Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:04:20.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Sarah E. Duffy  and
Michele I. Feist
Sarah E. Duffy
Affiliation:
Northumbria University, Newcastle
Michele I. Feist
Affiliation:
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Time, Metaphor, and Language
A Cognitive Science Perspective
 , pp. 159 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abouserie, R. (1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self-esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14(3), 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K. and Huang, C. (2002). Time passing is motion. Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 491–519.Google Scholar
Alcaraz Carrión, D., Pagán Cánovas, C. and Valenzuela, J. (2020). Enaction through co-speech gesture: The rhetorical handing of the mental timeline. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 68(4), 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcaraz Carrión, D. and Valenzuela, J. (2021). Duration as length vs amount in English and Spanish: A corpus study. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(2), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alibali, M., Bassok, M., Olseth, K., Syc, S. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (1995). Gestures reveal mental models of discrete and continuous change. In Moore, J. and Lehman, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 391–396.Google Scholar
Alverson, H. (1994). Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphor of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Areni, C., Burger, M. and Zlatevska, N. (2011). Factors affecting the extent of Monday blues: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 109(3), 723–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argyle, M. and Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(10), 1011–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. (1984a). Physics. Trans. R. Hardie and R. Gaye. In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume One: The Revised Oxford Translation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 315–446.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1984b). Poetics. Trans. I. Bywater. In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume Two: The Revised Oxford Translation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 2316–2340.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (2004). Rhetoric. Trans. Roberts, W. Rhys. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 289–303.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, M., Jackson, D., Paunonen, S., Helmes, E. and Rothstein, M. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(4), 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Hall, K., Meacham, M. and Shapiro, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Augustine (1907). The Confessions of St. Augustine. Trans. Pusey, E.. London: J. M. Dent and Son.Google Scholar
Back, M., Schmukle, S. and Egloff, B. (2006). Who is late and who is early? Big Five personality factors and punctuality in attending psychological experiments. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 841–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S. (2021). Stuck in the past or living in the present? Temporal focus and the spread of COVID-19. Social Science and Medicine, 280, 114057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnosky, A., Matlock, T., Christensen, J. et al. (2016). Establishing common ground: Finding better ways to communicate about climate disruption. Collabra, 2(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., Glover, L. and Alexander, T. (2014). An exploration of pregnant teenagers’ views of the future and their decisions to continue or terminate their pregnancy: Implications for nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(17–18), 2503–2514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, A., Bennardo, G. and Beller, S. (2005). Spatial frames of reference for temporal relations: A conceptual analysis in English, German, and Tongan. In Bara, B., Barsalou, L. and Bucciarelli, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 220–225.Google Scholar
Bender, A., Beller, S. and Bennardo, G. (2010). Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3–4), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennardo, G. (2000). Language and space in Tonga: ‘The front of the house is where the chief sits’. Anthropological Linguistics, 42(4), 499–544.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. and Chan Lau, T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Cultural Psychology, 3, 109.Google ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. and Slobin, D. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-Linguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bienfait, F. and van Beek, W. (2014). Political left and right: Our hands-on logic. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1955). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55(1), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1960). Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie [Paradigms for a metaphorology]. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte [Archive for Conceptual History], 6. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 7–142.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1971). Beobachtungen an Metaphern [Observations on metaphors]. Archiv für Begriffsgeschicnte [Archive for Conceptual History], 15. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 161–214.Google Scholar
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. and Steen, G. (2017). The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(2), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogetić, K. (2019). Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltz, M. and Yum, Y. (2010). Temporal concepts and predicted duration judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonato, M., Zorzi, M. and Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2257–2273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, M. (1979). The pace of life: Revisited. International Journal of Psychology, 14(1–4), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O. and McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. and Gaby, A. (2010). Remembrances of times east: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L. and Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottini, R., Crepaldi, D., Casasanto, D., Crollen, V. and Collignon, O. (2015). Space and time in the sighted and blind. Cognition, 141, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, J. (1997). The meanings of directionals in Taba. In Senft, G. (ed.), Referring to Space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breaux, B. and Feist, M. (2008). The color of similarity. In Love, B., McRae, K. and Sloutsky, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
Briggs-Myers, I. and Briggs, K. (1985). Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Brook Napier, D. (2007). Languages, language learning, and nationalism in South Africa. In Schuster, K. and Witkosky, D. (eds.), Language of the Land: Policy, Politics, Identity. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2012). Time and space in Tzeltal: Is the future uphill? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(212), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1993). ‘Uphill’ and ‘downhill’ in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1), 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunyé, T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C., Augustyn, J. and Taylor, H. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, G. (1899). The Metaphor: A Study in the Psychology of Rhetoric. Folcroft: Folcroft Library Editions.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P., McCormack, T., Jaroslawska, A., O’Connor, P. and Caruso, E. (2019). Time points: A gestural study of the development of space–time mappings. Cognitive Science, 43(12), e12801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busseri, M. and Choma, B. (2016). Reevaluating the link between dispositional optimism and positive functioning using a temporally expanded perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(3), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., Gygax, P., Samuel, S. and Athanasopoulos, P. (2020). Back to the future? The role of temporal focus for mapping time onto space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. and Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). From physical to metaphorical motion: A cross-genre approach. In Pirrelli, V., Marzi, C. and Ferro, M. (eds.), NetWordS 2015: Word Knowledge and Word Usage: Representations and Processes in the Mental Lexicon. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore, pp. 155–157.Google Scholar
