Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law Fundamental Rights, Privacy and Extraterritoriality
Book contents
- Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law
- Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Author’s Note
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Conceptual Approaches to Data Protection in the European Union and the United States
- 3 The European Union’s Obligations to Safeguard the Fundamental Right to Data Protection Extraterritorially
- 4 Limits That Public International Law Poses on the European Union Safeguarding the Fundamental Right to Data Protection Extraterritorially
- 5 Ways to Mitigate Problematic Jurisdictional Overreach
- 6 The Reach of European Union Data Protection Law in Transatlantic Data Transfers for Counterterrorism Purposes
- 7 Data Protection and the Free Flow of Information
- 8 Enabling Transatlantic Trade and Protecting Privacy through Cross-Border Data Transfer Agreements
- 9 The Normative External Effects of the European Union’s Exercise of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Data Protection Law
- 10 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2023
Book contents
- Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law
- Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Author’s Note
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Conceptual Approaches to Data Protection in the European Union and the United States
- 3 The European Union’s Obligations to Safeguard the Fundamental Right to Data Protection Extraterritorially
- 4 Limits That Public International Law Poses on the European Union Safeguarding the Fundamental Right to Data Protection Extraterritorially
- 5 Ways to Mitigate Problematic Jurisdictional Overreach
- 6 The Reach of European Union Data Protection Law in Transatlantic Data Transfers for Counterterrorism Purposes
- 7 Data Protection and the Free Flow of Information
- 8 Enabling Transatlantic Trade and Protecting Privacy through Cross-Border Data Transfer Agreements
- 9 The Normative External Effects of the European Union’s Exercise of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Data Protection Law
- 10 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transatlantic Jurisdictional Conflicts in Data Protection LawFundamental Rights, Privacy and Extraterritoriality, pp. 263 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Select Bibliography
Akandji-Kombe, J. Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide to the Implementation of the ECHR (Council of Europe Publishing 2007).Google Scholar
Alo, ER. ‘EU Privacy Protection: A Step towards Global Privacy’ (2014) 22 Michigan State International Law Review 1095.Google Scholar
Alvarez Rigaudias, C and Spina, A. ‘Article 37: Designation of the Data Protection Officer’ in Kuner, Christopher and others (eds), The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Argomaniz, J. ‘When the EU Is the “Norm‐Taker”: The Passenger Name Records Agreement and the EU’s Internalization of US Border Security Norms’ (2009) 31(1) Journal of European Integration 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assey, JM and Eleftheriou, DA. ‘The EU–US Privacy Safe Harbor: Smooth Sailing or Troubled Waters?’ (2001) 9 CommLaw Conspectus 145.Google Scholar
Ausloos, J. ‘European Court Rules against Google, in Favour of Right to Be Forgotten’ (LSE Media Policy Project Blog, 13 May 2014) <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2014/05/13/european-court-rules-against-google-in-favour-of-right-to-be-forgotten/>..>Google Scholar
Ausloos, J. The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law: From Individual Rights to Personal Protection (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausloos, J and Kuczerawy, A. ‘From Notice-and-Takedown to Notice-and-Delist: Implementing the Google Spain Ruling’ (2016) 14(2) Colorado Technology Law Journal 219.Google Scholar
Bamberger, KA and Mulligan, DK. Privacy on the Ground: Driving Corporate Behavior in the US and Europe (MIT Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banisar, D and Davies, S. ‘Global Trends in Privacy Protection: An International Survey of Privacy, Data Protection, and Surveillance Law and Developments’ (1999) 18(1) John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law 1.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. ‘The EU’s Human Rights Obligations in Relation to Policies with Extraterritorial Effects’ (2015) 25 European Journal of International Law 1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, CJ. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States (Cornell University Press 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, CJ and Raab, CD. The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in a Global Perspective (2nd edn, MIT Press 2006).Google Scholar
Bennett, SC. ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten”: Reconciling EU and US Perspectives’ (2012) 30(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law 169.Google Scholar
Besson, S. ‘Sovereignty’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: April 2011) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bignami, F. ‘European versus American Liberty: A Comparative Privacy Analysis of Antiterrorism Data Mining’ (2007) 48 Boston College Law Review 609.Google Scholar
Bignami, F and Resta, G. ‘Human Rights Extraterritoriality: The Right to Privacy and National Security Surveillance’ in Benvenisti, Eyal and Nolte, Georg (eds), Community Interests across International Law (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Bigos, O. ‘Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Wrongs on the Internet’ (2005) 54(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 585.Google Scholar
