References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Uncertainty x DesignEducating for Possible Futures, pp. 162 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
AACTE + Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519336.pdfGoogle Scholar
Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231Google Scholar
Ahvenharju, S., Lalot, F., Minkkinen, M., & Quiamzade, A. (2021). Individual futures consciousness: Psychology behind the five-dimensional Futures Consciousness scale. Futures, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102708Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2022). Discovering and dismantling enormous barriers hindering the transition from transactional to transformational giftedness. In Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Transformational Giftedness for Education (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R. (2013). Creativity and the Philosophy of CS Peirce (vol. 27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Irvin, S., Bousselot, T., Beard, N., & Beach, P. (2022). Grasping the uncertainty of scientific phenomena: A creative, agentic, and multimodal model for sensemaking. In R. A. Beghetto & G. Jaeger (Eds.). Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 159–179). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1998/1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1992). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Barber, M., Analyst, S., & Vic, B. (2006). Wildcards: Signals from a future near you. Journal of Futures Studies, 11(1), 75–94.Google Scholar
Basu, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Technology as social-material mediator: From primary to secondary creativity and beyond. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 8(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Oettingen, G. (2016). Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000060Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29(4), 265–270.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about students’ goal orientations: A carry-over effect of prior schooling experiences? Social Psychology of Education, 10(2), 171–191.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Nurturing creativity in the micro-moments of the classroom. In K. H. Kim, J. C. Kaufman, J. Baer, & B. Sriraman (Eds.). Creatively Gifted Students Are Not Like Other Gifted Students (pp. 3 – 15). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Legacy projects: Helping young people respond productively to the challenges of a changing world. Roeper Review, 39(3), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Lesson unplanning: Toward transforming routine tasks into non-routine problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(7), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0885-1Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2018). Taking beautiful risks in education. Educational Leadership, 76(4), 18–24.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2018). What If? Building students’ problem-solving through complex challenges. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. In Mullen, C. A. (Ed.), Creativity under Duress in Education? Creativity Theory and Action in Education (vol. 3, pp. 27–40). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_2Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Uncertainty. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_122-1Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative learning in education. In Kern, M. L. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Education (pp. 473–491). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64537-3.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2021). How times of crisis serve as a catalyst for creative action: An agentic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.600685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beghetto, R. A. (2021). There is no creativity without uncertainty: Dubito ergo creo. Journal of Creativity, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100005Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2023). A new horizon for possibility thinking: A conceptual case study of Human × AI collaboration. Possibility Studies & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699231160136Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (in press). Uncertainty as a lever for change and innovation. In Preiss, D. D., Singer, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). Creativity, Innovation, and Change across Cultures. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Anderson, R. C. (2022). Positive creativity is principled creativity. Education Sciences, 12(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030184Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151, 85–95.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). The Creative Self: Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., Karwowski, M., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2021). Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000323Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & McBain, L. (2022). My Favorite Failure. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Berg, J. M. (2019). When silver is gold: Forecasting the potential creativity of initial ideas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154, 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.Google Scholar
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, L. E., Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Beghetto, R. A. (2022). Examining teachers’ perspectives of school-based opportunities and support for student creativity with the ICI Index. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2110416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2004). The Art of Problem Posing (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611833Google Scholar
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(8), 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4Google Scholar
Butterscotch, J. (2022, September 6). Exploring the relationship between tolerance of ambiguity and critical thinking. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xnbjyGoogle Scholar
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catmull, E., & Wallace, A. (2014). Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Claxton, G. (2008). What’s the Point of School? Rediscovering the Heart of Education. Oxford: Oneworld publications.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. S., Boufal, M. M., & Kurtz, J. E. (2004). Personality traits and critical thinking skills in college students: Empirical tests of a two-factor theory. Assessment, 11(2), 169–176.Google Scholar
Committee on Science and Technology. (1986). Investigation of the Challenger Accident. House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress (Second Session). Washington, DC. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016/pdf/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Craft, A. (2015). Possibility thinking: From what is to what might be. In Rupert Wegerif, Li Li, & James C., Kaufman (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 177–191). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031106Google Scholar
Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.47.18930Google Scholar
Dator, J. (2019). What futures studies is, and is not. In J. Dator: A Noticer in Time. Anticipation Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17387-6_1vanGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (2005). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books. (Original work published 1934.)Google Scholar
