 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, B. (1991). Education and the Social Order, 1940–1990. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1995) Pressure Politics. Manchester: Baseline Books.Google Scholar
Sorensen, T. B., Grimaldi, E. & Gajderowich, T. (2021). Rhetoric or Game Changer: Social Dialog and Industrial Relations Midst EU Governance and Privatisation in Europe. Brussels: European Trade Union Committee for Education.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (2021) Comprehensive education and teachers’ unions. The puzzle of why comprehensive education has never been established in Austria. An analysis of Austrian vested interests. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Stéger, C. (2014). Review and analysis of the EU teacher-related policies and activities. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, H. (2014). Promoting Racial Literacy in Schools: Differences that Make a Difference. New York and London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. (2015). Teacher unionism in changing times: Is this real ‘new unionism’. Journal of School Choice, 9(4), 604–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, H. & Mercer, J. (2015). Education reform in England and the emergence of social movement unionism: The National Union of Teachers in England. In Bascia, N., ed., Teacher Unions in Public Education: Politics, History, and the Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H., Milner, A. & Winchip, E. (2018). Strengthening the Capacity of Education Trade Unions to Represent Teachers’ Professional Needs in Social Dialog. Brussels: European Trade Union Committee for Education.Google Scholar
Strath, A. (2004). Teacher Policy Reforms in Sweden: The Case of Individualised Pay. International Institute for Educational Planning, Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Striebing, C. (2018). Foundations in Germany: Primary and secondary education. American Behavioural Scientist, 62(12), 1670–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2015). Politics as organized combat. New players and new riles of the game in Sweden. MPIfG discussion paper 15/2. Max-Planck-Institut Für Gesellschaftforschung.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S (2016) Politics as organised combat – New players and new rules of the game in Sweden, New Political Economy. 21(6): 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S., Garsten, G. & Rothstien, B. (2015). Makt uten mandate: De policyprofessionella i svensk politik. Stockholm: Dialogos.Google Scholar
Symeonidis, V. (2018). Revisiting the European teacher education area: The transformation of teacher education policies and practices in Europe. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(3), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E.R. (1965) Doubts from the Joint Four. The School Master. 16 July.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2002). The silver age of the welfare state: Perspectives on resilience. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teravainen-Goff, A. (2019). Literacy and financial capability: An evidence review. National Literacy Trust Research Report. National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Terrier, C. (2015). Why French school curriculum and timetable reforms forced teachers onto the streets. The Conversation, May 22. Available at: https://theconversation.com/why-french-school-curriculum-and-timetable-reforms-forced-teachers-onto-the-streets-42193 (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Tesseyman, A. J. (1999). The New Right Think Tanks and Policy Change in the UK. DPhil thesis. University of York, Politics Department.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thränhardt, D. (1990). Politik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Töller, A. E. (2010). Measuring and comparing the Europeanization of public policies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 413–440.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulowitzki, P. (2013). Leadership and school improvement in France. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(6), 812–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verger, A., Altinyelken, H. K. & Novelli, M. (Eds.). (2018). Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C. & Zancajo, A. (2016). The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Verger, A., Novelli, M. & Altinyelken, H. K. (2012). Global education policy and international development: An introductory framework. In A. Verger, H.K. Altinyelken, M Novelli, eds., Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Volante, L. (2017). The PISA Effect on Global Educational Governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volante, L. & Ritzen, J. (2016). The European Union, education governance and international surveys. Policy Futures in Education, 14(7), 988–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldow, F. (2009). What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the ‘PISA-shock’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkenhorst, H. (2008). Explaining change in EU education policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 567–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, R. E. (1974). Change in French education. West European Education, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
Warren, M. (2011). Schools shut as teachers stage mass walk-out. The Local fr, September 27. Available at: www.thelocal.fr/20110927/1296/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Weale, S. (2019). Academisation rebellion: Parents resist school takeovers. The Guardian, May 5. Available at: www.theguardian.com/education/2019/may/05/academisation-rebellion-parents-resist-school-takeovers#:~:text=A%20wave%20of%20resistance%20by,and%20beyond%2C%20according%20to%20campaigners. (Accessed 15 April 2022).Google Scholar
