Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:25:11.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Developing Modern Welfare Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2021

Edited by
Roger E. Backhouse ,
Antoinette Baujard  and
Tamotsu Nishizawa
Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham and Erasmus University Rotterdam
Antoinette Baujard
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon et Université Jean Monnet à Saint-Étienne
Tamotsu Nishizawa
Affiliation:
Teikyo University Japan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values
Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics
 , pp. 157 - 331
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951/1963/2012): Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1st ed., 1951; 2nd ed., with “Notes on the Theory of Social Choice, 1963,” New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963; 3rd ed., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barone, E. (1935): “The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State,” in von Hayek, F. A., ed., Collectivist Economic Planning, London: Routledge, pp. 245–290.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1776): A Fragment on Government, London: T. Payne.Google Scholar
Bergson, A. (1938): “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 310–334.Google Scholar
Bergson, A. (1976): “Social Choice and Welfare Economics under Representative Government,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969): Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bossert, W. and Suzumura, K. (2016): “The Greatest Unhappiness of the Least Number,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 47, pp. 187–205.Google Scholar
Deb, R., Pattanaik, P. K., and Razzolini, L. (1997): “Game Forms, Rights, and the Efficiency of Social Outcomes,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 72, pp. 74–95.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. (1881): Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, London: Kegan & Paul.Google Scholar
Gaertner, W., Pattanaik, P. K., and Suzumura, K. (1992/2016): “Individual Rights Revisited,” Economica, Vol. 59, pp. 161–177. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1974): “A Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Claim,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 7, pp. 388–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, W. M. (1955): “The Intransitivity of Certain Criteria Used in Welfare Economics,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 7, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
Gorman, W. M. (1956/1980): “The Demand for Related Goods: A Possible Procedure for Analysing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, 1980, pp. 843–856. First circulated as Journal Paper No. 2319, Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, November 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graaff, J. de V. (1957): Theoretical Welfare Economics, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1955): “Cardinal Welfare, Individual Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 63, pp. 309–321.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1940/1981): “The Evaluation of the Social Income,” Economica, Vol. 7, 1940, pp. 105–124. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 78–99.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (no date; c. 1955): “Another Shot at Welfare Economics, Lecture I and Lecture II,” unpublished typescript, 19 pages folio + 21 pages, diagrams in the text.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1959/1981): “Preface – and a Manifesto,” in his Essays in World Economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 135–141.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (no date; c. 1963): “The Real Product – A Revision of Welfare Economics,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1975/1981): “The Scope and Status of Welfare Economics,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 27, 1975, pp. 307–326. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 218–239.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1981): Wealth and Welfare: Collected Essays on Economic Theory, Vol. 1, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1939): “Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 549–552.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. (1966): “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, pp. 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. (1971): Consumer Demand: A New Approach, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. (1960): “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–1959,” Economic Journal, Vol. 70, pp. 197–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. C. (1937): The Backward Art of Spending Money and Other Essays, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K., eds. (1993): The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1920/1932/1999): The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan, 1st ed., 1920; 4th ed., 1932. Reprinted in Vol. 3 of Pigou’s Collected Economic Writings, London: Macmillan, 1999.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002): The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971/1999): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, original ed., 1971; revised ed., 1999.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1932/1935): An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan, 1st ed., 1932; 2nd ed., 1935.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1938): “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 635–641.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1981): “Economics and Political Economy,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1947/1983): Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1st ed., 1947; enlarged 2nd ed., 1983.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1950): “Evaluation of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 2, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1981): “Bergsonian Welfare Economics,” in Rosefielde, S., ed., Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–266.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, T. (1941): “A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970a): Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970b): “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, pp. 152–157.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1976): “Liberty, Unanimity and Rights,” Economica, Vol. 43, pp. 217–245.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1980): “Equality of What?” in McMurrin, S., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–220.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982): Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985): Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1993): “Capability and Well-Being,” in Nussbaum, and Sen, , pp. 30–53.