Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:39:02.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Religion

from PART II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Steven H. Shiffrin
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter, I argued that the Court's libertarian approach to speech protection faltered when it was called upon to protect the speech that matters the most. In other words, it casts a blind eye upon the needs of the subordinated, the vulnerable, and the minority. Just as the Court is not sufficiently sensitive to the importance of protecting those who use speech to dissent, the Court is insensitive to those whose religions mark them out as different from others. First, in the absence of malicious intent, the Court has developed a constitutional doctrine that does little to protect religious liberty. In addition, in the system of freedom of expression, the Court permits government speech about religion that marginalizes the nonreligious and those of minority religions. In many of the chapters we considered in Part I, I suggested that better approaches could be found in other Western countries. But here, European approaches in this area are differentiated and disappointing. On the whole, those approaches are somewhat worse than those taken in the United States.

The First Amendment addresses religion in two ways. First, it protects the free exercise of religion. Second, it prohibits the establishment of religion by the state. Taken together, these clauses should protect important values. Ideally, the Free Exercise Clause would stand for religious liberty, particularly freedom of conscience; it also would protect equality by guarding against discrimination on the basis of religion; it would safeguard freedom of religious association, which is vital to many forms of free exercise; it would bind together a strong political community committed to protecting religious freedom. The Establishment Clause should also promote important values many of which are also supported by the Free Exercise Clause.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Religion
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Religion
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Religion
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.010
Available formats
×