Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:26:55.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Transnational Legal Ordering and Transnational Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Edited by
Gregory Shaffer  and
Ely Aaronson
Gregory Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Ely Aaronson
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice , pp. 49 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Amicelle, Anthony, and Iafolla, Vanessa. 2018. “Suspicion-in-the-Making: Surveillance and Denunciation in Financial Policing.” British Journal of Criminology 58: 845–863.Google Scholar
Artingstall, David, Dove, Nick, Howell, John, and Levi, Michael. 2016. Drivers and Impacts of Derisking. London: Financial Conduct Authority. www.fca.org.uk/your-fca/documents/research/drivers-impacts-of-derisking.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan. 2019. “Soft and Hard Strategies: The Role of Business in the Crafting of International Commercial Law.” Michigan Journal of International Law 40: 433–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Clearing House. 2017. A New Paradigm: Redesigning the U.S. AML/CFT Framework to Protect National Security and Aid Law Enforcement. www.theclearinghouse.org/~/media/TCH/Documents/TCH%20WEEKLY/2017/20170216_TCH_Report_AML_CFT_Framework_Redesign.pdf.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, eds. 2012. Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbenova, Michaela, Liu, Yan, Kyriakos-Saad, Nadim, Mejia, Aledjandro Lopez, Gasha, Jose Giancarlo, Mathias, Emmanuel, Norat, Mohamed, Fernando, Francisco, and Almeida, Yasmin. 2016. The Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking Relationships: A Case for Policy Action. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Financial Stability Board. 2018. Stocktake of Remittance Service Providers’ Access to Banking Services. Basel: Financial Stability Board.Google Scholar
Genschel, Philipp, and Rixen, Thomas. 2015. Settling and Unsettling the Transnational Legal Order of International Taxation. Pp. 154–186 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 2018. “Plausible Folk Theories: Throwing Veils of Plausibility over Zones of Ignorance in Global Governance.” British Journal of Sociology 69(4): 936–961.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Levi, Michael, and Reuter, Peter. 2014. Global Surveillance of Dirty Money: Assessing Assessments of Regimes to Control Money Laundering and Combat the Financing of Terrorism. Chicago: Center on Law and Globalization, American Bar Foundation, and University of Illinois College of Law. www.americanbarfoundation.org/uploads/cms/documents/report_global_surveillance_of_dirty_money_1.30.2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015a. “Researching Transnational Legal Orders.” Pp. 473–528 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015b. “Transnational Legal Orders.” Pp. 1–72 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Michael. 1991. “Pecunia non olet: Cleansing the Money Launderers from the Temple.” Crime, Law and Social Change 16: 217–302.Google Scholar
Levi, Michael. 1997. “Evaluating ‘The New Policing’: Attacking the Money Trail of Organised Crime.” Australia New Zealand Journal of Criminology 30: 1–25.Google Scholar
Levi, Michael. 2006. “Pecunia non olet? The Control of Money-Laundering Revisited.” Pp. 161–182 in The Organised Crime Community, edited by Bovenkerk, F. and Levi, Michael. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Levi, Michael. 2010. “Combating the Financing of Terrorism: A History and Assessment of the Control of ‘Threat Finance.’” British Journal of Criminology 50(4): 650–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Michael, and Reuter, Peter. 2006. “Money Laundering.” Crime and Justice 34: 289–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Michael, Reuter, Peter, and Halliday, Terence. 2018. “Can the AML System Be Evaluated without Better Data?” Crime, Law and Social Change 69: 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexis-Nexis. 2017a. Future Financial Crime Risks 2017.Google Scholar
Lexis-Nexis. 2017b. True Cost of AML Compliance – Europe.Google Scholar
Lexis-Nexis.2018a. The True Cost of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance: A LexisNexis Risk Solutions Report Study on Financial institutions across Six Markets in Asia. www.lexisnexis.com/risk/intl/en/resources/research/true-cost-of-aml-compliance-apac-survey-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Lexis-Nexis. 2018b. The True Cost of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance in the United States.Google Scholar
Nance, Mark T. 2018. “The Regime That FATF Built: An Introduction to the Financial Action Task Force.” Crime, Law and Social Change 69(2): 109–129.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. Measuring OECD Responses to Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Reuter, Peter. 2013. “Are Estimates of Money Laundering Volume Either Feasible or Useful?” Pp. 224–231 in Research Handbook on Money Laundering, edited by Unger, Brigitte. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Reuter, Peter, and Truman, Edwin M.. 2004. Chasing Dirty Money: The Fight against Money Laundering. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Ginsburg, Tom, and Halliday, Terence C., eds. 2019. Constitution-Making and Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2011. The Money Laundry: Regulating Criminal Finance in the Global Economy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2017. The Despot’s Guide to Wealth Management: On the International Campaign against Grand Corruption. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2016. Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Duyne, Petrus, Harvey, Jackie H., and Gelemerova, Liliya Y.. 2019. The Critical Handbook of Money Laundering: Policy, Analysis and Myths. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van der Does de Willebois, E., Halter, E. M., Harrison, R. A., Park, J. W., and Sharman, J. C.. 2011. The Puppet Masters: How the Corrupt Use Legal Structures to Hide Stolen Assets and What to Do about It. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan. 2002. “Values and Interests: International Legalization in the Fight against Corruption.” Journal of Legal Studies 31: S141–177.Google Scholar
Abikoff, Kevin T., Little, Edward J. M., Wood, John F., and Huneke, Michael H.. 2014. The International Perspective: Lessons from US Authorities’ Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Pp. 439–483 in Lissack and Horlick on Bribery, edited by Lissack, Richard and Horlick, Fiona, 2nd ed. London: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
AFP. 2017. Amended Annual Report 2016–2017. www.afp.gov.au/about-us/publications-and-reports/annual-reports.Google Scholar
AFP and CDPP. 2017. Self-Reporting of Foreign Bribery and Related Offending by Corporations. December 8, 2017. www.cdpp.gov.au/sites/g/files/net2061/f/20170812AFP-CDPP-Best-Practice-Guideline-on-self-reporting-of-foreign-bribery.pdf.Google Scholar
AGD. 2016. Improving Enforcement Options for Serious Corporate Crime: Consideration of a Deferred Prosecution Agreements Scheme in Australia: Public Consultation Paper. March 2016. www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Pages/Deferred-prosecution-agreements-public-consultation.aspx.Google Scholar
AGD. 2017. Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Bribery Offence in the Criminal Code Act 1995: Public Consultation Paper. April 2017. www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Pages/Proposed-amendments-to-the-foreign-bribery-offence-in-the-criminal-code-act-1995.aspx.Google Scholar
AGD. 2018a. Submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017, Sub. No. 7. www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/CombattingCrime/Submissions.Google Scholar
AGD. 2018b. Response Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017: Questions on Notice, March 7, 2018. www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/CombattingCrime/Additional_Documents.Google Scholar
ALRC. 2019. Review into Australia’s Corporate Criminal Responsibility Regime. April 10, 2019. www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/review-australia%E2%80%99s-corporate-criminal-responsibility-regime.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter, and Nadelmann, Ethan. 2008. Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, Gabrielle, Reilly, Alexander, and Grenfell, Laura. 2014. Australian Public Law, 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. 2017. “Positive Duties, Regulation and the Criminal Sanction.” Law Quarterly Review 133: 606–630.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. 2018. “A New Generation of Omissions Offences?” The Criminal Law Review 5: 354–364.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, and Zedner, Lucia. 2008. “Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 2: 21–51.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, and Zedner, Lucia. 2014. Preventive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayes, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Cat. 2019. Australia’s Implementation of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. August 28, 2019. Parliamentary Library Research Paper. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22library%2Fprspub%2F6300407%22.Google Scholar
