Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:45:17.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Liam Murphy
Liam Murphy
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
What Makes Law
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law
 , pp. 189 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 2010. The Decline and Fall of the American Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew. 2006. “Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition.” Northwestern University Law Review, 100: 719–805.Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew, and Himma, Kenneth Einar. 2009. The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. 1997. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110: 1359–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. 2002. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip. 2002. “Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann.” European Journal of International Law 13: 815–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Jose. 2005. International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose 2008. “The Factors Driving and Constraining the Incorporation of International Law into WTO Adjudication.” In The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries, edited by Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria, and Yanovich, Alan, 611–34. Hunington: Juris Publishing.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1990. “On the Source of the Authority of the State.” In Authority, edited by Joseph Raz, 142–73. New York, New York University Press.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1988. St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics, translated and edited by Sigmund, Paul E.. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1991. On Rhetoric. Translated by Kennedy, George A.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. Of Laws in General, edited by Hart, H. L. A.. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy 2010. Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, edited by Schofield, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George. 2007. “The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law.” Stanford Law Review 60: 595–632.Google Scholar
Isaiah, Berlin. 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. 2010. “Theorizing the Sources of International Law.” In Besson and John Tasioulas, 163–86.
Samantha, Besson, and Tasioulas, John, eds. 2010. The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bix, Brian H. 2005. “Raz, Authority, and Conceptual Analysis.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 50: 311–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–9. Commentaries on the Laws of England.
Brink, David O. 1988. “Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 17: 105–48.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2007. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics and International Affairs 20: 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke-White, William. 2005. “International Legal Pluralism.” Michigan Journal of International Law 25: 963–80.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tom D. 1996. The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism. Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tom D. 2004. Prescriptive Legal Positivism: Law, Rights and Democracy. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tom D. 2005. “Prescriptive Conceptualism: Comments on Liam Murphy, ‘Concepts of Law.’” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30:20–9.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2005. International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David. 2011. “Verbal Disputes.” Philosophical Review 120: 515–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2011. “Capitalism, Freedom and the Proletariat.” In On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice and other Essays in Political Philosophy, edited by Otsuka, Michael, 147–65. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 2001a. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. ed. 2001b. Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 2011. “The Architecture of Jurisprudence.” Yale Law Journal 121: 2–80.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L., and Simchen, Ori. 2003. “Law.” Legal Theory 9: 1–41.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, and Nevill, Penelope. 2012. “Relations between International Courts and Tribunals: The ‘Regime Problem.’” In Young 2012, 235–60.
Crawford, James, and Olleson, Simon. 2010. “The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility.” In International Law, edited by Evans, Malcolm D., 445–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, and Watkins, Jeremy. 2010. “International Responsibility.” In Besson and Tasioulas 2010, 283–98.
Cruft, Rowan, Kramer, Matthew H., and Reiff, Mark R., eds. 2011. Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Anthony Duff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Davis, Kevin. 2004. “What Can the Rule of Law Variable Tell Us about Rule of Law Reforms?” Michigan Journal of International Law 26:141–61.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne. 2010. “The EU, the European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi.” Harvard International Law Journal 51:1–49.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie. 2001. Evaluation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie 2007. “Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27: 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Julie 2008. “How Many Legal Systems? Some Puzzles Regarding the Identity Conditions of, and Relations between, Legal Systems in the European Union.” Problema 2: 9–50.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 2007. Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 2006. Democracy: A History. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1996. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2006. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2013. “A New Philosophy for International Law.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 4: 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 1997. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2000. “Form and Substance in the Rule of Law.” In Judicial Review & The Constitution, edited by Forsyth, Christopher, 141–72. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2006. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2007. “The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle.” In Ronald Dworkin, edited by Ripstein, Arthur, 56–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2010. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2012. “Hobbes on the Authority of Law.” In Hobbes and the Law, edited by Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, 186–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 1998. Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2004. “State of the Art.” Legal Theory 10: 215–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2006. “The Virtue of Law-Abidance.” Philosophers’ Imprint 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2010. “Political Authority, Moral Powers and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1979. “Causation and Corrective Justice: A Reply to Two Critics.” Journal of Legal Studies 8: 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1967. “Blackstone’s Theoretical Intentions.” Natural Law Forum 12: 163–83.Google Scholar
Finnis, John 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John 1984. “The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 1: 115–37.Google Scholar
Finnis, John 1996. “The Truth in Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, edited by George, Robert P., 195–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John 2003. “Law and What I Truly Should Decide.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48:107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary & Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 2004. “Water’s Water Everywhere.” Review of Kripke: Names, Necessity and Identity by Hughes, Christopher. London Review of Books, October 21, 17–19.