Boehm, F and Cole, M. ‘Data Retention after the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2014). <www.zar.kit.edu/DATA/veroeffentlichungen/237_237_Boehm_Cole-Data_Retention_Study-June_2014_1a1c2f6_9906a8c.pdf>>Google Scholar
Bradford, A. ‘The Brussels Effect’ (2012) 107(1) Northwestern University Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Bradford, A. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brkan, M. ‘Data Protection and European Private International Law: Observing a Bull in a China Shop’ (2015) 5(4) International Data Privacy Law 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brkan, M. ‘The Unstoppable Expansion of EU Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Little Shop of Horrors?’ (2016) 23(5) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 812.Google Scholar
Brkan, M. ‘The Court of Justice of the EU, Privacy and Data Protection: Judge-Made Law as a Leitmotif in Fundamental Rights Protection’ in Brkan, M and Psychogiopoulou, E (eds), Courts, Privacy and Data Protection in the Digital Environment (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brkan, M. ‘The Essence of the Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection: Finding the Way through the Maze of the CJEU’s Constitutional Reasoning’ (2019) 20(6) German Law Journal 864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I. ‘The Feasibility of Transatlantic Privacy-Protective Standards for Surveillance’ (2015) 23(1) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23.Google Scholar
Brown, I and Korff, D. ‘Foreign Surveillance: Law and Practice in a Global Digital Environment’ (2014) 3 European Human Rights Law Review 243.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. ‘Consent’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: January 2022) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Buttarelli, G. ‘The EU GDPR as a Clarion Call for a New Global Digital Gold Standard’ (2016) 6(2) International Data Privacy Law 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxbaum, HL. ‘Territory, Territoriality and the Resolution of Jurisdictional Conflicts’ (2009) 57(2) American Journal of Comparative Law 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygrave, LA. Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Calster, G. ‘Regulating the Internet. Prescriptive and Jurisdictional Boundaries to the EU’s “Right to Be Forgotten”’ (2015) 24 <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2686111>..>Google Scholar
Cannataci, JA. ‘Games People Play: Unvarnished Insights on Privacy at the Global Level’ in Vermeulen, Gert and Lievens, Eva (eds), Data Protection and Privacy under Pressure: Transatlantic Tensions, EU Surveillance, and Big Data (Maklu 2017).Google Scholar
Carolina, R. ‘Why the EU Has Issued Relatively Few Data Protection Adequacy Determinations? A Reply’ (Lawfare, 13 January 2017) <www.lawfareblog.com/why-eu-has-issued-relatively-few-data-protection-adequacy-determinations-reply>..>Google Scholar
Cate, FH. ‘The Changing Face of Privacy Protection in the European Union and the United States’ (1999) 33(1) Indiana Law Review 173.Google Scholar
Chander, A and Schwartz, PM. ‘Privacy and/or Trade’ (2023) 90(1) University Chicago Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Cole, D and Fabbrini, F. ‘Bridging the Transatlantic Divide? The United States, the European Union, and the Protection of Privacy across Borders’ (2016) 14(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonna, L. ‘Article 4 of the EU Data Protection Directive and the Irrelevance of the EU–US Safe Harbor Program?’ (2014) 4(3) International Data Privacy Law 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, M. ‘Justice and Home Affairs in a Globalised World: Ambitions and Reality in the Tale of the EU-US SWIFT Agreement’ (2011) Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for European Integration Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. ‘Complying with International Data Protection Law’ (2016) 84(2) University of Cincinnati Law Review 421.Google Scholar
Czerniawski, M. ‘Extraterritoriality in the Age of the Equipment-Based Society: Do We Need the “Use of Equipment” as a Factor for the Territorial Applicability of the EU Data Protection Regime’ in Svantesson, DJB and Kloza, D (eds), Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Relations as a Challenge for Democracy (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K and Mortenson, JD. ‘Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law’ (2016) 110(2) The American Journal of International Law 346.Google Scholar
Determann, L. Determann’s Field Guide to Privacy Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar Publishing 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Determann, L. ‘Adequacy of Data Protection in the USA: Myths and Facts’ (2016) 6(3) International Data Privacy Law 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docksey, C. ‘Four Fundamental Rights: Finding the Balance’ (2016) 6(3) International Data Privacy Law 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdos, D. ‘Confused? Analysing the Scope of Freedom of Speech Protection vis-à-vis European Data Protection’ (2012) University of Oxford Legal Research Paper Series, Paper No 48/2012.Google Scholar
Erdos, D and Garstka, K. ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten” Online within G20 Statutory Data Protection Frameworks’ (2019) University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No 31/2019.Google Scholar