Cabeza Pereiro, C. and Fernández Soneira, A. (2004). The expression of time in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Sign Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cablitz, G. (2006). Marquesan: A Grammar of Space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J., Priester, J. and Berntson, G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Trans. Copple, M.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callizo-Romero, C., Tutnjević, S., Pandza, M. et al. (2020). Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(6), 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Carlson-Radvansky, L. and Irwin, D. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46(3), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, D., Cuddy, A. and Yap, A. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, D., Hall, J. and Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. and Scheier, M. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2008a). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D. (2008b). Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2009a). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2009b). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In Evans, V. and Pourcel, S. (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In Evans, V. and Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, Cognition, and Space: State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox Publishing, pp. 453–478.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2016). Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in hand. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (ed.), Conceptualizations of Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 169–186.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2017a). Relationships between language and cognition. In Dancygier, B. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2017b). The hierarchical structure of mental metaphors. In Hampe, B. (ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W. et al. (2004). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 575–580.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror-reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 473–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D. and Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115(1), 179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D. and Henetz, T. (2012). Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 643–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the Bell Jar: Metaphor, gender, and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J. and O’Seaghdha, P. (2013). Do Mandarin and English speakers think about time differently? Review of existing evidence and some new data. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 41, 338–358.Google Scholar
Chen, M. and Bargh, J. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, R. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23(1), 43–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero. (1942). On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory. Trans. Rackham, H. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero. (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. Caplan, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Koenig, J. (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. (2008). Motion in English and Spanish: A Perspective from Cognitive Linguistics, Typology and Psycholinguistics. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Murcia: University of Murcia.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. (2009). A Crosslinguistic Study on the Semantics of Motion Verbs in English and Spanish. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. and Molés-Cases, T. (2020). On the translation of boundary-crossing events: Evidence from an experiment with German and Spanish translation students. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press, pp. 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coëgnarts, M. (2022). Time-creation in film: An embodied cognitive perspective. In Piata, A., Gordejuela, A. and Alcaraz Carrión, D. (eds.), Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coëgnarts, M. and Kravanja, P. (2015a). On the embodiment of temporal meaning in cinema: Perceiving time through the character’s eyes. In Coëgnarts, M. and Kravanja, P. (eds.), Embodied Cognition and Cinema. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 245–269.Google Scholar
Coëgnarts, M. and Kravanja, P. (2015b). With the past in front of the character: Evidence for spatial-temporal metaphors in cinema. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(3), 218–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K. and Núnez, R. (2009). Across time, across the body: Transversal temporal gestures. Gesture, 9(2), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Slotta, J. and Núñez, R. (2022). The ups and downs of space and time: Topography in Yupno language, culture, and cognition. Language and Cognition, 14(1), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. and McCrae, R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O. J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. and Pagán Cánovas, C. (2009). Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L., Margolies, S., Drake, J. and Murphy, M. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 20(8), 1153– 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A., Wilmuth, C., Yap, A. and Carney, D. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1286–1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Silva Sinha, V. (2019). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(454), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, H., Milkman, K. and Riis, J. (2015). Put your imperfections behind you: Temporal landmarks spur goal initiation when they signal new beginnings. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1927–1936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dainton, B. (2022). Temporal consciousness. In Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 ed). Stanford: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/consciousness-temporal/ [accessed August 2022].Google Scholar
Dalí, S. (1931). Persistence of Memory. Museum of Modern Art, New York. Available at: www.moma.org/collection/works/79018 [accessed November 2022].Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (2009). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2002–). Corpus del Español: Genre/Historical. Available online at: www.corpusdelespanol.org/hist-gen/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/bnc/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/coca/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2010). The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/coha/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2013). Corpus of Global Web-Based English. Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/glowbe/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2016a–). Corpus del Español: Web/Dialects. Available online at: www.corpusdelespanol.org/web-dial/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2016b–). Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/now/Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2018). The iWeb Corpus. Available online at: www.english-corpora.org/iWeb/Google Scholar
Day, H. (1867). The Art of Discourse: A System of Rhetoric. New York: Charles Scribner and Company.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Román, A., Dumitrache, C. and Casasanto, D. (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1682–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jorio, A. (2000). Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
de Sousa, H. (2012). Generational differences in the orientation of time in Cantonese speakers as a function of changes in the direction of Chinese writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(255), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Waal, F. (1998). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, J. and Margola, D. (2022). Priming the self as an agent influences causal, spatial, and temporal events: Implications for animacy, cultural differences, and clinical settings. Psychological Research, 86(3), 711–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, J. and Markman, A. (2005). Are abstract concepts structured via more concrete concepts? In Bara, B., Barsalou, L. and Bucciarelli, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2467.Google Scholar
Díaz-Morales, J., Ferrari, J., Díaz, K. and Argumedo, D. (2006). Factorial structure of three procrastination scales with a Spanish adult population. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, D. and Stromback, J. (2005). Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette, 67(5), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Directgov. (2022). Holiday Entitlement. Available at: www.gov.uk/holiday-entitlement-rights [accessed March 2022].Google Scholar