Fuller, Lon. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1955. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John. 2001. “Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 46:199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John 2012. “How Law Claims, What Law Claims.” In Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy, edited by Klatt, Matthias, 29–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garzón Valdés, Ernesto. 1998. “Two Models of Legal Validity: Hans Kelsen and Francisco Suárez.” In Paulson and Paulson, 1998, 263–72.
Goldsmith, Jack, and Levinson, Daryl. 2009. “Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law.” Harvard Law Review 122: 1791–1868.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A.. 2005. The Limits of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golove, David. 2005–6. “Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner’s The Limits of International Law.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 34:333–77.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1988. The Authority of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie 1999. “Positivism and Conventionalism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie 2010. “Law as a Means.” In The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Cane, Peter, 169–87. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1989. Conflicts of Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark. 2011. “The Standard Picture and Its Discontents.” In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1, edited by Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian, 39–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2002. “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law.” California Law Review 90: 1826–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jϋrgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hand, Learned. 1952. “How Far Is a Judge Free in Rendering a Decision,” in The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand103–10. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1982. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71 (1958): 593–629. Reprinted in Hart 1984, 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1982. Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1984. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, and Shapiro, Scott J.. 2011. “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law.” Yale Law Journal 121: 252–349.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas. 2002. “Questions about Kant’s Opposition to Revolution.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 36: 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth. 2002. “Inclusive Legal Positivism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, edited by Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, 125–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan.
Hobbes, Thomas (1681) 1971. A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, edited by Cropsey, Joseph. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert. 2007. “The Concept of Odious Debt in Public International Law.” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Discussion Paper, No. 185. .
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti. 2010. “Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters.” Global Policy 1: 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. 1897. “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10: 457–78.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1978. 2nd ed. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Selby-Bigge, L.A., 2nd ed. revised by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1994. “Of the Original Contract.” In Hume, David, “Political Writings,” edited by Warner, Stuart D. and Livingston, Donald W., 164–81.
International Law Commission. 2006a. “Conclusions of the work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law.” UN Doc. A/61/10, para. 251.
International Law Commission 2006b. “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law,” Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.
Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: In Defense of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1928. “Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism.” Reprinted in Kelsen 2006, 391–446.
Kelsen, Hans 1967. Pure Theory of Law. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1973. “Law and Morality.” In Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy, edited by Weinberger, Ota and translated by Heath, Peter, 83–94. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 2000. “On the Essence and Value of Democracy.” In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, edited by Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard, translated by Cooper, Belinda, 84–109. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 2006. General Theory of Law and State. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89:1685–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1998. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1999. “Foreword: Is the Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals a Systemic Problem?” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31:679–96.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict 2003. “Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law.” In East Asian and European Perspectives on International Law, edited by Stolleis, Michael and Yanagihara, Masaharu, 139–78. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict 2009. “The Concept of Law in Global Administrative Law.” European Journal of International Law 20: 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard. 2005. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 15–61.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” Yale Law Journal 106: 2599–2695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis. 2004. “Governance Structures, Legal Systems, and the Concept of Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 79: 355–81.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis Unpublished Manuscript. “Designing Collegial Courts.” Last revised 2012. Adobe pdf file.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2002. “The Lady Doth Protest Too Much: Kosovo and the Return to Ethics in International Law.” Modern Law Review 65: 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2012. “Hegemonic Regimes.” In Young 2012, 305–324.