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1996): “On the Foundations of Welfare Economics: Utility, Capability and Practical Reason,” in Farina, F., Hahn, F. H., and Vannucci, S., eds., Ethics, Rationality and Economic Behaviour, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2009): The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2017): Collective Choice and Social Welfare, expanded ed., London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1985): “Liberty, Preference and Choice,” Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 185–205.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (1996/2016): “Welfare, Rights, and Social Choice Procedure: A Perspective,” Analyse & Kritik, Vol. 18, pp. 20–37. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 447–467.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (1999/2016): “Paretian Welfare Judgments and Bergsonian Social Choice,” Economic Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 204–220. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 709–730.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2002/2016): “Introduction” to Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K., eds., Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, pp. 1–32. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 671–708.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2005/2011): “An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, ‘Old’ and ‘New’, and Social Choice Theory,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 25, pp. 327–356. Reprinted in Murray, J., ed., The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 6, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011, pp. 843–872.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2011): “Welfarism, Individual Rights, and Procedural Fairness,” in Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K., eds., Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, pp. 605–685.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2016): Choice, Preferences, and Procedures: A Rational Choice Theoretic Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2020): “The Capability Approach from the Viewpoint of Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory,” in Chiappero, Enrica, Osmani, Siddiq, and Qizilbash, Mozaffar, eds., The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–125.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2001): “Characterizations of Consequentialism and Non-consequentialism,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 101, pp. 423–436. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 505–519.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2004): “Welfarist-Consequentialism, Similarity of Attitudes, and Arrow’s General Impossibility Theorem,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 22, pp. 237–251. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 537–556.Google Scholar

References

Amadae, S. M. (2003) Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. (2017) Founder of Modern Economics: Paul A. Samuelson. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bator, F. M. (1960) The Question of Government Spending: Public Needs and Private Wants. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Bergson, A. (1938) A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, 310–34.Google Scholar
Burk (Bergson), A. (1936) Real Income, Expenditure Proportionality, and Frisch’s “New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility.” The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 33–52.Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. (1899) The Distribution of Wealth. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Emmett, R. B. (2009) Frank Knight and the Chicago School in Modern Economics. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1914) Work and Wealth: A Human Valuation. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Igersheim, H. (2017) The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy. CHOPE Working Paper, 2017-03, 1–37.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1923) The Ethics of Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 37, 579–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1997) The Ethics of Competition. Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Little, I. M. D. (1950) A Critique of Welfare Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1932) Das Politisches Element in der Nationaloekonomischen Doctrinbildung. Juncker und Duennhaupt, Berlin. English translation: The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1953, translated by Paul Streeten.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1909) Manuel d’economie politique. Giard et Briere, Paris.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London. 1st ed.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London. 4th ed.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1928) A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–59.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. C. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1950) The Economic Problem in Peace and War: Some Reflections on Objectives and Mechanisms. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1937) A Note on Measurement of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155–61.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938a) The Numerical Representation of Ordered Classifications and the Concept of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938b) Welfare Economics and International Trade. The American Economic Review, 28, 261–6.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938c) A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour. Economica, 5, 61–71.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1939) The Gains from International Trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue canadienne d’Economique et de Science politique, 5, 195–205.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1940) Foundations of Analytical Economics: The Observational Significance of Economic Theory. PhD thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1943) Further Commentary on Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 33, 604–7.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1948a) Letter to Jacob Viner. Paul A. Samuelson Papers, Rubenstein Library, Duke University, Box 74.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1948b) Review of Studies in the Theory of Welfare Economics by Melvin W. Reder. American Economic Review, 38, 397–400.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1949) Review of Hla Myint, Theories of Welfare Economics. Economica, 16, 371–4.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1950a) Evaluation of Real National Income. Oxford Economic Papers, 2, 1–29.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1950b) The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory. Economica, 17, 355–85.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1951) Politics, Ethics, and Economics. Unpublished paper, in Paul A. Samuelson Papers, Rubenstein Library, Duke University, Box 133.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1981) Bergsonian Welfare Economics. In Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson (ed. Rosefielde, S.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 223–66.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1943) The New Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 33, 355–9.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. (2005) An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, “Old” and “New,” and Social Choice Theory. Social Choice and Welfare, 25, 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Baumol, William J. 1972. “On Taxation and the Control of Externalities.” American Economic Review 62–3, 307–322.Google Scholar