Barker, Cat, and Biddington, Monica. 2017–2018. Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017, Parliamentary Library Bills Digests 105.Google Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2002. “Human Rights Protections in the Suppression Conventions.” Human Rights Law Review 2: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2003. “Transnational Criminal Law?” European Journal of International Law 14: 953–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2014. The Concept and Nature of Transnational Criminal Law. Pp. 11–26 in Routledge Handbook of Transnational Criminal Law, edited by Boister, Neil and Currie, Robert. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2015. “Further Reflections on the Concept of Transnational Criminal Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 6: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2018. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boucht, Johan. 2017. The Limits of Asset Confiscation: On the Legitimacy of Extended Appropriation of Criminal Proceeds. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bronitt, Simon. 2018. Deferred Prosecution Agreements: Negotiating Punishment Before Conviction? Pp. 45–59 in The Evolving Role of the Public Prosecutor: Challenges and Innovations, edited by Colvin, Victoria and Stenning, Philip C.. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronitt, Simon and Brereton, Zoe. Submission to the Attorney General’s Department, Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Bribery Offence in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Public Consultation Paper. May 10, 2017. www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Documents/Proposed-amendments-to-the-foreign-bribery-offence-criminal-code-act-1995/Foreign-bribery-submission-Bronitt-Brereton.pdf.Google Scholar
Campbell, Liz. 2018. “Corporate Liability and the Criminalisation of Failure.” Law and Financial Markets Review 12: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Liz, 2019. “Trying Corporations: Why Not Prosecute?” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 31: 269–291.Google Scholar
Catá Backer, Larry. 2008. “Global Panopticism: States, Corporations, and the Governance Effects of Monitoring Regimes.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 15: 101–148.Google Scholar
CDPP. 2018. Annual Report 2017–2018. www.cdpp.gov.au/publications.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chiam, Madelaine, Hovell, Devika, and Williams, George. 2003. “Deep Anxieties: Australia and the International Legal Order.” Sydney Law Review 25: 423–465.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chiam, Madelaine, Hovell, Devika, and Williams, George. 2006. No Country Is an Island: Australia and International Law. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Melissa, Conley Tyler, Crawford, Emily, and Scott, Shirley V.. 2017. Australia’s International Personality: Historical, Legal, and Policy Perspectives. Pp. 1–22 in International Law in Australia, 3rd ed., edited by Crawford, Emily and Rothwell, Donald R.. Pyrmont: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
Criminal Law Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of the Attorneys-General. 1992. Model Criminal Code: General Principles of Criminal Responsibility (Final Report).Google Scholar
Currie, Robert. 2015. “Neil Boister, An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 13: 1166–1169.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2015. The Local-Global Life of Indicators: Law, Power, and Resistance. Pp. 1–24 in The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law, edited by Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin E., and Kingsbury, Benedict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, and Scott, Joanne. 2006. Introduction: New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism. Pp. 1–12 in Law and New Governance in the EU and the US, edited by de Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freiberg, Arie. 2017. Regulation in Australia. Annandale: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Jock. 2018. “Arendt and Corporate Culture: Instilling Thoughtfulness into the Commonwealth Criminal Code.” Australian Journal of Corporate Law 33: 25–54.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Brandon. 2014. Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon. 2020. “Declining Corporate Prosecutions.” American Criminal Law Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3360456.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Jo-Anne, and Sharman, Jason. 2016. “Turning a Blind Eye to Bribery: Explaining Failures to Comply with the International Anti-corruption Regime.” Political Studies 64: 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gless, Sabine. 2015. “Bird’s-Eye View and Worm’s Eye View: Towards a Defendant-Based Approach in Transnational Criminal Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 6: 117–140.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015a. Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 3–72 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terrence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015b. Researching Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 475–528 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terrence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayne, The Hon. Kenneth, M.A.C. 2018. Q.C. Interim Report: Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, vol. 1. September 21, 2018. https://financialservices.royalcommission.gov.au/Documents/interim-report/interim-report-volume-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Hayne, The Hon. Kenneth, M.A.C. 2019. Q.C. Final Report: Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, vol. 1. February 1, 2019. https://financialservices.royalcommission.gov.au/Pages/reports.aspx#final.Google Scholar
House of Lords, Select Committee on the Bribery Act 2010. 2019. Report of Session 2017–2019, The Bribery Act 2010: Post-Legislative Scrutiny. March 14, 2019. www.parliament.uk/bribery-act–2010.Google Scholar
Husisian, Gregory. 2017. “The Future of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act under the Trump Administration.” International Trade Law and Regulation 23: 97–108.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2016. ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use. www.iso.org/standard/65034.html.Google Scholar
Ivory, Radha. 2014. Corruption, Asset Recovery and the Protection of Property in Public International Law: The Human Rights of Bad Guys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ivory, Radha. 2018. “Beyond Transnational Criminal Law: Anti-corruption as Global New Governance.” London Review of International Law 6: 413–422.Google Scholar
Ivory, Radha. Forthcoming. From Content to the Construction of Risk: Due Diligence Debates in International Anti-corruption and Money Laundering Law. In Due Diligence in International Law, edited by Anne Peters, Heike Krieger, and Leonhard Kreuzer (manuscript accepted by Oxford University Press and on file with author).Google Scholar
Jessup, Phillip. 1956. Transnational Law: Storrs Lectures on Jurisprudence, vol. 2.New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, The Hon. Michael, MP, Minister for Justice. 2014. Media Release: AFP-Hosted Anti-fraud and Anti-corruption Centre. July 31, 2014. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/143276/20141001-1307/www.ministerjustice.gov.au/Mediareleases/Pages/2014/ThirdQuarter/31July2014-AFPHostedFraudAndAntiCorruptionCentre.html.Google Scholar
Koehler, Mike. 2018. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Continuity in a Transition Year.” South Carolina Law Review 70: 143–208.Google Scholar
Kohli, Rahul. 2018. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.” American Criminal Law Review 55: 1269–1331.Google Scholar
