Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:07:13.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Sex ratio determinants in Indian populations: studies at national, state and district levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2009

Lawrence M. Schell
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
Malcolm Smith
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Alan Bilsborough
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Although the human sex ratio at conception, i.e. the primary sex ratio, is not readily amenable to investigation, data on the karyotypes of spontaneous and induced abortions indicate that early in pregnancy there is a large surplus of males, estimated at between 123 and 130 males for every 100 females (Stevenson, 1959; Lee & Takano, 1970; Hassold et al., 1983). Selective attrition of male foetuses occurs throughout the gestational period and also is seen in excess numbers of male stillbirths, resulting in a sex ratio at birth (i.e. secondary sex ratio) in the Caucasian populations of Western countries of 105 to 106, with slightly lower values of between 102 and 104 for Blacks (Chahnazarian, 1988). However, considerable global variation has been reported in secondary sex ratios, ranging from less than 100 to over 110 (Visaria, 1967; James, 1987).

While the excess spontaneous loss of male foetuses must be considered a primarily biological phenomenon, related to the male phenotype but not significantly associated with the expression of X chromosome mutations in hemizygous males (Stevenson & Bobrow, 1967), in postnatal life both biological and social factors influence the tertiary sex ratio. By the third decade approximately equal numbers of males and females are observed in Western countries, the decline in proportion of males again being ascribed to their relatively greater biological frailty, in combination with higher exposure to fatal accidents and homicide (Macfarlane & Mugford, 1984).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×