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Päivi. 2002. “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties.” Leiden Journal of International Law 15: 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. 2003. In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law without Trimmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. 2005. “The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty,” European Law Journal 11: 262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias 2012. “The Moral Point of Constitutional Pluralism: Defining the Domain of Legitimate Institutional Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Objection.” In Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law, edited by Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos, 216–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. 2006. A life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Nobel Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, Grant. 2001. “Coercion and the Nature of Law.” Legal Theory 7: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. 2004. “Legitimate Political Authority and the Duty of Those Subject to It: A Critique of Edmundson.” Law and Philosophy 23: 399–435.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, David 2008. “(Dis)solving the Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach.” The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21: 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Daryl. 2011. “Parchment and Politics.” Harvard Law Review 124: 657–746.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David. 1989. The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteen-century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1974. “What Is De Re Modality?” Journal of Philosophy 71:551–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei. 2009. Social Conventions: From Language to Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei 2010. “The Pure Theory of Law.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. .
Marmor, Andrei 2011. Philosophy of Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Donald. 2012. “The Work of the International Law Commission, 2007–2011: Progress and Prospects.” The American Journal of International Law 106: 322–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Trevor W. 2010. “Stare Decisis in the Office of Legal Counsel.” Columbia Law Review 110: 1448–1525.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam. 2001a. “The Political Question of the Concept of Law.” In Coleman 2001b, 371–409.
Murphy, Liam 2001b. “Beneficence, Law, and Liberty: The Case of Required Rescue.” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 605–65.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2005. “Concepts of Law.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30:1–19.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2007. “Razian Concepts.” American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Law 6: 27–31.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2008. “Better to See Law This Way.” New York University Law Review 83: 1088–1108.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2010. “International Responsibility.” In Besson and John Tasioulas, 299–320.
Murphy, Liam, and Nagel, Thomas. 2002. The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L. 1998. “Introduction.” In Paulson and Paulson 1998, xxiii–liii.
Paulson, Stanley L. 2006. “On the Background and Significance of Gustav Radbruch’s Post-War Papers.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L., and Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski, eds. 1998. Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law – How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payandeh, Merhdad. 2011. “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of HLA Hart.” European Journal of International Law 21: 967–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen. 1987. “Judicial Obligation, Precedent, and the Common Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7: 215–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen 2001. “Hart’s Methodological Positivism.” In Coleman 2001b, 311–54.
Perry, Stephen 2009. “Where All Have the Powers Gone: Hartian Rules of Recognition, Noncognitivsm, and the Constitutional and Jurisprudential Foundations of Law.” In Adler, and Himma, 2009, 295–326.
Perry, Stephen 2013. “Political Authority and Political Obligation.” In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 2, edited by Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian, 1–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2010. “Law before Government: Ideology and Aspiration.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda 2013. The Anthropology of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, and Vermuele, Adrian. 2011. The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald. 1986. Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald 2012. “Legal Positivism: Early Foundations.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by Andrei Marmor, 31–47. New York: Routledge.
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. 2006. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law.” Translated by Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley L.. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1984. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 13: 134–71.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1980. 2nd ed. The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1985. “Authority and Justification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14: 3–29.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1986. “Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain.” California Law Review 74: 1103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1993. “H. L. A. Hart (1907–1992).” Utilitas 5:145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1999. Practical Reason and Norms. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2001. “Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law.” In Coleman 2001b, 1–38.