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A. and Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613– 621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druckman, J. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. (2014). The role of cultural artifacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(2), 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. and Evans, V. (2017). The top trumps of time: Factors motivating the resolution of temporal ambiguity. Language and Cognition, 9(2), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. and Feist, M. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. and Feist, M. (2017). Power in time: The influence of power posing on metaphoric perspectives on time. Language and Cognition, 9(4), 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S., Feist, M. and McCarthy, S. (2014). Moving through time: The role of personality in three real life contexts. Cognitive Science, 38(8), 1662–1674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunkel, C. and Weber, J. (2010). Using three levels of personality to predict time perspective. Current Psychology, 29(2), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eikmeier, V., Alex-Ruf, S., Maienborn, C. and Ulrich, R. (2015). How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left–right axis? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1878–1883.Google ScholarPubMed
Eikmeier, V., Schröter, H., Maienborn, C., Alex-Ruf, S. and Ulrich, R. (2013). Dimensional overlap between time and space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(6), 1120–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, A. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach–avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. and Knaus, W. (1977). Overcoming Procrastination. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
Ellis, D., Wiseman, R. and Jenkins, R. (2015). Mental representations of weekdays. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0134555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elman, J. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Refaie, E. (2019). Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvevåg, B., Helsen, K., De Hert, M., Sweers, K. and Storms, G. (2011). Metaphor interpretation and use: A window into semantics in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 133(1–3), 205–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, R. and Diener, E. (1986). Influence of impulsivity and sociability on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1211–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2001). Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In Gattis, M. (ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. (1998). Asceticism in Early Taoist Religion. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Eslon, P. and Matsak, E. (2009). Eesti keele kasutusvariandid: Korpusest tulenev käändevormide võrdlev analüüs [Corpus-driven comparative analysis of variants of Estonian]. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat [Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics], 5, 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2013). Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M. and Blomberg, J. (2013). The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. In Faytak, M., Neely, K., Goss, M. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 364–379.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fedden, S. and Boroditsky, L. (2012). Spatialization of time in Mian. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(485), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, M. (2008). Space between languages. Cognitive Science, 32(7), 1177–1199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, M. (2010). Motion through syntactic frames. Cognition, 115, 192–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, M. (2013). Experimental lexical semantics at the crossroads between languages. In Rojo, A. and Ibarretxe Antuñano, I. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in Some Theoretical Models and Applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feist, M. and Duffy, S. (2015). Moving beyond ‘Next Wednesday’: The interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 633–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, M. and Duffy, S. (2020). On the path of time: Temporal motion in typological perspective. Language and Cognition, 12(3), 444–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, M., Rojo, A. and Cifuentes, P. (2007). Salience and acceptability in Spanish manner verbs: A preliminary view. International Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 137–148.Google Scholar
Feist, M. and Zhang, Y. (2019). Mapping space: A comparative study. In Goel, A., Seifert, C. and Freksa, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1717–1723.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. and Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, J. and Beck, B. (1998). Affective responses before and after fraudulent excuses by academic procrastinators. Education, 118(4), 529–538.Google Scholar
Ferrari, J., Harriott, J., Evans, L., Lecik‐Michna, D. and Wenger, J. (1997). Exploring the time preferences by procrastinators: Night or day, which is the one? European Journal of Personality, 11(3), 187–196.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira-Brito, L. (1983). A comparative study of signs for time and space in São Paulo and Urubu-Kaapor Sign Language. In Stokoe, W. and Volterra, V. (eds.), SLR’83: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Sign Language Research. Silver Spring: Linstok Press, pp. 263–268.Google Scholar
Filipović, L. and Jaszczolt, K. (eds.). (2012). Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In Jarvella, R. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. Chinchester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. and Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(260), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. (2004). Four modes of constituting relationships: Consubstantial assimilation; space, magnitude, time, and force; concrete procedures; abstract symbolism. In Haslam, N. (ed.), Relational Models Theory. A Contemporary Overview. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 61–146.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. (1999). A Watched Pot: How We Experience Time. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. (2016). Modally hybrid grammar? Celestial pointing for time-of-day reference in Nheengatú. Language, 92, 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flusberg, S., Matlock, T. and Thibodeau, P. (2017). Thinking about the future: The role of spatial metaphors for time. In Gunzelmann, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T. and Davelaar, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. London: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 361–366.Google Scholar
FrameNet. Available at: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu [accessed July 2014].Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O. and Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E. et al. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1305–1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A. (1981). Personality and activity preference. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaby, A. (2012). The Thaayorre think of time like they talk of space. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(300), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garhammer, M. (2002). Pace of life and enjoyment of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 217–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S., Sloman, S., Malt, B. and Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D. and Imai, M. (1992). Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system-mappings in understanding space-time metaphors. In Kruschke, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 510–515.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M. and Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space→time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. and Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 447–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 61(3), 309–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21(3), 434–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2009). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 14–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2017a). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphor in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2017b). The embodied and discourse views of metaphor: Why these are not so different and how can they be brought closer together. In Hampe, B. (ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2021). Book review, Jeannette Littlemore, Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Language and Cognition, 13(3), 494–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Buchalter, D., Moise, J. and Farrar, W. (1993). Literal meaning and figurative language. Discourse Processes, 16(4), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. and Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. and Perlman, M. (2006). The contested impact of cognitive linguistic research on psycholinguistic theories of metaphor understanding. In Kristiansen, G., Achard, M., Dirven, R. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. and Santa Cruz, M. (2012). Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göbel, S., Shaki, S. and Fischer, M. (2011). The cultural number line: A review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(11), 419–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Sandhofer, C. (1999). Gesture conveys substantive information to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2(1), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J. and Stefanowitsch, A. (eds.). (2013). Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 188–213.Google Scholar