Kotiswaran, Prabha, and Palmer, Nicola. 2015. “Rethinking the ‘International Law of Crime’: Provocations from Transnational Legal Studies.” Transnational Legal Theory 6: 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liss, Carolin, and Sharman, Jason. 2015. “Global Corporate Crime-Fighters: Private Transnational Responses to Piracy and Money Laundering.” Review of International Political Economy 22: 693–718.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2004. “The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought.” Minnesota Law Review 89: 342–470.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2012. New Governance as Regulatory Governance. Pp. 65–82 in The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by Levi-Faur., David Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, Nicholas. 2014. Regulating Corporate Bribery in International Business: Anti-corruption in the UK and Germany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Low, Lucinda. 2014. Preventing and Defending Against Vicarious and Successor Liability under National and International Transnational Bribery Regimes. Pp. 611–683 in The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Commentary, 2nd ed., edited by Pieth, Mark, Low, Lucinda, and Bonucci, Nicola. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine, and Ransley, Janet. 2006. Third Party Policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, Senator the Hon. James. 2017. Second Reading Speech: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017. Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates. Senate Official Hansard, December 6, 2017. 15: 9906–9908.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2011. The Bribery Act 2010: Guidance about Procedures Which Relevant Commercial Organisations Can Put into Place to Prevent Persons Associated with them from Bribing. March 2011. www.gov.uk/government/publications/bribery-act-2010-guidance.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2019. Government Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Bribery Act 2010, May 2019. www.gov.uk/government/publications.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.” International Organization 44: 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Crime Agency. Undated. International Anti-corruption Coordination Centre. www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/about-us/what-we-do/national-economic-crime-centre/international-anti-corruption-coordination-centre.Google Scholar
Nourse, Victoria, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. “Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?” Cornell Law Review 95: 61–137.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger. 2015. International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2009. Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, C(2009)159/REV1/FINAL (November 26, 2009) as amended by C(2010)19 (February 18, 2010).Google Scholar
OECD. 2019. Resolving Foreign Bribery Cases with Non-trial Resolutions Settlements and Non-trial Agreements by Parties to the Anti-Bribery Convention. www.oecd.org/corruption/Resolving-Foreign-Bribery-Cases-with-Non-Trial-Resolutions.htm.Google Scholar
OECD, UNODC, and World Bank Group. 2013. Anti-corruption Ethics and Compliance Handbook for Business. www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-corruption-ethics-and-compliance-handbook-for-business.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 1999. Australia: Review of the Implementation of the Convention and 1997 Recommendation. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2002. United States: Phase 2 Report on the Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. October 2002. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2005. United Kingdom: Phase 2 Report on the Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. March 17, 2005. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2006. Australia: Phase 2 Report on the Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. January 4, 2006. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2008. United Kingdom: Phase 2bis Report on the Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. October 16, 2008. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2009. Australia: Phase 2 Follow-Up Report on the Implementation of the Phase 2 Recommendations, Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. August 29, 2009. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2010a. Phase 3 Report on Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention in the United States. October 2010. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2010b. United Kingdom: Phase 1ter Report on the Application of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and 2009 Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions. December 16, 2010. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2011. United Kingdom: Phase 2bis Follow-Up Report on the Implementation of the Phase 2bis Recommendations. May 23, 2011. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2012. Phase 3 Report on Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention in Australia. October 12, 2012. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2015. Australia: Phase 3 Follow-Up to the Phase 3 Report and Recommendations. April 3, 2015. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2017a. Phase 4 Report: United Kingdom. March 16, 2017. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2017b. Phase 4 Report: Australia. December 15, 2017. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
OECD-WGB. 2019. Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention: Phase 4 Two-Year Follow-Up Report: United Kingdom. March 2019. www.oecd.org/corruption/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htm.Google Scholar
Ogg, James Thomas. 2015. Preventive Justice and the Power of Policy Transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Library (Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Services). 2019. Briefing Book: Key Issues for the 46th Parliament. Commonwealth of Australia. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook46p.Google Scholar
Pieth, Mark. 2014. Article 2: The Responsibility of Legal Persons. Pp. 212–251 in The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Commentary, 2nd ed., edited by Pieth, Mark, Low, Lucinda, and Bonucci, Nicola. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pieth, Mark, and Ivory, Radha. 2011. Emergence and Convergence: Corporate Criminal Liability Principles in Overview. Pp. 3–60 in Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, edited by Pieth, Mark and Ivory, Radha. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Porter, The Hon. Christian, MP, Attorney General. 2018a. Letter to Senator Helen Polley, Chair, Senate Scrutiny of Bills Committee, No. MS18-000369. March 6, 2018. www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Scrutiny_of_Bills/Scrutiny_Digest/2018.Google Scholar
Porter, The Hon. Christian, MP, Attorney General. 2018b. Media Release: Consultation on New Measures to Combat Corporate Crime. June 8, 2018. www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/Media/Pages/Consultation-on-new-measure-to-combat-corporate-crime-8-june-2018.aspx.Google Scholar
Porter, The Hon. Christian, MP, Attorney General. 2019. Media Release: Review into Australia’s Corporate Criminal Responsibility Regime. April 10, 2019. www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/Media/Pages/Review-into-Australia%E2%80%99s-corporate-criminal-responsibility-regime-10-april-19.aspx.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason. 2017. “The Responsibility to Protect and the Rise of China: Lessons from Australia’s Role as a ‘Pragmatic’ Norm Entrepreneur.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17: 35–65.Google Scholar
Senate. 1994. Explanatory Memorandum, Criminal Code Bill 1994 (Cth).Google Scholar
Senate. 2017. Explanatory Memorandum, Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017 (Cth).Google Scholar
Senate. 2018a. Economic References Committee, Foreign Bribery (Report), March 2018. www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Foreignbribery45th/Report.Google Scholar
Senate. 2018b. Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017 (Report), April 2018. www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/CombattingCrime.Google Scholar
Senate. 2018c. Addendum to the Explanatory Memorandum, Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017 (Cth).Google Scholar
Serious Fraud Office. 2014. Deferred Prosecution Agreements Code of Practice: Crime and Courts Act 2013, February 14, 2014. www.sfo.gov.uk/?wpdmdl=1447.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. “How Business Shapes Law: A Socio-Legal Framework.” Connecticut Law Review 42: 147–183.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2013a. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. Pp. 1–22 in Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change, edited by Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2013b. Dimensions and Determinants of State Change. Pp. 23–49 in Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change, edited by Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. “The New Legal Realist Approach to International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28: 189–210.Google Scholar
Transparency International Australia. 2018. Media Release: Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2017 Shows Australia Falls again in Corruption Perceptions Index Scores. http://transparency.org.au/corruption-perceptions-index-cpi-2017-shows-australia-falls-corruption-perceptions-index-scores.Google Scholar
UNCAC-COSP. 2012. Implementation Review Group, Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, Executive Summary: Australia. UN Doc. No. CAC/COSP/IRG/I/2/1. www.unodc.org/unodc/treaties/CAC/country-profile.Google Scholar
