Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:44:27.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2023

Edgar Maraguat
Edgar Maraguat
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
True Purposes in Hegel's Logic , pp. 244 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (2007), Negative Dialectics, translated by E. B. Ashton, London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1991), ‘Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgement’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement): 25–42.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (1985), ‘Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957), Intention, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962), Sense and Sensibilia, edited by Warnock, G. J., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balme, David M. (1972), see Abbreviations, De part. an.Google Scholar
Birch, Jonathan (2012), ‘Robust Processes and Teleological Language’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Brady (2013), Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. (2009), Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas, Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. (2010), ‘Reply to Daniel Dennett’s “The Evolution of ‘Why’?”’, in Weiss, Bernhard and Wanderer, Jeremy (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit, London and New York: Routledge, 305–8.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. (2019), A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology, Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela (2008), ‘Two Views on Nature: A Solution to Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2): 351–69.Google Scholar
Buffon, George Louis Leclerc de (1749), Histoire naturelle, générale et particuliére, avec la description du Cabinet du Roy, vol. 2, Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Cameron, Rich (2003), ‘The Ontology of Aristotle’s Final Cause’, Apeiron 35 (2): 153–79.Google Scholar
Charlton, William (1970), see Abbreviations, Phys.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew (2020), ‘Do Functions Explain? Hegel and the Organizational View’, Hegel Bulletin 41 (3): 389–406.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert (1975), ‘Functional Analysis’, The Journal of Philosophy LXXII (20): 741–65.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert (2002), ‘Neo-Teleology’, in Ariew, Andre, Cummins, Robert and Perlman, Mark (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–72.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert and Roth, Martin (2009), ‘Traits Have Not Evolved to Function the Way They Do because of a Past Advantage’, in Ayala, Francisco and Arp, Robert (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology, London: Wiley-Blackwell, 72–85.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1866), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: Murray, 4th edition.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence (2012), Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1996), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (2014), ‘The Evolution of Reasons’, in Bashour, Bana and Muller, Hans D. (eds.), Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications, London and New York: Routledge, 47–62.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1997), Of Grammatology, translated by G. Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
DeVries, Willem A. (1991), ‘The Dialectic of Teleology’, Philosophical Topics 19 (2): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Hondt, Jacques (1970), ‘Téléologie et praxis dans la “Logique” de Hegel’, in d’Hondt, Jacques (ed.), Hegel et la pensée moderne. Séminaire sur Hegel dirigé par Jean Hyppolite au Collège de France (1967–1968), Paris: PUF, 1–26.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann (ed.) (1960), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch, new edition by Walther Kranz, 3 vols., Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 6th edition. References by author, section and fragment number.Google Scholar
Duque, Félix (1992), ‘La lógica de la objetividad y la asunción de la teología’, Pensamiento 48 (191): 57–78.Google Scholar
Duque, Félix (1998), Historia de la Filosofía Moderna. La era de la crítica, Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea (2019), ‘Aristotle on Causality’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, in https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/aristotle-causality/.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo (2001), Hegel and Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo (2022), Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia (2011), ‘The Transition to Organics: Hegel’s Idea of Life’, in Houlgate, Stephen and Baur, Michael (eds.), A Companion to Hegel, Oxford: Blackwell, 203–24.Google Scholar
Findlay, John N. (1964), ‘Hegel’s Use of Teleology’, The Monist 48 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans Friedrich (2003), ‘Von der äusseren Teleologie zur inneren’, in Koch, Anton F. et al. (eds.), Der Begriff als die Wahrheit. Zur Anspruch der Hegelschen »Subjektiven Logik«, Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans Friedrich (2004), ‘Hegels Logik der Idee und ihre epistemologische Bedeutung’, in Halbig, Christoph, Quante, Michael and Siep, Ludwig (eds.), Hegels Erbe, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 78–137.Google Scholar
Gambarotto, Andrea (2018), Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization: Philosophy of Nature and the Rise of Biology in Germany, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, Justin (2019), What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentry, Gerad (2019), ‘The Ground of Hegel’s Logic of Life and the Unity of Reason: The Free Lawfulness of the Imagination’, in Gentry, Gerad and Pollok, Konstantine (eds.), The Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–72.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2004), ‘Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42 (1): 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2006), ‘Kant’s Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance’, in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant, Oxford: Blackwell, 455–69.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart (2017), The New Mechanical Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (1993), ‘Functions: Consensus without Unity’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3): 196–208.Google Scholar
Graham, Daniel W. (1999), see in Abbreviations, Phys.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006), ‘Bridging the Gulf: Kant’s Project in the Third Critique’, in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant, Oxford: Blackwell, 423–40.Google Scholar
