Book contents
- Understanding the Christianity–Evolution Relationship
- Series page
- Understanding the Christianity–Evolution Relationship
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Rival Paradigms
- 2 The Mechanists’ God
- 3 The Organicists’ God
- 4 Humans
- 5 Environment
- 6 Hate
- Epilogue
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure Credits
- Index
- References
References and Further Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2023
Book contents
- Understanding the Christianity–Evolution Relationship
- Series page
- Understanding the Christianity–Evolution Relationship
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Rival Paradigms
- 2 The Mechanists’ God
- 3 The Organicists’ God
- 4 Humans
- 5 Environment
- 6 Hate
- Epilogue
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure Credits
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding the Christianity–Evolution Relationship , pp. 158 - 174Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Augustine, [396] 1998. Confessions. (Translator H. Chadwick) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (editor) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. [1686] 1996. A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. (Editors Davis, E. B. and Hunter, M) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, R. 1688. A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things: Wherein it is Inquir’d Whether, And (if at all) With what Cautions, a Naturalist should admit Them? London: John Taylor.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1987. Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836–1844. (Editors Barrett, P. H., Gautrey, P. J., Herbert, S., Kohn, D., and Smith, S.) Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, E. [1794–1796] 1801. Zoonomia; or, The Laws of Organic Life. 3rd ed. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
de Buffrénil, V., Farlow, J. O., and de Ricqlès, A. 1986. Growth and function of stegosaurus plates: evidence from bone histology. Paleobiology 12: 459–73.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2003. Darwin’s Legacy: What Evolution Means Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. 1996. Basis for our caring. This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment. (Editor Gottlieb, R. S.) New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farlow, J. O., Thompson, C. V., and Rosner, D. E.. 1976. Plates of the dinosaur Stegosaurus: forced convection heat loss fins? Science 192: 1123–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kant, I. [1790] 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. (Editor Guyer, P.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. 1833–34 [2008]. On the History of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. 1988. Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature – as Introduction to the Study of this Science 1797 – second edition 1803. (Translators E. E. Harris and P. Heath) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2008. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. [1857] 1868 . Progress: Its law and cause. Westminster Review LXVII: 244–67.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D., and Crick, F. H. C.. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 171: 737–8.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1926. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1: 356–66.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Anselm, St. 1903. Proslogium, Monologium, An Appendix in Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilon; and Cur Deus Homo. (Translator S. N. Deane). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Behe, M. 1996. Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. 1963. Biological Science: Molecules to Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1999. A scientific argument for the existence of God: The fine-tuning argument. Reason for the Hope Within. (Editor Murray, M.) 47–75. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A. 2015. Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1958. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. (Edited by Barlow, Nora) London: Collins.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1983. Universal Darwinism. Evolution from Molecules to Men. (Editor Bendall, D. S) 403–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1964. Meditations. Philosophical Essays, 59–143. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Draper, J. W. 1875. History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Hick, J. 1973. God and the Universe of Faiths: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1779] 1990. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. (Editor Bell, M.) London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. 1912. The Individual in the Animal Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1893. Evolution and Ethics with a New Introduction. (Edited by Ruse, M.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keats, J. 1819. Letter to siblings 1819. The Letters of John Keats, 1814–1821. (Edited by Rollins, Hyder Edward), 100–4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Vol. 1 (Kierkegaard’s Writings, Vol. 12.1) (Translators H. V. Hong, and E. H. Hong) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1955. Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life. London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Meléndez-Hevia, E., Waddell, T. G., and Cascante, M. 1996. The puzzle of the Krebs citric acid cycle: assembling the pieces of chemically feasible reactions, and opportunism in the design of metabolic pathways during evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 293–303.Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1890. The Christian doctrine of God. Lux Mundi. (Editor Gore, C.) 57–109. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. 1973. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman, XXV. (Editors Dessain, C. S and Gornall, T) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, J. C. and Morris, H. M.. 1961. The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.Google Scholar
White, A. D. 1896. History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Berry, T. 2009. The Sacred Universe: Earth, Spirituality, and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. (Editor Tucker, E.-M.) New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. 1901. Body and mind (from Fortnightly Review). Lectures and Essays of the Late William Kingdom Clifford Vol. 2. (Editors Stephen, L. and Pollock, F.) 1–51. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M.. 2010. What Darwin Got Wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gayon, J. 2013. Darwin and Darwinism in France after 1900. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. (Editor Ruse, M.) 300–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. and Ruse, M.. 1996. On the nature of the evolutionary process: the correspondence between Theodosius Dobzhansky and John C. Greene. Biology and Philosophy 11: 445–91.Google Scholar
Laland, K., Endler, J., and Odling-Smee, J.. 2017. Niche construction, sources of selection and trait coevolution. Interface Focus (Royal Society) https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M. et al. 2014. Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514: 161–4.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. F. W. 1714. Monadology and other Philosophical Essays. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