UNCAC-COSP. 2013. Implementation Review Group, Country Review Report of the United Kingdom. www.unodc.org/unodc/treaties/CAC/country-profile.Google Scholar
UNCAC-COSP. 2019. Implementation Review Group, Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, Executive Summary: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. UN Doc. No. CAC/COSP/IRG/II/2/1/Add.4. www.unodc.org/unodc/treaties/CAC/country-profile.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2018. Justice Manual. November 2018. www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9–28000-principles-federal-prosecution-business-organizations.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2019. Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs. www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/937501/download.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice and US Securities and Exchange Commission. 2012. A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. November 14, 2012. www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf.Google Scholar
US Sentencing Commission. 2018. Guidelines Manual, §3E1.1. November 1, 2018. www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2018/GLMFull.pdf.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, Elies. 2016. “International Criminal Law: Over-Studied and Underachieving?” Leiden Journal of International Law 29: 1–12.Google Scholar
Vuona, Bridget. 2019. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.” American Criminal Law Review 56: 979–1032.Google Scholar
Weiner, Blake, Austin, Kimberly, Lapin, John, and Mary, McCullough. 2018. “Corporate Criminal Liability.” American Criminal Law Review 55: 961–999.Google Scholar
Wells, Celia. 2001. Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Celia. 2019. Economic Crime in the UK: Corporate and Individual Liability. Pp. 253–276 in White Collar Crime: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Ligeti, Katalin and Tosza, Stanislaw. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2016. De-risking in the Financial Sector. October 6, 2016. www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/de-risking-in-the-financial-sector.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. 2013. Anti-corruption Ethics and Compliance Handbook for Business. www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-corruption-ethics-and-compliance-handbook-for-business.htm.Google Scholar
Wyld, Robert. 2019. Australia. Pp. 11–59 in From Baksheesh to Bribery: Understanding the Global Fight against Corruption and Graft, edited by Markus Funk, T. and Boutros, Andrew S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Allain, J. 2014. “No Effective Trafficking Definition Exists: Domestic Implementation of the Palermo Protocol.” Albany Government Law Review 7: 111–142.Google Scholar
Andrees, B., and Aikman, A. 2017. Raising the Bar: The Adoption of New ILO Standards against Forced Labour. Pp. 359–394 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andrijasevic, R. 2007. “Beautiful Dead Bodies: Gender, Migration and Representation in Anti-Trafficking Campaigns.” Feminist Review 86: 24–44.Google Scholar
Anti-Slavery International. 2016. International Cotton Campaign against Slavery. https://www.antislavery.org/take-action/campaigns/end-uzbek-cotton-crimes/ (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Avelar, F. 2012. “Alternative Drug Policies in the Americas.” Law and Business Review of the Americas 18: 403–410.Google Scholar
Baer, K. 2015. “The Trafficking Protocol and the Anti-Trafficking Framework: Insufficient to Address Exploitation.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 167–172.Google Scholar
Bales, K. 1999. Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bales, K. 2007. Ending Slavery: How We Free Today’s Slaves. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. 2017. “Brokered Subjects and Sexual Investability.” Pp. 329–358 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boister, N. 2003. “Transnational Criminal Law?” European Journal of International Law 14: 953–976.Google Scholar
Boister, N. 2015. “Further Reflections on the Concept of Transnational Criminal Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 6(1): 9–30.Google Scholar
Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. 2016. “The Good, Bad, the Ugly: Human Rights Violators in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Human Trafficking 2(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Chuang, J. A. 2010. “Rescuing Trafficking from Ideological Capture: Prostitution Reform and Anti-Trafficking Law and Policy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158: 1655–1728.Google Scholar
Chuang, J. A. 2014. “Exploitation Creep and the Unmaking of Human Trafficking Law.” American Journal of International Law 108(4): 609–649.Google Scholar
Chuang, J. A. 2017. Contemporary Debt Bondage, “Self-Exploitation,” and the Limits of the Trafficking Definition. Pp. 112–133 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, B. 2015. “Re-framing Exploitation Creep to Fight Human Trafficking: A Response to Janie Chuang.” AJIL Unbound. June 11, 2015. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/reframing-exploitation-creep-to-fight-human-trafficking-a-response-to-janie-chuang/6953C5CFD765CD49954A1FD24279E222 (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Danailova-Trainor, G., and Laczko, F.. 2010. “Trafficking in Persons and Development: Towards Greater Policy Coherence.” International Migration 48(4): 38–83.Google Scholar
De, Rohit. 2018. People’s Constitution: The Everyday Life of Law in the Indian Republic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
de Castilho, E. W. V. 2015. “Human Trafficking in Brazil: Between Crime-Based and Human Rights-Based Governance.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 174–185.Google Scholar
Debroy, B. 2017. “International Labour Organisation’s Omissions.” Indian Express. November 30, 2017. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/international-labour-organisation-modern-slavery-forced-marriage-4960954/.Google Scholar
Chronicle, Deccan. 2018. “Hyderabad: Rescued Uzbek Woman Ends Life in Shelter Home.” April 15, 2018. www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/crime/150418/hyderabad-rescued-uzbek-woman-ends-life-in-shelter-home.html.Google Scholar
Doezema, J. 2000. “Loose Women or Lost Women? The Re-emergence of the Myth of White Slavery in Contemporary Discourses of Trafficking of Women.” Gender Issues 18(1): 23–50.Google Scholar
Dottridge, M. 2007. Introduction. Pp. 1–27 in Global Alliance against Traffic in Women, Collateral Damage: The Impact of Anti-Trafficking Measures on Human Rights Around the World, edited by M. Dottridge, www.gaatw.org/Collateral%20Damage_Final/singlefile_CollateralDamagefinal.pdf (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Dottridge, M. 2017. Trafficked and Exploited: The Urgent Need for Coherence in International Law. Pp. 59–82 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Economic and Political Weekly. 2016. Review of Women’s Studies 51: 44–45.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. T. 2001. “Human Rights and the New U.N. Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis.” Human Rights Quarterly 23: 975–1004.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. T. 2015. “Two Cheers for the Trafficking Protocol.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 14–32.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. T. 2016. “Editorial: The Problems and Prospects of Trafficking Prosecutions: Ending Impunity and Securing Justice.” Anti-Trafficking Review 6: 1–11.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. T. 2017. The International Legal Definition of “Trafficking in Persons”: Scope and Application. Pp. 83–111 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Govindan, P. 2013. “Rethinking Emancipation: The Rhetorics of Slavery and Politics of Freedom in Anti-Trafficking Work in India.” Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 15(4): 511–529.Google Scholar
Grono, N. 2016. “Measuring Slavery Encourages Governments to Do Better.” Thomson Reuters Foundation News. July 16, 2016. http://news.trust.org/item/20160716164413-tig2w (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Davida, Grupo. 2015. “Trafficking as a Floating Signifier: The View from Brazil.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 161–166.Google Scholar
Hackney, L. K. 2015. “Re-evaluating Palermo: The Case of Burmese Women as Chinese Brides.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 98–119.Google Scholar
Halley, J., Kotiswaran, P., Shamir, H., and Thomas, C.. 2006. “From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29: 335–423.Google Scholar
Halliday, T. C., and Shaffer, G.. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodal, K., Kelly, C., and Lawrence, F.. 2014. “Revealed: Asian Slave Labour Producing Prawns for Supermarkets in US, UK.” The Guardian. June 10, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/10/supermarket-prawns-thailand-produced-slave-labour (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