Bensusan-Butt, D. M. 1974. “Political Economy for Aesthetes.” Australian Economic Papers 13–23, 178–187.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Elodie. 2010. “The Three Uses of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Coase’s Works.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17–4, 975–1000.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Elodie 2018. “George Stigler: The First Apostle of the Coase Theorem.” In Understanding the Enigmatic George Stigler: Extending Price Theory in Economics and Beyond, edited by Freedman, Craig. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 445–475.Google Scholar
Boll-De Kock, Suzan. 1976. “A Critical View on Liability Rules in Theory and Practice: The Belgian Case.” Recherches Économiques de Louvain / Louvain Economic Review 42–1, 23–36.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 1978. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 43–60.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 1990. “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19–1, 86–107.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Stubblebine, Wm. Craig. 1962. “Externality.” Economica 29–116, 371–384.Google Scholar
Burrows, Paul. 1970. “On External Costs and the Visible Arm of the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 22–1, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Tony, Walsh, Cliff, and Brennan, Geoffrey. 1974. “Pollution and Resource Allocation.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 18–1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3–1, 1–44.Google Scholar
Common, Michael. 1988. Environmental and Resource Economics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D. 1987. “Torts as the Union of Liberty and Efficiency: An Essay on Causation.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63, 523–551.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1964. “The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 7–1, 11–26.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold 1968. “The Cost of Transacting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82–1, 33–53.Google Scholar
Dick, Daniel T. 1974. Pollution, Congestion and Nuisance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dick, Daniel T. 1976. “The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: A Survey of the Critics.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2–3, 185–195.Google Scholar
Edel, Matthew. 1973. Economics and the Environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fisher, Anthony C. and Peterson, Frederick M.. 1976. “The Environment in Economics: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1986. “Death of the Law.” Cornell Law Review 72–1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Head, John G. 1974. “Public Policies and Pollution Problems.” FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis 33–1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Helm, Dieter. 2005. “Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy.” Economic and Social Review 36–3, 205–228.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23–1, 16–59.Google Scholar
Horner, Gerald L. 1975. “Internalizing Agricultural Nitrogen Pollution Externalities: A Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57–1, 33–39.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven. 2003. “Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice.” Journal of Legal Studies 32–1, 331–362.Google Scholar
Kapp, K. William. 1950. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kneese, Allen V. 1964. The Economics of Regional Water Quality Management. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1983. “Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 12–1, 109–134.Google Scholar
Liebhafsky, H. H. 1973. “The Problem of Social Cost: An Alternative Approach.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 615–676.Google Scholar
Lowry, S. Todd. 1976. “Bargain and Contract Theory in Law and Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 10–1, 1–22.Google Scholar
Marciano, Alain. 2018. “Why Is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A Methodological Explanation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 36A, 127–155.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1996. “Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase on Social Cost Analysis.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18–1, 96–114.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2011. “A Case of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, ‘The Problem of Social Cost,’ and the Coase Theorem.” European Journal of Law and Economics 31–1, 11–38.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2014. “The Curious Treatment of the Coase Theorem in Environmental Economics, 1960–1979.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8–1, 39–57.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2015. “How Textbooks Create Knowledge and Meaning: The Case of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Intermediate Microeconomics, 1960–1979.” Working Paper, University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2020. “‘Exceptional and Unimportant’? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition.” History of Political Economy 52–1, 135–170.Google Scholar
Milliman, Jerome W. 1962. “Can People Be Trusted with Natural Resources?” Land Economics 38–3, 199–218.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1965. “Reflections on Recent Developments in the Concept of External Effects.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue Canadienne d’Economique et de Science Politique 31–1, 3–34.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1967a. The Costs of Economic Growth. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1967b. “Pareto Optimality and the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 19–3, 255–287.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1971a. “Pangloss on Pollution.” Swedish Journal of Economics 73–1, 113–120.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1971b. “The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 9–1, 1–28.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1974. “What Is the Optimal Level of Pollution?” Journal of Political Economy 82–6, 1287–1299.Google Scholar
