Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:11:14.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Mariusz Tabaczek
Mariusz Tabaczek
Affiliation:
Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Theistic Evolution
A Contemporary Aristotelian-Thomistic Perspective
 , pp. 281 - 307
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part One).” The Thomist 1, no. 1 (1939): 80–122.Google Scholar
Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Two).” The Thomist 1, no. 2 (1939): 237–70.Google Scholar
Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Three).” The Thomist 1, no. 3 (1939): 381–443.Google Scholar
Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Four).” The Thomist 2, no. 1 (1940): 88–155.Google Scholar
Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Five).” The Thomist 2, no. 2 (1940): 237–300.Google Scholar
Albert the Great. Questions Concerning Aristotle’s On Animals. Translated by Irven M Resnick and Kenneth F Kitchell. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Alexander, Andrew. “Human Origins and Genetics.” Clergy Review 49, no. 6 (1964): 344–53.Google Scholar
Alexander, Denis. Creation or Evolution: Do We Have to Choose? Oxford: Monarch Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Allen, Colin, Bekoff, Marc, and Lauder, George, eds. Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1998.Google Scholar
Allen, Colin, and Neal, Jacob. “Teleological Notions in Biology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford University, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/teleology-biology/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Allis, C. David, Caparros, Marie-Laure, Jenuwein, Thomas, and Reinberg, Danny, eds. Epigenetics, Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Alszeghy, Zoltan, and Flick, Maurizio. “Il Peccato Originale in Prospettiva Personalistica.” Gregorianum 46, no. 4 (1965): 705–32.Google Scholar
Ambrose. Hexameron, Paradise, and Cain and Abel. Translated by John J. Savage. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Amundson, Ron. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Aquinas on Creation: Writings on the “Sentences” of Peter Lombard Book 2, Distinction 1, Question 1. Translated by William E. Carroll and Steven E. Baldner. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1997.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Aquinas: Selected Writings. Translated by Robert P. Goodwin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium theologiae seu brevis compilation theologiae ad fratrem Raynaldum. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 42. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1979, 83–191. [English translation: Compendium of Theology, tr. C. Vollert. St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1947.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De ente et essentia. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 43. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1976, 131–57. [English translation: Aquinas on Being and Essence: A translation and Interpretation, tr. Joseph Bobik. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De mixtione elementorum ad magistrum Philippum de Castro Caeli. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 43. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1976, 315–81. [English translation: Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the De Principiis Naturae and the De Mixtione Elementorum of St. Thomas Aquinas, tr. Joseph Bobik. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De principiis naturae. Vol. 43 of Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Rome. Typographia polyglotta, 1976, 39–47. [English translation: The Principles of Nature. In Selected Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. Edited and translated by Robert P. Goodwin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965, 7–28.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Aristotelis librum De anima commentarium. Vol. 45/1 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1984. [English translation: Aristotle’s De Anima in the Version of William of Moerbeke and the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Kenelm Foster and Silvester Humphries. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1951.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Librum Boethii de Trinitate, Quaestiones Quinta et Sexta, ed. Wyser, Paul. Fribourg: Societe Philosophique and Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1948. [English translation: The Division and Methods of the Sciences. Quaestions V and VI of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius translated with Introduction and Notes, Third Revised Edition by Armand Maurer. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1963.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Metaphysicam Aristotelis commentaria. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1926. [English translation: Commentary on The Metaphysics of Aristotle. 2 vols. Translated by John Rowan. Chicago: Regnery Press, 1961.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965. [English translation: Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel. Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox Books, 1999.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata de anima. Edited by Robb, James H.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1968. [English translation: Quaestions on the Soul. Translated by James H. Robb. Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press, 1984.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de malo. Vol. 23 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1982. [English translation: On Evil. Translated by John A. Oesterle and Jean T. Oesterle. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de potentia Dei. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965. [English translation: On the Power of God. Translated by English Dominican Fathers. Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1952.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Vol. 22/1–3 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1972–1976. [English translation: Truth. 3 vols. Translated by Robert W. Mulligan S.J. et al. Albany, New York: Preserving Christian Publications, 1993.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus. In Quaestionis disputatae vol. 2, 10th ed. Edited by Odetto, E.. Turin: Marietti, 1965, 707–828. [English Translation: Disputed Questions on Virtue: Quaestio Disputata de Virtutibus in Communi and Quaestio Disputata de Virtutibus Cardinalibus. Translated by Ralph McInerny. South Bend, IN: St. Augustines Press, 2009.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones quodlibetales. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1949.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum. Edited by Fretté, S. E. and Maré, P.. Vols. 7–11 of Opera omnia. Paris: Vivès, 1882–1889.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles. 3 vols. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1961–1967. [English translation: On the Truth of the Catholic Faith: Summa Contra Gentiles. 4 vols. Translated by Anton C. Pegis et al. Garden City, New York: Image Books, 1955–1957.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. Rome: Editiones Paulinae, 1962. [English translation: Summa Theologica. 3 vols. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Bros., 1946.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super librum De causis expositio. Edited by Saffrey, H. D., Fribourg and Louven: Société Philosophique, 1954. [English translation: Commentary on the Book of Causes. Translated and annotated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, O.P., Charles R. Hess, O.P., and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.]Google Scholar
Arintero, Juan. La Evolución y la filosofía cristiana: Introducción general y Libro primero, La evolución y la mutabilidad de las especies orgánicas. Madrid: Gregorio del Amo, 1898.Google Scholar
Aristotle. De anima (On the Soul), translated by J. A. Smith. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 533–603. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. De generatione animalium (On the Generation of Animals), translated by Arthur Platt. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 665–80. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. De generatione et corruptione (On Generation and Corruption), translated by Harold H. Joachim. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 465–531. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. De partibus animalium (On the Parts of Animals), translated by William Ogle. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 641–61. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Historia animalium (The History of Animals), translated by D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 774–993. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Metaphysica (The Metaphysics), translated by W. D. Ross. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 681–926. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Meteorologica (The Meteorology), translated by W. Webster. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 555–625. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Physica (The Physics), translated by R. K Gaye. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 213–394. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Artigas, Mariano. The Mind of the Universe: Understanding Science and Religion. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Artigas, Mariano, Glick, Thomas F., and Martínez, Rafael A.. Negotiating Darwin: The Vatican Confronts Evolution, 1877–1902. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Artmann, Stefan. “Biological Information.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Sarkar, Sahotra and Plutynski, Anya, 22–39. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Ashley, Benedict M. “Causality and Evolution.” The Thomist 36, no. 2 (1972): 199–230.Google Scholar
