Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:04:03.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - How Families Are Doing Nine Years after Welfare Reform: 2005 Evidence from the Three-City Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

James P. Ziliak
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Much of what we understand about economic outcomes associated with welfare reform comes from studies of families who were initially on welfare and who left after welfare reform (“leaver” studies), from studies of lowincome families in the first few years after reform, and from randomized trial evaluations conducted at around the time of the reform. Blank (2002) reviewed numerous studies that indicated that employment and labor supply for disadvantaged families increased in the immediate aftermath of welfare reform. She also reported that the evidence regarding impacts on incomes and well-being was generally positive, although the leaver studies showed smaller gains. More recently, Grogger and Karoly (2005) and Blank (Chapter One, this volume) summarized evidence from experimental and observational studies that indicated that specific types of reforms, especially mandatory work activities, and welfare reform as a whole contributed to higher levels of employment, larger incomes, and less poverty among welfare households. However, as Moffitt (2002) has pointed out, the rise in incomes in the experimental studies was largely confined to studies without time limits; in the experiments with such limits, which most closely reflectactual welfare reform in the states, the rise in income was insignificant (Bloom and Michalopoulos 2001).

Further, the income gains shown in observational cross-sectional datasets like the Current Population Survey (CPS) or the National Survey of America's Families were almost all a result of increases in income among families not on welfare; incomes for leavers per se rose very little (see the reviews by Blank and by Grogger and Karoly on this point as well).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×