Papandreou, Andreas A. 1994. Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parish, Ross M. 1972. “Economic Aspects of Pollution Control.” Australian Economic Papers 11–18, 32–43.Google Scholar
Pearce, David W. 1976. Environmental Economics. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan. 1971. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53–5, 867.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan 1972a. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54–2, 175–183.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan 1972b. On the Theory of Market Solutions to Externality Problems. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 351.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan 1974. “Coasian Externality Theory in a Policy Context.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 35–54.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan 1975. “Property Rights and Social Microeconomics.” Natural Resources Journal 15–4, 729–747.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan 1978. “Property Institutions and Economic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Lloyd G. 1973. Microeconomic Analysis and Policy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. 1972. “Welfare Economics, Power, and Property.” In Perspectives of Property, edited by Wunderlich, G. and Gilson, W. L.. University Park, PA: Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources, 61–127. Reprinted in Warren J. Samuels and A. Allen Schmid, eds., Law and Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective. Boston, MA: Nijhoff, 1981, pp. 9–75.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. 1974. “The Coase Theorem and the Study of Law and Economics.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1979. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism.” Journal of Philosophy 76–9, 463–489.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thompson, Donald N. 1973. The Economics of Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
Tollison, Robert D. and Wagner, Richard E.. 1988. Smoking and the State: Social Costs, Rent Seeking, and Public Policy. Lexington, MD: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Weld, John. 1973. “Coase, Social Cost and Stability: An Integrative Essay.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 595–613.Google Scholar
Wellisz, Stanislaw. 1964. “On External Diseconomies and the Government-Assisted Invisible Hand.” Economica 31–124, 345–362.Google Scholar

References

Amadae, Sonja M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B., Cnossen, Sijbren, Ladd, Helen F., Mieszkowski, Peter, Pestieau, Pierre, and Samuelson, Paul A.. 2008. ‘Commemorating Richard Musgrave (1910–2007)’. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 64(2): 145–70.Google Scholar
Bok, P. Mackenzie. 2015. ‘To the Mountaintop Again: The Early Rawls and Post-Protestant Ethics in Postwar America’. Modern Intellectual History: 1–33.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1949. ‘The Pure Theory of Government Finance: A Suggested Approach’. The Journal of Political Economy 57(6): 496–505.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cherrier, Beatrice, and Fleury, Jean-Baptiste. 2017. ‘Economists’ Interest in Collective Decision after World War II: A History’. Public Choice 172(1–2): 23–44.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D. 1975. ‘What Is the Public Interest’. PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., and Rappoport, Peter. 1984. ‘Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?’ Journal of Economic Literature 22(2): 507–30.Google Scholar
Davis, John B. 1990. ‘Cooter and Rappoport on the Normative’. Economics and Philosophy 6(1): 139–46.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime. 2014. ‘Normative and Positive Theories of Public Finance: Contrasting Musgrave and Buchanan’. Journal of Economic Methodology 21(3): 273–89.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2017a. ‘A Genealogy of the Concept of Merit Wants’. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24(3): 409–40.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2017b. ‘Musgrave, Samuelson, and the Crystallization of the Standard Rationale for Public Goods’. History of Political Economy 49(1): 59–92.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2019. ‘The Normative Problem of Merit Goods in Perspective’. Forum for Social Economics 48(3): 219–47.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime in press. ‘Généalogie du principe d’équité horizontale: Une contribution à l’histoire de la normativité en théorie des finances publiques’. Revue de philosophie économique.Google Scholar
Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime, and Johnson, Marianne. 2019. ‘“The Fiscal Policy Seminar: Its Early Stages” by Richard A. Musgrave’. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 37 C: 147–79.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina. 2019. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1985. ‘Review: Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 14(3): 308–22.Google Scholar
Hawi, Rima. 2016. John Rawls – Itinéraire d’un libéral américain vers l’égalité sociale. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2000. ‘“Related Disciplines”: The Professionalization of Public Choice Analysis’. History of Political Economy 32 (Supplement): 289–324.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1937. ‘The Theory of Public Finance and the Concept of “Burden of Taxation”’. PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1964. ‘Efficiency vs. Equity in Public Finance’. Review of Social Economy 22(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1969. ‘Provision for Social Goods’. In Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and Their Relations to the Private Sectors, edited by Margolis, Julius and Guitton, H., 124–44. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1981. ‘Leviathan Cometh – Or Does He?’ In Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume II: Fiscal Doctrine, Growth and Institutions, 200–32. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1986. Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume I: Social Goods, Taxation and Fiscal Policy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1987. ‘Merit Goods’. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, 1958–60. London: Palgrave, 452–3.