Ashley, Benedict M. Theologies of the Body: Humanist and Christian. St. Louis: Pope John Center, 1985.Google Scholar
Attfield, Robin. Creation, Evolution and Meaning. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Augustine. The Literal Meaning of Genesis. Vol. 1–2. Translated by John Hammond Taylor. New York: Newman Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Austin, Christopher J. “Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in the Age of Evolution.” Synthese 194, no. 7 (2017): 2539–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Christopher J. “Contemporary Hylomorphisms: On the Matter of Form.” Ancient Philosophy Today 2, no. 2 (2020): 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Christopher J. Essence in the Age of Evolution: A New Theory of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “Defending Adam After Darwin: On the Origin of Sapiens as a Natural Kind.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92, no. 2 (2018): 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “The Fittingness of Evolutionary Creation.” In Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith, edited by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, James Brent, Thomas Davenport, and John Baptist Ku. 182–91. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “The Historicity of Adam and Eve IV: A Theological Synthesis.” In Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith, edited by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, James Brent, Thomas Davenport, and John Baptist Ku. 171–75. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio, Brent, James, Davenport, Thomas, and Baptist Ku, John. Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. “Teleological Explanations.” In Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 187–95. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology.” In Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, edited by Allen, Colin, Bekoff, Marc, and Lauder, George, 29–49. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1998.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Dignity and Advancement of Learning. London and New York: The Colonial Press, 1900.Google Scholar
Baglow, Christopher. “Evolution and the Human Soul.” Church Life Journal. https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/evolution-and-the-human-soul/. Retrieved 16 April 2022.Google Scholar
Balme, David M. “Aristotle’s Biology Was Not Essentialist.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 287–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Balsas, Álvaro. Divine Action and the Laws of Nature: An Approach Based on the Concept of Causality Consonant with Contemporary Science. Braga: Axioma, 2018.Google Scholar
Barrett, Paul H., ed. The Collected Papers of Charles Darwin: Two Volume Set. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Basil the Great. De hominis structura. In Patrologia Graeca. Vol. 30. Paris: Migne, 1888.Google Scholar
Baedke, Jan, and Gilbert, Scott F.. “Evolution and Development.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2021. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/evolution-development/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Beatty, John. “Speaking of Species: Darwin’s Strategy.” In The Darwinian Heritage, edited by Kohn, David, 265–82. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark. “Where’s the Good in Teleology?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, no. 4 (1992): 781–806.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen, and Sabbarton-Leary, Nigel, eds. The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Benzinger. Enchiridion Symbolorum, 43rd Ed. Edited by Hünermann, Peter. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchel. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J., and Noble, T. A., eds. Darwin, Creation and the Fall: Theological Challenges. Nottingham: Intervarsity Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bethell, Tom. “Darwin’s Mistake.” Harper’s 252, no. 1509 (1976): 70–75.Google Scholar
Binswanger, Harry. The Biological Basis of Teleological Concepts. Los Angeles, CA: TOF Publications, Inc., 1990.Google Scholar
Blanchette, Oliva. The Perfection of the Universe According to Aquinas: A Teleological Cosmology. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Blandino, Giovanni S. Deux Hypotheses Sur L’Origine De L’Homme. Observations Theologiquese Et Scientifiques. Bologna: Assoguidi, 1962.Google Scholar
Bostock, David. Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s “Physics”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Boulter, Stephen J. “Can Evolutionary Biology Do Without Aristotelian Essentialism?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 70 and 71 (2012): 83–103.Google Scholar
Boulter, Stephen J. “Evolution and the Principle of Proportionality.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Orr, James, 125–48. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Bouyssonie, Jean and Amédée, Bouyssonie. “Polygénisme.” Dictionnaire de théologie catholique 12, no. 2 (1935): col. 2536.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. Evolution: The History of an Idea, 25th Anniversary Edition, With a New Preface. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., and Henry, John. “Evolution.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by Ferngren, Gary B., 2nd ed., 204–19. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 141–85. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Braillard, Pierre-Alain, and Malaterre, Christophe, eds. Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ and Chichester: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12, no. 2 (June 1, 1981): 91–105.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N., and Ramsey, Grant. “What’s Wrong with the Emergentist Statistical Interpretation of Natural Selection and Random Drift.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael, 66–84. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brown, Christopher. Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus: Solving Puzzles about Material Objects. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Brown, David O. “St. George Jackson Mivart: Evo-Devo, Epigenetics and Thomism.” Theology and Science 20, no. 4 (2022): 474–92.Google Scholar
Butler, Samuel. Evolution: Old and New. London: Boque, 1882.Google Scholar
Byl, Simon. “Le Jugement de Darwin Sur Aristote.” L’Antiquité Classique 42, no. 2 (1973): 519–21.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph Keim, O’Rourke, Michael, and Slater, Matthew H., eds. Carving Nature at Its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richard. The Metaphysics of Emergence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar
Carl, Brian T. “Thomas Aquinas on the Proportionate Causes of Living Species.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 223–48.Google Scholar
Carroll, William E. “At the Mercy of Chance? Evolution and the Catholic Tradition.” Revue Des Questions Scientifiques 177, no. 2 (2006): 179–204.Google Scholar
Caruana, Louis, ed. Darwin and Catholicism: The Past and Present Dynamics of a Cultural Encounter. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Catholic Church. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd edition. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2000.Google Scholar
Catholic News Agency. “Francis Inaugurates Bust of Benedict, Emphasizes Unity of Faith, Science,” www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/francis-inaugurates-bust-of-benedict-emphasizes-stewardship-43494. Retrieved 9 January 2021.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William T., and Smith, James K. A., eds. Evolution and the Fall. Grand Rapids, MI: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Centore, Floyd. F. “Darwin on Evolution: A Re-Estimation.” The Thomist 33, no. 3 (1969): 456–96.Google Scholar
Centore, Floyd. F. “Evolution after Darwin.” The Thomist 33, no. 4 (1969): 718–36.Google Scholar
Chaberek, Michael. Aquinas and Evolution. Lexington: The Chartwell Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Chaberek, Michael. “Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution: Why Are They Incompatible?” Studia Gilsoniana 8, no. 1 (2019): 47–81.Google Scholar
Chaberek, Michael. Knowledge and Evolution: How Theology, Philosophy, and Science Converge in the Question of Origins. Eugene, OR: Resource Publications, 2021.Google Scholar
Chaberek, Michael. “The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution: Accidental Change Does Not Generate Substantial Change.” Forum Philosophicum 26, no. 1 (2021): 35–49.Google Scholar
Chaberek, Michael. “Where Do Substantial Forms Come From? – A Polemic with the Theistic Evolution of Mariusz Tabaczek.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. “Fall, Redemption, and Geocentrism.” In Christianity and Evolution, edited by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, translated by René Hague, 36–44. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar
Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. “Note on Some Possible Historical Representations of Original Sin.” In Christianity and Evolution, edited by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, translated by René Hague, 45–55. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar
Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper, 1959.Google Scholar
Charlton, William. “Did Aristotle Believe in Prime Matter?” In Physics: Books I and II, by Aristotle, Translated with Introduction and Notes by W. Charlton, 129–45. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Chiu, Lynn. Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: A Review of the Latest Scientific Research, www.templeton.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/EES_Review_FINAL_.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2023.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. God and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Kenotic Trinitarian Panentheism.” Dialog 44, no. 3 (2005): 250–55.Google Scholar
Coffey, Peter. Ontology or the Theory of Being. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1970.Google Scholar
Collins, Francis S. The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. New York: Free Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Corey, Michael Anthony. Evolution and the Problem of Natural Evil. Lanham (Md.) ; New York ; Oxford: University Press of America, 2000.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter A. “Beyond the Modern Synthesis: A Framework for a More Inclusive Biological Synthesis.” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 153 (July 1, 2020): 5–12.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. In Quest of the Historical Adam: A Biblical and Scientific Exploration. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2021.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. “Functions and Mechanisms: A Perspectivalist View.” In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, edited by Huneman, Philippe, 133–58. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72, no. 20 (1975): 741–64.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. “Letter no. 2534.” In Correspondence Project, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2534.xml. Retrieved 20 July 2021.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. “Letter no. 7273.” In Correspondence Project, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-7273.xml. Retrieved 20 July 2021.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. In two volumes – Vol. 1. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. Edited by Barlow, Nora. London: Collins, 1958.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, and Mayr, Ernst. On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition. Facsimile ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Darwin, Francis. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. Vols. 1–3. London: John Murray, 1887.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul. “Teleology without Teleology: Purpose through Emergent Complexity.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur Robert, 95–108. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Dawes, Gregory W., and Smith, Tiddy. “The Naturalism of the Sciences.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67 (2018): 22–31.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life. New York: Basic Books/Harper Collins, 1995.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia. “In Adam All Die?: Questions at the Boundary of Niche Construction, Community Evolution, and Original Sin.” In Evolution and the Fall, edited by Cavanaugh, William T. and Smith, James K. A., 23–47. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
De Filippi, Filippo. L’uomo e Le Scimie: Lezione Pubblica Detta in Torino La Sera Dell’11 Gennaio 1864 Da Filippo De Filippi. Milano: G. Daeli, 1864.Google Scholar
De Haan, Daniel. “Nihil dat quod non habet: Thomist Naturalism Contra Supernaturalism on the Origin of Species.” In A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, ed. by Austriaco, Nicanor (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Delbrück, Max. “Aristotle-Totle-Totle.” In Of Microbes and Life, edited by Monod, Jacques and Borek, Ernest, 50–55. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Depew, David J. “Aristotelian Teleology and Philosophy of Biology in the Darwinian Era.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology, edited by Connell, Sophia M., New ed., 261–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Depew, David J. “Consequence Etiology and Biological Teleology in Aristotle and Darwin.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, no. 4 (December 2008): 379–90.Google Scholar
Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H.. “Challenging Darwinism: Expanding, Extending, Replacing.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought, edited by Ruse, Michael, 405–11. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H.. “The Fate of Darwinism: Evolution After the Modern Synthesis.” Biological Theory 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2011): 89–102.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, Kevin. “Different Species Problems and Their Resolution.” BioEssays 27, no. 12 (December 2005): 1263–69.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, Kevin. “Species Concepts and Species Delimitation.” Systematic Biology 56, no. 6 (2007): 879–86.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, Kevin. “Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution.” Philosophy of Science 55, no. 2 (1988): 238–59.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, Kevin. “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 49–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
de Sinéty, Robert. “Les Preuves et Les Limites Du Transformisme.” Études 127 (1911): 660–93.Google Scholar
de Sinéty, Robert. “Transformisme.” In Dictionnaire Apologétique de La Foi Catholique, edited by D’Alès, . Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne, col. 1793–1848.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence W. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
Decaen, Christopher. “Elemental Virtual Presence in St. Thomas.” The Thomist 64, no. 2 (2000): 271–300.Google Scholar
Deely, John N. “The Philosophical Dimensions of the Origin of Species. Part I.” The Thomist 33, no. 1 (1969): 75–149.Google Scholar
Deely, John N. “The Philosophical Dimensions of the Origin of Species. Part II.” The Thomist 33, no. 2 (1969): 251–335.Google Scholar
DeKoninck, Charles. “Darwin’s Dilemma.” The Thomist 24, no. 2 (1961): 367–82.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A., and Witt, Jonathan. Intelligent Design Uncensored: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to the Controversy. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A., and Ruse, Michael, eds. Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 2. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. Biological Essentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. “Defending Intrinsic Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 88, no. 1 (2021): 67–82.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. “Historical Biological Essentialism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 71 (2018): 1–7.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. “Individual Essentialism in Biology.” Biology & Philosophy 33, no. 5 (2018): 1–22.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 75, no. 3 (2008): 344–82.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence. “The Importance of Substance,” https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti/dewan.htm. Retrieved 19 August 2022.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk, McCluskey, Colleen, and Van Dyke, Christina. Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. The Biology of Ultimate Concern. Later Printing edition. New York: The New American Library, 1967.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael J. “Science, Causality and Divine Action: Classical Principles for Contemporary Challenges.” CTNS Bulletin 21, no. 1 (2001): 3–12.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael J. The Philosophy of Nature. Oakland, CA: Western Dominican Province, 2010.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael J. Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Donceel, Joseph. “Causality and Evolution: A Survey of Some Neo-Scholastic Theories.” New Scholasticism 39, no. 3 (1965): 295–315.Google Scholar
Dorlodot, Henry de. Darwinism and Catholic Thought. New York: Benziger, 1922.Google Scholar
Dorlodot, Henry de. Le Darwinisme Au Point de Vue de l’Orthodoxie Catholique. Brussels: Lovanium, 1921.Google Scholar
Dudley, John. Aristotle’s Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Duffy, Stephen J. “Our Hearts of Darkness: Original Sin Revisited.” Theological Studies 49, no. 4 (1988): 597–622.Google Scholar
Dulles, Avrey Robert. “God and Evolution.” First Things 176 (2007): 19–24.Google Scholar
Dumsday, Travis. “A New Argument for Intrinsic Biological Essentialism.” Philosophical Quarterly 62, no. 248 (2012): 486–504.Google Scholar