International Labour Office, Walk Free Foundation and International Organization for Migration. 2017. Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 1930. Convention Concerning Forced or Compulsory Labour (No. 29), Geneva, 28 June 1930, in force 1 May 1932, 39 UNTS 55.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 1957. Convention Concerning the Abolition of Forced Labour (No 105), Geneva, 25 June 1947, in force 17 January 1959, 520 UNTS 291.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2005. A Global Alliance against Forced Labour. International Labour Conference 93rd Session 2005, Report I(B). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2009a. The Cost of Coercion: Global Report under the Follow-Up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. International Labour Conference 98th Session 2009, Report I(B). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2009b. Operational Indicators of Trafficking in Human Beings: Results from a Delphi Survey Implemented by the ILO and the European Commission. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2009c. Fighting Forced Labour, The Example of Brazil. Special Action Programme to Combat Forced Labour. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2013a. Report for Discussion at the Tripartite Meeting of Experts Concerning the Possible Adoption of an ILO Instrument to Supplement the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2013b. Report and Conclusions of the Tripartite Meeting of Experts on Forced Labour and Trafficking for Labour Exploitation. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2014. Profits and Poverty: The Economics of Forced Labour. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Jahnsen, S. O., and Skilbrei, M. L.. 2015. “From Palermo to the Streets of Oslo: Pros and Cons of the Trafficking Framework.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 156–160.Google Scholar
Jenner, M. S. 2011. “International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic Solution.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18(2): 901–927.Google Scholar
Kangaspunta, K. 2015. “Was Trafficking in Persons Really Criminalised?” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 80–97.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2016. “46 Million People Living as Slaves, Latest Global Index Reveals.” The Guardian. June 1, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/jun/01/46-million-people-living-as-slaves-latest-global-index-reveals-russell-crowe (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Kotiswaran, P. 2014. “Beyond Sexual Humanitarianism: A Postcolonial Approach to Anti-Trafficking Law.” UC Irvine Law Review 4: 353.Google Scholar
Lawrence, F. 2018. “How Did We Let Modern Slavery Become Part of Our Everyday Lives?” The Guardian. April 2, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/02/modern-slavery-daily-life-exploitation-goods-services.Google Scholar
LeBaron, G. 2016. It’s Time to Get Serious about Forced Labour in Supply Chains. Pp. 8–13 in E-Book on Forced Labour in the Global Economy, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by G. LeBaron and N. Howard. www.opendemocacy.net (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Lee, M., ed. 2007. Human Trafficking. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lerche, J. 2016. ILO Campaigns: Missing the Wood for the Trees? Pp. 74–77 in E-Book on Forced Labour in the Global Economy, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by LeBaron, G. and Howard, N.. www.opendemocracy.net/beyondslavery (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. B. 2011. “Conflict, Intervention, and Drug Trafficking: Unintended Consequences of United States Policy in Colombia.” Oklahoma City University Law Review 36(2): 293–349.Google Scholar
Magar, V. 2012. “Rescue and Rehabilitation: A Critical Analysis of Sex Workers’ Antitrafficking Response in India.” Signs 37(3): 619–644.Google Scholar
McGrath, S., and Watson, S.. 2018. “Anti-Slavery as Development: A Global Politics of Rescue.” Geoforum 93: 22–31.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. 2016. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law Into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. 1998. “The United States Extraterritorial War on Drugs.” Southern Cross University Law Review 2: 36–75.Google Scholar
Modern Slavery Act. 2015, C30.Google Scholar
O’Connell Davidson, J. 2010. “New Slavery, Old Binaries: Human Trafficking and the Borders of ‘Freedom.’” Global Networks 10: 244–261.Google Scholar
O’Connor, M. P., and Rumann, C. M. 2011. “Market Solutions to Global Narcotics Trafficking and Addiction.” Phoenix Law Review 5: 123–149.Google Scholar
Parrenas, R. S. 2006. “Trafficked? Filipino Hostesses in Tokyo’s Nightlife Industry.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 18: 145–180.Google Scholar
Plant, R. 2017. Combating Trafficking for Labour Exploitation in the Global Economy: The Need for a Differentiated Approach. Pp. 422–442 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, J. G. 2010. “A Free Labor Approach to Human Trafficking.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158: 1849–1976.Google Scholar
Quirk, J. 2016. The Rhetoric and Reality of “Ending Slavery in Our Lifetime.” Pp. 20–25 in E-Book on Popular and Political Representations, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by J. Quirk and J. O’Connell Davidson. www.opendemocracy.net (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Quirk, J., and Bunting, A.. 2016. The Politics of Exception: The Bipartisan Appeal of Human Trafficking. Pp. 64–68 in E-Book on Popular and Political Representations, Beyond Slavery and Trafficking Series, edited by J. Quirk and J. O’Connell Davidson. www.opendemocracy.net (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Quirk, J., and J. O’Connell Davidson. 2016. Introduction. Pp. 10–19 in E-Book on Popular and Political Representations, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by J. Quirk and J. O’Connell Davidson. www.opendemocracy.org (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Ramachandran, . 2010. The Politics of the US State Department’s TIP Report in India: Ethnographic Vignettes and Theoretical Possibilities.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. 1999. “Law, Liberalization and International Narcotics Trafficking.” N.Y.U Journal of International Law and Politics 32: 89–145.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. 2016. Still Slaving Over Sugar. Pp. 43–47 in E-Book on Forced Labor in the Global Economy, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by G. LeBaron and N. Howard. www.opendemocracy.net (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Rittich, K. 2017. Representing, Counting, Valuing: Managing Definitional Uncertainty in the Law of Trafficking. Pp. 238–272 in Revisiting the Law and Governance of Trafficking, Forced Labour and Modern Slavery, edited by Kotiswaran, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savona, E. U., and Stefanizzi, S. 2007. Introduction. Pp. 1–4 in Measuring Human Trafficking: Complexities and Pitfalls, edited by in Savona, E. U. and Stefanizzi, S.. Verlag and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Seshu, M. and Ahmed, A. 2012. “‘We Have the Right Not to Be Rescued … ’: When Anti-trafficking Programmes Undermine the Health and Well-Being of Sex Workers.” Anti-Trafficking Review 1: 149–165.Google Scholar
Shamir, H. 2012. “A Labor Paradigm for Human Trafficking.” UCLA Law Review 60: 76–137.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. B. 2010. “What Are They Smoking?! Mexico’s Decriminalization of Small-Scale Drug Possession in the Wake of a Law Enforcement Failure.” Inter-American Law Review 42(1): 115–144.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., and Lloyd, P.. 2015. Framing and Transnational Legal Organization: The Case of Human Trafficking. Pp. 400–438 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, T. C. and Shaffer, G.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skrivankova, K. 2010. Between Decent Work and Forced Labour: Examining the Continuum of Exploitation. Joseph Rowntree Foundation Programme Paper: Forced Labour. York: JRF.Google Scholar
