Book contents
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- B IP Overlaps
- 25 Intellectual Property in Transition: The Several Sides of Overlapping Copyright and Trademark Protection
- 26 Cultural Heritage and the Public Domain: What the US’s Myriad and Mayo can Teach Oslo’s Angry Boy
- 27 Public Order in the Light of Aesthetic Theory: The Copyright/Trademark Interface after Vigeland
- 28 Separability as Channeling: A Cautionary Tale
- 29 Novelty, Idea or New Meaning as Criteria for Copyright Protection? Transitions in Swedish Design Law
- 30 Examining Functionality
- 31 Substantial Value and the Concept of Shapes
- 32 Copyright and Patents on Software: The UPC’s Answer to an Old Problem of Intellectual Property Overlaps
- 33 Chopping off Hydra’s Heads: Spare Parts in EU Design and Trade Mark Law
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
29 - Novelty, Idea or New Meaning as Criteria for Copyright Protection? Transitions in Swedish Design Law
from B - IP Overlaps
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 December 2020
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- B IP Overlaps
- 25 Intellectual Property in Transition: The Several Sides of Overlapping Copyright and Trademark Protection
- 26 Cultural Heritage and the Public Domain: What the US’s Myriad and Mayo can Teach Oslo’s Angry Boy
- 27 Public Order in the Light of Aesthetic Theory: The Copyright/Trademark Interface after Vigeland
- 28 Separability as Channeling: A Cautionary Tale
- 29 Novelty, Idea or New Meaning as Criteria for Copyright Protection? Transitions in Swedish Design Law
- 30 Examining Functionality
- 31 Substantial Value and the Concept of Shapes
- 32 Copyright and Patents on Software: The UPC’s Answer to an Old Problem of Intellectual Property Overlaps
- 33 Chopping off Hydra’s Heads: Spare Parts in EU Design and Trade Mark Law
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
While the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has proclaimed a harmonized concept for the very object of copyright protection – an original work – in a fairly comprehensive bulk of decisions,2 by mainly defining a protected work as being the result of an author’s own intellectual creation, as expressed in three different EU Directives,3 some recent signs of a Swedish fall-out from that concept are in view, as will be discussed in this text, concerning artistic works and applied art. It is written in the hope that Professor Annette Kur, being a long-time observer of Nordic IP law and an esteemed link between Nordic and Continental IP law, may take some interest in those possible transitions in Swedish design law.4
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property LawEssays in Honour of Annette Kur, pp. 352 - 363Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021