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1996. ‘Public Finance and Finanzwissenschaft Traditions Compared’. In Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume III, 2000, 33–80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1997. ‘Crossing Traditions’. In Zur Deutschsprachigen Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration Nach 1933, edited by Hagemann, Harald, 63–79. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A., and Buchanan, James M.. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A., and Musgrave, Peggy B.. 1976. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A., and Musgrave, Peggy B. 1980. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2013. ‘Foreword’. In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, by Nozick, Robert, xi–xviii. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo. 1898. ‘Comment se pose le problème de l’économie pure’. Reprinted in Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto 1(1): 121–30 (1963).Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur Cecil. 1928. A Study in Public Finance. 3rd ed., 1960. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur Cecil 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rau, Karl Heinrich. 1837. Lehrbuch der Politischen Oekonomie. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. French translation of the 3rd ed. Traité d’économie nationale. 1839. Brussels: Société Belge de Librairie. Hauman et cie.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2009. A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community, edited by Nagel, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Read, Colin. 2016. ‘The Early Life of Richard Musgrave’. In The Public Financiers, 144–9. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reiner, Toby. 2011. ‘The Sources of Communitarianism on the American Left: Pluralism, Republicanism, and Participatory Democracy’. History of European Ideas 37(3). 293–303.Google Scholar
Ritschl, Hans. 1931. Gemeinwirtschaft und Kapitalistische Marktwirtschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Roemer, John E. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sax, Emil. 1924. ‘Die Wertungstheorie der Steuer’. Zeitschrift für Volkswirthchaft und Sozialpolitik 4(4–6): 191–240.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav. 1900. Grundriß der Allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre. French translation Principes d’économie politique. 1905. Paris: V. Giard et E. Brière.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1908. The Nature and Essence of Economic Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Translated by Bruce A. McDaniel from Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. 2010.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970a. ‘Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability’. Econometrica 38(3): 393–409.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970b. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. London: Penguin. 2017 Extended Edition.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317–44.Google Scholar
Sinn, Hans-Werner. 2009. ‘Please Bring Me the New York Times: On the European Roots of Richard Abel Musgrave’. International Tax and Public Finance 16(1): 124–35.Google Scholar
Sturn, Richard. 2016a. ‘Public Economics’. In Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume III: Developments in Major Fields of Economics, edited by Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz D., 480–98. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sturn, Richard 2016b. ‘Richard Abel Musgrave (1910–2007)’. In Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume I: Great Economists since Petty and Boisguilbert, edited by Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz D., 634–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1990. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods’. In Rationality, Individualism, and Public Policy, edited by Brennan, Geoffrey and Walsh, Cliff, 45–63. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, the Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1887. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Translated as Community and Civil Society by Harris, Jose. 2001. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1988. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1975. Knowledge and Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. 1892. Lehr- und Handbuch der Politischen Oekonomie. Grundlegung der Politischen Oekonomie. 3rd ed. Translated in French as Les fondements de l’économie politique. 1904. Paris: V. Giard et E. Brière.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1922. Wirthschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). A new English translation of Economy and Society by Keith Tribe. 2019. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

References

Amadae, Sonia, 2003, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1963[1951], Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1967, “The Place of Moral Obligation in Preference System,” in Hook, Sidney, ed., Human Values and Economic Policy, New York: New York University Press, p. 118.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1970, “Political Economic Evaluation of Social Effects and Externalities,” NBER chapters, in The Analysis of Public Output, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1972a, “Gifts and Exchanges,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 343–362.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1972b, “Models of Job Discrimination,” in Pascal, Anthony H. (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington: D. C. Heath, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1972c, “Some Mathematical Models of Race Discrimination in the Labor Market,” in Pascal, Anthony H. (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life. Lexington: D. C. Heath, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1973a, “Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice,” Journal of Philosophy, 70, pp. 245–263.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1973b, “The Theory of Discrimination,” in Ashenfelter, Orley and Rees, Albert (eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1974, The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1983, Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow: Social Choice and Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1985, “Distributive Justice and Desirable Ends of Economic Activity,” in Feiwel, George (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 134–156.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1994, “Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge,” American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1996, “Information, Responsibility, and Human Services,” in Fuchs, Victor R. (ed.), Individual and Social Responsibility: Child Care, Education, Medical Care, and Long-Term Care in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1997, “Invaluable Goods,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 757–765.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1998, “What Has Economics to Say about Racial Discrimination?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 2006, “Freedom and Social Choice: Notes from the Margin,” Utilitas, Vol. 18, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 2016, On Ethics and Economics: Conversations with Kenneth J. Arrow, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth and Debreu, Gerard, 1954, “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 22, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. and Hahn, Frank H., 1971, General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Bergson, Abram, 1938, “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 310–334.Google Scholar
