Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T23:43:57.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Thought and Action: Connecting Attributions to Behaviors in Married Couples' Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

By
Valerie Manusov
Edited by
Patricia Noller  and
Judith A. Feeney
Valerie Manusov
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Judith A. Feeney
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Causal and responsibility attributions made by married partners are a frequent subject of study by relationship researchers (Fletcher & Fincham, 1991; Holtzworth-Munroe & Jacobson, 1988; Manusov, 1990; Miller & Bradbury, 1995). Few studies have connected couples' attributions to the behaviors they use in response to those thoughts however (see Fincham, 1994). Because overt behaviors are likely to shape the climate for a relationship (Noller, 1992), investigating how thoughts may connect with action is important for understanding the role causal attributions play within marriage.

This paper focuses particularly on nonverbal cues exhibited by married partners. Goffman (1979) refers to nonspoken cues as part of a “glimpsed” world, often unarticulated but rich in social information (Ambady & Rosenthal, 1992). According to Noller (1992), “many messages having neutral words … [are] changed into positive or negative messages by … the nonverbal channels” (p. 50). The valence of messages has been found to differentiate satisfied from unsatisfied couples consistently, and much of the affective tone of messages is relayed via nonverbal means (Gottman & Levenson, 1992; Huston & Vangelisti, 1991). Because more highly valenced (very positive or very negative) behaviors are likely to instigate greater attribution making (Wong & Weiner, 1981), they should also result in behaviors that reflect the attributions given for a spouse's actions.

In the following pages, I discuss the importance of investigating nonverbal behaviors as both triggers of, and reactions to, attributions by married couples.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Marriage
Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction
 , pp. 14 - 31
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, P. A. (1999). Nonverbal communication: Forms and function. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company
Baucom, D. H. (1987). Attributions in distressed relations: How can we explain them? In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 177–206). London: Sage
Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L., & Duhe, A. (1989). Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 596–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, T. N., Beach, S. R. H., Fincham, F. D., & Nelson, G. M. (1996). Attributions and behavior in functional and dysfunctional marriages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 569–576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613–628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. The Southern Communication Journal, 56, 96–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Camper, P. M., Jacobson, N. S., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Schmaling, K. B. (1988). Causal attributions for interactional behaviors in married couples. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12, 195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D. (1994). Cognition in marriage: Current status and future challenges. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Baucom, D. H. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 4. Self-partner attribution differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 739–748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1993). Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 442–452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., & O'Leary, K. D. (1982). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 42–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Fincham, F. D. (1991). Attribution processes in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 7–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row
Gottman, J. (1996). Why marriages fail. In K. M. Galvin & P. Cooper (Eds.), Making connections: Readings in relational communication (pp. 219–227). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company
Gottman, J. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press
Gottman, J., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottman, J., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Attachment styles and reactions to nonverbal involvement change in romantic dyads: Patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Human Communication Research, 22, 335–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1988). Toward a methodology for coding spontaneous causal attributions: Preliminary results with married couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721–733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. D., Karney, B. R., Rogge, R., Bradbury, T. N. (2001). The role of marital behavior in the longitudinal association between attributions and marital quality. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication, and close relationships (pp. 173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Manusov, V. (1990). An application of attribution principles to nonverbal messages in romantic dyads. Communication Monographs, 57, 104–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manusov, V. (1995). Reacting to changes in nonverbal behaviors: Relational satisfaction and adaptation patterns in romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 21, 456–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manusov, V. (1996). Intentionality attributions for naturally occurring nonverbal behaviors in intimate relationships. In J. E. Aitken & L. J. Shedletsky (Eds.), Intrapersonal communication processes (pp. 343–353). Plymouth, MI: Midnight Oil Multimedia
Manusov, V., Floyd, K., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (1997). Yours, mine, and ours: Mutual attributions for nonverbal behaviors in couples' interactions. Communication Research, 24, 234–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. E., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Refining the association between attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, P. (1984). Nonverbal communication and marital interaction. Oxford: Pergamon
Noller, P. (1992). Nonverbal communication in marriage. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Applications of nonverbal behavioral theories and research (pp. 31–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Orvis, B. R., Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D. (1976). Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. I. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1. pp. 353–384). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Patterson, M. L. (1991). A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458–495). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pike, G. R., & Sillars, A. L. (1985). Reciprocity of marital communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. A., & Price, M. G. (1980). Pleasurable behavior in marital interaction: An observational study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satir, V. (1976). Family communication and conjoint family therapy. In B. N. Ard & C. C. Ard (Eds.), Handbook of marriage counseling (2nd ed.) (pp. 175–185). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books
Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, A. L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277–305). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Smith, T. W., Sanders, J. D., & Alexander, J. F. (1990). What does the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale measure? Affect, behavior, and attributions in the marital context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 699–708CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of the attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×