Fazlioglu, M. ‘Forget Me Not: The Clash of the Right to Be Forgotten and Freedom of Expression on the Internet’ (2013) 3(3) International Data Privacy Law 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, L. ‘Google Ruling: Freedom of Speech vs. the Right to Be Forgotten’ The Wall Street Journal (13 May 2014).Google Scholar
Floridi, L. ‘Should You Have the Right to Be Forgotten on Google? Nationally, Yes. Globally, No.’ (2015) 32(2) New Perspectives Quarterly 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M. ‘Will Europe Censor This Article? The Troubling Implications of the EU’s New “Right to Be Forgotten”’ The Atlantic (13 May 2014).Google Scholar
Ford, RT. ‘Law’s Territory: (A History of Jurisdiction)’ (1999) 97(4) Michigan Law Review 843.Google Scholar
Franck, T. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantziou, E. ‘Further Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten: The European Court of Justice’s Judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos’ (2014) 14(4) Human Rights Law Review 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuster, GG. The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU (Springer 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, R. ‘Fair Information Practices: A Basic History – Version 2.22’ (2022) 12 <www.bobgellman.com/rg-docs/rg-FIPShistory.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Georgieva, I. ‘The Right to Privacy under Fire – Foreign Surveillance under the NSA and the GCHQ and Its Compatibility with Art. 17 ICCPR and Art. 8 ECHR’ (2015) 31(80) Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 104.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J and Wu, T. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Goodman, R and Jinks, D. ‘How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law’ (2004) 54 Duke Law Journal 621.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. ‘The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics’ (1978) 32(4) International Organization 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, MH. ‘A Return to Lilliput: The LICRA v. Yahoo – Case and the Regulation of Online Content in the World Market’ (2003) 18(4) Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1191.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, G. ‘The Influence of European Data Privacy Standards outside Europe: Implications for Globalisation of Convention 108?’ (2012) University of Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper Series No 2012/12.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, G. ‘Sheherazade and the 101 Data Privacy Laws: Origins, Significance and Global Trajectories’ (2014) 23(1) Journal of Law, Information & Science, Special Edition: Privacy in the Social Networking World.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, G. ‘Global Data Privacy Laws 2021: Despite COVID Delays, 145 Laws Show GDPR Dominance’ (2021) 169 Privacy Laws & Business International Report 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, G, Chung, P and Mowbray, A. ‘Supporting and Influencing Data Privacy Practice: The Free Access International Privacy Law Library’ (2014) 31(2) Computer Law & Security Review 221.Google Scholar
Gstrein, OJ and Zwitter, AJ. ‘Extraterritorial Application of the GDPR: Promoting European Values or Power?’ (2021) 10(3) Internet Policy Review 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E., Carrera, S., den Hertog, L and Parkin, J. ‘Implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Impact on EU Home Affairs Agencies’ European Parliament (2011).Google Scholar
Hershey, AM. ‘History of International Law since the Peace of Westphalia’ (1912) 6(1) The American Journal of International Law 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hert, P and Czerniawski, M. ‘Expanding the European Data Protection Scope beyond Territory: Article 3 of the General Data Protection Regulation in Its Wider Context’ (2016) 6(3) International Data Privacy Law 230.Google Scholar
de Hert, P and Papakonstantinou, V. ‘Three Scenarios for International Governance of Data Privacy: Towards an International Data Privacy Organization, Preferably a UN Agency’ (2013) 9(2) I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 271.Google Scholar
de Hert, P and Thumfart, J. ‘The Microsoft Ireland Case and the Cyberspace Sovereignty Trilemma: Post-Territorial Technologies and Companies Question Territorial State Sovereignty and Regulatory State Monopolies’ (2018) 4(11) Brussels Privacy Hub Working Paper.Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and Council of Europe. Handbook on European Data Protection Law (Publications Office of the European Union 2014).Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M. ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction to Enforce in Cyberspace? Bodin, Schmitt, Grotius in Cyberspace’ (2013) 63(2) Toronto Law Journal 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, H. The European Union as Guardian of Internet Privacy: The Story of Art 16 TFEU (Springer 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hondius, FW. ‘A Decade of International Data Protection’ (1983) 30 Netherlands International Law Review 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoofnagle, CJ. Federal Trade Commission Privacy Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Hörnle, J. ‘Juggling More Than Three Balls at Once: Multilevel Jurisdictional Challenges in EU Data Protection Regulation’ 27 International Journal of Law and Information Technology (2019) 142.Google Scholar
Hornung, G and Boehm, F. ‘Comparative Study on the 2011 Draft Agreement between the Unites States of America and the European Union on the Use and Transfer of Passenger Name Records (PNR) to the United States Department of Homeland Security’ (2012) 3.Google Scholar
