Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T02:58:52.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Blood donor selection and qualification

from Section 2 - Selection and testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

By
Virge James
Edited by
John A. J. Barbara ,
Fiona A. M. Regan  and
Marcela Contreras
Virge James
Affiliation:
NHS Blood and Transplant, Sheffield, UK
John A. J. Barbara
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Fiona A. M. Regan
Affiliation:
HNSBT and Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London
Marcela Contreras
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Get access

Summary

Introduction: basic principles of blood donor selection

The basic principle of blood donor selection is simply stated: it should be safe for the donor to give blood and the donation should not harm the recipient.

The processes involved in achieving this deceptively simple aim are complex and so interwoven that no attempt can be made to separate out the criteria which might be considered specific for the microbiological safety of the donation.

Increasing public concern and litigation has led to many debates on the meaning of ‘safe’. Calman (2001) draws attention to the importance of clarifying the language of risk; the relationship between safety and perception of safety is debated by many authors in the Millennium Festival of Medicine (2001) (please refer to Chapter 26). A new tool for communicating risk perception is introduced by Lee, et al. (1998). Sadly this excellent and clear method has not yet seen wider acceptance.

The term ‘donor selection’, with its implication that there is an abundance of potential donors from amongst whom the blood services have only to select those who meet their current pre-set criteria, is misleading and outdated. Today, it is the donor who selects the activities he/she participates in and therefore ‘donor qualification’, implying positive action by the donor might be a more appropriate term.

This chapter will examine the problems involved in setting and implementing the selection/qualification criteria, highlight inconsistencies and seek solutions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transfusion Microbiology , pp. 153 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

AuBuchon, J. P. (2004) Managing change to improve transfusion safety. Transfusion, 11 (44), 1377–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calman, K. C. (2001) The language of risk: a question of trust. Transfusion, 41(11), 1326–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Drugs Agency (2002) Compliance Policy guide for FDA staff and industry blood donor classification statement (available at: www.fda.gov).
Davey, R. J. (2004) Recruiting blood donors: challenges and opportunities. Transfusion, 44, 597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, R. Y. and Leiby, D. A. (2004) Emerging infectious threats to the blood supply. Ann Rev Med, 55, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domen, R. E. (1995) Paid-versus-volunteer blood donation in the United States: a historical review. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 9, 53–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU Directive 2002/98/EC Official Journal of the European Union L33/30 8.2.2003.
EU Commission Directive 2004/33/EC Official Journal of the European Union L91/25 30.3.2004.
Field, M. J. and Lohr, K. N. (eds) (1990) Institute of Medicine Committee to Advise the Public Health Service in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Goodnough, L. T., Shander, A. and Brecher, M. E. (2003) Transfusion medicine: looking to the future. Lancet, 361, 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (2003) Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood components, 10th edn. Strasburg, Council of Europe.
James, V., Hewitt, P. E. and Barbara, J. A. J., et al. (1999) How understanding donor behaviour should shape donor selection. Transfus Med Rev, 13, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, V., Jones, K. F., Turner, E. H., et al. (2003) Statistical analysis of inappropriate results from current Hb screening methods for blood donors. Transfusion, 43, 400–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. H., Paling, J. E. and Blajchman, M. A. (1998) A new tool for communicating transfusion risk information. Transfusion, 38(2), 184–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, B. (ed.) (2001) Handbook of Transfusion Medicine, TSO 3rd edn. London, The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Millennium Festival of Medicine (2001) Transfusion Med, 11, 119–45.
Newman, B. H. (2004) Adjusting our management of female blood donors: the key to an adequate blood supply. Transfusion, 44, 591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T. L. (2003) Where have all the donors gone? A personal reflection on the crisis in America's volunteer blood program. Transfusion, 43(2), 273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soldan, K. and Sinka, K. (2003) Evaluation of the de-selection of men, who have had sex with men, from blood donation in England. Vox Sang, 84, 265–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trend, Trouern J. J., Cable, R. G., Badon, S. J., et al. (1999) A case controlled multicentre study of vasovagal reactions in blood donors: influence of sex, age, donation status, weight, blood pressure and pulse. Transfusion, 39, 316–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.transfusionguidelines.org.uk

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×