Dumsday, Travis. “Is There Still Hope for a Scholastic Ontology of Biological Species?” The Thomist 76, no. 3 (2012): 371–95.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. “On the Impossibility of a Monistic Account of Species.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 3–22. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Dubarle, Andre-Marie. The Biblical Doctrine of Original Sin. Translated by E. M. Stewart. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1964.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. How God Acts: Creation, Redemption, And Special Divine Action. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. The God of Evolution: A Trinitarian Theology. New York: Paulist Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Terrence. “Anthropogenesis and the Soul.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 173–92.Google Scholar
Elder, Crawford L. “Biological Species Are Natural Kinds.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 46, no. 3 (2008): 339–62.Google Scholar
Elders, Leo J. “The Philosophical and Religious Background of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.” Doctor Communis 37 (1984): 32–67.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles, and Jay Gould, Stephen. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by Schopf, T. J. M., 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co., 1972.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian D. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian D. The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism. Montreal and Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Darwin’s Solution to the Species Problem.” Synthese 175, no. 3 (2010): 405–25.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Microbiology and the Species Problem.” Biology & Philosophy 25, no. 4 (2010): 553–68.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/species/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species and the Linnean Hierarchy.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 285–305. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism.” Philosophy of Science 65, no. 1 (1998): 103–20.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. “Systematics and Taxonomy.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Sarkar, Sahotra and Plutynski, Anya, 99–118. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc, and Matthen, Mohan. “Taxonomy, Polymorphism, and History: An Introduction to Population Structure Theory.” Philosophy of Science 72, no. 1 (2005): 1–21.Google Scholar
Facchini, Fiorenzo. “Man, Origin and Nature.” In Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science, 2002. http://inters.org/origin-nature-of-man. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar
Fáinche, Ryan. “Aquinas and Darwin.” In Darwin and Catholicism: The Past and Present Dynamics of a Cultural Encounter, edited by Caruana, Louis, 43–59. London; New York: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Joseph. The Fall and the Ascent of Man: How Genesis Supports Darwin. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2012.Google Scholar
Flaman, Paul J. P. “Evolution, the Origin of Human Persons, and Original Sin: Physical Continuity with an Ontological Leap.” The Heythrop Journal 57, no. 3 (2016): 568–83.Google Scholar
Fowler, Thomas B., and Kuebler, Daniel. The Evolution Controversy: A Survey of Competing Theories. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Francis, Pope. Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor, 2015.Google Scholar
Franklin, Laura R. “Bacteria, Sex, and Systematics.” Philosophy of Science 74, no. 1 (2007): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Gloria. Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Gaine, Simon F. “The Teaching of the Catholic Church and the Evolution of Humanity.” In A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, edited by Austriaco, Nicanor (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Gage, Logan Paul. “Can a Thomist Be a Darwinist?” In God and Evolution, edited by Richards, Jay W., 187–202. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “Le Monogénisme n’est-Il Nullement Révélé, Pas Même Implicitement?” Doctor Communis 2 (1948): 191–202.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23, no. 4 (1974): 536–44.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. “Introduction.” In Darwin, Charles, The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, 2nd rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. “Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity.” Biology and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (1987): 127–43.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Giberson, Karl W., ed. Abraham’s Dice: Chance and Providence in the Monotheistic Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A.. “Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology.” Developmental Biology 173, no. 2 (1996): 357–72.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality, Species, and Evolution. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by L. K. Shook. New York: Random House, 1956.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. “A Modern History Theory of Functions.” In Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology, edited by Rosenberg, Alex and Arp, Robert, 175–88. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, and Sterelny, Kim. “Biological Information.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/information-biological/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, and Sterelny, Kim. “Information in Biology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael, 103–19. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
González, Zeferino. La Biblia y La Ciencia. 2nd ed. Seville: Izquierdo, 1892.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Brian. How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Essentiality as Foundationality.” In Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, edited by Novotný, Daniel D. and Novák, Lukáš, 119–37. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” Review of Metaphysics 30, no. 2 (1976): 226–54.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan. “Darwin on Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Biology 32, no. 1 (1999): 3–30.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan, and Lennox, James G., eds. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. Revised and Expanded edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1996.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C.. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 205, no. 1161 (September 21, 1979): 581–98.Google Scholar
Graham, William. The Creed of Science: Religious, Moral, and Social. London: Kegan Paul, 1881.Google Scholar
Gray, Asa. “Scientific Worthies.” Nature 10 (1874): 79–81.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. “Deep Incarnation and Kenosis: In, With, Under, and As: A Response to Ted Peters.” Dialog 52, no. 3 (2013): 251–62.Google Scholar
Grelot, Pierre. Réflexions sur le Problème du Péché Originel. Tournai: Casterman, 1968.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, and Depew, David J.. The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. “Origins of Life Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 263–90. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. “Squaring the Circle: Natural Kinds with Historical Essences.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 209–28. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. “What Is Innateness?” The Monist 85, no. 1 (2001): 70–85.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain Gabriel. Christian Moral Principles: Way of the Lord Jesus: 1. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 6, Aristotle: An Encounter. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst. The History of Creation. Translated by E. Ray Lankester. London: H. S. King and Company, 1876.Google Scholar
HallerJr., John S. Outcasts from Evolution: Scientific Attitudes of Racial Inferiority, 1859 – 1900. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Haught, John F. God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hayward, Alan. Creation and Evolution: Rethinking the Evidence from Science and the Bible. Ada, Ml: Bethany House Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar
Hefner, Philip J. The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G., and Oppenheim, Paul. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15, no. 2 (1948): 135–75.Google Scholar
Henry, John, and Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Causation.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by Ferngren, Gary B., 377–94. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hey, Jody. Genes, Categories, and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Cause of the Species Problem. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “Catholicism and Evolution: Polygenism and Original Sin Part I.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 95–138.Google Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “Catholicism and Evolution: Polygenism and Original Sin Part II.” Scientia et Fides 9, no. 1 (2021): 63–129.Google Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “Erich Wasmann, S.J.: Natural Species and Catholic Polyphyletic Evolution during the Modernist Crisis.” Journal of Jesuit Studies 7 (2020): 244–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “Some Thomistic Encounters with Evolution.” Theology and Science 18, no. 2 (2020): 325–46.Google Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “The Evolving Taxonomy of Progressive Creation.” Scientia et Fides 11, no. 1 (2023): 199–214.Google Scholar