Ireland-Piper, D. ‘Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Does the Long Arm of the Law Undermine the Rule of Law?’ (2012) 13(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, RF. ‘The Right to Express Oneself and to Seek Information’ in Jørgensen, RF (ed), Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozwiak, M. ‘Balancing the Rights to Data Protection and Freedom of Expression and Information by the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Vulnerability of Rights in an Online Context’ (2016) 23(3) Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law 404.Google Scholar
Kamarinou, D, Millard, C and Hon, WK. ‘Cloud Privacy: An Empirical Study of 20 Cloud Providers’ Terms and Privacy Policies – Part II’ (2016) 6(3) International Data Privacy Law 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamminga, MT. ‘Extraterritoriality’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: September 2020) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kamminga, MT. ‘Transnational Human Rights Litigation against Multinational Corporations Post-Kiobel’ in Ryngaert, Cedric, Molenaar, Erik J and Nouwen, Sarah MH (eds), What’s Wrong with International Law? Liber Amicorum A.H.A. Soons (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Kaushal, A. ‘The Politics of Jurisdiction’ (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 759, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, MJ and Satola, D. ‘The Right to Be Forgotten’ (2017) 1 University of Illinois Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Kleizen, B. ‘Externalizing EU Law, Policy and Values Europe’s Global Identity, Mechanisms of Rule Transfer and Case Studies on Illegal Logging and Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2015) RENFORCE Working Paper Series No 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, U. Jurisdiction and the Internet: Regulatory Competence over Online Activity (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Kohl, U. ‘Jurisdiction in Cyberspace’ in Tsagourias, N and Buchan, R (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (Edward Elgar Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Kohl, U and Rowland, D. ‘Censorship and Cyberborders through EU Data Protection Law’ in Kohl, U (ed), The Net and the Nation State: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Internet Governance (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Kokott, J and Sobotta, C. ‘The Distinction between Privacy and Data Protection in the Jurisprudence of the CJEU and ECtHR’ (2013) 3(4) International Data Privacy Law 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, B-J. ‘The Trouble with European Data Protection Law’ (2014) 4(4) International Data Privacy Law 250.Google Scholar
Kowalik-Bańczyk, K and Oreste, P. ‘Migration of European Judicial Ideas Concerning Jurisdiction over Google on Withdrawal of Information’ (2016) 17(3) German Law Journal 315.Google Scholar
Krisch, N. ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’ (2014) 108(1) American Journal of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhelj, A. ‘The Twilight Zone of Privacy for Passengers on International Flights between the EU & USA’ (2009) 16(2) UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 383.Google Scholar
Kulk, S and Borgesius, FZ. ‘Google Spain v. González: Did the Court Forget about Freedom of Expression?: Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos and Mario Costeja González’ (2014) 5(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulk, S and Borgesius, FZ. ‘Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe’ in Polonetsky, J, Tene, J and Selinger, E (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘An International Legal Framework for Data Protection: Issues and Prospects’ (2005) 25 Computer Law & Security Review 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C. European Data Protection Law: Corporate Compliance and Regulation (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Data Protection Law and International Jurisdiction on the Internet (Part 1)’ (2010) 18(2) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 176.Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Data Protection Law and International Jurisdiction on the Internet (Part 2)’ (2010) 18(3) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Extraterritoriality and the Fundamental Right to Data Protection’ (EJIL: Talk!, 16 December 2013) <www.ejiltalk.org/extraterritoriality-and-the-fundamental-right-todata-protection/>..>Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Requiring Local Storage of Internet Data Will Not Protect Privacy’ (OUPblog, 6 December 2013) <https://blog.oup.com/2013/12/data-security-privacy-storage-law/>..>Google Scholar
Kuner, C. Transborder Data Flows and Data Privacy Law (Oxford University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘The European Union and the Search for an International Data Protection Framework’ (2014) 2 Groningen Journal of International Law 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘A Super-Right to Data Protection? The Irish Facebook Case and the Future of EU Data Transfer Regulation’ (LSE Media Policy Project Blog, 24 June 2014) <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2014/06/24/a-super-right-to-data-protection-the-irish-facebook-case-the-future-of-eu-data-transfer-regulation/>..>Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘The Court of Justice of the EU Judgment on Data Protection and Internet Search Engines’ (2015) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 3/2015.Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Extraterritoriality and Regulation of International Data Transfers in EU Data Protection Law’ (2015) 5(4) International Data Privacy Law 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Reality and Illusion in EU Data Transfer Regulation Post Schrems’ (2016) Cambridge University Legal Studies Working Paper No 14/2016.Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Reality and Illusion in EU Data Transfer Regulation Post Schrems’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 10.Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘Third Country Law in the CJEU’s Data Protection Judgments’ (European Law Blog, 12 July 2017) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/07/12/third-country-law-in-the-cjeus-data-protection-judgments/>..>Google Scholar