Raz, Joseph 2004. “Incorporation by Law.” Legal Theory 10:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2005. “Can There Be a Theory of Law?” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A., 324–42. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Simon. 2005. “After Government? On Representing Law without the State.” Modern Law Review, 68:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, Kristen. 2012. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1998. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, edited by Gutmann, Amy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-based Decision Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 2005. “The Social Construction of the Concept of Law: A Reply to Julie Dickson.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 2010a. “Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law.” Ratio Juris 23: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 2010b. “When and How (If at All) Does Law Constrain Official Action?” Georgia Law Review 44: 769–801.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 2012. “The Political Risk (If Any) of Breaking The Law.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4: 83–101.
Segal, Gabriel M. A. 2004. “Reference, Causal Powers, Externalist Intuitions and Unicorns.” In The Externalist Challenge, edited by Schantz, Richard, 329–46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. 2011. Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1998. Political Thought and Political Thinkers, edited by Hoffmann, Stanley. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1982. The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry 2000. “Bentham and Benthamism in Politics and Ethics.” In Essays on Ethics and Method, edited by Singer, Marcus G., 195–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Simmons A.. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
John, Simmons A. 2001. Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
John, Simmons A. 2005. “The Duty to Obey and our Natural Moral Duties.” In Wellman and Simmons, 93–196.
Simmons, Beth. 2010. “Treaty Compliance and Violation.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Stephen A. 2011. “Normativity of Private Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31: 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip. 1984. A Theory of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip 2002. The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law’s Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip 2007. “In Defense of Classical Natural Law in Legal Theory: Why Unjust Law Is No Law at All.” The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20: 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavropoulos, Nicos. 1996. Objectivity in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavropoulos, Nicos 2003. “Interpretivist Theories of Law.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. .
Stavropoulos, Nicos 2014 Forthcoming. “Legal Interpretivism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, <>.
Tamanaha, Brian. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John. 2007. “Customary International Law and the Quest for Global Justice.” In The Nature of Customary Law: Philosophical, Historical and Legal Perspectives, edited by Perreau-Saussine, Amanda and Murphy, James B., 307–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh. 2006. “The Sources of International Law.” In International Law, 2nd ed., edited by Evans, Malcolm D., 115–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 2003. “A Post-Westphalian Conception of Law.” Law and Society Review 37:199–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, William 2009. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp, and Goldmann, Matthias. 2008. “Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities.” German Law Journal 9: 1375–1400.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1996. “Kant’s Legal Positivism,” Harvard Law Review 109: 1535–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 1999. “Special Ties and Natural Duties.” In The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings, edited by Edmundson, William A., 271–99. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2001. “Normative (or Ethical) Positivism.” In Coleman 2001b, 410–34.
Waldron, Jeremy 2002. “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy 21: 137–64.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2007. “Legislation and the Rule of Law.” Legisprudence 1: 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2008. “The Concept and the Rule of Law.” Georgia Law Review 43: 1–61.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2009a. “Can There Be a Democratic Jurisprudence?” Emory Law Journal 58: 675–712.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2009b. “Who Needs Rules of Recognition?” In Adler and Himma 2009, 327–49.
Walker, Neil, and de Burca, Grainne. 2007. “Reconceiving Law & New Governance.” Columbia Journal of European Law 13:519–37.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J. 1994. Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper. 1983. “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?” The American Journal of International Law 77:413–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Jonathan, Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen. 2001. “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions,” Philosophical Topics 29: 429–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2005. “Samaritanism and the Duty to Obey the Law.” In Wellman and Simmons 2005, 3–89.
Wellman, Christopher Heath, and Simmons, A. John. 2005. Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2009. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville. 1945. “International Law and the Controversy Concerning the word ‘Law.’” The British Year Book of International Law 22: 146–63.Google Scholar
Yankah, Ekow. 2008. “The Force of Law: The Role of Coercion in Legal Normativity.” University of Richmond Law Review 42: 1195–1255.Google Scholar
Young, Margaret A, ed. 2012. Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Liam Murphy, New York University
  • Book: What Makes Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808425.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Liam Murphy, New York University
  • Book: What Makes Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808425.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Liam Murphy, New York University
  • Book: What Makes Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808425.010
Available formats
×