Graham, L., Gosling, S. and Travis, C. (2015). The psychology of home environments: A call for research on residential space. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y. (2022). Time in Chinese hands. In Piata, A., Gordejuela, A. and Alcaraz Carrión, D. (eds.), Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y., Zheng, Y. and Swerts, M. (2019a). Which is in front of Chinese people, past or future? The effect of language and culture on temporal gestures and spatial conceptions of time. Cognitive Science, 43(12), e12804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, Y., Zheng, Y. and Swerts, M. (2019b). Having a different pointing of view about the future: The effect of signs on co-speech gestures about time in Mandarin–CSL bimodal bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 836–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In Hampe, B. (ed.), From Perception to Meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. (1990). Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. (2003). Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriott, J. and Ferrari, J. (1996). Prevalence of procrastination among samples of adults. Psychological Reports, 78(2), 611–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, T. (2012). Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication, 29(3), 278–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, M., Grabherr, L. and Mast, F. (2012). Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1416–1427.Google ScholarPubMed
Hartmann, M. and Mast, F. (2012). Moving along the mental time line influences the processing of future related words. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1558–1562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmann, M., Mast, F. and Fischer, M. (2015). Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: Evidence from eye movements on a blank screen. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Hauser, D., Carter, M. and Meier, B. (2009). Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1166–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, J. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, J. (1996). Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–323.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. (1998). Guugu Yimithirr cardinal directions. Ethos, 26(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, R., Bergen, B. and Marghetis, T. (2018). Do metaphors move from mind to mouth? Evidence from a new system of linguistic metaphors for time. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2950–2975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendricks, R. and Boroditsky, L. (2017). New space-time metaphors foster new non-linguistic representations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 800–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. and Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, A. (1875). Manual of English Rhetoric. Cincinnati: Van Antwerp, Bragg and Co.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (1978). Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 524–538.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (1982). Up/down, front/back, left/right: A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In Weissenborn, J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Here and There: Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Andrew Crooke.Google Scholar
Holler, J. and Beattie, G. (2003). Pragmatic aspects of representational gestures: Do speakers use them to clarify verbal ambiguity for the listener? Gesture, 3(2), 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, K. and Lourenco, S. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1044–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, J. and Ostberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4(2), 97–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K. and Ş. Özçalışkan, (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 403–414.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2017). Motion and semantic typology: A hot old topic with exciting caveats. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (ed.), Motion and Space Across Languages: Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. and Caballero, R. (2014). Una aproximación al studio de los eventos de movimiento metafórico desde la tipología semántica y el género [An approach to the study of metaphorical motion events from semantic typology and genre]. Anuari de Filologia. Estudis de Lingüística [Yearbook of Philology. Linguistic Studies], 4, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, M., Keller, P., Rossetti, Y. and Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44(4), 454–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. and Aaron, D. (1991). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor by George Lakoff and Mark Turner. Language, 67(2), 320–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäkel, O. (1999). Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich: Some forgotten contributions to the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. In Gibbs, R. and Steen, G. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamalian, A. and Tversky, B. (2012). Gestures alter thinking about time. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D. and Cooper, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 503–508.Google Scholar
James, W. (1950). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. and Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, T., Sun, L. and Zhu, L. (2015). The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, T. and Zhu, L. (2015). Is power-space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, O. (1990). The ‘Big Five’ factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In Pervin, L. (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 66–100.Google Scholar
John, O., Donahue, E. and Kentle, R. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
John, O., Naumann, L. and Soto, C. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and conceptual issues. In John, O., Robins, R. and Pervin, L. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, pp. 114–158.Google Scholar
John, O. and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. and John, O. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, pp. 102–138.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In Hiraga, M., Sinha, C. and Wilcox, S. (eds.), Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1981). Introduction: Metaphor in the philosophical tradition. In Johnson, M. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–47.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. and Cable, D. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 428–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julich-Warpakowski, N. (2022). Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1951). Critique of Judgment. Trans. Bernard, J.. New York: Hafner Press.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. and Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. and Essegbey, J. (2001). Pointing left in Ghana: How a taboo on the use of the left-hand influences gestural practice. Gesture, 1(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, J. and Frazer, G. (1986). An academic stress scale: Identification and rated importance of academic stressors. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosecki, K. (2016). The Western conception of time in signed languages. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (ed.), Conceptualizations of Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 52–85.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). The concept of anger: Universal or culture specific? Psychopathology, 33(4), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2008). Metaphor and emotion. In Gibb, R.s (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In Semino, E. and Demjén, Z. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Kranjec, A. (2006). Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. In Forbus, K., Gentner, D. and Regier, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 447–452.Google Scholar