Kuner, C. ‘The Internet and the Global Reach of EU Law’ in Cremona, Marise and Scott, Joanne (eds), EU Law beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Kuner, C. Territorial Scope and Data Transfer Rules in the GDPR: Realising the EU’s Ambition of Borderless Data Protection’ (2021) University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No 20/2021.Google Scholar
Kuner, C and others. ‘The (Data Privacy) Law Hasn’t Even Checked in When Technology Takes Off’ (2014) 4(3) International Data Privacy Law 175.Google Scholar
Kuner, C and others. ‘Internet Balkanization Gathers Pace: Is Privacy the Real Driver?’ (2015) 5(1) International Data Privacy Law 1.Google Scholar
Kuner, C and Marelli, M. Handbook on Data Protection in Humanitarian Action (2nd edn, International Committee of the Red Cross 2020).Google Scholar
Kuner, C and others. ‘The Language of Data Privacy Law (and How It Differs from Reality)’ (2016) 6(4) International Data Privacy Law 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuner, C and others. ‘The GDPR as a Chance to Break Down Borders’ (2017) 7(4) International Data Privacy Law 231.Google Scholar
Kunig, P ‘Prohibition of Intervention’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: April 2008) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lee, E. ‘Recognizing Rights in Real Time – The Role of Google in the EU Right to Be Forgotten’ (2015–2016) UC Davis Law Review 1017.Google Scholar
Louks, D. ‘(Fly) Anywhere but Here: Approaching EU-US Dialogue concerning PNR in the Era of Lisbon’ (2013) 23(3) Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 479.Google Scholar
Lowe, V and Staker, C. ‘Jurisdiction’ in Evans, M (ed), International Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Lynskey, O. ‘Deconstructing Data Protection: The “Added-Value” of a Right to Data Protection in the EU Legal Order’ (2014) 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 569.Google Scholar
Lynskey, O. ‘Rising Like a Phoenix: The “Right to Be Forgotten’ before the ECJ’ (European Law Blog, 13 May 2014) <http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=2351>..>Google Scholar
Maier, B. ‘How Has the Law Attempted to Tackle the Borderless Nature of the Internet?’ (2010) 18(2) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 142.Google Scholar
Maier, HG. ‘Interest Balancing and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’ (1983) 31(4) The American Journal of Comparative Law 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, FA. ‘The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited after Twenty Years’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Brill Nijhoff 1984).Google Scholar
Manners, I. ‘The Normative Ethics of the European Union’ (2008) 84(1) International Affairs 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulies, P. ‘Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology’s Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 496.Google Scholar
Markou, C. ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten”: Ten Reasons Why It Should Be Forgotten’ in Gutwirth, S, Leenes, R and de Hert, P (eds) Reforming European Data Protection Law (Springer 2015).Google Scholar
McNealy, JE. ‘The Emerging Conflict between Newsworthiness and the Right to Be Forgotten’ (2012) 39(2) Northern Kentucky Law Review 119.Google Scholar
Mercer, ST. ‘The Limitations of European Data Protection as a Model for Global Privacy Regulation’ (2020) AJIL Unbound 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R. ‘Territorial Jurisdiction after Territoriality’ in Slot, P-J and Bulterman, M (eds), Globalisation and Jurisdiction (Kluwer Law International 2004).Google Scholar
Michelman, FI. ‘The State Action Doctrine’ in Amar, Vikram David and Tushnet, Mark V (eds), Global Perspectives on Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Milanovic, M. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, M. ‘Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age’ (2015) 56(1) Harvard International Law Journal 81.Google Scholar
Mills, A. ‘Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2014) 84(1) British Yearbook of International Law 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. ‘Transatlantic Counter-terrorism Cooperation and European Values. The Elusive Quest for Coherence’ in Curtin, D and Fahey, E (eds), A Transatlantic Community of Law (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. ‘Surveillance and Digital Privacy in the Transatlantic “War on Terror.” The Case for a Global Privacy Regime’ (2016) 47(3) Columbia Human Rights Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Moerel, L. ‘The Long Arm of EU Data Protection Law: Does the Data Protection Directive Apply to the Processing of Personal Data of EU Citizens by Websites Worldwide?’ (2011) 1(1) International Data Privacy Law 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerel, L. Binding Corporate Rules: Corporate Self-Regulation of Global Data Transfers (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Moreno-Lax, V and Costello, C. ‘The Extraterritorial Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: From Territoriality to Facticity, the Effectiveness Model’ in Peers, S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Nolte, G. ‘European and US Constitutionalism: Comparing Essential Elements’ in Nolte, Georg (ed), European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, BH. ‘Jurisdiction of States’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: November 2007) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Papakonstantinou, V and de Hert, P. ‘The PNR Agreement and Transatlantic Anti-terrorism Cooperation: No Firm Human Rights Framework on Either Side of the Atlantic’ (2009) 46(3) Common Market Law Review 885.Google Scholar
