Book contents
- Truth and Privilege
- Studies in Legal History
- Truth and Privilege
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Foreword – The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Common Law’s Diverging Paths
- 3 The Transformation of Privilege
- 4 Truth, Privacy and Authority
- 5 The Individual Conscience and Blasphemous and Obscene Expression
- 6 Private Defamation Suits
- 7 Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index
- Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2021
- Truth and Privilege
- Studies in Legal History
- Truth and Privilege
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Foreword – The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Common Law’s Diverging Paths
- 3 The Transformation of Privilege
- 4 Truth, Privacy and Authority
- 5 The Individual Conscience and Blasphemous and Obscene Expression
- 6 Private Defamation Suits
- 7 Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index
- Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
Summary
This chapter introduces the framework for the comparison between Massachusetts and Nova Scotia, the factors individuals confronted when they decided what type of proceeding to take over expression they disliked, the conceptual transition from the law concerning libels to libel law, the development of the defenses of privilege and truth, the emergence of the idea that obscene texts could be prosecuted as criminal libels, and the establishment of the courtroom as the site where individual claims to freedom of speech and conscience were brought in Massachusetts – but not Nova Scotia – against a backdrop of majoritarian violence.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Truth and PrivilegeLibel Law in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia, 1820-1840, pp. 1 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021