Kranjec, A. and McDonough, L. (2011). The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranjec, A., Cardillo, E., Schmidt, G. and Chatterjee, A. (2010). Prescribed spatial prepositions influence how we think about time. Cognition, 114(1), 111–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, V. and Boroditsky, L. (2013). The immediate and chronic influence of spatio-temporal metaphors on the mental representations of time in English, Mandarin, and Mandarin-English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(142), 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1995). Reflections on metaphor and grammar. In Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S. (eds.), Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 133–144.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate – The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In Gibbs, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M., Meier, B. and Keefer, L. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, M., Sullivan, D. and Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langston, W. (2002). Violating orientational metaphors slows reading. Discourse Processes, 34(3), 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, P. (1964). The Whitsun Weddings. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Lay, C. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(4), 474–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, O. and Pool Balam, L. (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(271), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Poidevin, R. (2003). Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. and Ji, L. (2014). Moving away from a bad past and toward a good future: Feelings influence the metaphorical understanding of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, D., Wong, E., Chan, S. and Lam, T. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Big Five inventory in a Chinese sample of smokers receiving cessation treatment: A validation study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(6), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levine, R. and Bartlett, K. (1984). Pace of life, punctuality, and coronary heart disease in six countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 109–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Linguistic Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S., Meira, S. and The Language and Cognition Group. (2003). ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language, 79(3), 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. and Stickles, E. (2017). Gestural modality and addressee perspective influence how we reason about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(1), 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. (2017). Time on hands: Deliberate and spontaneous temporal gestures by speakers of Mandarin. Gesture, 16(3), 396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. (2018). A future-minded lark in the morning: The influence of time-of day and chronotype on metaphorical associations between space and time. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. (2020). Will it really happen? Disambiguating of the hypothetical and real ‘Next Wednesday’s meeting’ question in Mandarin speakers. Lingua, 237, 102806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. (2021). Time heals all wounds: Analysis of changes in temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings among survivors of the 2019 China earthquake over time. Language and Cognition, 13(4), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Bui, V. and Cao, Y. (2018). One country, two cultures: Implicit space–time mappings in Southern and Northern Vietnamese. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 560–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2017a). Personal attitudes toward time: The relationship between temporal focus, space-time mappings and real-life experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(3), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2017b). Who’s holding the moral higher ground: Religiosity and the vertical conception of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2018a). Karma or immortality: Can religion influence space–time mappings? Cognitive Science, 42(3), 1041–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2018b). The hope of the future: The experience of pregnancy influences women’s implicit space-time mappings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(2), 152–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2018c). Time will tell: Temporal landmarks influence metaphorical associations between space and time. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(4), 677–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2019a). Moving at the speed of life: How life pace influences temporal reasoning. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(3), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2019b). Planning for the future: The relationship between conscientiousness, temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2019c). The wheel of time: The relationship between religious experiences and Chinese Buddhists’ spatial representations of time. Pragmatics and Cognition, 26(2–3), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2020). Best wishes for the future: The link between dispositional optimism and mental sagittal space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2021a). In times of illness: COVID-19 threat influences temporal focus and implicit space–time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2021b). Move with the flow: Metaphorical perspectives on time in Chinese Taoists and atheists. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(4), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffler, J., Raab, M. and Cañal-Bruland, R. (2017). Does movement influence representations of time and space? PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0175192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loermans, A. and Milfont, T. (2018). Time after time: A short-term longitudinal examination of the ego- and time-moving representations. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loermans, A., de Koning, B. and Krabbendam, L. (2019). Agency and time representation in English and Dutch speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loermans, A., de Koning, B. and Krabbendam, L. (2021). Do you approach positive events or do they approach you? Linking event valence and time representations in a Dutch sample. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 21(3–4), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C., Nicholls, M. and Brugger, P. (2010). Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology, 20(6), R264–R265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, L., Schubert, T. and Zhu, L. (2017). The spatial representation of power in children. Cognitive Processing, 18(4), 375–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. and Seidenberg, M. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. Traxler and M. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 581–611.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2006). But it will take time… points of view on a lexical grammar of English. In Renouf, A. and Kehoe, A. (eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, pp. 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. and Levinson, S. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majid, A., Gaby, A. and Boroditsky, L. (2013). Time in terms of space (Editorial). Frontiers in Psychology, 4(554), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesza, M., (2019). The effects of potentially real and hypothetical rewards on effort discounting in a student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 108807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolies, S. and Crawford, L. (2008). Event valance and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, 22(7), 1401–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., Holmes, K., Srinivasan, M. and Ramscar, M. (2011). Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(4), 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., Ramscar, M. and Boroditsky, L. (2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 655–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEnery, T. and Xiao, R. (2004). The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese. Available online at: www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/corpus/LCMC/Google Scholar