Drake, D. (2016). Sit with Us creator Natalie Hampton’s crusade to help bullied teens feel included. Wharton Global Youth Program. https://globalyouth.wharton.upenn.edu/articles/podcasts/sit-us-creator-natalie-hamptons-crusade-help-bullied-teens-feel-included/Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003Google Scholar
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70(3), 193–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044139Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Felten, P., & Clayton, P. H. (2011). Service‐learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 75–84.Google Scholar
Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17(6), 791–802.Google Scholar
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267.Google Scholar
Gall, T., Vallet, F., & Yannou, B. (2022). How to visualise futures studies concepts: Revision of the futures cone. Futures, 143, 103024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, D., Willy, C., & Bischoff, J. (2016). How to catch a black swan: Measuring the benefits of the premortem technique for risk identification. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 6, 87–106.Google Scholar
Getzels, J. W. (1964). Creative thinking, problem solving, and instruction. In Hilgard, E. R. (Ed.), Theories of Learning and Instruction (pp. 240–267). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: Criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032616Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). The Possible: A Sociocultural Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (in preparation). Pedagogies of the Possible. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., Corazza, G. E., & Ness, I. J. (2023). Dialogical provocations: A creative trialogue. In Henriksen, D. & Mishra, P. (Eds.), Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning (pp. 213–227). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Godwin, K. E., Seltman, H., Almeda, M., Skerbetz, M. D., Kai, S., Baker, R. S., & Fisher, A. V. (2021). The elusive relationship between time on-task and learning: Not simply an issue of measurement. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1894324Google Scholar
Goodlad, J. L. (2004). A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Grant, A., & Coyle, D. (2018). The process of building trust works in the opposite way that you think it does. Retrieved from https://work.qz.com/1241911/daniel-coyle-author-of-the-the-culture-code-says-building-trust-works-in-the-opposite-way-you-think-it-does/?mc_cid=015ae0d31b&mc_eid=427e2dccd0Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Lin, S., Acar, S., Jin, S., Xu, X., Feng, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Divergent thinking and evaluative skill: A meta-analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.539Google Scholar
Gustafson, K. (2010). Strategic horizons: Futures forecasting and the British Intelligence Community. Intelligence and National Security, 25(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2010.537118Google Scholar
Gustafsson, E. (2023). How can contextual variables influence creative thinking? Contributions from the optimal-level of arousal model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.565Google Scholar
Hakan, T. (2022). Philosophy of science and black swan. Child’s Nervous System, 38, 1655–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-05009-3Google Scholar
Hannon, V., & Peterson, A. (2021). Thrive: The Purpose of Schools in a Changing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, M. (2023). Student loan debt statistics. EducationData.org. https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-statisticsGoogle Scholar
Hausman, C. R. (1984). A Discourse on Novelty and Creation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37. www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.27Google Scholar
Henry Ford Foundation. (2023). A framework using the steps of the invention process. https://inhub.thehenryford.org/curriculum-resources/invention-convention-curriculumGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J. D., McGarry, J., & Seibyl, J. (2022). Beyond tolerating ambiguity: How emotionally intelligent people can channel uncertainty into creativity. In Beghetto, R. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (Eds.), Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 59–79). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98729-9_5Google Scholar
Inayatullah, S. (2013). Futures studies: Theories and methods. In Junquera, F. G. (Ed.), There’s a Future: Visions for a Better World (pp. 33–36). Madrid, Spain: BBVA.Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Hoffmann, J. D. (2022). The creativity dare: Attitudes toward creativity and prediction of creative behavior in school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56, 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.527Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2017). From having an idea to doing something with it: Self-regulation for creativity. In Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Creative Self: Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 343–365). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00020-0Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., Payne, B. R., Roberts, B. W., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). Can an old dog learn (and want to experience) new tricks? Cognitive training increases openness to experience in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025918Google Scholar
Jefferson, M., & Anderson, M. (2017). Transforming Schools: Creativity, Critical Reflection, Communication, Collaboration. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1972). Motives and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032356Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185Google Scholar
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., Han, M.-H., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000229Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). The Creative Self: Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (vol. 2, pp. 333–368). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lash, J. P. (1997). Helen and Teacher: The Story of Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan Macy. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Lavin, I. (1993). Picasso’s Bull(s): Art history in reverse. Art in America, 81, 76–123.Google Scholar
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809433Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231Google Scholar
Manalo, E., & Kapur, M. (2018). The role of failure in promoting thinking skills and creativity: New findings and insights about how failure can be beneficial for learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.001Google Scholar
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College (MLFTC). (2023). Principled innovation. https://pi.education.asu.eduGoogle Scholar
Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Committed but closed-minded: When making a specific plan for a goal hinders success. Social Cognition, 30, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.37Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDiarmid, G. W., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Learning for Uncertainty: Teaching Students How to Thrive in a Rapidly Evolving World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In Miell, D. & Littleton, K. (Eds.), Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 11–25). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13–17.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Annual earnings by educational attainment. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cbaGoogle Scholar