Hofmann, James R. “Thomistic Hylomorphism and Theistic Evolution.” Scientia et Fides 11, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Howerth, I. W. “Natural Selection and the Survival of the Fittest.” The Scientific Monthly 5, no. 3 (1917): 253–57.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45, no. 3 (1978): 335–60.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles.” Biology and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (April 1, 1987): 168–84.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. “On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 23–48. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy – Two Thousand Years of Stasis (I-II).” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15–16, no. 60–61 (1965): 314–26, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. “What Philosophy of Biology Is Not.” Synthese 20, no. 2 (1969): 157–84.Google Scholar
Hunt, Tam. “Reconsidering the Logical Structure of the Theory of Natural Selection.” Communicative & Integrative Biology 7, no. 6 (2014): e972848.Google Scholar
International Theological Commission. Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2004.Google Scholar
Ingman, Max, Kaessmann, Henrik, Pääbo, Svante, and Gyllensten, Ulf. “Mitochondrial Genome Variation and the Origin of Modern Humans.” Nature 408, no. 6813 (December 2000): 708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irenaeus. “Against Heresies.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol 1: The Apostolic Fathers, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, edited by Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, 834–1391. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1885.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.Google Scholar
John, Paul II. Address to the Plenary Session on ‘The Origins and Early Evolution of Life.’ Rome: Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1996. www.pas.va/content/accademia/en/magisterium/johnpaulii/22october1996.html. Retrieved 14 June 2021.Google Scholar
John Paul IIAddress to the Symposium ‘Christian Faith and the Theory of Evolution.’ Translated by Paolo Zanna. Rome, 1985, http://inters.org/John-Paul-II-Faith-Evolution-1985. Retrieved 15 May 2021.Google Scholar
John Paul II“Consequences of Original Sin for All Humanity: Catechesis by Pope John Paul II on Jesus Christ.” October 1, 1986, http://totus2us.com/teaching/jpii-catechesis-on-god-the-son-jesus/. Retrieved 12 July 2021.Google Scholar
John Paul IIVeritatis Splendor. Rome, 1993. www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.html. Retrieved 15 July 2022.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Christopher B. “Early Christian Belief in Creation and the Beliefs Sustaining the Modern Scientific Endeavor.” In The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity, edited by Stump, J. B. and Padgett, Alan G., 3–13. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, Kostas, and Minelli, Alessandro. “Understanding Evolution: Why Evo-Devo Matters.” BioScience 64, no. 5 (May 1, 2014): 381–82.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Eric Matthews and Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Waters, C. Kenneth, eds. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Keltz, B. Kyle. Thomism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2020.Google Scholar
Kemp, Kenneth W. “God, Evolution, and the Body of Adam.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 139–72.Google Scholar
Kemp, Kenneth W. “Humani Generis & Evolution: A Report from the Archives.” Scintia ef Fides 11, no. 1 (2023): 9–27.Google Scholar
Kemp, Kenneth W. “Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85, no. 2 (2011): 217–36.Google Scholar
Kendal, Jeremy, Tehrani, Jamshid J., and Odling-Smee, John. “Human Niche Construction in Interdisciplinary Focus.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, no. 1566 (2011): 785–92.Google Scholar
Kerr, Gaven. Aquinas and the Metaphysics of Creation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Kimura, Motoo. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
King, Hugh R. “Aristotle without Prima Materia.” Journal of the History of Ideas 17, no. 1/4 (1956): 370–89.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. In Mendel’s Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. “Species.” Philosophy of Science 51, no. 2 (1984): 308–33.Google Scholar
Kitts, David B., and Kitts, David J.. “Biological Species as Natural Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 46, no. 4 (1979): 613–22.Google Scholar
Klubertanz, George P. “Causality and Evolution.” Modern Schoolman 19, no. 1 (1941): 11–14.Google Scholar
Kohn, David. “Darwin’s Keystone: The Principle of Divergence.” In The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species”, edited by Ruse, Michael and Richards, Robert J., 87–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kopf, Simon Maria. Reframing Providence: New Perspectives from Aquinas on the Divine Action Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, Denis O. Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2008.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, Denis O. “Evolutionary Creation: Moving Beyond the Evolution Versus Creation Debate.” Christian Higher Education 9, no. 1 (2009): 28–48.Google Scholar
Lang, David P. “The Thomistic Doctrine of Prime Matter.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 54, no. 2 (1998): 367–85.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Joseph. Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lawlor, Leonard, and Moulard Leonard, Valentine. “Henri Bergson.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/bergson/. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar
Lennox, James G. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lennox, James G. “Darwin Was a Teleologist.” Biology and Philosophy 8 (1993): 409–21.Google Scholar
Leo XIII, . Aeterni Patris: On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy. Rome, 1879. www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_04081879_aeterni-patris.html. Retrieved 12 June 2021.Google Scholar
Leroy, Marie-Dalmace. L’évolution Restreinte Aux Espèces Organiques. Paris: Delhomme et Briguet, 1891.Google Scholar
Levada, William Joseph, Auletta, Gennaro, Leclerc, Marc, and Martínez, Rafael A., eds. Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories: A Critical Appraisal 150 Years after “The Origin of Species”. Analecta Gregoriana 312. Roma: Gregorian & Biblical Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lickliter, Robert. “Developmental Evolution.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 8, no. 1–2 (2017).Google Scholar
Livingstone, David N. Adam’s Ancestors: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Livingstone, David N. Dealing with Darwin: Place, Politics, and Rhetoric in Religious Engagements with Evolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas E. “Evolutionary Genetics and Theological Narratives of Human Origins.” The Heythrop Journal 59, no. 3 (2018): 523–33.Google Scholar
Luyten, N. “Evolutionisme En Wijsbegeerte.” Tijdschrift Voor Philosophie 16, no. 1 (1954): 3–36.Google Scholar
Luyten, N. “The Philosophical Implications of Evolution.” The New Scholasticism 25 (1951): 290–312.Google Scholar
Macbeth, Norman. Darwin Retried: An Appeal to Reason. Boston: Gambit, 1971.Google Scholar
Mackie, John Leslie. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64, no. 254 (1955): 200–12.Google Scholar
Madden, James D. Mind, Matter, and Nature: A Thomistic Proposal for the Philosophy of Mind. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Madueme, Hans. “‘The Most Vulnerable Part of the Whole Christian Account’: Original Sin and Modern Science.” In Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: Theological, Biblical, and Scientific Perspectives, edited by Madueme, Hans and Reeves, Michael, 225–49. Grand Rapid, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Mallet, James. “Mayr’s View of Darwin: Was Darwin Wrong about Speciation?” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95, no. 1 (2008): 3–16.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. “On the Philosophy of Nature (I): Toward a Thomist Idea of Evolution.” In Untrammeled Approaches, 85–131. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. The Range of Reason. New York: Scribner, 1952.Google Scholar
Massie, Pascal. “The Irony of Chance: On Aristotle’s Physics B, 4–6.” International Philosophical Quarterly 43, no. 1 (2003): 15–28.Google Scholar
Matthen, Mohan. “Biological Universals and the Nature of Fear.” The Journal of Philosophy 95, no. 3 (1998): 105–32.Google Scholar
Mayden, Richard L. “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem.” In Species: The Units of Biodiversity, edited by Claridge, M. F., Dawah, A. H., and Wilson, M. R., 381–424. London and New York: Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. Populations, Species, and Evolution, An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution. Abridged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “Teleological and Teleonomic: A New Analysis.” In Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays, 383–404. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “The Multiple Meanings of Teleological.” In Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist, 38–66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “Typological Versus Population Thinking.” In Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal, edited by Meggers, Betty J., 409–12. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, 1959.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. What Evolution Is. London: Phoenix, 2002.Google Scholar
