Book contents
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Theorizing International Responsibility Law, an Introduction
- Part I International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Public and/or Private?
- Part II International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Collective and/or Individual?
- Part III International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Fault-based or Not?
- Part IV Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
- 12 The Responsibility of Public Authorities in China
- 13 Liability of Public Institutions in Middle Eastern Law
- 14 The Responsibility of Public Institutions in Africa
- 15 State Responsibility from a Central European Perspective
- 16 Comparative and Prospective Comments on the ‘World Tour’ of the Concept of Public Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Index
15 - State Responsibility from a Central European Perspective
from Part IV - Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Theorizing International Responsibility Law, an Introduction
- Part I International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Public and/or Private?
- Part II International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Collective and/or Individual?
- Part III International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Fault-based or Not?
- Part IV Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
- 12 The Responsibility of Public Authorities in China
- 13 Liability of Public Institutions in Middle Eastern Law
- 14 The Responsibility of Public Institutions in Africa
- 15 State Responsibility from a Central European Perspective
- 16 Comparative and Prospective Comments on the ‘World Tour’ of the Concept of Public Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The author presents the constitutional model of State responsibility in Central Europe as exemplified by four legal systems: the Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. In all of them, the legal rule providing for the reparation of damage caused by public authorities takes the shape of a subjective constitutional right which requires implementation in ordinary legislation. The very generous system of the Polish Constitution led to some limitations and qualifications of the broad constitutional right by the case law. In Hungary, a similarly broadly phrased constitutional right coexists with quite restrictive legislative provisions and a case law which tends to go slowly and cautiously beyond the letter of the ordinary legislation. In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the drafters of the Constitutions were much more cautious and the precise content of the constitutional right is specified in ordinary legislation. State responsibility mechanisms at the domestic level have proven quite effective to compensate material damage. The greatest remaining challenge is compensation of moral damage.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theories of International Responsibility Law , pp. 316 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022