Book contents
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Domestic Courts
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Domestic Courts
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Treaties
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The CRC and the Courts
- 3 France
- 4 Australia
- 5 South Africa
- 6 The United Kingdom
- 7 The Judicial Application of the CRC
- 8 Looking to the Future of Judicial Application of the CRC
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - The CRC and the Courts
International and Domestic Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2025
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Domestic Courts
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Domestic Courts
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Treaties
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The CRC and the Courts
- 3 France
- 4 Australia
- 5 South Africa
- 6 The United Kingdom
- 7 The Judicial Application of the CRC
- 8 Looking to the Future of Judicial Application of the CRC
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter highlights two distinct perspectives – international and domestic – on the judicial application of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention). The international perspective is framed by reference to article 4 of the Convention and the maximalist approach taken by the Committee on the Rights of the Child. The domestic perspective is conceptualised by reference to the direct and indirect application of the Convention as permitted by the reception rules in monist, dualist, and hybrid legal systems. The chapter argues that the international and domestic perspectives on the judicial application of the Convention differ on account of the different institutional positions of the bodies that control them (the Committee vs the domestic courts). The maximalist international position promoted by the Committee is often unavailable to the domestic courts, although it may be a potential inspiration to them. Canvassing these distinct perspectives provides the context for a better understanding of the limitations in the domestic courts’ engagement with the Convention, detailed in the subsequent chapters.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025