Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:38:16.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Transnational Legal Ordering and International Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Edited by
Gregory Shaffer  and
Ely Aaronson
Gregory Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Ely Aaronson
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice , pp. 203 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alexander, , J. C. 2004. “On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from War Crime to Trauma Drama.” Pp. 196–263 in Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, edited by Alexander, J. C. et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annan, Kofi. 2004. Speech before the United Nations General Assembly. April 7, 2004.Google Scholar
Bergsmo, Morten, Mark, Klamberg, Kjersti, Lohne and Mahony, Chris, eds., 2020. Power in International Criminal Justice: Towards a Sociology of International Justice. Oslo: TOAEP.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Judicial Field.” The Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–853.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen. 2016. “A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights.” In Anti-impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, edited by Engle, Karen, Miller, Zinaida, and Davis, D. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, and Savelsberg, Joachim J.. 2006. “Introduction: Global Processes, National Institutions, Local Bricolage: Shaping Law in an Era of Globalization.” Law and Social Inquiry 31: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 2004. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Golden, Shannon. 2013. After Atrocity: Community Reconstruction in Northern Uganda. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015a. “Transnational Legal Orders.” In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015b. “Researching Transnational Legal Orders.” In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ICID (International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur). 2005. Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. www.un.org/news/dh/sudan/com_inq_darfur.pdf.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2016. “Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?” International Organization 70(3): 443–475.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret. E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2010. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 939–963.Google Scholar
Levi, Ron, and Hagan, John, with the collaboration of Dezalay, Sara, eds. 2008. Pacifier et Punir, special issues of Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 173 and 174.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel, and Sznaider, Natan. 2010. Human Rights and Memory: Essays on Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
McElrath, Suzy. 2020. The Global Criminalization of Genocide, 1948–2015. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1918. “The Psychology of Punitive Justice.” American Journal of Sociology 23(5): 577–602.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2006. “Conspiracy in International Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 341–357.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2014. “The Evolution of the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court: Insights from Institutional Theory.” In The First Global Prosecutor, edited by Minow, Martha, Whiting, Alex, and True-Frost., Cora Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2016. “From Aggression to Atrocity: Rethinking the History of International Criminal Law.” Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805952.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 2012. The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Human Rights and Crimes against Humanity, Book 14. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Pensky, M. 2008. “Amnesty on Trial: Impunity, Accountability, and the Norms of International Law.” Ethics and Global Politics 1(1–2): 1–40.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N. 2005. The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rome Statute. 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. http://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1992. “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1346–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1994. “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment.” American Journal of Sociology 99(4): 911–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2015. Representing Mass Violence: Conflicting Responses to Human Rights Violations in Darfur. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2017. Max Weber’s Formal and Substantive Rationality: Tensions in International Law. Pp. 493–510 in Recht als Kultur? Beiträge zu Max Webers Soziologie des Rechts. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2020. “The Representational Power of International Criminal Courts.” In Power in International Criminal Justice: Towards a Sociology of International Justice, edited by Bergsma, Morten and Lohne, Kjersti. Oslo: TOAEP.