Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:15:40.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The role of species diversity in bottom-up and top-down interactions

from Part III - Patterns and Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Jerome J. Weis
Edited by
Torrance C. Hanley  and
Kimberly J. La Pierre
Jerome J. Weis
Affiliation:
Yale University
Torrance C. Hanley
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Kimberly J. La Pierre
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The flow of energy, carbon, and nutrients through food webs is constrained by the abilities of constituent organisms to consume, assimilate, and excrete resources. There is a growing recognition that the range of these abilities is positively correlated with community diversity and thus, variation in diversity can directly impact the functioning of food webs and ecosystems (Loreau et al., 2001; Naeem, 2002; Hooper et al., 2005). For instance, the strong influence of trophic diversity, or the number of trophic levels in a food web, is recognized as an important predictor of the standing stock and productivity of primary producers and herbivores (Hairston et al., 1960; Carpenter et al., 1985). In addition to trophic diversity, the diversity of competitors, from genotypic diversity within a species (Whitham et al., 2006; Hughes et al., 2008), to species diversity (Loreau et al., 2001; Naeem, 2002; Hooper et al., 2005), to broad phylogenetic diversity (Cadotte et al., 2008), can strongly influence ecosystem functions, including the uptake and assimilation of limiting nutrients and the stability of food webs through time.

In this chapter, I review the current understanding of the direct influences of competitor species richness on the transfer of energy and nutrients through food webs; a topic that has received a huge amount of attention over the past two decades (Naeem, 2008; Hooper et al., 2012). In part, the motivation to understand the influence of species richness on ecosystem functions has been prompted by a need to understand the ecosystem consequences of global species losses (Loreau et al., 2001; Naeem, 2002, Hooper et al., 2005; 2012; also, see Chapter 14). However, diversity varies across landscapes for a number of deterministic and stochastic reasons (MacArthur, 1967; Rosenzweig, 1995), and understanding the causes and consequences of this variation has resulted in a more broadly informative integration of community and ecosystem ecology with relevance beyond the implications of global species loss (Loreau et al., 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Trophic Ecology
Bottom-up and Top-down Interactions across Aquatic and Terrestrial Systems
 , pp. 318 - 339
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. A. (2001). Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science, 294, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andow, D. (1991). Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquilino, K. M., Cardinale, B. J. and Ives, A. R. (2005). Reciprocal effects of host plant and natural enemy diversity on herbivore suppression: an empirical study of a model tritrophic system. Oikos, 108, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N., et al. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9, 1146–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bärlocher, F. and Corkum, M. (2003). Nutrient enrichment overwhelms diversity effects in leaf decomposition by stream fungi. Oikos, 101, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behl, S., de Schryver, V., Diehl, S. and Stibor, H. (2012). Trophic transfer of biodiversity effects: functional equivalence of prey diversity and enrichment?Ecology and Evolution, 2, 3110–3122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, T., Newman, J. A., Silverman, B. W., Turner, S. L. and Lilley, A. K. (2005). The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature, 436, 1157–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2005). What determines the strength of a trophic cascade?Ecology, 86, 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, J. F. and O'Connor, M. I. (2005). Cascading effects of predator diversity and omnivory in a marine food web. Ecology Letters, 8, 1048–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, J. E. and Stachowicz, J. J. (2009). The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs. Ecology, 90, 2879–2888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. and Oakley, T. H. (2008). Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 17012–17017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J. (2011). Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature, 472, 86–U113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Duffy, J. E., et al. (2006). Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature, 443, 989–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Wright, J. P., Cadotte, M. W., et al. (2007). Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 18123–18128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Hillebrand, H., Harpole, W. S., Gross, K. and Ptacnik, R. (2009). Separating the influence of resource “availability” from resource “imbalance” on productivity-diversity relationships. Ecology Letters, 12, 475–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Matulich, K. L., Hooper, D. U., et al. (2011). The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 98, 572–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F. and Hodgson, J. R. (1985). Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience, 35, 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casula, P., Wilby, A. and Thomas, M. B. (2006). Understanding biodiversity effects on prey in multi-enemy systems. Ecology Letters, 9, 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crutsinger, G. M., Collins, M. D., Fordyce, J. A., et al. (2006). Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science, 313, 966–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMott, W. R. (1998). Utilization of a cyanobacterium and a phosphorus-deficient green alga as complementary resources by daphnids. Ecology, 79, 2463–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, S. and Cabido, M. (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, J. G., Duffy, J. E. and Bruno, J. F. (2008). Herbivore and predator diversity interactively affect ecosystem properties in an experimental marine community. Ecology Letters, 11, 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection. Oikos, 99, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E., Macdonald, K. S., Rhode, J. M. and Parker, J. D. (2001). Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology, 82, 2417–2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E., Richardson, J. P. and France, K. E. (2005). Ecosystem consequences of diversity depend on food chain length in estuarine vegetation. Ecology Letters, 8, 301–309.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E., Cardinale, B. J., France, K. E., et al. (2007). The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecology Letters, 10, 522–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, K. F., Aquilino, K. M., Best, R. J., Sellheim, K. L. and Stachowicz, J. J. (2010). Prey diversity is associated with weaker consumer effects in a meta-analysis of benthic marine experiments. Ecology Letters, 13, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fargione, J., Tilman, G. D., Dybzinski, R., et al. (2007). From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 871–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. W. (2003). The long-term relationship between plant diversity and total plant biomass depends on the mechanism maintaining diversity. Oikos, 102, 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. W. (2004). Effects of algal and herbivore diversity on the partitioning of biomass within and among trophic levels. Ecology, 85, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H. and Jonsson, P. R. (2005). Species richness changes across two trophic levels simultaneously affect prey and consumer biomass. Ecology Letters, 8, 696–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbold, J. A., Bulling, M. T. and Solan, M. (2011). Habitat structure mediates biodiversity effects on ecosystem properties. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287 (1717), 1–10.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. N., Jenkins, S. R., Gamfeldt, L., et al. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity increases the importance of species richness for an ecosystem process. Oikos, 118, 1335–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. N., Byrnes, J. E. and Cardinale, B. J. (2013). Effects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta-analysis. Ecology, 94, 2180–2187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, K. and Cardinale, B. J. (2007). Does species richness drive community production or vice versa? Reconciling historical and contemporary paradigms in competitive communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. and Slobodkin, L. B. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. The American Naturalist, 94, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., et al. (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286, 1123–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillebrand, H. and Cardinale, B. J. (2004). Consumer effects decline with prey diversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D. M. and Cadotte, M. W. (2008). Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology, 89, 1510–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D. and Loreau, M. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of trophic interactions and the importance of system openness. In The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, ed. Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W. and Tilman, D.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 246–262.Google Scholar
Holt, R. D., Grover, J. and Tilman, G. D. (1994). Simple rules for interspecific dominace in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. The American Naturalist, 144, 741–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F., Ewel, J., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J., et al. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 486, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N. and Vellend, M. (2008). Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters, 11, 609–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, M. (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 110, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ives, A. R., Cardinale, B. J. and Snyder, W. E. (2005). A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator-prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 8, 102–116.Google Scholar
Jactel, H. and Brockerhoff, E. G. (2007). Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecology Letters, 10, 835–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korhonen, J. J., Wang, J. and Soininen, J. (2011). Productivity-diversity relationships in lake plankton communities. PLoS One, 6, e22041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibold, M. A. (1989). Resource edibility and the effects of predators and productivity on the outcome of trophic interactions. American Naturalist, 134 (6), 922–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibold, M. A. (1996). A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: Trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. The American Naturalist, 147, 784–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. M., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E., et al. (2013). Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm. Ecology Letters, 16, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. (1998). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 5632–5636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. and Hector, A. (2001). Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 412, 72–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., et al. (2001). Ecology – biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M., Mouquet, N. and Gonzalez, A. (2003). Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 12765–12770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. H. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mulder, C., Koricheva, J., Huss-Danell, K., Hogberg, P. and Joshi, J. (1999). Insects affect relationships between plant species richness and ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters, 2, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S. (2002). Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology, 83, 1537–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S. (2008). Advancing realism in biodiversity research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 414–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeem, S., Hakansson, K., Lawton, J. H., Crawley, M. J. and Thompson, L. J. (1996). Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. Oikos, 76, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narwani, A. and Mazumder, A. (2010). Community composition and consumer identity determine the effect of resource species diversity on rates of consumption. Ecology, 91, 3441–3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostfeld, R. S. and LoGiudice, K. (2003). Community disassembly, biodiversity loss, and the erosion of an ecosystem service. Ecology, 84, 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfisterer, A. B., Diemer, M. and Schmid, B. (2003). Dietary shift and lowered biomass gain of a generalist herbivore in species-poor experimental plant communities. Oecologia, 135, 234–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polis, G. and Holt, R. D. (1992). Intraguild predation – the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptacnik, R., Solimini, A. G., Andersen, T., et al. (2008). Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 5134–5138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Root, R. B. (1973). Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs, 43, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L., (1995). Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, B. (2002). The species richness-productivity controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, A., Gaedke, U. and Weithoff, G. (2010). A mechanistic basis for underyielding in phytoplankton communities. Ecology, 91, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, O. J. (2009). Effects of predator functional diversity on grassland ecosystem function. Ecology, 90, 2339–2345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shurin, J. B., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E., et al. (2002). A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters, 5, 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., Englund, G. and Wooster, D. (1998). Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. D. and Knapp, A. (2003). Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecology Letters, 6, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. D., Wilcox, J., Kelly, T. and Knapp, A. (2004). Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie. Oikos, 106, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W. E., Snyder, G. B., Finke, D. L. and Straub, C. S. (2006). Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecology Letters, 9, 789–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, D. S. and Vellend, M. (2005). Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation?Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, D. S., Cardinale, B. J., Downing, A. L., et al. (2009). Diversity has stronger top-down than bottom-up effects on decomposition. Ecology, 90, 1073–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stachowicz, J. J., Bruno, J. F. and Duffy, J. E. (2007). Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 739–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachowicz, J. J., Best, R. J., Bracken, M. E. S. and Graham, M. H. (2008). Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 18842–18847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, C. F. (2001). The effects of prey heterogeneity and consumer identity on the limitation of trophic-level biomass. Ecology, 82, 2495–2506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symstad, A., Chapin, F., Wall, D., et al. (2003). Long-term and large-scale perspectives on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BioScience, 53, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thebault, E. and Loreau, M. (2003). Food-web constraints on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 14949–14954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, G. D., Wedin, D. and Knops, J. M. H. (1996). Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, G. D., Lehman, C. and Thomson, K. (1997). Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94, 1857–1861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, G. D., Reich, P. B. and Isbell, F. (2012). Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109, 10394–10397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toscano, B. J., Fodrie, F. J., Madsen, S. L. and Powers, S. P. (2010). Multiple prey effects: agonistic behaviors between prey species enhances consumption by their shared predator. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 385, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1989). The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venail, P. A., Maclean, R. C., Meynard, C. N. and Mouquet, N. (2010). Dispersal scales up the biodiversity-productivity relationship in an experimental source-sink metacommunity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2339–2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, D. V., Mordecai, E. A., Jaramillo, A. G., et al. (2010). Competition-defense tradeoffs and the maintenance of plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107, 17217–17222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weis, J. J. and Vasseur, D. A. (2014). Differential predation drives overyielding of prey species in a patchy environment. Oikos, 123, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, J. J., Cardinale, B. J., Forshay, K. J. and Ives, A. R. (2007). Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. Ecology, 88, 929–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weis, J. J., Madrigal, D. S. and Cardinale, B. J. (2008). Effects of algal diversity on the production of biomass in homogeneous and heterogeneous nutrient environments: a microcosm experiment. PLoS One, 3, e2825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitham, T. G., Bailey, J. K., Schweitzer, J. A., et al. (2006). A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 510–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilby, A. and Orwin, K. H. (2013). Herbivore species richness, composition and community structure mediate predator richness effects and top-down control of herbivore biomass. Oecologia, 172, 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojdak, J. M. (2005). Relative strength of top-down, bottom-up, and consumer species richness effects on pond ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 75, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worm, B. and Duffy, J. E. (2003). Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 628–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, E. K. and Cardinale, B. J. (2013). Is the relationship between algal diversity and biomass in North American lakes consistent with biodiversity experiments?Oikos, 123, 267–278.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×