Sloan, A. 2015. “UK Tied Visa System Turning Domestic Workers into Modern Day Slaves.” The Guardian. March 17, 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/17/uk-tied-visa-system-turning-domestic-workers-into-modern-day-slaves (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1950. Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others, New York, 21 March 1950, in force 25 July 1951, 96 UNTS 271.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2000a. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, New York, 15 November 2000, in force 25 December 2003, 2237 UNTS 319.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2000b. Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, New York,15 November 2000, in force 29 September 2003, 2225 UNTS 209.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2000c. Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, New York, 15 November 2000, in force 28 January 2004, 2241 UNTS 507.Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2012a. Global Report on Trafficking in Persons. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/Trafficking_in_Persons_2012_web.pdf (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2012b. Abuse of a Position of Vulnerability and Other “Means” within the Definition of Trafficking in Persons. Issue Paper. https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2012/UNODC_2012_Issue_Paper_–_Abuse_of_a_Position_of_Vulnerability.pdf (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2014a. Global Report on Trafficking in Persons. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2014b. The Role of Consent in the Trafficking in Persons Protocol. Issue Paper. www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2014/UNODC_2014_Issue_Paper_Consent.pdf.Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2015. The Concept of Exploitation in the Trafficking in Persons Protocol. Issue Paper. https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/sites/antitrafficking/files/unodc_ip_exploitation_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2016. Global Report on Trafficking in Persons. New York: United Nations. www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/2016_Global_Report_on_Trafficking_in_Persons.pdf.Google Scholar
Verite. 2014. Forced Labor in the Production of Electronic Goods in Malaysia: A Comprehensive Study of Scope and Characteristics. https://www.verite.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/VeriteForcedLaborMalaysianElectronics2014.pdf (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act. 2000. Pub. L. No. 106–386, § 106, 114 Stat. 1464, 1474 (2000) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 7104 (2012)).Google Scholar
Walk Free Foundation. 2013. Global Slavery Index. Australia: Walk Free Foundation.Google Scholar
Walk Free Foundation. 2014. Global Slavery Index. Australia: Walk Free Foundation.Google Scholar
Walk Free Foundation. 2016. Global Slavery Index. Australia: Walk Free Foundation.Google Scholar
Walk Free Foundation. 2018. Global Slavery Index. Australia: Walk Free Foundation.Google Scholar
Weitzer, R. 2006.Moral Crusade against Prostitution. Society 43(3): 33–38.Google Scholar
Wijers, M. 2015. “Purity, Victimhood and Agency: Fifteen Years of the UN Trafficking Protocol.” Anti-Trafficking Review 4: 56–79.Google Scholar
Wilshaw, R. 2016. What Would Loosen the Roots of Labour Exploitation in Supply Chains? Pp. 78–83 in E-Book on Forced Labour in the Global Economy, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Series, edited by LeBaron, G. and Howard, N.. www.opendemocracy.net (accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Womark, D. (producer), and Noorani, T. (director). 2018. Love Sonia [Motion picture]. India: Zee Studios.Google Scholar

References

Aas, Katja Franko. 2013. Globalization and Crime, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Aas, Katja Franko. 2014. “Bordered Penalty: Precarious Membership and Abnormal Justice.” Punishment and Society 16(5): 520–541.Google Scholar
Aas, Franko, Katja, and Bosworth, Mary, eds. 2013. Borders of Punishment: Citizenship, Migration, Citizenship and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aas, Katja Franko, and Gundhus, Helene. 2015. “Policing Humanitarian Borderlands: Frontex, Human Rights and the Precariousness of Life.” British Journal of Criminology 55: 1–18.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa. 2013. Democracy and Deportation: Why Membership Matters Most. Pp. 237–256. In Borders of Punishment: Citizenship, Migration, Citizenship and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa. 2017. “Penal Power at the Border: Realigning State and Nation.” Theoretical Criminology 21(4): 441–457.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa. 2018. Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary. 2008. “Border Control and the Limits of the Sovereign State.” Social Legal Studies 17(2): 199–215.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary. 2014. Inside Immigration Detention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, M. 2017. “Penal Humanitarianism: Sovereign Power in an Era of Mass Migration.” New Criminal Law Review. 39(20).Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary, Franko, Katja, and Pickering, Sharon. 2017. “Punishment, Globalization, and Migration Control: ‘Get Them the Hell Out of Here.’” Punishment and Society 20(1): 34–53.Google Scholar
Bowling, Benjamin, and Sheptycki, James. 2012. Global Policing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cancellaro, Francesca Zirulia, Stefano. 2018. Controlling Migration through De Facto Detention: The Case of the “Diciotti” Italian Ship. www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2018/10/controlling (accessed December 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Canning, Victoria. 2017. Gendered Harm and Structural Violence in the British Asylum System. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chacón, Jennifer. 2009. “Managing Migration through Crime.” Columbia Law Review Sidebar 109: 135.Google Scholar
De Genova, Nicholas. 2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement. Pp. 33–68. In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, eds. de Genova, Nicholas and Nathalie, Peutz. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony. 2001. Punishment, Communication and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lex, EU. 2018. EU Directives. EU Lex, Access to European Law. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Al14527 (accessed December 9, 2018).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee on the Regions: A European Agenda on Migration.” European Commission, Brussels, 13.5. 2015 COM (2015) 240 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015. Hotspot Approach. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/docs/2_hotspots_en.pdf (accessed January 1, 2019.)Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. Fact Sheet. Questions and Answers on the European Agenda on Migration. Brussels May 13, 2015. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15–4957_en.htm (accessed August 28, 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018. A Strengthened and Fully Equipped European Border and Coast Guard. September 12, 2018.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018a. State of the Union 2018: Commission Proposes Last Elements Needed for Compromise on Migration and Border Reform. Strasbourg, September 12. Press Release.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Common Standards and Procedures in Member States for Returning Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals (Recast). European Commission, Salzburg on September 19–20, 2018. Brussels, 12.9.2018 COM (2018) 634 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2020. The EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/frit_factsheet.pdf.Google Scholar
European Parliamentary Research Service. 2019. Priority 8: Toward a New Policy on Migration. European Parliament.Google Scholar
European Union. 2008. Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, December 16, 2008, on Common Standards and Procedures in Member States for Returning Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2018. Statistics on Enforcement of Immigration Legislation. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Enforcement_of_immigration_legislation_statistics.Google Scholar
Fleury-Steiner, Benjamin, and Longazel, Jamie. 2016. “The Pains of Immigrant Imprisonment.” Sociology Compass 10: 989–998.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2011. Case Study. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonne S.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Franko, Katja. 2020. The Crimmigrant Other: Migration and Penal Power, 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Global Detention Project. www.globaldetentionproject.org (accessed December 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015a. Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 3–72. In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015b. Researching Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 475–528. In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinsen, Johan. 2018. The Scandinavian Empires in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Pp. 97–122. In Global History of Convicts and Penal Colonies, edited by Anderson, Clare. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Leutert, Stephanie, Ezzel, Ellie, Arvey, Savitri, Sanchez, Gabriella, Yates, Caitlyn, and Kuhne, Paul. 2018. Asylum Processing and Waitlists: At the US-Mexico Border. Migration Policy Center, European University Institute. www.migrationpolicycentre.eu/new-report-asylum-processing-and-waitlists-at-the-us-mexico-border (accessed February 6, 2019).Google Scholar