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. forthcoming. “Media and Transitional Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transitional Justice, edited by Douglas, Lawrence, Hinton, Alexander, and Meierhenrich, Jens. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and King, Ryan D.. 2011. American Memories: Atrocities and the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Suzy, McElrath. 2018. “Human Rights and Penal Policy.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia for Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Brehm, Holly Nyseth. 2015. “Representing Human Rights Violations in Darfur: Global Justice, National Distinctions.” American Journal of Sociology 121(2): 564–603.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David. 2012. All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seekers of Truth and Justice. 2003. The Black Book. n.p.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2016. “Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 12: 231–253.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 2008. Punishment and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2004. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28(3): 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 1989. “Limits on Technocratization of Law.” American Sociological Review 54: 341–358.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1976. Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste Jeangène. 2015. La Responsabilité de Protéger. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

References

Alviar García, Helena, and Engle, Karen. 2016. The Distributive Politics of Impunity and Anti-impunity: Lessons from Four Decades of Colombian Peace Negotiations. Pp. 216–254 in Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, edited by Engle, K., Miller, Z., and Davis, D. M.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bensouda, Fatou. 2016. Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, on the Conclusion of the Peace Negotiations between the Government of Colombia and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army. www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=160901-otp-stat-colombia (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Kerry, Carrington, and Hogg, Russell. 2017. “Deconstructing Criminology’s Origin Stories.” Asian Journal of Criminology 12(3): 181–197.Google Scholar
Kerry, Carrington, Hogg, Russell, and Sozzo, Máximo. 2016. “Southern Criminology.” British Journal of Criminology 56(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Centro de Memoria Histórica. 2015. Una nación desplazada.Informe nacional del desplazamiento forzado en Colombia. www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2015/nacion-desplazada/una-nacion-desplazada.pdf (accessed August 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Centro de Memoria Histórica. 2018. Observatorio de Memoria y Conflicto. Contando la guerra en Colombia. http://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/observatorio/ (accessed August 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Comisión Colombiana de Juristas. 2012. Demanda de Inconstitucionalidad contra el acto legislativo 01 de 2012. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/C-577-14.htm (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Cravo, Teresa Almeida. 2014. Post-conflict Peacebuilding and the Rule of Law. Pp. 471–489 in Handbook on the Rule of Law, edited by May, C. and Cheltenham, Winchester A.: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
El Colombiano. 2016. Manuscrito de Uribe frente al Acuerdo que se firma hoy. September 26. www.elcolombiano.com/colombia/acuerdos-de-gobierno-y-farc/acuerdo-de-paz-manuscrito-de-alvaro-uribe-DF5052072 (accessed August 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Espectador, El. 2014. Acuerdo entre Colombia y Farc sobre drogas es un “paso hacia la paz”: UE. May 19, 2014. www.elespectador.com/noticias/paz/acuerdo-entre-colombia-y-farc-sobre-drogas-un-paso-paz-articulo-493201 (accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Espectador, El. 2016. La cuestionable estrategia de campaña del No. October 6. www.elespectador.com/noticias/politica/cuestionable-estrategia-de-campana-del-no-articulo-658862 (accessed June 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Espectador, El. 2018. Agresiones contra líderes sociales antes y después del acuerdo de paz. September 24, 2018. https://colombia2020.elespectador.com/pais/agresiones-contra-lideres-sociales-antes-y-despues-del-acuerdo-de-paz (accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Tiempo, El. 2016. CPI destaca que en paz con Farc no haya amnistía en crímenes de guerra. September 1. www.eltiempo.com/politica/proceso-de-paz/respaldo-de-la-corte-penal-internacional-al-acuerdo-de-paz-con-las-farc-43107 (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Engle, Karen. 2016. A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights. Pp. 15–67 in Anti-impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, edited by Engle, K., Miller, Z., and Davis, D. M.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen, Miller, Zinaida, and Davis, Denys Mathias, eds. 2016. Anti-impunity and the Human Rights Agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franzki, Hanna, and Olarte, María Carolina. 2014. Understanding the Political Economy of Transitional Justice. Pp. 201–221 in Transitional Justice Theories: A Critical Theory Perspective, edited by Buckley-Zistel, S., Beck, T. Koloma, Braun, C., and Mieth, F.. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory, eds. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Borda, Sandra. 2018. “The Judicialization of Peace.” Harvard International Law Journal 59(2): 279–330.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2013. “Law by Other Means: The Quasi-Criminal Jurisdiction of the Human Rights Courts.” The American Journal of International Law 107(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
