Book contents
- Understanding the Law of Assignment
- Understanding the Law of Assignment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Cases
- Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Model
- Part III Joinder
- 7 Joinder of Assignor in Equitable Proceedings
- 8 Joinder of Assignor in Common Law Proceedings
- 9 Non-joinder of Assignor of Legal Choses
- Part IV Notice
- Part V Statutes
- Part VI Consequences
- Bibliography
- Index
9 - Non-joinder of Assignor of Legal Choses
from Part III - Joinder
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 October 2019
Book contents
- Understanding the Law of Assignment
- Understanding the Law of Assignment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Cases
- Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Model
- Part III Joinder
- 7 Joinder of Assignor in Equitable Proceedings
- 8 Joinder of Assignor in Common Law Proceedings
- 9 Non-joinder of Assignor of Legal Choses
- Part IV Notice
- Part V Statutes
- Part VI Consequences
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter draws on the analysis in the preceding two chapters, and puts forward the hypothesis that the important case of William Brands’ Sons & Co v. Dunlop Rubber Co is a decision of the House of Lords within its equitable jurisdiction, and not its common law jurisdiction, as is usually assumed to be the case.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding the Law of Assignment , pp. 179 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019