Haig, David (2020), From Darwin to Derrida: Selfish Genes, Social Selves, and the Meanings of Life, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halbig, Christoph (2002), Objektives Denken. Erkenntnistheorie und Philosophy of Mind in Hegels System, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Harris, Errol E. (1998), ‘How Final Is Hegel’s Rejection of Evolution’, Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 13: 189–208.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1989), Unterwegs zur Sprache 1950–1959 (Gesamtausgabe 12), edited by von Hermann, F.-W., Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1998), Pathmarks, edited by McNeill, W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio (1987), Hegels System. Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität, Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen (2016), ‘Hegel, Kant and the Antinomies of Pure Reason’, Kant Yearbook 8 (1): 39–62.Google Scholar
Hudson, Hud (1994), Kant’s Compatibilism, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1777), Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
Illetterati, Luca (2008), ‘Being-For: Purposes and Functions in Artefacts and Living Beings’, in Illetterati, Luca and Michelini, Francesca (eds.), Purposiveness: Teleology between Nature and Mind, Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag, 135–62.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (1787), Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn, edited by Hammacher, K., Piske, I.-M. and Lauschke, M., Hamburg: Meiner, 2000.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter (2016), Hegel-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Schule, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Johnson, Monte R. (2005), Aristotle on Teleology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1966), The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Juarrero, Alicia (1999), Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knappik, Franz (2016), ‘Hegel’s Essentialism. Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of “the Concept”’, European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4): 760–87.Google Scholar
Knappik, Franz (2019), ‘Gêneros objetivos e teleologia em Hegel: da natureza à sociedade’, Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos 16 (27): 1–40.Google Scholar
Knappik, Franz (2021), ‘Hegel and Arguments for Natural Kind Essentialism’, Hegel Bulletin 42 (3): 368–94.Google Scholar
Kreines, James (2004), ‘Hegel’s Critique of Pure Mechanism and the Philosophical Appeal of the Logic Project’, European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1): 38–74.Google Scholar
Kreines, James (2008), ‘The Logic of Life: Hegel’s Philosophical Defense of Teleological Explanation of Living Beings’, in Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 344–77.Google Scholar
Kreines, James (2015), Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, David (1987), ‘Teleology: Kant and Hegel’, in Priest, Stephen (ed.), Hegel’s Critique of Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–84.Google Scholar
Lassalle, Ferdinand (1922), Nachgelassene Briefe und Schriften, vol. 3, edited by Mayer, Gustav, Stuttgart and Berlin: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt and Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried W. (1714), Monadologie, in Monadologie und andere metaphysische Schriften, edited by Schneider, Ulrich J., Hamburg: Meiner, 2002, 110–51.Google Scholar
Lennox, James G. (1982), ‘Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (3): 219–38.Google Scholar
Leunissen, Mariska (2010), Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, Daniel (2020), ‘On Origins and Species: Hegel on the Genus-Process’, Hegel Bulletin 41 (3): 426–45.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2007), Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Graham and Papineau, David (eds.) (2006), Teleosemantics: New Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Malabou, Catherine (2012), L’avenir de Hegel: plasticité, temporalité, dialectique, Paris: PUF, 2nd edition. Translation used (of the first edition) by Lisabeth During: The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic, London and New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman (1968), ‘The Conceivability of Mechanism’, The Philosophical Review 77 (1): 45–72.Google Scholar
Maraguat, Edgar (2020), ‘Hegel’s Organizational Account of Biological Functions’, Hegel Bulletin 41 (3): 407–25.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1996), Mind and World, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2nd edition with a new introduction.Google Scholar
McFarland, John D. (1970), Kant’s Concept of Teleology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter (1989), Kants Kritik der teleologischen Urteilskraft, Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter (2001), What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf (1984), ‘Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions’, in Meerbote, Ralf and Harper, William L. (eds.), Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 138–64.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph (2010), ‘Autonomie und Befreiung’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (5): 675–95.Google Scholar
Merker, Barbara (1995), ‘Über Gewohnheit’, in Eley, Lothar (ed.), Hegels Theorie des subjektiven Geistes, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 227–43.Google Scholar
Michelini, Francesca (2008), ‘Thinking Life: Hegel’s Conceptualization of Living Being as an Autopoietic Theory of Organized Systems’, in Illetterati, Luca and Michelini, Francesca (eds.), Purposiveness: Teleology between Nature and Mind, Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag, 75–96.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. (1984), Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. (1989), ‘In Defence of Proper Functions’, Philosophy of Science 56 (2): 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Richard (2002), Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mossio, Matteo, Saborido, Cristian and Moreno, Álvaro (2009), ‘An Organizational Account of Biological Functions’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 813–41.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen (1991), ‘The Teleological Notion of “Function”’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4): 454–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, Karen (2020), Hegel’s Concept of Life: Self-Consciousness, Freedom, Logic, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1873), ‘On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense’, in The Brith of Tragedy and Other Writings, edited by Geuss, Raymond and Speirs, Ronald, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–53.