Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: the science of taphonomy
- 2 Biostratinomy I: necrolysis, transport, and abrasion
- 3 Biostratinomy II: dissolution and early diagenesis
- 4 Bioturbation
- 5 Time-averaging of fossil assemblages: taphonomy and temporal resolution
- 6 Exceptional preservation
- 7 Sedimentation and stratigraphy
- 8 Megabiases I: cycles of preservation and biomineralization
- 9 Megabiases II: secular trends in preservation
- 10 Applied taphonomy
- 11 Taphonomy as a historical science
- References
- Index
11 - Taphonomy as a historical science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: the science of taphonomy
- 2 Biostratinomy I: necrolysis, transport, and abrasion
- 3 Biostratinomy II: dissolution and early diagenesis
- 4 Bioturbation
- 5 Time-averaging of fossil assemblages: taphonomy and temporal resolution
- 6 Exceptional preservation
- 7 Sedimentation and stratigraphy
- 8 Megabiases I: cycles of preservation and biomineralization
- 9 Megabiases II: secular trends in preservation
- 10 Applied taphonomy
- 11 Taphonomy as a historical science
- References
- Index
Summary
I am still learning.
MichelangeloMajor themes
Would we really understand the Earth and its Life if we only understood the present? Geology is the study of the history of the Earth and its Life. Taphonomy is no different. Taphonomy, and the more inclusive disciplines of paleontology and geology, are historical sciences (Chapter 1). The ultimate value of geology is that there are patterns and processes that can only be the documented by the geological record (Martin, 1998a).
One of the major themes of this book is that biogenic particles and assemblages exhibit an incredible diversity of taphonomic pathways and histories (Chapters 2, 3). However, historical sciences find themselves in a nebulous realm: there are often too few parts to average their behavior and too many to account for separately with their own differential equation (Allen and Starr, 1982; see also Martin, 1998a). In such situations, it is very difficult to formulate laws, which presumably express unfailing predictive relationships between objects, processes, etc., except under the most restrictive of conditions (as is usually the case in the reductionist approach), much less rules or principles.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- TaphonomyA Process Approach, pp. 387 - 395Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999