McGlone, M. (2001). Concepts as metaphors. In Glucksberg, S. (ed.), Understanding Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. and Harding, J. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1211–1223.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. and Pfiester, R. (2009). Does time fly when you’re having fun, or do you? Affect, agency, and embodiment in temporal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, I. (2002). Right Hand, Left Hand: The Origins of Asymmetry in Brains, Bodies, Atoms and Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (ed.). (2000). Language and Gesture: Window into Thought and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medimorec, S. (2022). The effects of day of the week on temporal ambiguity resolution. Psychological Reports, 125(2), 882–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B. and Robinson, M. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B., Sellbom, M. and Wygant, D. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikša, T., Hrvatska, Z. and Tonković, M. (2018). Who is winning in the race against time? Individual differences in mental representation of time. Psihologijske Teme, 27(3), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, L., Nind, L. and Macrae, C. (2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21(2), 222–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L., Tan, L., Noble, G., Lumsden, J. and Macrae, C. (2011). Can a mind have two timelines? Exploring space-time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(3), 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miracle, A. and Yapita Moya, J. (1981). Time and space in Aymara. In Hardman, M. (ed.), The Aymara Language in Its Social and Cultural Context. Gainesville.: University Presses of Florida, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. (2019). The flexibility of association between temporal concepts and physical space in the Japanese language. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 54(6), 759–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K. (2006). Space to time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. (2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 759–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. (2014). The Spatial Language of Time: Metaphor, Metonymy and Frames of Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. (2017). Elaborating time in space: The structure and function of space–motion metaphors of time. Language and Cognition, 9(2), 191–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2019). Metaphorizing as embodied interactivity: What gesturing and film viewing can tell us about an ecological view on metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. (1886). Metaphor as a mode of abstraction. The Fortnightly Review, 40(239), 617–632.Google Scholar
Muramoto, N. (1999). Gesture in Japanese language instruction: The case of error correction. In Heilenman, L. (ed.), Research Issues and Language Program Direction. Heinle and Heinle Publishers: Boston, pp. 150–182.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L., Eisenberg, A., Kako, E., Highter, M. and McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2012). ‘Low carbon’ metals, markets and metaphors: The creation of economic expectations about climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 110(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R., Forster, J. and Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In Much, J. and Klauer, K. (eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 371–391.Google Scholar
Neves, J. and Brown, A. (2022). Student Academic Experience Survey. Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) and Higher Education Academy (HEA). Available at: www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-academic-experience-survey-2022 [accessed July 2022].Google Scholar
Niffenegger, A. (2003). The Time Traveler’s Wife. San Francisco: MacAdam/Cage.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. (2007). Inferential statistics in the context of empirical cognitive linguistics. In González-Márquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. and Spivey, M. (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D. and Wassmann, J. (2012). Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition, 124(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Núñez, R. and Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Núñez, R., Motz, B. and Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R. and Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NUS-HSBC. (2011). Student Experience Report: Teaching and Learning. Available at: www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/nus-hsbc-student-experience-report-2010-11-teaching-and-learning [accessed March 2012/June 2023].Google Scholar
OED. (nd a). Culture, n. Oxford: Oxford University. Available online at: www.oed.com/ [accessed July 2022]Google Scholar
OED. (nd b). Metaphor, n. Oxford: Oxford University. Available online at: www.oed.com/ [accessed August 2018]Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2010). Labour Market Profile Great Britain. Available at: https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/gor/2092957698/report.aspx [accessed October 2011/July 2023].Google Scholar
Olza, I., Koller, V., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Pérez-Sobrino, P. and Semino, E. (2021). The #ReframeCovid initiative: From Twitter to society via metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 11(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (ed.). (1979). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z. and Gabay, S. (2010). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özçalıskan, S. (2003). Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 189–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, S. (2004). Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2(1), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, S. (2005). Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 207–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalıskan, S. and Slobin, D. (1999). Learning ‘how to search for the frog’: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H. and Tano, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, pp. 541–552.Google Scholar
Özçalıskan, S. and Slobin, D. (2003). Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in English and Turkish. In Özsoy, A., Akar, D., Nakipoglu-Demiralp, M., Taylan, E. and Aksu-Koç, A. (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics. Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press, pp. 259–270.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. and Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. and Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98(3), B75–B87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrill, F., Hinnell, J., Moran, G. et al. (2022). Observers use gesture to disambiguate contrastive expressions of preference. Language and Cognition, 14(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S. and Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña Cervel, S. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2009). The metonymic and metaphoric grounding of two image-schema transformations. In Panther, K., Thornburg, L. and Barcelona, A. (eds.), Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J. and Ford, S. (2021). Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaltz, M., Plichta, M., Bockisch, C. et al. (2021). Processing of an ambiguous time phrase in posttraumatic stress disorder: Eye movements suggest a passive, oncoming perception of the future. Psychiatry Research, 299, e113845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinelli, E. (2016). The role of metaphor and metonymy in framing terrorism. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 134–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, B. and Casasanto, D. (2020). The correlations in experience principle: How culture shapes concepts of time and number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(6), 1048–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórka, A., Błachnio, A. and Siu, N. (2019). The relationships between self-efficacy, self-control, chronotype, procrastination and sleep problems in young adults. Chronobiology International, 36(8), 1025–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, Y. (2021). Putting time in context: There is no causal link between temporal focus and implicit space–time mappings on the front–back axis. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 41(2), 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In Fernandez, J. (ed.), Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 56–93.Google Scholar
Quintilian. (1922). Institutio Oratoria. Trans. Butler, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rabadán, R., Labrador, B. and Ramón, N. (2009). Corpus-based constrastive analysis and translation universals: A tool for translation quality assessment English--> Spanish. Babel, 55(4), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G. (2004). The metaphor time as space across languages. In Baumgarten, N., Böttger, C., Motz, M. and Probst, J. (eds.), Übersetzen, interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung—Das Leben mit Mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60 Geburtstag. Aks-verlag: Bochum, pp. 226–239.Google Scholar
Ramón, N. (2006). Mapping meaning onto form: A corpus-based contrastive study of nominal modification in English and Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 6(2), 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–310.Google Scholar
Restak, R. (2011). Empathy and other mysteries. American Scholar, 80(1), 44–52.Google Scholar
Richards, E. (1999). Mapping Time: The Calendar and Its History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, I. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richmond, J., Wilson, J. and Zinken, J. (2012). A feeling for the future: How does agency in time metaphors relate to feelings? European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Locati, F., Parolin, L., Bernardi, N. and Girelli, L. (2016). Walking on a mental time line: Temporal processing affects step movements along the sagittal space. Cortex, 78, 170–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, L., Vecchi, T., Fantino, M., Merabet, L. and Cattaneo, Z. (2018). The Ego-moving metaphor of time relies on visual experience: No representation of time along the sagittal space in the blind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(3), 444–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivera, C. (2007). Time Management. Delhi: Global Media.Google Scholar