O’Connell, G. 2017. Will Pope Francis remove the Vatican’s “warning” from Teilhard de Chardin’s writings? America November 21.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J., and Ruse, M.. 2019. After Darwin: Morality in a secular world. Secular Studies 1: 161–85.Google Scholar
Prince of Wales, Juniper, T., and Skelly, I.. 2010. Harmony: A New Way of Looking at Our World. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. 2001. Song of the World Becoming: New and Collected Poems 1981–2001. Minneapolis: Milkweed.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. 1988. Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature – as Introduction to the Study of this Science 1797 – second edition 1803. (Translators E. E. Harris and P. Heath) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1929 [1978]. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1969. Freedom of the Will. (Editor Kaufman, A. S) Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M.. 2007. Four Views on Free Will. Maldan, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1739–1740] 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1751] 1983. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1948. UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1893. Evolution and Ethics with a New Introduction. (Edited by Ruse, M.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. and Huxley, J. 1947. Evolutionary ethics. Touchstone for Ethics. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1781 [1899]. Critique of Pure Reason. (Translator J. M. D. Meikeljohn) New York: Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Maine, H. J. S. 1861. Ancient Law; Its Connection to the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1876. The theory of evolution in its application to practice. Mind 1: 52–67.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1851. Social Statics: Or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. [1857] 1868 . Progress: Its law and cause. Westminster Review LXVII: 244–67.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. and Wilson, E. O. 2007. Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology 82: 327–48.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Agassiz, E. C. (editor). 1885. Louis Agassiz: His Life and Correspondence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Agricola, G. [1556] 1950. De Re Metallica. (Translators H. C. Hoover and L. C. Hoover) New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Capra, F. 1987. Deep Ecology: a new paradigm. Deep Ecology for the 21st Century. (Editor Sessions, G.) Boston, MA: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. 1839. Observations on the parallel roads of Glen Roy, and other parts of Lochaber in Scotland, with an attempt to prove that they are of marine origin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1839.0005Google Scholar
Francis (Pope). 2015. Encyclical on Climate Change and Inequality: On Care for Our Common Home. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. 1788. Theory of the Earth; or an Investigation of the Laws observable in the Composition, Dissolution, and Restoration of Land upon the Globe. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1: 209–304.Google Scholar
International Rice Research Institute, . 2007. The Great Rice Robbery. Penang, Malaysia: Pesticide Action Network.Google Scholar
Kant, I. [1785] 2007. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. 1979. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E., and Margulis, L.. 1974a. Homeostatic tendencies of the Earth’s atmosphere. Origins of Life 5: 93–103.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. and Margulis, L.. 1974b. Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia Hypothesis. Tellus 26: 1–10.Google Scholar
Miles, M., and Shiva, V.. 2014. Ecofeminism (Critique. Influence. Change). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Moncrief, L. 1970. The cultural basis of our environmental crisis. Science 170: 508–12.Google Scholar
Naydler, J. (editor). 1996. Goethe on Science: An Anthology of Goethe’s Scientific Writings. Edinburgh: Floris Books.Google Scholar
Razak, A. 1990. Toward a womanist analysis of birth. Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. (Editors Diamond, I. and Orenstein, G. F.) 165–72. San Francisco: Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Regis, E. 2019. Golden Rice: The Imperiled Birth of a GMO Superfood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Spretnak, C. 1989. Toward an ecofeminist spirituality. Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. (Editor Plant, J.) 127–32. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. W. 1981. The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics 3: 197–218.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, F., Mahan, D. C., Sheldon, J. K. and Brand, R. H.. 1996. Redeeming Creation: The Biblical Basis for Environmental Stewardship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1926. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zell-Ravenheart, O. 2009. Green Egg Omelet: An Anthology of Art and Articles from the Legendary Pagan Journal. Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books.Google Scholar
Ardrey, R. 1961. African Genesis: A Personal Investigation into the Animal Origins and Nature of Man. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Bang, J. P. 1917. Hurrah and Hallelujah: The Teaching of Germany’s Poets, Prophets, Professors and Preachers. New York: George H. Doran.Google Scholar
Baxter, R. 2021. A Christian Directory, Or, a Body of Practical Divinity and Cases of Conscience: Christian Ethics (Or Private Duties). Los Angeles: HardPress Publishing.Google Scholar
Bennhold, K. and Pronczuk, M.. 2022. Poland shows the risks for women when abortion is banned. New York Times www.nytimes.com/2022/06/12/world/europe/poland-abortion-ban.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 1999. The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues 55: 429–44.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. and Williams, W. M.. 2009. The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and Girls. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. 1988. Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239: 985–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1913. De Officiis. (Translator W. Miller) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, C. 2009. Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, P. 1994. Darwinism, War and History: The Debate over the Biology of War from the “Origin of Species” to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dart, R. 1953. The predatory transition from ape to man. International Anthropological and Linguistic Review 1: 201–17.Google Scholar
