Book contents
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- B IP Overlaps
- 25 Intellectual Property in Transition: The Several Sides of Overlapping Copyright and Trademark Protection
- 26 Cultural Heritage and the Public Domain: What the US’s Myriad and Mayo can Teach Oslo’s Angry Boy
- 27 Public Order in the Light of Aesthetic Theory: The Copyright/Trademark Interface after Vigeland
- 28 Separability as Channeling: A Cautionary Tale
- 29 Novelty, Idea or New Meaning as Criteria for Copyright Protection? Transitions in Swedish Design Law
- 30 Examining Functionality
- 31 Substantial Value and the Concept of Shapes
- 32 Copyright and Patents on Software: The UPC’s Answer to an Old Problem of Intellectual Property Overlaps
- 33 Chopping off Hydra’s Heads: Spare Parts in EU Design and Trade Mark Law
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
26 - Cultural Heritage and the Public Domain: What the US’s Myriad and Mayo can Teach Oslo’s Angry Boy
from B - IP Overlaps
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 December 2020
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- B IP Overlaps
- 25 Intellectual Property in Transition: The Several Sides of Overlapping Copyright and Trademark Protection
- 26 Cultural Heritage and the Public Domain: What the US’s Myriad and Mayo can Teach Oslo’s Angry Boy
- 27 Public Order in the Light of Aesthetic Theory: The Copyright/Trademark Interface after Vigeland
- 28 Separability as Channeling: A Cautionary Tale
- 29 Novelty, Idea or New Meaning as Criteria for Copyright Protection? Transitions in Swedish Design Law
- 30 Examining Functionality
- 31 Substantial Value and the Concept of Shapes
- 32 Copyright and Patents on Software: The UPC’s Answer to an Old Problem of Intellectual Property Overlaps
- 33 Chopping off Hydra’s Heads: Spare Parts in EU Design and Trade Mark Law
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
At a high level of generality, intellectual property (IP) regimes are much alike. They grant exclusivity to promote socially desirable activity, be it creating goodwill and maintaining quality, producing expressive works, or inventing technological products and processes. Of course details differ, for each system must take account of the demands of the sector it governs. Thus the gravamen of a copyright claim – copying – would never be suitable for trademark law because trademark’s focus on diminishing search costs is inconsistent with allowing similar trademarks (even if independently produced) to confuse consumers. Similarly, trademark’s term of protection – which continues as long as the mark is in use – would not be suitable for patent law, where one generation’s output is the next generation’s input and the goal is to promote rapid progress.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property LawEssays in Honour of Annette Kur, pp. 322 - 331Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021