Roberts, B., Bogg, T., Walton, K., Chernyshenko, O. and Stark, S. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M., Cassidy, D., Lloyd, B. and Fetterman, A. (2015). The politics of time: Conservatives differentially reference the past and liberals differentially reference the future. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, L. (2019). ‘Time is not a line’. Temporal gestures in Chol Mayan. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., Thompson, E. and Varela, F. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rothe-Wulf, A., Beller, S. and Bender, A. (2015). Temporal frames of reference in three Germanic languages: Individual consistency, interindividual consensus, and crosslinguistic variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2005). Linguistic interpretation and cognition. In Croitoru, E., Tuchel, D. and Praisler, M. (eds.), Cultural Matrix Reloaded: Romanian Society for English and American Studies, 7th International Conference. Bucarest: Didactica Si Pedagogica, pp. 36–64.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2009). Book review, Rosa Vega Moreno, Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2007. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 193–196.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and Pérez-Hernández, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–85.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and Santibáñez Sáenz, F. (2003). Content and formal cognitive operations in construing meaning. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 293–320.Google Scholar
Ruscher, J. (2011). Moving forward: The effect of spatiotemporal metaphors on perceptions about grief. Social Psychology, 42, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruscher, J. (2012). Describing grief under cyclical versus linear conceptions of time. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safarnejad, F., Ho-Abdullah, I. and Awal, N. (2014). A cognitive study of happiness metaphors in Persian and English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E. and Funes, M. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 512-516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, M. and Bergen, B. (2013). The case of the missing pronouns: Does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person? Cognition, 127(3), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheier, M. and Carver, C. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheier, M., Carver, C. and Bridges, M. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, T. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, B., Tesser, A. and Powell, E. (1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(2), 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. (1989). The vertical dimension and time in Mandarin. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9(2), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, A. and Kaschak, M. (2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117(1), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semino, E. and Demjén, Z. (eds.). (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z. and Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.Google Scholar
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. and Sicoli, M. (2011). The thickness of pitch: Cross-modal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish and Zapotec. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, S. and Li, H. (2021). It’s owl time!: The relationship between chronotype and resolution of temporal ambiguity. Chronobiology International, 38(8), 1103–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, Y. and Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, L. (2020). A Corpus-Based Study on the Mode of Spatio-Temporal Metaphors in Chinese – from the Perspectives of Stationary Temporal Metaphors and Dynamic Temporal Metaphors. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar
Shinohara, K. (1999). Conceptual mappings from spatial motion to time: Analysis of English and Japanese. In Nehaniv, C. (ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 230–241.Google Scholar
Shinohara, K. (2000). Constraints on motion verbs in the time is motion metaphor. In Good, J. and Yu, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 250–259.Google Scholar
Shinohara, K. and Pardeshi, P. (2011). The more in front, the later: The role of positional terms in time metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, A., Edwards, J. and Lambert, L. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C., da Silva Sinha, V., Zinken, J. and Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjögren, B. (1997). Reasons for anxiety about childbirth in 100 pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18(4), 266–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skidelsky, R. (2019). How to Achieve Shorter Working Hours. Available at: https://progressiveeconomyforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PEF_Skidelsky_How_to_achieve_shorter_working_hours.pdf [accessed March 2022].Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 157–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 219–257.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2005). Relating narrative events in translation. In Ravid, D. and Shyldkrot, H. (eds.), Perspectives on Language and Language Development: Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. and Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations. In Moore, K., Peterson, D. and Wentum, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 487–505.Google Scholar
Solomon, L. and Rothblum, E. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sopory, P. and Dillard, J. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spatola, N., Santiago, J., Beffara, B. et al. (2018). When the sad past is left: The mental metaphors between time, valence, and space. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1019), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starr, A. and Srinivasan, M. (2021). The future is in front, to the right, or below: Development of spatial representations of time in three dimensions. Cognition, 210, e104603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, P., Brothen, T. and Wambach, C. (2001). Procrastination and personality, performance, and mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. (1999). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In Gibbs, R. and Steen, G. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., Reijnierse, W. and Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLOS ONE, 9(12), e113536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stocker, K. (2020). Mental perspectives during temporal experience in posttraumatic stress disorder. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, K. and Hartmann, M. (2019). ‘Next Wednesday’s meeting has been moved forward two days’: The time-perspective question is ambiguous in Swiss German, but not in standard German. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 78(1–2), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A., Schneider, S. and Harter, J. (2012). Day-of-week mood patterns in the United States: On the existence of ‘Blue Monday’, ‘Thank God it’s Friday’ and weekend effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.). (2004). Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. and Bui, L. (2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. and Woll, B. (1999). The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3(99), 36–149.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. and Mbense, T. (1998). Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger. In Athanasiadou, A. and Tabakowska, E. (eds.), Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualization and Expression. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, Time, and the Use of Language: An Investigation of Relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 704–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrizzi, J. Shook, N. and McDaniel, M. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS ONE, 6(2), e16782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibodeau, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibodeau, P., Crow, L. and Flusberg, S. (2017). The metaphor police: A case study of the role of metaphor in explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(5), 1375–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. (1936). Twenty-Five Poems. London: J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Tillman, K., Tulagan, N., Fukuda, E. and Barner, D. (2018). The mental timeline is gradually constructed in childhood. Developmental Science, 21(6), e12679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torralbo, A., Santiago, J. and Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 745–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracy, J. and Matsumoto, D. (2008). The spontaneous expression of pride and shame: Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(33), 11655–11660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traugott, E. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C. and Moravcsik, E. (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 369–400.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. and Tanenhaus, M. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Clifton, C., Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar