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1882/1887), The Gay Science, edited by Williams, Bernard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Novakovic, Andreja (2017), Hegel on Second Nature in Ethical Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David (1984), ‘Representation and Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 51 (December): 550–72.Google Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan Th. (1995), ‘“Second Nature”: Place and Significance of the Objective Spirit in Hegel’s Encyclopedia’, The Owl of Minerva 27 (1): 51–66.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry (2012), Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2000), ‘What Is the Question for Which Hegel’s Theory of Recognition Is the Answer?’, European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2): 155–72.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2001), ‘Rigorism and the “New Kant”’, in Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX. Internationales Kant-Kongresses, vol. 1, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 313–26.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2008), Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2018), Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in The Science of Logic, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel (2004), Transcendental Idealism and the Organism: Essays on Kant, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel (2006), ‘Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37: 735–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quine, Willard V. O. (1969), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rand, Sebastian (2013), ‘What’s Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality’, European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 68–86.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1982), Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays 1972–1980), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmied-Kowarzik, Wolfdietrich (1993), ‘Thesen zur Entstehung und Begründung der Naturphilosophie Schellings’, in Gloy, Karen and Burger, Paul (eds.), Die Naturphilosophie im Deutschen Idealismus, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 67–100.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (2012), Hegel’s Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (2017), ‘Innere versus äußere Zweckmäßigkeit in Hegels Philosophie der Geschichte’, Hegel-Studien 51: 11–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1991), ‘Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?’, Phronesis 36: 179–97.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1963), ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in Science, Perception and Reality, London: Routledge, 1–40.Google Scholar
Spahn, Christian (2007), Lebendiger Begriff – Begriffenes Leben. Zur Grundlegung der Philosophie des Organischen bei G. W. F. Hegel, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin (1992), Hegels Analytische Philosophie. Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung, Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin (2005), Philosophie des Selbstbewußtseins. Hegels System als Formanalyse von Wissen und Autonomie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin (2006), ‘The Question of System: How to Read the Development from Kant to Hegel’, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (1): 80–102.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Allison (2005), Petrified Intelligence: Nature in Hegel’s Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. (1985), Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. The Woodbridge Lectures 1983, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1979), ‘The Validity of Transcendental Arguments’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1): 151–66.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1983), ‘Hegel and the Philosophy of Action’, in Stepelevich, Lawrence S. and Lamb, David (eds.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Action, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Wandschneider, Dieter (2002), ‘Hegel und die Evolution’, in Breidbach, Olaf and von Engelhardt, Dietrich (eds.), Hegel und die Lebenswissenschaften, Berlin: VWB, 225–40.Google Scholar
Weber, Andreas and Varela, Francisco J. (2002), ‘Life after Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 97–125.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2020), ‘Causality, Natural Systems, and Hegel’s Organicism’, in Bykova, Marina F. and Westphal, Kenneth R. (eds.), The Palgrave Hegel Handbook, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 219–39.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (1991), Praktische Vernunft. Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant, Stuttgart and Weimar: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953), Philosophical Investigations, edited by Anscombe, G. E. M., Rhees, Rush and von Wright, G. H., translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. Clark (2018), ‘Rethinking Hegel’s Conceptual Realism’, The Review of Metaphysics 72: 331–70.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (1992), Das Körper-Seele-Problem. Kommentar zu Hegel, Enzyklopädie (1830), §389, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2010), ‘The Antinomies of Pure Reason’, in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–65.Google Scholar
Wouters, Arno (2005), ‘The Function Debate in Philosophy’, Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2): 123–51.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry (1973), ‘Functions’, Philosophical Review 82: 139–68.Google Scholar
Yeomans, Christopher (2012), Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. (2006), ‘Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant’s Relevance for Contemporary Controversies over Function in Biology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37: 748–70.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. (2018), The Gestation of German Biology: Philosophy and Physiology from Stahl to Schelling, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zanetti, Véronique (1993), ‘Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft’, Kant-Studien 83: 341–55.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj (2012), Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edgar Maraguat, Universidad de Valencia
  • Book: True Purposes in Hegel's Logic
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edgar Maraguat, Universidad de Valencia
  • Book: True Purposes in Hegel's Logic
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edgar Maraguat, Universidad de Valencia
  • Book: True Purposes in Hegel's Logic
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
Available formats
×