Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:29:33.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Time and Embodiment in the Process of Psychotherapy: A Dynamical Systems Perspective

from Part I - Body and Time: General Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

By
Wolfgang Tschacher
Edited by
Christian Tewes  and
Giovanni Stanghellini
Christian Tewes
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University Hospital
Giovanni Stanghellini
Affiliation:
Chieti University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, a quantitative approach to the exploration of psychotherapy is developed. Emphasizing the significance of time and the body for this specific type of social interaction, a dynamical modeling method is sketched, which is based on high-resolution time series. Such time series must allow mapping the processes at the time scale of seconds because consciousness resides in the here-and-now, in the present moment. Such nowness constitutes the core of the social exchange between therapist and client. The demand for high sampling rates can be satisfied with the help of measures of the embodied mind – the embodiment approach has shown that mental processes are reciprocally connected to bodily variables such as body movement and physiological signals. I present an example of time series of respiratory activity measured in a sample of psychotherapy sessions, from which the nonverbal synchrony and a signature of the present moment, the social present, can be derived.

Type
Chapter
Information
Time and Body
Phenomenological and Psychopathological Approaches
 , pp. 104 - 116
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alloa, E., Bedorf, T., Grüny, C., & Klass, T. N. (Eds.). (2012). Leiblichkeit: Geschichte und Aktualität eines Konzepts [Corporeality: History and actuality of a concept]. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Boker, S. M., Xu, M., Rotondo, J. L., & King, K. (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychological Methods, 7(3), 338–355. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.3.338Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5Google Scholar
Flückiger, C., Regli, D., Zwahlen, D., Hostettler, S., & Caspar, F. (2010). Der Berner Patienten- und Therapeutenstundenbogen 2000 [The Bern patient and therapist session report 2000]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 39(2), 71–79. doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000015Google Scholar
Friston, K. J. (2011). Embodied inference: or “I think therefore I am, if I am what I think”. In Tschacher, W. & Bergomi, C. (Eds.), The implications of embodiment – Cognition and communication (pp. 89–125). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2016). Das Gehirn - ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption [The brain – A mediating organ. A phenomenological-ecological conception] (5th ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Schlimme, J. E. (2009). Embodiment and psychopathology: A phenomenological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(6), 570–575. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283318e5cGoogle Scholar
Geller, S. M., & Porges, S. W. (2014). Therapeutic presence: Neurophysiological mechanisms mediating feeling safe in therapeutic relationships. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24(3), 178–192. doi:10.1037/a0037511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammer, K., Kruck, K. B., & Magnusson, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(1), 3–29. doi:10.1023/A:1022986608835Google Scholar
Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie [Psychological therapy]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics – An introduction. Nonequilibrium phase-transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2014). Consciousness, dreams, and inference. The Cartesian theatre revisited. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(1), 6–32.Google Scholar
Koole, S. L., & Tschacher, W. (2016). Synchrony in psychotherapy: A review and an integrative framework for the therapeutic alliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862Google Scholar
Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In Lambert, M. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 169–218). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Martin, L. A., Koch, S. C., Hirjak, D., & Fuchs, T. (2016). Overcoming disembodiment: The effect of movement therapy on negative symptoms in schizophrenia – A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00483Google Scholar
Moulder, R. G., Boker, S. M., Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2018). Determining synchrony between behavioral time series: An application of surrogate data generation for establishing falsifiable null-hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 757–773. doi:10.1037/met0000172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutz, G., & Becker, K. (2006). Ambulante physiologische Messgeräte – Entwicklung und Stand der Technik am Beispiel von Vitaport und Varioport [Ambulatory physiological measurement devices – Development and state of the art exemplified by Vitaport and Varioport]. In Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (Ed.), Ambulantes psychophysiologisches Monitoring – neue Perspektiven und Anwendungen [Ambulatory psychophysiological monitoring – New perspectives and applications] (pp. 137–147). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.Google Scholar
Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-Organization in nonequilibrium systems: From dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Pöppel, E. (2009). Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1887–1896. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0015Google Scholar
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body-movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284–295. doi:10.1037/a0023419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Perception's shadow: Long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397(6718), 430–433. doi:10.1038/17120Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Tröndle, M., Greenwood, S., Ramakrishnan, C., Uhde, F., Egermann, H., & Tschacher, W. (2020). Integrated methods: A call for integrative and interdisciplinary aesthetics research. In Vartanian, O. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of empirical aesthetics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.001.0001Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., & Bergomi, C. (Eds.). (2011). The implications of embodiment: Cognition and communication. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., Giersch, A., & Friston, K. J. (2017). Embodiment and schizophrenia: A review of implications and applications. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(4), 745–753. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2019). The process of psychotherapy: Causation and chance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12748-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschacher, W., Junghan, U., & Pfammatter, M. (2014). Towards a taxonomy of common factors in psychotherapy – Results of an expert survey. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21(1), 82–96. doi:10.1002/cpp.1822Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., & Meier, D. (2020). Physiological synchrony in psychotherapy sessions. Psychotherapy Research 30, 558–573. doi:10.1080/10503307.2019.1612114Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., Ramseyer, F., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Sharing the now in the social present: Duration of nonverbal synchrony is linked with personality. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 129–138. doi:10.1111/jopy.12298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschacher, W., Ramseyer, F., & Pfammatter, M. (2020). The social present in psychotherapy: Duration of nowness in therapeutic interaction. In Ochs, M., Borcsa, M., & Schweitzer, J. (Eds.), Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling (pp. 39–53). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_3.Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., Rees, G. M., & Ramseyer, F. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323Google Scholar
Varela, F. J. (1999). Present-Time consciousness. In Varela, F. J. & Shear, J. (Eds.), The view from within: First-Person methodologies (pp. 111–140). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkung zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie [The reafference principle. Reciprocity between central nervous system and periphery]. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.Google Scholar
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270–277. doi:10.1002/wps.20238Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×