Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:41:22.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Competition in Romantic Relationships: Do Partners Build Niches?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Steven R. H. Beach
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Daniel Whitaker
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Heather A. O'Mahen
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Deborah Jones
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Abraham Tesser
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Frank D. Fincham
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Judith A. Feeney
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Baumeister and Leary (1995) argue compellingly that human beings have a need to belong, and that this need may be deeply rooted in the experience of homo sapiens in their Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness (EEA). For humans, the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness is commonly taken to be the Pleistocene environment in which the overwhelming majority of human evolution is thought to have occurred. The need to belong to a group may, however, be only the most basic of the adaptations that emerged during the EEA for humans. It seems likely that a variety of other social adaptations have developed as well, and that these serve to further the goal of maintaining or optimizing group involvement and pair bonding.

Leary and Downs (1995) note, for example, that evaluative feelings about the self may serve as a social adaptation “that (1) monitors the social environment for cues indicating disapproval, rejection, or exclusion and (2) alerts the individual via negative affective reactions when such cues are detected.” (Leary & Downs, 1995, p. 129). Gilbert (1992) also hypothesizes that mechanisms to enhance smooth functioning within a group or dyadic context may have assumed increasing evolutionary importance as homo sapiens became more oriented to alliances and sharing. Gilbert (1992) highlights the emergence of strategies to gain and control others' attention through coalitions and cooperative activity, rather than exclusive reliance on strategies to attain dominance via threat and aggression.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Marriage
Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction
, pp. 59 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (1993). Decision-making power and marital satisfaction: A self-evaluation maintenance perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 471–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (1995). Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model: The self in social context. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 145–170). New York: PlenumCrossRef
Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (2000). Self-evaluation maintenance and evolution: Some speculative notes. In J. Suls and L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 123–140). New York: PlenumCrossRef
Beach, S. R. H., Tesser, A., Mendolia, M., Anderson, P., Crelia, R., Whitaker, D., & Fincham, F. D. (1996). Self-evaluation maintenance in marriage: Toward a performance ecology of the marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., Whitaker, D. J., Jones, D. J., & Tesser, A. (2001). When does performance feedback prompt complementarity in romantic relationships? Personal Relationships, 8, 231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal Attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Bennett, M. E. (1992). Research on relationships: Implications for mental health. In D. N. Ruble, Philip R. Costenzo, & M. E. Oliveri (Eds.), The social psychology of mental health. New York: Guilford
Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333–338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human agency: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). New York: Plenum
Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Gilbert, P. (1992). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness. New York: Guilford
Houts, R. M., Robins, E., & Huston, T. L. (1996). Compatibility and the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1983a). Love and commitment. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McLintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: Freeman
Kelley, H. H. (1983b). The situational origins of human tendencies: A further reason for the formal analysis of structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 8–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). Evolution, pair-bonding, and reproductive strategies: A reconceptualization of adult attachment. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 353–393). New York: Guilford
Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995) Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. (pp. 123–144.) New York: Plenum
Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, K. D., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Marital interactions. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 191–212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Mahen, H. A., Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (2000). Relationship ecology and negative communication in romantic relationships: A self-evaluation maintenance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1343–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruble, D. N. (1987). The acquisition of self-knowledge: A self-socialization perspective. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Contemporary topics in developmental psychology (pp. 243–270). New York: John Wiley & Sons
Rusbult, C. E., Bissonnette, V. I., Arriaga, X. B., & Cox, C. L. (1999). Accommodation processes across the early years of marriage. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction. (pp. 74–113). New York: Cambridge University Press
Rusbult, C. E., Yovetich, N. A., & Verette, J. (1996). An interdependence analysis of accommodation processes. In G. J. O. Fletcher and J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 63–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 311–378). New York: Random House
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 21, pp. 181–227). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Tesser, A., & Campbell, J. (1982). Self-evaluation maintenance and the perception of friends and strangers. Journal of Personality, 50, 261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesser, A., & Paulhus, D. (1983). The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation maintenance strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 72–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). My relationship is better than – and not as bad as – yours is: The perception of superiority in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×