Loyd, Jenna M., and Mountz, Alison. 2018. Boats, Borders and Bases: Race, the Cold War, and the Rise of Migration Detention in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Manieri, Maria Giovanna. 2018. Current Trends, Numbers and Routes in EU Migration: Is Existing Law Creating Irregularity? Committee of Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament. Presentation at Managing Migration through Criminal Law Tools meeting. December 3–4, University of Milano.Google Scholar
Medecins sans Frontiers. n.d. Mediterranean Search and Rescue. www.msf.org.uk/country/mediterranean-search-and-rescue.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. 2015. The Criminalisation of Migration in Europe: Challenges for Human Rights and the Rule of Law. London: Springer.Google Scholar
NATO. 2016. NATO’s Deployment in the Aegean Sea: Fact Sheet. www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2016_07/20160627_1607-factsheet-aegean-sea-eng.pdf (accessed February 6, 2019).Google Scholar
Rajah, Jothie. 2015. “Rule of Law” as Transnational Legal Order. Pp. 340–373 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Gabriella. 2016. Human Smuggling and Border Crossing. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scharff Smith, Peter. 2008. “Solitary Confinement: An Introduction to the Istanbul Statement on the Uses and Effects of Solitary Confinement.” Torture Volume 18(1): 56–62.Google Scholar
Statewatch, . 2018. Dangerous Link between Migration, Development and Security for the Externalization of Borders in Africa: Case Studies on Sudan, Niger, and Tunisia. www.statewatch.org/news/2018/jul/report-frontiere-2018-english-.pdf?utm_source=ECRE+Newsletters&utm_campaign=b7215dda50-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_08_06_12_37&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3ec9497afd-b7215dda50-422285469.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. 2006. “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigration, Crime and Sovereign Power.” American University Law Review 52(2): 367–419.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council [UNHRC], n.d. Rescue at Sea. www.unhcr.org/4ef3002c9.pdf (accessed February 6, 2019).Google Scholar
van der Woude, Maartje, van der Leun, Johanna, and Nijland, JA. 2014. “Crimmigration in the Netherlands.” Law and Social Inquiry 39: 560–579.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk, and Snacken, Sonja 2009. The Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Leanne, and Pickering, Sharon. 2011. Globalization and Borders: Death at the Global Frontier. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/21/europe/diciotti-italy-coast-guard-ship-migrants-standoff-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/25/matteo-salvini-formally-investigated-over-migrant-ship-standoffGoogle Scholar
www.thelocal.se/20180822/sweden-turns-down-migrants-docked-in-italyGoogle Scholar
www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2017/GPPi_DRC_RMMS_2017_Protection_Fallout.pdfGoogle Scholar
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/21/europe/diciotti-italy-coast-guard-ship-migrants-standoff-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/25/matteo-salvini-formally-investigated-over-migrant-ship-standoffGoogle Scholar
www.thelocal.se/20180822/sweden-turns-down-migrants-docked-in-italyGoogle Scholar
www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2017/GPPi_DRC_RMMS_2017_Protection_Fallout.pdfGoogle Scholar

Media Sources on the Diciotti Italian Coast Guard Ship

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/21/europe/diciotti-italy-coast-guard-ship-migrants-standoff-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/25/matteo-salvini-formally-investigated-over-migrant-ship-standoffGoogle Scholar
www.thelocal.se/20180822/sweden-turns-down-migrants-docked-in-italyGoogle Scholar
www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2017/GPPi_DRC_RMMS_2017_Protection_Fallout.pdfGoogle Scholar

References

Abel, Ernest. 1980. Marihuana: The First Twelve Thousand Years. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michele. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 2013. The War on Marijuana in Black and White. www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/1114413-mj-report-rfs-rel1.pdf.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter. 2013. Smuggler Nation: How Illicit Trade Made America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter, and Nadelmann, Ethan. 2006. Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Guy. 2004. The International Drug Trade. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ballotta, Danilo, Bergeron, Henri, and Hugher, Brendan. 2008. Cannabis Control in Europe. Pp. 97–118 in A Cannabis Reader: Global Issues and Local Experiences, edited by Griffiths, Paul. Lisbon: European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction.Google Scholar
Baum, Dan. 1997. Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure. Boston: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine. 1999. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bender, Steven. 2016. “The Colors of Cannabis: Race and Marijuana.” UC Davis Law Review 50: 689–706.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David. 2002. The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David. 2012. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David, and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia. 2018. “The Evolution and Modernization of Treaty Regimes: The Contrasting Cases of International Drug Control and Environmental Regulation.” International Community Law Review 20(5): 403–435.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David, and Jelsma, Martin. 2012. “Regime Change: Re-Visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.” International Journal of Drug Policy 23: 72–81.Google Scholar
Blickman, Tom. 2018. The Elephant in the Room: Cannabis in the International Drug Control Regime. Pp. 101–131 in Collapse of the Global Order on Drugs: From UNGASS 2016 to Review 2019, edited by Klein, Axel and Stothard, Blaine. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2001. Penal Aspects of the UN Drug Conventions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bone, Melissa, and Seddon, Toby. 2016. “Human Rights, Public Health and Medicinal Cannabis Use.” Critical Public Health 26: 51–61.Google Scholar
Bonnie, Richard, and Charles Whitebread, II. 1974. The Marihuana Conviction: A History of Marihuana Prohibition in the United States. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Borougerdi, Bradley. 2018. Commodifying Cannabis: A Cultural History of a Complex Plant in the Transatlantic World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowling, Ben. 2010. Policing the Caribbean: Transnational Security Cooperation in Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowling, Ben, and Sheptycki, James. 2012. Global Policing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Buxton, Julia. 2006. The Political Economy of Narcotics: Production, Consumption, and Global Markets. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Carrier, Neil, and Klantschnig, Gernot. 2012. Africa and the War on Drugs. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Caulkins, Jonathan, Kilmer, Beau, and Kleiman, Mark. 2016. Marijuana Legalization: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatwin, Caroline. 2015. “UNGASS 2016: Insights from Europe on the Development of Global Cannabis Policy and the Need for Reform of the Global Drug Policy Regime.” The International Journal of Drug Policy 49: 80–85.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Forman, Jolene, Hopper, Allen, and Kamin, Sam. 2015. “Cooperative Federalism and Marijuana Regulation.” UCLA Law Review 62: 74–122.Google Scholar
Christie, Nils. 1986. Suitable Enemies. Pp. 34–51 in Abolitionism: Toward A Non-repressive Approach to Crime, edited by Bianchi, Herman and Rene, von Swaaningen. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
Courtwright, David. 2002. Forces of Habit: Drugs and the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Santos, Boaventura. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DiChiara, Albert, and Galiher, John F.. 1994. “Dissonance and Contradictions in the Origins of Marihuana Decriminalization.” Law and Society Review 28(1): 47–76.Google Scholar
Dufton, Emily. 2017. Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Efrat, Asif. 2012. Governing Guns, Preventing Plunder: International Cooperation against Illicit Trade. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2007. Fighting Terrorism and Drugs: Europe and International Police Cooperation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friman, Richard, ed. 2015a. The Politics of Leverage in International Relations: Name, Shame, and Sanction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friman, Richard. 2015b. Behind the Curtain: Naming and Shaming in International Drug Control. Pp. 143–164 in The Politics of Leverage in International Relations: Name, Shame, and Sanction, edited by Friman, Richard. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frydl, Kathleen. 2013. The Drug War in America, 1940–1973. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gieringer, Dale. 1999. “The Forgotten Origins of Cannabis Prohibition in California.” Contemporary Drug Problems 26(2): 237–288.Google Scholar