Weiler, H. N. (1988) The politics of aborted reform: Education and the legitimacy of the state in France and West Germany. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Weiler, H. N. (1989). Why reforms fail: The politics of education in France and the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, H. A. (2014). Education, federalism and the 2013 Bundestag elections. German Politics, 23(4), 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A. (2014). Academies in England and independent schools (fritstående skolor) in Sweden: Policy, privatisation, access, and segregation. Research Papers in Education, 29(3), 330–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A. (2015). Education policy and governance in England under the Coalition Government (2010–1015): Academies, the pupil premium, and free early education. London Review of Education, 13(2), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A. & Bailey, E. (2013). The development of the academies programme: ‘privatising’ school-based education in England 1986–2013. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A. & Pennell, H. (2002). How new is New Labour? The quasi-market and English schools 1997 to 2001. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(2), 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A., Allmendinger, J., Nikolai, R. & Barham, E. (2010). Decentralisation and achievement in Germany and the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(3), 450–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, G. (2008). Twenty years of progress?: English education policy 1988 to the present. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, G. & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2009). Education and Social Integration: The Development of Comprehensive Schooling in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2010). Swedish Free Schools: Do they Work? (Vol. 18). London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2010) Why is there no comprehensive education in Germany? A historical explanation. History of Education. 39(4), pp. 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980–2011. Comparative Education, 48(2), 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2015). Privatizing education: Free School policy in Sweden and England. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2017a). Teacher unions in England: The end is nigh?. In Moe, T. M. and Wiborg, S., eds., The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–86.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2017b). Teacher unions in the Nordic Countries: Solidarity and the politics of self-interest. In Moe, T. M. and Wiborg, S., eds., The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–191.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S. & Larsen, K. R. (2017). Why school choice reforms in Denmark fail: The blocking power of the teacher union. European Journal of Education, 52(1), 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, M. (2006). Kunskapens fanbärare. Den goda läraren som diskursiv konstruktion på en mediaarena. Dotorsavhnadling. Örebro Studies Education 17.Google Scholar
Wilde, S. (2002). Secondary education in Germany 1990–2000: ‘One decade of non-reform in unified German education?’ Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, J, Green, F., Taylor-Gooby, P., Wiborg, S. (2016) Private schools and the provision of public benefit. Journal of Social Policy. 45(2), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkoszewski, H. & Sundy, E. (2016). From hard to soft governance in multi-level education systems. European Journal of Education, 1(4), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. L. (1987). Interest-Group Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, F. & Kraemer, A. (2012). On the electoral relevance of education policy in the German Länder. German Politics, 21(4), 444–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woll, C. (2009). The demise of the Statism?. In Brouard, S., Appleton, A. M. and Mazur, A., eds., The French Fifth Republic at Fifty: Beyond Stereotypes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 226–246.Google Scholar
Wollmann, H. (2008). Reforming local leadership and local democracy: The cases of England, Sweden, Germany and France in comparative perspective. Local Government Studies, 34(2), 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollmann, H. (2012). Local government reforms in (Seven) European countries: Between convergent and divergent, conflicting and complementary developments. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonka, A., Baumgartner, F. R., Mahoney, C. & Berkhout, J. (2010). Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population. European Union Politics, 11(3), 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, R. (1999). Institutions, the CDU and policy change: Explaining German economic policy in the 1980s. German Politics, 8(3), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2003). Partisan politics, party competition and veto players: German economic policy in the Kohl Era. Journal of Public Policy, 23(2), 123–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Susanne Wiborg, University College London
  • Book: Who Controls Education?
  • Online publication: 26 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009581134.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Susanne Wiborg, University College London
  • Book: Who Controls Education?
  • Online publication: 26 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009581134.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Susanne Wiborg, University College London
  • Book: Who Controls Education?
  • Online publication: 26 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009581134.007
Available formats
×