McIver, Tom. “Formless and Void: Gap Theory Creationism.” Creation/Evolution Journal 8, no. 3 (1988): 1–24.Google Scholar
McMahon, Kevin. “Monogenism and Polygenism.” In New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003. www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/monogenism-and-polygenism. Retrieved 21 June 2021.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. “Introduction: Evolution and Creation.” In Evolution and Creation, edited by McMullin, Ernan, 1–56. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Melsen, Andreas Gerardus Maria van. The Philosophy of Nature. 3rd ed. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Messenger, Ernest C. Evolution and Theology: The Problem of Man’s Origin. New York: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
Messenger, Ernest C. Theology and Evolution. London: Sands & Co., 1951.Google Scholar
Miller, Kenneth R. Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mishler, Brent D. “Getting Rid of Species?” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 307–15. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Mivart, St George Jackson. “Darwin’s Brilliant Fallacy.” The Forum 7 (1889): 99–105.Google Scholar
Mivart, St George Jackson. On the Genesis of Species. New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1871.Google Scholar
Molnar, George. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Edited by Mumford, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Monod, Jacques. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Translated by Austryn Wainhouse. New York: Vintage Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Morales, José. Creation Theology. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Morange, Michel. “Is There an Explanation for … the Diversity of Explanations in Biological Studies?” In Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences, edited by Braillard, Pierre-Alain and Malaterre, Christophe, 31–46. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alvaro, and Mossio, Matteo. Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Moreno, Antonio. “Finality and Intelligibility in Biological Evolution.” The Thomist 54, no. 1 (1990): 1–31.Google Scholar
Moreno, Antonio. “Some Philosophical Considerations on Biological Evolution.” The Thomist 37, no. 3 (1973): 417–54.Google Scholar
Moss, Lenny, and Nicholson, Daniel J.. “On Nature and Normativity: Normativity, Teleology, and Mechanism in Biological Explanation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43, no. 1 (2012): 88–91.Google Scholar
Muller, Camille. “L’Encyclique ‘Humani Generis’ et Les Problèmes Scientifiques.” Synthèses; Revue Mensuelle International 5, no. 57 (1951): 296–312.Google Scholar
Muller, Earl. “Evolution.” In New Catholic Encyclopedia, Supplement 2009, A-I. Detroit: Gale in association with The Catholic University of America, 2010.Google Scholar
NABRE: New American Bible Revised Edition. Charlottesville, VA: Saint Benedict Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernst. “Types of Causal Explanation in Science.” In Cause and Effect, edited by Lerner, Daniel, 11–32. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense.” Philosophy of Science 58, no. 2 (1991): 168–84.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Daniel J., and Dupré, John. Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Nicolas, M. J. Evolution et Christianisme. De Teilhard de Chardin à Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Fayard, 1973.Google Scholar
Nogar, Raymond J. “From the Fact of Evolution to the Philosophy of Evolutionism.” The Thomist 24, no. 2 (1961): 463–501.Google Scholar
Nogar, Raymond J. The Wisdom of Evolution. New York: Doubleday, 1963.Google Scholar
Nosil, Patrik, Feder, Jeffrey L., and Gompert, Zachariah. “How Many Genetic Changes Create New Species?” Science 371, no. 6531 (2021): 777–79.Google Scholar
Novo, Francisco J. “The Theory of Evolution in the Writings of Joseph Ratzinger.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 323–49.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Oakes, Edward T. “Dominican Darwinism: Evolution in Thomist Philosophy After Darwin.” The Thomist 77, no. 3 (2013): 333–65.Google Scholar
Oderberg, David S. Real Essentialism. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Robert J. “Systematic Generalization, Historical Fate, and the Species Problem.” Systematic Biology 42, no. 3 (1993): 231–46.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131, no. 2 (2002): 191–213.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Don. Roman Catholicism and Modern Science: A History. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Olson, Richard G. Science and Religion, 1450–1900: From Copernicus to Darwin. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2004.Google Scholar
O’Malley, Maureen. Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
O’Malley, Maureen, and Dupré, John. “Size Doesn’t Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 22, no. 2 (2007): 155–91.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Fran. “Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Evolution.” The Review of Metaphysics 58, no. 1 (2004): 3–59.Google Scholar
Orr, H. Allen. “Is Single-Gene Speciation Possible?” Evolution 45, no. 3 (1991): 764–69.Google Scholar
Paley, William. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: R. Faulder, 1802.Google Scholar
Paro, Renato, Grossniklaus, Ueli, Santoro, Raffaella, and Wutz, Anton. Introduction to Epigenetics. Berlin: Springer, 2021.Google Scholar
Pasnau. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Paul VI, Pope. “Original Sin and Modern Science: Address to Participants in A Symposium on Original Sin,” The Pope Speaks 11, no. 3 (1966): 229–35 (translated from the Italian L’Osservatore Romano, 11 July 1966, by Rev. Austin Vaughan).Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. “Articulating God’s Presence in and to the World Unveiled by the Sciences.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur Robert, 137–54. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. “Biological Evolution – A Positive Theological Appraisal.” In Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and Ayala, Francisco José, 357–76. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine, and Human. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar
Pendergast, Richard. “Evil, Original Sin, and Evolution.” The Heythrop Journal 50, no. 5 (2009): 833–45.Google Scholar
Pennisi, Elizabeth. “Evo-Devo Enthusiasts Get Down to Details.” Science 298, no. 5595 (November 1, 2002): 953–55.Google Scholar
Pennock, Robert T. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 2001.Google Scholar
Perlman, Mark. “The Modern Philosophical Resurrection of Teleology.” In Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology, edited by Rosenberg, Alex and Arp, Robert, 149–63. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Peters, Ted, and Hewlett, Martin. Evolution from Creation to New Creation: Conflict, Conversation, and Convergence. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Peterson, Daniel J. “The Kenosis of the Father: Affirming God’s Action at the Higher Levels of Nature.” Theology and Science 11, no. 4 (2013): 451–54.Google Scholar
Phillips, Richard Percival. Modern Thomistic Philosophy: An Explanation for Students. Volume 1: The Philosophy of Nature. Reprint of the second reprinted edition (1962). Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2013.Google Scholar
Pittendrigh, Colin S. “Adaptation, Natural Selection and Behavior.” In Behavior and Evolution, edited by Roe, Anne and Simpson, George Gaylord, 390–419. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Pius XII., Humani Generis. Rome, 1950. www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis.html. Retrieved 23 May 2021.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John C. “Kenotic Creation and Divine Action.” In The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis, edited by Polkinghorne, J. C., 90–106. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Pontifical Academy of Sciences. “Statement by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Current Scientific Knowledge on Cosmic Evolution and Biological Evolution.” In Scientific Insights into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life, edited by Arber, Werner, Cabibbo, Nicola, and Sorondo, Marcelo Sanchez, 583–86. Vatican City: Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, 2009.Google Scholar
Portalié, Eugène. A Guide to the Thought of St. Augustine. Chicago, IL: Regnery Publishing 1960.Google Scholar
Porter, Alan M. W. “Do Animals Have Souls? An Evolutionary Perspective.” The Heythrop Journal 54, no. 4 (2013): 533–42.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. “God, Chance and Evolution. In Memory of Benjamin Arbour.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Orr, James, 364–82. New York: Routledge, 2022.Google Scholar