Paul, JR. ‘Comity in International Law’ (1991) 32(1) Harvard International Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Paul, JR. ‘The Transformation of International Comity’ (2008) 71(3) Law and Contemporary Problems 19.Google Scholar
Peers, S. ‘The CJEU’s Google Spain Judgment: Failing to Balance Privacy and Freedom of Expression’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 13 May 2014) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.nl/2014/05/the-cjeus-google-spain-judgment-failing.html>..>Google Scholar
Peguera, M. ‘Right to Be Forgotten and Global Delisting: Some News from Spain’ (Stanford Center for Internet and Society Blog, 17 December 2017) <https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2017/12/right-be-forgotten-and-global-delisting-some-news-spain>..>Google Scholar
Peters, A. ‘Surveillance without Borders? The Unlawfulness of the NSA-Panopticon, Part II’ (EJIL: Talk!, 4 November 2013) <www.ejiltalk.org/surveillance-without-borders-the-unlawfulness-of-the-nsa-panopticon-part-ii/>..>Google Scholar
Pfisterer, VM. ‘PNR in 2011: Recalling Ten Years of Transatlantic Cooperation in PNR Information Management’ (2012) 2 National Security and Armed Conflict Law Review 111.Google Scholar
Pierik, R and Werner, W. ‘Cosmopolitanism in Context: An Introduction’ in Pierik, R and Werner, W (eds), Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory (Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Post, RC. ‘Data Privacy and Dignitary Privacy: Google Spain, the Right to Be Forgotten, and the Construction of the Public Sphere’ (2017) Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No 598.Google Scholar
Prins, C. ‘Should ICT Regulation Be Undertaken at an International Level?’ in Koops, B-J and others (eds), Starting Points for ICT Regulation: Deconstructing Prevalent Policy One-liners (TMC Asser Press 2006).Google Scholar
Privacy Bridges. ‘EU and US Privacy Experts in Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions’ (2015) 19 <https://privacybridges.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/PrivacyBridges-FINAL.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Reidenberg, JL. ‘Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace’ (1999) 52 Stanford Law Review 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. The Right to Privacy: Origins and Influence of a Nineteenth-Century Idea (Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodotà, S. ‘Data Protection as a Fundamental Right’ in Gutwirth, S and others (eds), Reinventing Data Protection? (Springer 2009).Google Scholar
Rosas, A. ‘The European Union and Fundamental Rights/Human Rights’ in Krause, C and Scheinin, M (eds), International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook (2nd edn, Åbo Akademi University 2012).Google Scholar
Rudgard, S. ‘Origins and Historical Context of Data Protection Law’ in Esturan, E (ed) European Privacy: Law and Practice for Data Protection Professionals (International Association of Privacy Professionals 2012) 3.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘The Limits of Substantive International Economic Law: In Support of Reasonable Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’ in Keirsbilck, B, Devroe, W and Claes, E (eds), Facing the Limits of the Law (Springer 2009).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. Jurisdiction in International Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Law’ in Orakhelashvili, A (ed), Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. Unilateral Jurisdiction and Global Values (Eleven International Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘An Urgent Suggestion to Pour Old Wine into New Bottles – Comment on ‘A New Jurisprudential Framework for Jurisdiction’ (2015) 109 AJIL Unbound 81.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘Whither Territoriality? The European Union’s Use of Territoriality to Set Norms with Universal Effects’ in Ryngaert, C, Molenaar, EJ and Nouwen, SMH (eds), What’s Wrong with International Law? Liber Amicorum A.H.A. Soons (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘EU Trade Agreements and Human Rights: From Extraterritorial to Territorial Obligations’ (2018) 20(3–4) International Community Law Review 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryngaert, C. Selfless Intervention: The Exercise of Jurisdiction in the Common Interest (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C and Taylor, M. ‘The GDPR as Global Data Protection Regulation?’ (2020) AJIL Unbound 5.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C and Zoetekouw, M. ‘The End of Territory? The Re-Emergence of Community as a Principle of Jurisdictional Order in the Internet Era’ in Kohl, U (ed), The Net and the Nation State: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Internet Governance (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Samie, N. ‘The Doctrine of “Effects” and the Extraterritorial Application of Antitrust Laws’ (1982) 14(1) Lawyer of the Americas 23.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, D. ‘What Schrems, Delvigne and Celaj Tell Us about the State of Fundamental Rights in the EU’ (Verfassungsblog, 16 October 2015) <http://verfassungsblog.de/what-schrems-delvigne-and-celaj-tell-us-about-the-state-of-fundamental-rights-in-the-eu/>..>Google Scholar