Bossert, Walter and Fleurbaey, Marc, 2014, “An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura,” Hitotsubashi University Repository.Google Scholar
Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Cléo, 2015, “Crossing Boundaries, Displacing Previous Knowledge and Claiming Superiority: Is the Economics of Discrimination a Conquest of Economics Imperialism?,” Working Paper 5.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C., 1975, “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 594–606.Google Scholar
Kelly, Jerry S., 1987, “An Interview with Kenneth J. Arrow,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Mackay, Alfred, 1980, Arrow’s Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry, 2003, Democracy Defended, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard and Anderson, Elizabeth, 1990, “Slinging Arrows at Democracy: Social Choice Theory, Value Pluralism, and Democratic Politics,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 90, pp. 2121–2214.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret, 1996, Contested Commodities, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William, 1982, Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel, 1969[1932], An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saito, Nao, 2018, “The Transformation of Kenneth Arrow’s Attitude toward War,” in Ikeda, Yukihiro and Rosselli, Annalisa (eds.), War in the History of Economic Thought: Economists and the Question of War, New York: Routledge, pp. 239–257.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul, 1967, “Arrow’s Mathematical Politics,” in Hook, Sidney (ed.), Human Values and Economic Policy, New York: New York University Press, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K., 1970, “The Impossibility of Paretian Liberal,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 152–157.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 2009, The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shionoya, Yūichi, 2005, Economy and Morality: The Philosophy of the Welfare State, North Hampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

References

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. and Foster, J. 2011. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, Journal of Public Economics 95(7–8): 476–87.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. and Nishizawa, T. 2010. No Wealth but Life: Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basu, K. and Lopez Calva, L. F. 2011. Functionings and Capabilities, in Arrow, K., Sen, A. K. and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 153–87.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. 2007. Conceptions of Freedom and Ranking Opportunity Sets: A Typology, Homo Oeconomicus 24: 231–54.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. 2011. Utilité et liberté de choix dans les classements d’ensembles d’opportunités, Raisons politiques 43: 59–92.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. 2016. Welfarism, an historical perspective. 3rd International Conference Economic Philosophy, June 2016, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2017. Sen Is Not a Capability Theorist, Journal of Economic Methodology 24(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Binder, C. 2013. Plural Identities and Preference Formation. Social Choice and Welfare: 1–18. doi:10.1007/s00355-013-0761-z.Google Scholar
Binder, C. B. 2019. Agency, Freedom and Choice. Theory and Decision Library A: Rational Choice in Practical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Binder, C. and Binder, C. B. 2016. A Capability Perspective on Indigenous Autonomy, Oxford Development Studies 44: 297–314.Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and van Hees, M. 2009. Freedom of Choice, in Anand, P., Pattanaik, P. K. and Puppe, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–92.Google Scholar
Drydyk, J. and Keleher, L. 2019. Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 1972. Paternalism, The Monist 56: 64–84.Google Scholar
Echávarri, R. A. and Permanyer, I. 2008. Ranking Profiles of Capability Sets, Social Choice and Welfare 31: 521–35.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1982. Sour Grapes, in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–38.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiebiger Byskov, M. 2018. The Capability Approach in Practice: A New Ethics for Setting Development Agendas, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foster, J. E. 2015. Freedom, Opportunity, and Well-Being, in Arrow, K., Sen, A. K. and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 687–728.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. 2003. The Human Development Paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s Ideas on Development, Feminist Economics 9(2/3): 301–17.Google Scholar
Gasper, D. 2002. Is Sen’s Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? Review of Political Economy 14: 435–61.Google Scholar
van Hees, M. 2016. Analysing Capabilities: Games, Groups and Effectivity, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Khader, S. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramm, M. 2019. When a River Becomes a Person, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. 1979. A Representation Theorem for ‘Preference for Flexibility’, Econometrica 47: 565–77.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1988. Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution, in Annas, J. and Grimm, R. H. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 145–84.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1993. Non-relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K. (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 242–69.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options, Economics and Philosophy 17: 67–88.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K., eds. 1993. The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 1990. On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice, Recherches Economiques de Louvain 56: 383–90.Google Scholar
Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 1998. On Preference and Freedom, Theory and Decision 44: 173–98.Google Scholar
Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 2012. Some Foundational Issues in the Functioning and Capability Approach to the Concept of Well-Being, in Social and Cultural Development of Human Resources [Eds. UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee], in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK, [www.eolss.net] [Retrieved 24 April 2013].Google Scholar
Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 2020. The Concept of Capability and Its Measurement, in Chiappero, E., Qizilbash, M. and Osmani, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2007. Social Choice and Individual Capabilities, Politics Philosophy Economics 6: 169–92.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2016. Capability, Objectivity and ‘False Consciousness’: On Sen, Marx and J. S. Mill, International Journal of Social Economics 43: 1207–18.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2011. The Capability Approach, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/capability-approach/.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-examined, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Saito, M. 2003. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration, Journal of Philosophy of Education 37: 17–34.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1977. On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis, Econometrica 45: 1539–72.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1979a. Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What’s Wrong With Welfare Economics?, The Economic Journal 89: 537–58.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1979b. Utilitarianism and Welfarism, The Journal of Philosophy 76: 463–89.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1980. Equality of What?, in McMurrin, S. M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–220; reprinted in Goodin, R. E. and Pettit, P. (eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy, An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell, 473–83.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1983. Development: Which Way Now?, The Economic Journal 93(372): 745–62.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1984. Rights and Capabilities, in Resources, Values, and Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 307–24.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. Ethics and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1991. Welfare, Preference and Freedom, Journal of Econometrics 50: 15–29.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1995. Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Glover, J. (eds.), Women, Culture, and Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 259–73.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2002. Rationality and Freedom, The American Economic Review 89: 349–78.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K., and Xu, Y. 2009. Consequentialism and Non-consequentialism: The Axiomatic Approach, in Anand, P., Pattanaik, P. K. and Puppe, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 346–73.Google Scholar
Wantene, K., Yap, M. and Bockstael, E. 2019. Indigenous Peoples and the Capability Approach, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Alkire, S. 2010. Development: A Misconceived Theory Can Kill, in Morris, C. W., ed., Amartya Sen, New York: Cambridge University Press: 191–219.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1950. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare, Journal of Political Economy, August, 58, 4: 328–46.Google Scholar
Barsamian, D. 2001. Reflections of an Economist, Alternative Radio, USA, India Together, September.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2017. Sen Is Not a Capability Theorist, Journal of Economic Methodology, 24, 1: 1–19.Google Scholar
Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2020. ’Positional Views’ as the Cornerstone of Sen’s Idea of Justice, Working paper of the Condorcet Center for Political Economy.Google Scholar
Bréban, L. and Gilardone, M. 2020. A Missing Touch of Adam Smith in Amartya Sen’s Account of Public Reasoning: The Man within for the Man Without, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 2: 257–283.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. 2009. Agency Goals, Adaptation and Capability Sets, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10, 1: 3–19.Google Scholar
Chanda, A. 1998. Amartya Sen Returns to Repay His Debt to Alma Mater, Rediff on the Net, 21 December, http://202.54.124.133/business/1998/dec/21sen.htm.Google Scholar
Crocker, D. A. and Robeyns, I. 2010. Capability and Agency, in Morris, C. W., ed., Amartya Sen, New York: Cambridge University Press: 60–90.Google Scholar
Davis, J. 2012. The Idea of Public Reasoning, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 2: 169–72.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 2001. Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Economics, Oxford Development Studies, 29, 3: 213–22.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 1989. Hunger and Public Action, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fetherolf Loufti, M. 1998. Amartya Sen, Lauréat du Prix Nobel d’Economie, et l’OIT, Le Magazine de l’OIT, 27 December: 1–9.Google Scholar
Fine, B. J. 2004. Economics and Ethics: Amartya Sen as Point of Departure, The New School Economic Review, 1, 1: 95–103.Google Scholar
Gilardone, M. 2008. Dobb, Dasgupta et Tagore: trois sources méconnues de la pensée de Sen, Storia del Pensiero Economico, 5, 2: 107–31.Google Scholar
Gilardone, M. 2009. Inégalités de genre et approche par les capabilités: quelle mise en dialogue chez Sen?, Tiers Monde, 198: 357–71.Google Scholar
Gilardone, M. 2010. Amartya Sen sans prisme, Cahiers d’économie politique, 56: 9–39.Google Scholar
Gilardone, M. 2015. Rawls’s Influence and Counter-Influence on Sen: Post-Welfarism and Impartiality, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22, 2: 198–235.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility, Journal of Political Economy, 63, 4: 309–21.Google Scholar
Hirai, T. 2017. The Creation of the Human Development Approach, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kynch, J. and Sen, A. K. 1983. Indian Women: Well-Being and Survival, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7, 3/4: 363–80.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Peter, F. 2003. Gender and the Foundations of Social Choice: The Role of Situated Agency, Feminist Economics 9, 2: 13–32.Google Scholar