Emily, Hafner-Burton, and Tsutsui, Kiyotero. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110: 1373–1411.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 2009. “Recursivity of Global Lawmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5: 263–290.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence, and Shaffer, Gregory, eds. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, A. Lee, and Mallinson, Daniel. 2018. “Defiant Innovation: The Adoption of Medical Marijuana Laws in the American States.” Policy Studies Journal 46(2): 402–423.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence. 2013. Flexibility in International Agreements. Pp. 175–196 in International Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, eds. Dunoff, Jeffrey and Pollack, Mark. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Home Office. 1968. Cannabis: Report by the Advisory Committee on Drug Dependence.Google Scholar
International Narcotic Control Board. 1984. Report of the International Narcotic Control Board for 1983.Google Scholar
International Narcotic Control Board. 1998. Report of the International Narcotic Control Board for 1997.Google Scholar
International Narcotic Control Board. 2000. Report of the International Narcotic Control Board for 1999.Google Scholar
International Narcotic Control Board. 2013. Report of the International Narcotic Control Board for 2012.Google Scholar
International Narcotic Control Board. 2018. Report of the International Narcotic Control Board for 2017.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John. 2005. “Power and Liberal Order: America’s Postwar World Order in Transition.” International Relations of Asia-Pacific 5: 133–152.Google Scholar
Jakobi, Anja. 2013. Common Goods and Evils? The Formation of Global Crime Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jojarth, Christine. 2009. Crime, War, and Global Trafficking: Designing International Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kamin, Sam. 2017. Marijuana Regulation in the United States. Pp. 105–119 in Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation, edited by Savona, Ernesto, Kleiman, Mark, and Calderoni, Francesco. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Klantschnig, Gernot. 2013. Crime, Drugs and the State in Africa: The Nigerian Connection. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Knepper, Paul. 2011. International Crime in the Twentieth Century: The League of Nations Era, 1919–1939. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knepper, Paul. 2016. Dreams and Nightmares: Drug Trafficking and the History of International Crime. Pp. 208–228 in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Crime and Criminal Justice, edited by Knepper, Paul and Johansen, Anja. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kozma, Liat. 2011. “The League of Nations and the Debate over Cannabis Prohibitions.” History Compass 9: 61–70.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2014. “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods.” American Journal of International Law 108: 1–40Google Scholar
Levine, Harry, and Reinarman, Craig. 2006. Alcohol Prohibition and Drug Prohibition: Lessons from Alcohol Policy for Drug Policy. Pp. 43–76 in Drugs and Society: U.S. Public Policy, edited by Fish, Jefferson. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Line, Richard. 2017. Drug Control and Human Rights in International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, William. 2002. Drug Diplomacy in the Twenty Century: An International History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLeod, Allegra. 2010. “Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice.” Yale Law and Policy Review 29: 83–164.Google Scholar
Mills, James. 2005. Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition, 1800–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, James. 2013. Cannabis Nation: Control and Consumption in Britain, 1928–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Musto, David. 1973. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse. 1972. Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding.Google Scholar
Pardo, Bryce. 2014. Cannabis Policy Reforms in the Americas: A Comparative Analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay. International Journal of Drug Policy 25: 727–735.Google Scholar
Parker, Howard, Aldridge, Judith, and Measham, Fiona. 1998. Illegal Leisure: The Normalization of Adolescent Recreational Drug Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pederson, Susan. 2007. “Back to the League of Nations.” The American Historical Review 112(4): 1091–1117.Google Scholar
Potter, Gary, Bouchard, Martin, and Decorte, Tom. 2011. The Globalization of Cannabis Cultivation. Pp. 1–21 in World Wide Weed: Trends in Cannabis Cultivation and Its Control, eds. Potter, Gary, Bouchard, Martin, and Decorte, Tom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie. 2007. Unequal under Law: Race in the War on Drugs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reuter, Peter. 2003. The Political Economy of Drug Smuggling. Pp. 128–147 in The Political Economy of the Drug Industry: Latin America and the International System, edited by Vellinga, Menno. Gainesville: Florida University Press.Google Scholar
Room, Robin. 2013. “Legalizing a Market for Cannabis for Pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and Beyond.” Addiction 109: 345–351.Google Scholar
Room, Robin, Fischer, Benedikt, Hall, Wayne, Lenton, Simon, and Reuter, Peter. 2010. Cannabis Policy: Moving beyond Stalemate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Room, Robin, and Reuter, Peter. 2012. “How Well Do International Drug Conventions Protect Public Health?” Lancet 379: 84–91.Google Scholar
Sander, Gen, and Lines, Rick. 2018. The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: Pulling Back the Curtain to Expose a Flawed Regime. Pp. 49–64 in Collapse of the Global Order on Drugs: From UNGASS 2016 to Review 2019, edited by Klein, Axel and Stothard, Blaine. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Santos, Alvaro. 2013. “International Law and Its Discontents: Critical Reflections on the War on Drugs or the Role of Law in Creating Complexity.” American Society of International Law Proceeding 106: 172–176.Google Scholar
Seddon, Toby. 2016. “Inventing Drugs: A Genealogy of a Regulatory Concept.” Journal of Law and Society 43(3): 393–415.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2013. The Dimensions and Determinants of State Change. Pp. 23–49 in Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change, edited by Shaffer, Gregory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2016. “Theorizing Transnational Legal Orders.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 231–253.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen, and Hacker, Daphna. 2001. “Colonialism’s Civilizing Mission: The Case of the Indian Hemp Drug Commission.” Law and Social Inquiry 26(2): 435–461.Google Scholar
Shiner, Michael. 2015. “Drug Policy Reform and the Reclassification of Cannabis in England and Wales: A Cautionary Tale.” International Journal of Drug Policy 26: 696–704Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 2007. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Public of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Doug. 2005. America’s Other War: Terrorizing Columbia. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Tackeff, Mike. 2018. “Constructing a ‘Creative Reading’: Will the US State Cannabis Legislation Threaten the Fate of the International Drug Control Treaties?” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 51: 247–295.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2018. Analysis of Drug Markets: Opiates, Covaine, Cannabis, Synthetic Drugs. www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_Booklet_3_DRUG_MARKETS.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2018. International Narcotic Control Strategy Report.Google Scholar
Van Solinge, Tim. 2017. The Dutch Model of Cannabis Decriminalization and Tolerated Retail. Pp. 145–169 in Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation, edited by Savona, Ernesto, Kleiman, Mark, and Calderoni, Francesco. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Van Vilet, Henk. 1990. “Separation of Drug Markets and the Normalization of Drug Problems in the Netherland: An Example for Other Nations?” Journal of Drugs Issues 20: 463–471.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wisehart, Daniel. 2018. Drug Control and International Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, and Hawkins, Gordon. 1992. The Search for Rational Drug Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×