Scheinin, M. ‘Characteristics of Human Rights Norms’ in Krause, C and Scheinin, M (eds), International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook (2nd edn, Åbo Akademi University Institute for Human Rights 2012).Google Scholar
Schoeman, FD. (ed) Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology (Cambridge University Press 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenberger, AE. ‘Privacy Wars: EU versus US: Scattered Skirmishes, Storm Clouds Ahead’ (2007) 17 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrems, M. ‘The Privacy Shield Is a Soft Update of the Safe Harbor’ (2016) 2(2) European Data Protection Law Review 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T. ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’ (2008) 19(4) European Journal of International Law 799.Google Scholar
Schwartz, PM. ‘The EU–US Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures’ (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 1966.Google Scholar
Schwartz, PM. ‘Global Data Privacy: The EU Way’ (2019) 94 New York University Law Review 771.Google Scholar
Schwartz, PM and Peifer, KN. ‘Transatlantic Data Privacy Law’ (2017) 106 Georgetown Law Journal 115.Google Scholar
Schweighofer, E. ‘Principles for US–EU Data Flow Arrangements’ in Svantesson, DJB and Kloza, D (eds), Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Relations as a Challenge for Democracy (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Scott, J ‘Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law’ (2014) 62(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J and Rajamani, L. ‘Contingent Unilateralism – International Aviation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme’ in Vooren, BV, Blokmans, S and Wouters, J, The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. ‘Globalization and Social Protection: The Impact of EU and International Rules in the Ratcheting Up of US Privacy Standards’ (2000) 25(1) Yale Journal of International Law 55.Google Scholar
Sheftalovich, Z. ‘The Phone Call That Saved Safe Harbor’ (2016) Politico <www.politico.eu/article/the-phone-call-that-saved-safe-harbor-john-kerry-frans-timmermans/>..>Google Scholar
van der Sloot, B. ‘Legal Fundamentalism: Is Data Protection Really a Fundamental Right?’ in Leenes, R and others (eds), Data Protection and Privacy: (In)visibilities and Infrastructures (Springer 2017).Google Scholar
Solove, DJ. ‘A Taxonomy of Privacy’ (2006) 154(3) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 477.Google Scholar
Spijkers, O. The United Nations, the Evolution of Global Values and International Law (Intersentia 2011).Google Scholar
Sunstein, CR. ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’ (1996) 96(4) Columbia Law Review 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. Private International Law and the Internet (Kluwer Law International 2007).Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘A “Layered Approach” to the Extraterritoriality of Data Privacy Laws’ (2013) 3(4) IDPL 278.Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Delineating the Reach of Internet Intermediaries’ Content Blocking – “ccTLD Blocking”, “Strict Geolocation Blocking” or a “Country Lens Approach”?’ (2014) 11(2) SCRIPTed 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘The Extraterritoriality of EU Data Privacy Law – Its Theoretical Justification and Its Practical Effect on U.S. Businesses’ (2014) 50 Stanford Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘The Concept of “Extraterritoriality”: Widely Used, but Misguided and Useless’ (OUPblog, 17 November 2015) <https://blog.oup.com/2015/11/extraterritoriality-law/>..>Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Extraterritoriality and Targeting in EU Data Privacy Law: The Weak Spot Undermining the Regulation’ (2015) 5(4) International Data Privacy Law 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘The Google Spain Case: Part of a Harmful Trend of Jurisdictional Overreach’ (2015) European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No RSCAS 2015/45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Limitless Borderless Forgetfulness? Limiting the Geographical Reach of the “Right to Be Forgotten”’ (2015) 2(2) Oslo Law Review 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘A New Jurisprudential Framework for Jurisdiction’ (2015) 109 AJIL Unbound 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Article 4(1)(a) “Establishment of the Controller” in EU Data Privacy Law – Time to Rein in This Expanding Concept?’ (2016) 6(3) International Data Privacy Law 210.Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘The CJEU’s Weltimmo Data Privacy Ruling: Lost in the Data Privacy Turmoil, Yet So Very Important Case C-230/14 Weltimmo, EU:C:2015:639’ (2016) 2 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 332.Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Enforcing Privacy across Different Jurisdictions’ in Wright, D and De Hert, P (eds), Enforcing Privacy: Regulatory, Legal and Technological Approaches (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. Solving the Internet Jurisdiction Puzzle (Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report’ (2019) Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network.Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB. ‘Article 3. Territorial Scope’ in Kuner, Christopher and others (eds), The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Svantesson, DJB and Kloza, D. ‘Yet Another Book about Snowden and Safe Harbor?’ in Svantesson, DJB and Kloza, D (eds), Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Relations as a Challenge for Democracy (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Swire, P. ‘Peter Hustinx and Three Clichés about E.U.–U.S. Data Privacy’ in Hijmans, H and Kranenborg, H (eds), Data Protection Anno 2014: How to Restore Trust? Contributions in Honour of Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor (2004–2014) (Intersentia 2014).Google Scholar