Pressman, S. and Summerfield, G. 2002. Sen and Capabilities, Review of Political Economy, 14, 4: 429–33.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Advanced textbooks in economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, re-edit 1979.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1972. Technical Choice and Employment in the Non-wage Sector, World Employment Programme: Economic Research on Technology and Employment, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1975. Employment, Technology and Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1977. On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis, Econometrica, 45, 7: 1539–72.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1979. Utilitarianism and Welfarism, Journal of Philosophy, 76, 9: 463–89.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1980. Equality of What?, in McMurrin, S., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 1, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 197–220.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1983a. Economics and the Family, Asian Development Review, 1, 2: 14–26.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1983b. Development: Which Way Now?, The Economic Journal, 93, 372: 745–62.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1984. Family and Food: Sex Bias in Poverty, in Sen, A. K., Resources, Values and Development, Oxford: Blackwell: 346–68.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. Hunger and Entitlements, Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economic Research, United Nations University.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1989. Cooperation, Inequality, and the Family, Population and Development Review, 15: 61–76.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1990a. Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment, New York Review of Books, 37, 10: 49–54.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1990b. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts, in Tinker, I., ed., Persistent Inequalities, New York, Oxford University Press: 123–49.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1992. Inequality Reexamined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1994. Amiya Kumar Dasgupta (1903–1992), The Economic Journal, 104, 426: 1147–55.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1997. Development Thinking at the Beginning of the XXI Century, in Emmerij, L., ed., Economic and Social Development into the XXI Century, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999a. Autobiography, The Nobel Prizes 1998, Tore Frängsmyr, Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/1998/sen-autobio.html.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999b. Democracy as a Universal Value, Journal of Democracy, July, 10, 3: 3–17.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999c. Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2001. Tagore and His India, The New York Review, 28 August, www.nobel.se/literature/articles/sen/index.html.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2012. Values and Justice, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 2: 101–8.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2013. The Ends and Means of Sustainability, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14, 1: 6–20.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. and Sengupta, S. 1983. Malnutrition of Rural Indian Children and the Sex Bias, Economic and Political Weekly, 18: 855–64.Google Scholar
Shaikh, N. 2004. Interview of Amartya Sen, Asia Society Online, 6 December.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. 1990. Amartya Sen, in Swedberg, R., Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries – Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 249–67.Google Scholar
UNDP 1990. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP 1995. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP 2010a. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP 2010b. A 20th Anniversary Human Development Discussion with Amartya Sen, pre-launch material for the Human Development Report 2010.Google Scholar

References

Amadae, S. M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1951. An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics, in Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Neyman, J. (ed.), Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press: 507–532.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 2001. The Strange Disappearance of Welfare Economics. Kyklos 54(2–3), 193–206.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 2009. Economics as a Moral Science. Economica 76(1), 791–804.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. and Biddle, J. 2000. The Concept of Applied Economics: A History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings. History of Political Economy 32(5), 1–24.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. and Cherrier, B. 2017. The Age of the Applied Economist. History of Political Economy 49(Supplement), 1–33.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 2007. The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics, Historically Contemplated. History of Political Economy 39(2), 185–207.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. 1969. Economics as a Moral Science. American Economic Review 59(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. S. and Moore, J. C. 1978. The New Welfare Economics, 1939–1974. International Economic Review 19: 547–584.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1951. The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica 19(3), 273–292.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2000. Choix social: une difficulté et de multiples possibilités. Revue Economique 51(5), 1215–1232.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2007. Social Choice and Just Institutions: New Perspectives. Economics and Philosophy 23, 15–43.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2009. Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Journal of Economic Literature 47(4), 1029–1075.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. and Blanchet, D. 2013. Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. and Mongin, P. 2005. The News of the Death of Welfare Economics Is Greatly Exaggerated. Social Choice and Welfare 25(2), 381–418.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal 49(196), 696–712.Google Scholar
Igersheim, H. 2019. The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy. History of Political Economy 51(5), 827–865.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1960. A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–59. Economic Journal 70(278), 197–265.Google Scholar
Mongin, P. 2006. Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics. Economica 72(290), 257–286.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd. ed. 1935, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2004. L’économie est une science morale. Paris: La Découverte, Poche.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×