Book contents
- Tragedy and the Modernist Novel
- Tragedy and the Modernist Novel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Hardy’s Theory of Tragic Character
- Chapter 3 Woolf and Darwin
- Chapter 4 Camus’s Modernist Forms and the Ethics of Tragedy
- Chapter 5 Beckett
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 2 - Hardy’s Theory of Tragic Character
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2020
- Tragedy and the Modernist Novel
- Tragedy and the Modernist Novel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Hardy’s Theory of Tragic Character
- Chapter 3 Woolf and Darwin
- Chapter 4 Camus’s Modernist Forms and the Ethics of Tragedy
- Chapter 5 Beckett
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In Greek tragedies and in Hardy’s tragic novels, plots beyond our control destroy our good character, while we or others lament this injustice and envision events otherwise. In such moments of counter-narrative rebellion, both the impassioned narrator of Tess of the d’Urbervilles and the titular character of Jude the Obscure attack the logics of rape culture and victim-blaming that, in Greek tragic fashion, descend on their heroines from without and degrade them beyond recognition. This chapter contrasts Hardy’s theory of tragedy with the Aristotelian model of tragedy in which protagonists themselves inadvertently cause their demises. Hardy’s sense of tragedy is different, too, from the Christian model in which heroines fall because of their moral vices. Like Greek tragedies, Hardy’s novels show extrahuman and anthropogenic sources of suffering that cannot be justified. In particular, Hardy’s tragedy decries the notion of scapegoating, which understands the exile or elimination of the “other” to cleanse the community.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Tragedy and the Modernist Novel , pp. 30 - 64Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020