Institute for Integrated Transitions (IFIT). 2018. Los debates de La Habana: una Mirada desde adentro. Bogotá: Fondo de Capital Humano para la Transición Colombiana, Instituto para las Transiciones Integrales (IFIT).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court (ICC). 2018. The States Parties to the Rome Statute. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx (accessed December 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Iturralde, Manuel. 2008. “Emergency Penalty and Authoritarian Liberalism: Recent Trends in Colombian Criminal Policy.” Theoretical Criminology 12(3): 377–397.Google Scholar
Iturralde, Manuel. 2010. Castigo, liberalismo autoritario y justicia penal de excepción. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores, Universidad de los Andes, Instituto Pensar-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Google Scholar
Iturralde, Manuel. 2018. Neoliberalism and Its Impact on Latin American Crime Control Fields. Theoretical Criminology. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1362480618756362, 1–20.Google Scholar
Krever, Tor. 2013. “International Criminal Law: An Ideology Critique.” Leiden Journal of International Law 26: 701–723.Google Scholar
Krever, Tor. 2014. Unveiling (and Veiling) Politics in International Criminal Trials. Pp. 117–137 in Critical Approaches to International Criminal Law, edited by Schwöbel, C.. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krever, Tor. 2015. Ending Impunity? Eliding Political Economy in International Criminal Law. Pp. 298–314 in Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law, edited by Mattei, U. and Haskell, J. D.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Krever, Tor. 2016. Africa in the Dock: On ICC Bias. In Critical Legal Thinking. Law and the Political. http://criticallegalthinking.com/2016/10/30/africa-in-the-dock-icc-bias/ (accessed December 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2016. Anti-impunity as Deflection of Argument. In Anti-impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, edited by Engle, K., Miller, Z., and Davis, D. M.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muggah, Robert, and Tobón, Katherine Aguirre. 2018. Citizen Security in Latin America: Facts and Figures. Igarapé Institute Strategic Paper 33. https://igarape.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Citizen-Security-in-Latin-America-Facts-and-Figures.pdf?utm_campaign=2018_newsletter_10&utm_medium=email&utm_source=RD+Station (accessed January 2019).Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Alejandro. 2016. Víctimas, justicia y lucha contra la impunidad. https://es.scribd.com/document/327405587/Victimas-Justicia-Lucha-Contra-La-Impunidad-Punto-1 (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh. 2015. The Justice Paradox? Transnational Legal Orders and Accountability for Past Human Rights Violations. Pp. 439–474 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, T. and Shaffer, G.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil de Colombia. 2016. Plebiscito 2 de octubre 2016 Colombia. https://elecciones.registraduria.gov.co/pre_plebis_2016/99PL/DPLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ_L1.htm (accessed June 16, 2017).Google Scholar
Semana, . 2017. “Hacer trizas” el acuerdo con las FARC: ¿es posible? August 5, 2017. www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/uribismo-hara-trizas-acuerdo-acuerdo-con-farc-esta-blindado/524529 (accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2008. La amenaza del narcotráfico en América. www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/Reporte_OEA_2008.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2017. Histórico acuerdo entre Colombia y la UNODC para ayudar a campesinos a adoptar alternativas a la cultivación de coca. www.unodc.org/unodc/es/frontpage/2017/November/historic-agreement-between-colombia-and-unodc-can-help-farmers-embrace-alternatives-to-coca-cultivation.html (accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
René, Urueña, and Angélica, Prada María. 2018. “Transitional Justice and Economic Policy.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14: 397–410.Google Scholar
Vivanco, José Miguel. 2017. Colombia: Fix Flaws in Transitional Justice Law. www.hrw.org/news/2017/10/09/colombia-fix-flaws-transitional-justice-law (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Radio, W. 2016. Óscar Iván Zuluaga dijo que el acuerdo de paz viola la Constitución. August 25. www.wradio.com.co/noticias/actualidad/oscar-ivan-zuluaga-dijo-que-el-acuerdo-de-paz-viola-la-constitucion/20160825/nota/3226933.aspx (accessed August 29, 2018).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×