Turner, S., Littlemore, J. and Fuller, D. (2020). The production of time-related metaphors by people who have experienced pregnancy loss. In Barnden, J. and Gargett, A. (eds.), Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, Experimental and Practical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 389–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B. and Jamalian, A. (2021). Thinking tools: Gestures change thought about time. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(4), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. and Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L. et al. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12408–12413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulrich, R. and Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117(2), 126–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulrich, R., Eikmeier, V., Vega, I. et al. (2012). With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences. Memory and Cognition, 40(3), 483–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ureña, J. and Faber, P. (2010). Reviewing imagery in resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J. and Soriano, C. (2009). Are conceptual metaphors accessible on-line? Is control really up? In Valenzuela, J., Rojo, A. and Soriano, C. (eds.), Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. and Wegner, D. (1985). A Theory of Action Identification. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. and Wegner, D. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallacher, R. and Wegner, D. (2012). Action identification theory. In van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A. and Higgins, E. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd., pp. 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Elk, M., van Schie, H. and Bekkering, H. (2010). From left to right: Processing acronyms referring to names of political parties activates spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2202–2219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vega Moreno, R. (2007). Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidali, A. (2010). Seeing what we know: Disability and theories of metaphor. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, 4(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E., Bergen, B. and Núñez, R. (2014). Disentangling spatial metaphors for time using non-spatial responses and auditory stimuli. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E., Bergen, B. and Núñez, R. (2017). The spatial alignment of time: Differences in alignment of deictic and sequence time along the sagittal and lateral axes. Acta Psychologica, 175, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, E. and Cooperrider, K. (2016). The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 481–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H., Lu, Y. and Lu, Z. (2016). Moral-up first, immoral-down last: The time course of moral metaphors on a vertical dimension. Neuroreport, 27(4), 247–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weger, U. and Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, H. (1958). Münze und Wort: Untersuchungen an einem Bildfeld [Coin and word: Investigations of an image field]. In Weinrich, H. (ed.), Sprache in Texten [Language in Texts]. Stuttgart: Klett, pp. 276–290.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H. (1963). Semantik der kühnen Metapher [The semantics of bold metaphors]. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte [German Quarterly for Literary Studies and Humanities], 37(3), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, H. (1964). Metaphora memoriae [Metaphors of memory]. In Weinrich, H. (ed.), Sprache in Texten [Language in Texts]. Stuttgart: Klett, pp. 291–294.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H. (1967). Allgemeine Semantik der Metapher [A comprehensive semantics of metaphor]. In Weinrich, H. (ed.), Sprache in Texten [Language in Texts]. Stuttgart: Klett, pp. 317–327.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H. (1976). ‘Streit um Metaphern’ [‘Contested metaphors’]. In Weinrich, H. (ed.), Sprache in Texten [Language in Texts]. Stuttgart: Klett, pp. 328–341.Google Scholar
Wells, H. (1895). The Time Machine. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Werner, O. (1994). Ethnographic translation: Issues and challenges. Sartoniana, 7, 58–135.Google Scholar
Whately, R. (1841). Elements of Rhetoric (6th ed.). London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. (1941). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 134–159.Google Scholar
Wiemers, M., Bekkering, H. and Lindemann, O. (2014). Spatial interferences in mental arithmetic: Evidence from the motion–arithmetic compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1557–1570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, B., Daguna, J. and Matlock, T. (2018). Metaphor-enriched social cognition and spatial bias in the courtroom. Metaphor and the Social World, 8(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. and Duffy, S. (2020). Can co-speech gestures alone carry the mental time line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(9), 1768–1781.Google ScholarPubMed
Winter, B., Duffy, S. and Littlemore, J. (2020). Power, gender, and individual differences in spatial metaphor: The role of perceptual stereotypes and language statistics. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(3), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. and Matlock, T. (2013a). Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(4), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. and Matlock, T. (2013b). More is up… and right: Random number generation along two axes. In Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N. and Wachsmuth, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 3789–3974.Google Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M. and Matlock, T. (2014). Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV news archive. Gesture, 13(3), 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WordNet. Available at: http://wordnet.princeton.edu [accessed July 2014].Google Scholar
Xiao, C., Zhao, M. and Chen, L. (2018). Both earlier times and the future are ‘Front’: The distinction between time- and ego-reference-points in Mandarin speakers’ temporal representation. Cognitive Science, 42(3), 1026–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, A., Wazlawek, A., Lucas, B., Cuddy, A. and Carney, D. (2013). The ergonomics of dishonesty: The effect of incidental posture on stealing, cheating, and traffic violations. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2281–2289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, T. and French, L. (1996). Height and perceived competence of US presidents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82(3), 1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yousif, S. (2022). Redundancy and reducibility in the formats of spatial representations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), pp. 1778–1793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 663–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (2012). The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1335–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, W., Liu, Y., Liu, C. et al. (2019). The influence of event valence and emotional states on the metaphorical comprehension of time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(410), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zlatev, J. and Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Strömqvist, S. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 159–190.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Sarah E. Duffy, Northumbria University, Newcastle, Michele I. Feist, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  • Book: Time, Metaphor, and Language
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108150101.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Sarah E. Duffy, Northumbria University, Newcastle, Michele I. Feist, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  • Book: Time, Metaphor, and Language
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108150101.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Sarah E. Duffy, Northumbria University, Newcastle, Michele I. Feist, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  • Book: Time, Metaphor, and Language
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108150101.009
Available formats
×