Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:32:13.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Thing that Would Not Die: Notes on Refutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Hartmut Lehmann
Affiliation:
German Historical Institute, Washington DC
Guenther Roth
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

The reception of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is littered with the corpses of critiques that fell stillborn from the press, dead on arrival because they attacked positions Weber did not hold or otherwise employed arguments irrelevant to his case. One of the virtues of Malcolm MacKinnon's critique of The Protestant Ethic is that it does not fall into these perennial errors. Concerning his critique and the project of refuting Weber's account of the relationship between the Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, I would like to make two points.

Weber developed two analyses that tie the Protestant ethic to the spirit of capitalism: the first in the two Protestant Ethic essays of 1904- 1905, the second in his series of essays on American Protestant sects. What is the relation between The Protestant Ethic and Weber's subsequent essays on the Protestant sects? What is the relation between The Protestant Ethic and Weber’s subsequent essays on the Protestant sects?

Weber's argument in The Protestant Ethic may be sketched as follows. According to the Calvinist doctrine of predestination, God has chosen a small segment of the human race as recipients of His grace. These He has selected for salvation. The rest He has chosen to damn. Because of the abyss that separates the transcendence of God from the wretchedness of the human sinner, the unalterable decretum horrible is ultimately unintelligible to the human understanding and incomprehensible from the standpoint of human conceptions of justice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Weber's Protestant Ethic
Origins, Evidence, Contexts
, pp. 285 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×