Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of conference participants
- I Introduction
- II History, geography and the theory of trade
- III The structure of simple trade models
- IV Policy towards international trade
- V Trade, growth and dynamics
- 11 Prices of goods and factors in a dynamic stochastic economy
- 12 Capital market imperfections and the infant industry argument for protection
- 13 Endogenous real business cycles and international Specialization
- 14 Impact of government on growth and trade
- 15 Long-run production frontiers for the Jones specific-factors model with optimal capital accumulation
- 16 Hysteresis in the trade pattern
- Index
13 - Endogenous real business cycles and international Specialization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of conference participants
- I Introduction
- II History, geography and the theory of trade
- III The structure of simple trade models
- IV Policy towards international trade
- V Trade, growth and dynamics
- 11 Prices of goods and factors in a dynamic stochastic economy
- 12 Capital market imperfections and the infant industry argument for protection
- 13 Endogenous real business cycles and international Specialization
- 14 Impact of government on growth and trade
- 15 Long-run production frontiers for the Jones specific-factors model with optimal capital accumulation
- 16 Hysteresis in the trade pattern
- Index
Summary
Introduction
This study investigates, from the viewpoint of endogenous real business cycles, the relationship between international specialization and dynamic behavior of multiple countries' economic activities (business cycles) in a two-good, two-factor model in which capital is freely mobile internationally. Among the many areas of international economics to which Professor Ronald Jones has made major contributions are the determination of trade patterns and the international movement of capital. In his early work, Professor Jones investigated world specialization patterns in models in which production factors are internationally immobile (Jones, 1956 and 1961). He then extended his research to the case in which capital is freely mobile internationally. In this setting, he investigated the determinants of capital flows and the roles of tariff and tax policies (Jones, 1967, 1987 and 1989, Jones and Ruffin, 1975, and Jones and Dei, 1983). Through this long sequence of insightful research, Professor Jones has illuminated the critical role that the international movement of capital plays in the determination of a world specialization pattern. We are both graduates of the University of Rochester, the school that Professor Jones has helped to become a center of economic thought, and we are honored to have this opportunity to present our study involving a subject to which he has made such an important contribution.
The relationship between international specialization and international business cycles has long been considered in the context of what may be called the hypothesis of trade destabilization, the proposition that trade destablizes a (small) less-developed country by making the country overly specialized in a small part of the primary sector, thereby subjecting it to the (larger) business cycles of (more developed) large countries.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theory, Policy and Dynamics in International Trade , pp. 213 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993
- 4
- Cited by