Swire, PP and Litan, RE. None of Your Business: World Data Flows Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive (Brookings Institution Press 1998).Google Scholar
Taylor, M. ‘The EU’s Human Rights Obligations in Relation to Its Data Protection Laws with Extraterritorial Effect’ (2015) 5(4) International Data Privacy Law 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tene, O and Wolf, C. White Paper – Overextended: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law under the EU General Data Protection Regulation, The Future of Privacy Forum (2013).Google Scholar
Tzanou, M. ‘Data Protection as a Fundamental Right Next to Privacy? “Reconstructing” a Not So New Right’ (2013) 3(2) International Data Privacy Law 88.Google Scholar
Tzanou, M. ‘The War against Terror and Transatlantic Information Sharing: Spillovers of Privacy or Spillovers of Security?’ (2015) 31(80) Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzanou, M. The Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Normative Value in the Context of Counter-Terrorism Surveillance (Hart Publishing 2017).Google Scholar
Tzanou, M. ‘The EU–US Data Privacy and Counterterrorism Agreements: What Lessons for Transatlantic Institutionalisation?’ in Fahey, E (ed), Institutionalisation beyond the Nation State. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation (Springer 2018).Google Scholar
Uncular, S. ‘The Right to Removal in the Time of Post-Google Spain: Myth or Reality under General Data Protection Regulation?’ (2019) 33(3) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 309.Google Scholar
Ustaran, E. ‘EU General Data Protection Regulation: Things You Should Know’ (2016) 16(3) Privacy & Data Protection 3.Google Scholar
Van Alsenoy, B. ‘Reconciling the (Extra)territorial Reach of the GDPR with Public International Law’ in Vermeulen, Gert and Lievens, Eva (eds), Data Protection and Privacy under Pressure: Transatlantic Tensions, EU Surveillance, and Big Data (Maklu 2017).Google Scholar
Van Alsenoy, B and Koekkoek, M. ‘Internet and Jurisdiction after Google Spain: The Extraterritorial Reach of the “Right to Be Delisted”’ (2015) 5(2) International Data Privacy Law 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vara, JS. ‘Transatlantic Counterterrorism Cooperation Agreements on the Transfer of Personal Data’ in Fahey, E and Curtin, D (eds), A Transatlantic Community of Law: Legal Perspectives on the Relationship between the EU and US Legal Orders (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
in‘t Veld, S. ‘Transatlantic Relations and Security’ in Fahey, E and Curtin, D (eds), A Transatlantic Community of Law: Legal Perspectives on the Relationship between the EU and US Legal (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Warf, B. ‘Alternative Geographies of Cyberspace’ in Kohl, Uta (ed), The Net and the Nation State: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Internet Governance (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Warren, SD and Brandeis, LD. ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1890) 4 Harvard Law Review 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, E. ‘The Role of International Human Rights Law in the Protection of Online Privacy in the Age of Surveillance’ in Rõigas, H and others (eds), 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Defending the Core (NATO CCD COE Publications 2017).Google Scholar
Watt, HR. ‘Yahoo! Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates?’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law 673.Google Scholar
Watt, HR. ‘A Private (International) Law Perspective – Comment on “A New Jurisprudential Framework for Jurisdiction”’ (2015) 109 AJIL Unbound 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, N. ‘Opinion and Expression, Freedom of, International Protection’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Article last updated: April 2014) (Online version Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Werro, F. ‘The Right to Inform v. the Right to Be Forgotten: A Transatlantic Clash’ in Ciacchi, AC and others (eds), Haftungsrecht im dritten Millennium – Liability in the Third Millennium (Nomos 2009).Google Scholar
de Wet, E and Vidmar, J. Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Whitman, JQ. ‘The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty’ (2004) 113(6) Yale Law Journal 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, R. ‘Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties’ (2007) 40(2) Israel Law Review 503.Google Scholar
Zanfir, G. ‘How CJEU’s “Privacy Spring” Construed the Human Rights Shield in the Digital Age’ in Kuzelewska, E and others (eds), European Judicial Systems as a Challenge for Democracy (Intersentia 2015).Google Scholar
Zanfir, G. ‘Tracing the Right to Be Forgotten in the Short History of Data Protection Law: The “New Clothes” of an Old Right’ in Gutwirth, S, Leenes, R and de Hert, P (eds), Reforming European Data Protection Law (Springer 2015).Google Scholar