Book contents
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Understanding Life
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Genesis: Why Do We Care About Nature–Nurture?
- 2 The Worst Legacy of Francis Galton
- 3 Statistical Science and the Invention of Heritability
- 4 Reports of Galton’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
- 5 Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
- 6 Plomin’s Predictions and the Human Genome Project
- 7 GWAS Unchained, GWAS Unwound
- 8 Intelligence
- 9 IQ, Race, and Genetics
- 10 Nature–Nurture and the Possibility of Human Science
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure and Quotation Credits
- Index
5 - Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2024
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Understanding Life
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Genesis: Why Do We Care About Nature–Nurture?
- 2 The Worst Legacy of Francis Galton
- 3 Statistical Science and the Invention of Heritability
- 4 Reports of Galton’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
- 5 Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
- 6 Plomin’s Predictions and the Human Genome Project
- 7 GWAS Unchained, GWAS Unwound
- 8 Intelligence
- 9 IQ, Race, and Genetics
- 10 Nature–Nurture and the Possibility of Human Science
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure and Quotation Credits
- Index
Summary
Let’s summarize where the nature–nurture debate stood as the twentieth century drew to a close. When the century began, thinkers were faced for the first time with the hard evolutionary fact that human beings were not fundamentally different biologically than other evolved organisms. Galton and his eugenic followers concluded that even those parts of human experience that seemed to be unique – social, class, and cultural differences; abilities, attitudes, and personal struggles – were likewise subsumed by evolution and the mammalian biology it produced. People and societies could therefore be treated like herds of animals, rated on their superior and inferior qualities, bred to maintain them, treated to fix them, and culled as necessary for the good of the herd. Not every mid-century moral disaster that followed resulted from their misinterpretation of human evolution, but it played a role. Society has been trying to recover from biologically justified racism, eugenics, and genocide ever since.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding the Nature‒Nurture Debate , pp. 67 - 83Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024