Pušić, Bruno, Gregorić, Pavel, and Franjević, Damjan. “What Do Biologists Make of the Species Problem?” Acta Biotheoretica 65, no. 3 (2017): 179–209.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, edited by Hilary Putnam, 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View, edited by Willard Van Orman Quine, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “Evolution and Original Sin.” Concilium 26, no. 6 (1967): 61–73.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. New York: Crossroad, 1978.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “Theological Reflections on Monogenism.” In Theological Investigations. Vol. I, translated by Cornelius Ernst, 229–96. Baltimore: Helicon, 1961.Google Scholar
Ramage, Matthew J. From the Dust of the Earth: Benedict XVI, the Bible, and the Theory of Evolution. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Ian T. Models for Divine Activity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2011.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. “Belief in Creation and the Theory of Evolution.” In Dogma and Preaching, edited by Joseph Ratzinger, 131–42. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Introduction to Christianity. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Schöpfungslehre [unpublished Freising lecture notes], 1958.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Schöpfungslehre [unpublished Freising lecture notes], 1964.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. The Spirit of the Liturgy. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Revol, Fabien. “The Concept of Continuous Creation Part I: History and Contemporary Use.” Zygon 55, no. 1 (2020): 229–50.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. “Species and Taxonomy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 161–88. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rieppel, Olivier. “New Essentialism in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 77, no. 5 (2010): 662–73.Google Scholar
Robert, Jason Scott. “Evo-Devo.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 291–309. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. M. “Prime Matter in Aristotle.” Phronesis 19, no. 2 (1974): 168–88.Google Scholar
Rondet, Henri. Original Sin: The Patristic and Theological Background. Staten Island, NY: Alba House, 1972.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. Instrumental Biology, or The Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander, and Bouchard, Frederic. “Fitness.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2020 Edition), 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=fitness&archive=spr2020. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex, and McShea, Daniel W.. Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Ross, Hugh. A Matter of Days: Resolving a Creation Controversy. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2004.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?” In The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, edited by Ereshefsky, Marc, 343–62. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1992.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. The Philosophy of Human Evolution. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert John. Cosmology from Alpha to Omega: The Creative Mutual Interaction of Theology and Science. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2008.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert John. “Special Providence and Genetic Mutation: A New Defense of Theistic Evolution.” In Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and Ayala, Francisco José, 191–223. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1998.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Isham, C.J., eds. Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1993.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., Meyering, Theo C., and Arbib, Michael A., eds. Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1999.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Robert Peacocke, Arthur, eds. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 2000.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Stoeger, William R., eds. Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 2008.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Clayton, Philip, Wegter-McNelly, Kirk, and Polkinghorne, John, eds. Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and José Ayala, Francisco, eds. Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1998.Google Scholar
Sanz Sánchez, Santiago. “La Dottrina Della Creazione Nelle Lezioni Del Professor Joseph Ratzinger: Gli Appunti Di Freising (1958).” Annales Theologici 30, no. 1 (2016): 11–44.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Scheffczyk, Leo. Schwerpunkte des Glaubens: Gesammelte Schriften zur Theologie. Einsiedeln: Johannes-Verlag [Auslfg. Benziger], 1977.Google Scholar
Schmaus, Michael. Dogma: God and Creation. London: Sheed and Ward, 1969.Google Scholar
Schoonenberg, Piet. “Erbsünde und ‘Sünde der Welt’.” Orientierung: Katholische Blätter für weltanschauliche Information 6, no. 6 (1962): 65–69.Google Scholar
Schoonenberg, Piet. Man and Sin: A Theological View by Piet Schoonenberg. Translated by Joseph Donceel. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Schönborn, Christoph Cardinal. Chance or Purpose? Creation, Evolution and a Rational Faith. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Thomas R. “Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12–19.” In Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: Theological, Biblical, And Scientific Perspectives, edited by Madueme, Hans and Reeves, Michael, 271–88. Grand Rapid, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Gerald. Genesis and the Big Bang Theory: The Discovery of Harmony Between Modern Science and The Bible. New York: Bantam Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, Erwin. What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Schwager, Raymund. Banished from Eden: Original Sin and Evolutionary Theory in the Drama of Salvation. Herefordshire: Gracewing Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Scott, Eugenie Carol. Evolution Vs. Creationism: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Scott, Eugenie Carol. “The Creation/Evolution Continuum.” In National Center for Science Education, 2016. https://ncse.ngo/creationevolution-continuum. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, Gaudium et Spes (Rome, 1965), www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html. Retrieved 15 may 2021.Google Scholar
Seibt, Johanna, ed. Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic, 2003.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “A Cause Among Causes? God Acting in the Natural World.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 99–114.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Divine Action and Thomism: Why Thomas Aquinas’s Thought Is Attractive Today.” Acta Philosophica 25, no. 1 (2016): 65–84.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. Providence and Science in a World of Contingency: Thomas Aquinas’ Metaphysics of Divine Action. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Revisiting Aquinas on Providence and Rising to the Challenge of Divine Action in Nature.” Journal of Religion 94, no. 3 (2014): 277–91.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today’s Debate on Divine Action.” Heythrop Journal 48, no. 1 (2011): 1–10.Google Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Skrzypek, Jeremy. “Three Concerns for Structural Hylomorphism.” Analytic Philosophy 58, no. 4 (2017): 360–408.Google Scholar
Smit, Harry. “Darwin’s Rehabilitation of Teleology Versus Williams’ Replacement of Teleology by Natural Selection.” Biological Theory 5, no. 4 (2010): 357–65.Google Scholar
Smith, John Maynard, and Szathmary, Eors. The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Snyder, Steven. “Evolution and the Origin of Species: Aristotelian Reflections.” https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti/snyder.htm. Retrieved 19 August 2022.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 47, no. 3 (1980): 350–83.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. “Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher’s ‘Species.’” Philosophy of Science 51, no. 2 (1984): 334–41.Google Scholar
Solinas, M. From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy: The Stamp of Inutility. Translated by James Douglas. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015.Google Scholar
Sollereder, Bethany N. God, Evolution, and Animal Suffering: Theodicy without a Fall. New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Aristotle and Prime Matter: A Reply to Hugh R. King.” Journal of the History of Ideas 19, no. 2 (1958): 243–52.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher, ed. God, Humanity and the Cosmos – 3rd Edition: A Textbook in Science and Religion. London and New York: T & T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher, The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution, and the Problem of Evil. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. “Ethics.” In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza. Vol. 2, translated by Robert Harvey Monro Elwes, 43–271. New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar
Stamos, David N. The Species Problem, Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. “Species as Ecological Mosaics.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 119–38. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim, and Griffiths, Paul E.. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Stipe, Claude E. “Scientific Creationism and Evangelical Christianity.” American Anthropologist 87, no. 1 (1985): 148–50.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. “Contemporary Physics and the Ontological Status of the Laws of Nature.” In Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Clayton, Philip, Wegter-McNelly, Kirk, and Polkinghorne, John, 207–31. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar
Storck, Michael Hector. “Parts, Wholes, and Presence by Power: A Response to Gordon P. Barnes.” The Review of Metaphysics 62, no. 1 (2008): 45–59.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Suarez, Antoine. “‘Transmission at Generation’: Could Original Sin Have Happened at the Time When Homo Sapiens Already Had a Large Population Size?” Scientia et Fides 4, no. 1 (April 26, 2016): 253–94.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco. Opera Omnia, Vol. 25. Edited by Berton, Carolo. Paris: Louis Vivès, 1861.Google Scholar
Swamidass, S. Joshua. The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2021.Google Scholar
Swamidass, S. Joshua. “The Misunderstood Science of Genetic Bottlenecks.” Peaceful Science, July 29, 2022. https://doi.org/10.54739/1w7j.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Afterword to the Polish Edition of Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, O.P., James Brent, O.P., Thomas Davenport, O.P., and John Baptist Ku, O.P.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “An Aristotelian Account of Evolution and the Contemporary Philosophy of Biology.” In The 1st Virtual International Conference on the Dialogue between Science and Theology. Dialogo Conf 2014: Cosmology, Life & Anthropology, edited by Cosmin, Tudor Ciocan and Anton, Lieskovský, 57–69. Zilina: Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, 2014.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Aristotelian-Thomistic Contribution to the Contemporary Studies on Biological Life and Its Origin.” Religions 14, no. 2 (February 2023): 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020214.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Contemporary Version of the Monogenetic Model of Anthropogenesis: Some Critical Remarks from the Thomistic Perspective.” Religions 14, no. 4 (2023): 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040528.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. Divine Action and Emergence: An Alternative to Panentheism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Does God Create Through Evolution? A Thomistic Perspective.” Theology and Science 20, no. 1 (January 2, 2022): 46–68.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. Emergence: Towards A New Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Essentialist and Hylomorphic Notion of Species and Species Transformation,” in A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, edited by Nicanor Austriaco (forthcoming). Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Evolution and Creation – A Response to Michael Chaberek’s Polemic with Theistic Evolution.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Hegel and Whitehead: In Search for Sources of Contemporary Versions of Panentheism in the Science–Theology Dialogue.” Theology and Science 11 (2013): 143–61.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “The Metaphysics of Evolution: From Aquinas’s Interpretation of Augustine’s Concept of Rationes Seminales to the Contemporary Thomistic Account of Species Transformism.” Nova et Vetera 18, no. 3 (2020).Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Thomistic Response to the Theory of Evolution: Aquinas on Natural Selection and the Perfection of the Universe.” Theology and Science 13, no. 3 (2015): 325–44.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, Mariusz. “What Do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change? Divine Concurrence and Transformism from the Thomistic Perspective.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93, no. 3 (2019): 445–82.Google Scholar
Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe. “La questione antropologica in prospettiva teologica.” In Centro di documentazione interdisciplinare di Scienza e fede, Conversazioni su scienza e fede, 192–95. Torino: Edizioni Lindau, 2012.Google Scholar
Tertullian. “On the Resurrection of the Flesh.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 3: Latin Christianity – Its Founder, Tertullian, edited by Schaff, Philip and Menzies, Alan, 1202–316. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1885.Google Scholar
Thomas, Owen C., ed. God’s Activity in the World: The Contemporary Problem. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Thomson, Russell, Pritchard, Jonathan K., Shen, Peidong, Oefner, Peter J., and Feldman, Marcus W.. “Recent Common Ancestry of Human Y Chromosomes: Evidence from DNA Sequence Data.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, no. 13 (2000): 7360–65.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Vol. 1. The Person and His Work. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Valen, Leigh Van. “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks.” Taxon 25, no. 2/3 (1976): 233–39.Google Scholar
Vander Laan, David. “Creation and Conservation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/creation-conservation/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar
Vanneste, Alfred. The Dogma of Original Sin. Translated by Edward Callens. Louvain: Vander, 1975.Google Scholar
Vanneste, Alfred. “Toward a Theology of Original Sin.” Theology Digest 15 (1967): 209–14.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: North Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
Velde, Rudi A. Aquinas on God: The “Divine Science” of the Summa Theologiae. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Velde, Rudi A. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Cologne: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Venema, Dennis R. “Genesis and the Genome: Genomics Evidence for Human-Ape Common Ancestry and Ancestral Hominid Population Sizes.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62, no. 3 (2010): 166–78.Google Scholar
Venema, Dennis R., and McKnight, Scot. Adam and the Genome: Reading Scripture after Genetic Science. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Verschuuren, Gerard M. Aquinas and Modern Science: A New Synthesis of Faith and Reason. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. Evolution after Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis. “Evolutionary Essentialism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, no. 2 (2006): 425–48.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis. “Teleology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 113–37. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wallace, Alfred Russel. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection: A Series of Essays. New York: Macmillan, 1870.Google Scholar
Wallace, Stan W. “In Defense of Biological Essentialism,” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 1 (2002), 34–35.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. The Modeling of Nature: Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Nature in Synthesis. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Warfield, Benjamin Breckinridge. Evolution, Scripture, and Science: Selected Writings. Edited by Noll, Mark A. and Livingstone, David N.. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Wasmann, Erich. Modern Biology and the Theory of Evolution. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, & Company, 1910.Google Scholar
Webster, Gerry, and Goodwin, Brian. Form and Transformation: Generative and Relational Principles in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, Mary Jane. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David L. “A Proposed Model for the Evolutionary Creation of Human Beings: From the Image of God to the Origin of Sin.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 68, no. 1 (2016): 22–43.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John S. Species: A History of the Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Williams, George Ch. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. “Realism, Essence, and Kind: Resuscitating Species Essentialism.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 187–207. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. “Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3, no. 1 (1972): 1–80.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82, no. 2 (1973): 139–68.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wuellner, Bernard J. Summary of Scholastic Principles. Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Yarnold, Edward. The Theology of Original Sin. Notre Dame: Fides, 1971.Google Scholar
Zahm, John Augustine. Evolution and Dogma. Chicago, IL: McBride, 1896.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Anthony Francis. Evolution and the Sin in Eden: A New Christian Synthesis. Lanham, MD; New York; Oxford: University Press of America, 1998.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Mariusz Tabaczek, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome
  • Book: Theistic Evolution
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367028.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Mariusz Tabaczek, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome
  • Book: Theistic Evolution
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367028.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Mariusz Tabaczek, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome
  • Book: Theistic Evolution
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367028.011
Available formats
×