Nations Report Card. (2018). Technology and Engineering Literacy, ‘Percentage of students assessed in eighth-grade NAEP technology and engineering literacy (TEL), by type of school and designing/creating to solve a problem.’ www.nationsreportcard.gov/dashboards/schools_dashboard.aspxGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, J. A., Silverman, B. S., & Zenger, T. R. (2007). The “problem” of creating and capturing value. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007079969Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2010). Creativity in mathematics teaching: A Chinese perspective. In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 270–288). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norcross, J. C., Mrykalo, M. S., & Blagys, M. D. (2002). Auld lang Syne: Success predictors, change processes, and self-reported outcomes of New Year’s resolvers and nonresolvers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1151Google Scholar
OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD LEARNING COMPASS 2030. www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdfGoogle Scholar
Oscarsson, M., Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., & Rozental, A. (2020). A large-scale experiment on New Year’s resolutions: Approach-oriented goals are more successful than avoidance-oriented goals. PLoS One, 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234097Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 5–8 Burks, A. W. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poli, R. (2020). Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Pólya, G. (1966). On teaching problem solving. In Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. The Role of Axiomatics and Problem Solving in Mathematics (pp. 123–129). Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Ranciere, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Translated and with an introduction by Kristin Ross. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Reece, A. G., Eubanks, A. D., Liebscher, A., & Baumeister, R. (2022, May 16). Enforcing pragmatic future-mindedness cures the innovator’s bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12956Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., Beghetto, R. A., Brandon, L. E., & Karwowski, M. (2022). Development of an instrument to measure opportunities for imagination, creativity, and innovation (ICI) in schools. Gifted Education International, 38(2), 174–193. www.doi.org/10.1177/02614294211042333Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Caspi, A. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 375–389). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y. Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. In Zanna, Mark P. & Olson, James M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 52, pp. 221–283). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2–3), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.1996.9651173Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2019). Divergent thinking. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 224–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.013Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2013). Zig Zag: The Surprising Path to Greater Creativity. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schwaba, T., Luhmann, M., Denissen, J. J. A., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000150Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612474317Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139Google Scholar
Simonton, D. (2003). Creativity as variation and selection: Some critical constraints. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Critical Creative Processes (pp. 3–18). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Sirotnik, K. A. (1983). What you see is what you get: Consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16–31.Google Scholar
Skidmore, D. (2000). From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy. Language and Education, 14(4), 283–296.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Society for Science. (2022). ‘14-year-old develops robotic hand to help with disaster recovery; Wins $25,000 top award at the Broadcom MASTERS’ www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/14-year-old-develops-robotic-hand-to-help-with-disaster-recovery-wins-25-000-top-award-at-the-broadcom-masters-301665640.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sparkman, D. J., Eidelman, S., & Blanchar, J. C. (2016). Multicultural experiences reduce prejudice through personality shifts in openness to experience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2189Google Scholar
Srinivasan, B. (2022). The network state: How to start a new country. https://thenetworkstate.comGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Transformational creativity: The link between creativity, wisdom, and the solution of global problems. Philosophies, 6, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6030075Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds.). (2022). The Palgrave Handbook of Transformational Giftedness for Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Chowkase, A. (2021). When we teach for positive creativity, what exactly do we teach for? Education Sciences, 11(5), 237.Google Scholar
Studer, J., Daly, S., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. (2018). Evidence of problem exploration in creative designs. AI EDAM, 32(4), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000124Google Scholar
The Youth Assembly (TYA). 2021. Outstanding youth delegate: Natalie Hampton. The Youth Assembly. www.youthassembly.org/2021/09/21/natalie-hampton/Google Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988.Google Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963Google Scholar
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.Google Scholar
van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., Borghans, L., & Seegers, P. (2022). Creative idea forecasting: The effect of task exposure on idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(3), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000426Google Scholar
Veinott, B., Klein, G. A., & Wiggins, S. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of the premortem technique on plan confidence. https://idl.iscram.org/files/veinott/2010/1049_Veinott_etal2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vyas, D., Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., & Van Der Veer, G. (2009). Collaborative practices that support creativity in design. In ECSCW 2009 (pp. 151–170). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagoner, B. (2008). Commentary: Making the familiar unfamiliar. Culture & Psychology, 14(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X08096511Google Scholar
Ward, T., & Kolomyts, Y. (2019). Creative cognition. In Kaufman, J. & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 175–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.011Google Scholar
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2017). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2019). Creativity: Intrapersonal and interpersonal selection of creative ideas. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.397Google Scholar
Zielińska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2022). Living with uncertainty in the creative process: A self-regulatory perspective. In Beghetto, R. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (Eds.), Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 81–102). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98729-9_6Google Scholar