Edsall, T. B. November 1, 2018. The Trump legions. New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2018-11/01/opinion/the-trump-legions.html.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. B. 2013. The prehistory of war and peace in Europe and the Near East. War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. (Editor Fry, D. P.) 191–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. B. 2015. History, explanation, and war among the Yanomami: a response to Chagnon’s Noble Savages. Anthropological Theory 15: 377–406.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. 2009. On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Harrington, A. 1996. Reenchanted Science: Holism in German Culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1821 [1991]. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. (Editor Wood, A.) Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Herf, J. 2006. The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hersch, S. M. 1972. Cover-up: The Army’s Secret Investigation of the Massacre at My Lai 4. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Holmes, A. F. (editor). 2005. War and Christian Ethics. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. 2014. The Great and Holy War: How World War I Became a Religious Crusade. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
Jones, E. 1849. The Land Monopoly: The Suffering and Demoralization Caused by It, and the Justice & Expediency of Its Abolition. London: Charles Fox.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution: A Feminist Reappraisal of the Scientific Revolution. Scranton, PA: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Reich, D. 2018. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Race. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
SBCEC (Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee). 2022. Southern Baptists and Women Pastors. Baptist 2 Baptist: www.baptist2baptist.net/printfriendly.asp?ID=58Google Scholar
Scott, E. 2019. Trump’s most insulting – and violent – language is often reserved for immigrants. Washington Post: www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019-10/02/trumps-most-insulting-violent-language-is-often-reserved-immigrants/Google Scholar
Selous, E. 1901. An observational diary of the habits – mostly domestic – of the great crested grebe (Podicipes cristatus). Continued as: An observational diary of the habits – mostly domestic – of the great crested grebe (Podicipes cristatus), and of the peewit (Vanellus vulgaris), with some general remarks. Zoologist: 5: 161–83; 5: 339–50; 5: 454–62; 6: 133–44.Google Scholar
Smith, H. M., Chiszar, D, and Montanucci, R. R.. 1997. Subspecies and classification. Herpetological Review 28: 13–16.Google Scholar
Von Bernhardi, F. 1920. Vom Kriege der Zukunft. Nach den Erfahrungen des Weltkrieges. Berlin: Mittler.Google Scholar
Rahner, K. 1966. Christology within an evolutionary view of the world. Theological Investigations. V. Later Writings, 157–92. Baltimore: Helicon Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value. (Editor Von Wright, G. H.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St T. [1259–1265] 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles. (Translator V. J. Bourke) Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, St. [413–426] 1998. The City of God against the Pagans. (Editor and translator Dyson, R. W ) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1982. The Literal Meaning of Genesis. (Translator J. H. Taylor) New York: Newman.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. 2021. Darwin’s closet: the queer sides of The Descent of Man (1871). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 191: 323–46.Google Scholar
Clark, E. D. 2006. Abraham and Sarah: a love story without end. Meridian Magazine: https://latterdaysaintmag.com/Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1839. Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries Visited by HMS Beagle. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1985–. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. and Rai, T. S.. 2014. Virtuous Violence: Hurting and Killing to Create, Sustain, End, and Honor Social Relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fry, D. P. 2013. War, peace, and human nature: the challenge of achieving scientific objectivity. War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. (Editor Fry, D. P.) 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 2013. Edward O. Wilson and the organicist tradition. Journal of the History of Biology 46: 599–630.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1999. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. 2006. Among the Dead Cities: Is the Targeting of Civilians in War ever Justified? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kant, I. [1785] 2007. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdfGoogle Scholar
Larson, E. J. 1997. Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America’s Continuing Debate over Science and Religion. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lucas, J. R. 1979. Wilberforce and Huxley: A legendary encounter. Historical Journal 22: 313–30.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mathez, E. A., and Smerdon, J. E.. 2018. Climate Change: The Science of Global Warming and Our Energy Future. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. R. 1990. Schelling and the origins of his Naturphilosophie. In Romanticism and the Sciences. (Edited by Cunningham, A. and Jardine, N.) 25–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naess, A. 1986. The deep ecological movement: Some philosophical aspects. Deep Ecology in the 21st Century. (Editor Sessions, G) Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Newson, L., and Richerson, P. J.. 2021. The Story of Us: A New Look at Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noll, M. 2002. America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Numbers, R. L. 2006. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Standard ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, W. V. 1992. Desert Storm: A just war analysis. St. John’s Law Review 66: 797–823.Google Scholar
Pennock, R. 1998. Tower of Babel: Scientific Evidence and the New Creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Provine, W. B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. 2003. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J., and Ruse, M.. 2016. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., and Rizzo, M.. 2020. The psychology of American racism. OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w2h73Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (editor). 1988. But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2010. Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2021a. A Philosopher Looks at Human Beings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2021b. The Arkansas creationism trial forty years on. Karl Popper’s Science and Philosophy. (Editors Zuzana, P., and Merritt, D.) 257–76. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2022a. Understanding Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2022b. Why We Hate: Understanding the Roots of Human Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2023. Evolutionary ethics: The wrong road taken. “Mind”: The Early Years. (Editor Verburgt, L. M) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2008. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2018. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.Google Scholar
Tuttle, R. H. 2014. Apes and Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whistler, D. and Kahl, J.. 2014. Two poems by F. W. J. Schelling. Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 43: 177–96.Google Scholar