Researching local perspectives on biodiversity in tropical landscapes: lessons from ten case studies

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511676482.006

6 - Researching local perspectives on biodiversity in tropical landscapes: lessons from ten case studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010

Nining Liswanti and

Edited by

Anna Lawrence: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

CIFOR's Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment approach

The Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment (MLA) approach, initiated in 1999 by researchers at the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) in collaboration with various partners, combines a technical survey of species, habitats and landscape locations with an assessment of their significance to local people. It fits the CIFOR mission to conduct research relevant to improving natural resource management and benefiting people. Its main claim to distinctiveness lies in its multi-disciplinary range of methods. The MLA landscape is defined by the people that live in it: how they define its land and vegetation types, the way they relate to it and use it: ‘a holistic and spatially explicit concept that is much more than the sum of its components: terrain, soil, land cover and use, […] a cultural construction’ (Sheil et al., 2003). The geographical scale of the landscape depends on the distances or (territories) that people cover to meet their livelihood needs. None of the studies explicitly explored local communities' concepts of ‘biodiversity’ and the term was never used with them. Rather the emphasis was on the environment and landscape in which people lived.

Since the first survey was conducted, others have used the approach in similar surveys. This chapter describes the basic methods; then compares the application and outcomes of the approach in ten case studies.

The basic approach

The approach and initial methods were developed during an extended two-month workshop and field trial in Malinau, East Kalimantan.

Type: Chapter
Information: Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
, pp. 113 - 141

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676482.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barney, K. (2005). Central Plans and Global Exports: Tracking Vietnam's Forestry Commodity Chains and Export Links to China. Forest Trend. Available at: http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/meetings/china_2005_protected/documents/other/Vietnam%20Final%20Report%206-1-05.pdf

Basuki, I. and Sheil, D. (2005). Local Perspectives of Forest Landscapes: A Preliminary Evaluation of Land and Soils, and their Importance in Malinau, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Boissière, M., Basuki, I., Koponen, P., Wan, M. and Sheil, D. (2006). Biodiversity and Local Perceptions on the Edge of a Conservation Area, Khe Tran Village, Vietnam. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Boissière, M. and Liswanti, N. (2006). Biodiversity in a Batak Village of Palawan (Philippines). A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Local Perceptions and Priorities. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Boissière, M. and Sassen, M. (2007). Mesurer l'importance de la biodiversité pour les sociétés forestières des pays du Sud. Une méthode d'investigation pluridisciplinaire. Nature, Sciences et Sociétés 15(1), 23–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campo, P. C. and Villanueva, T. R. (2006). Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) Modelling to Improve the Management of Common Renewable Resources in Palawan, Philippines, IASCP 2006 Conference Papers, 16 pp. Available at: http://www.iascp.org/bali/papers.html.

Céfaï, D. (2003). L'enquête de terrain. Paris: La Découverte MAUSS, 615 pp.Google Scholar

,CIFOR (2004). Building Capacity for Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment in Papua: three phases of training and pilot assessments in the Mamberamo Basin. Unpublished report.

Cunliffe, R. N. (2003). Responses by the Nhanchururu Community to the two SAfMA-GM Scenarios: ‘Patronage’ and ‘Devolution’. Unpublished report prepared for the Gorongosa-Marromeu Transect of the Southern African Millenium Assessment, Harare: Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar

Cunliffe, R. N., Lynam, T. J. P., Sheil, D.et al. (2007). Developing a predictive understanding of landscape importance to the Punan-Pelancau of East Kalimantan, Borneo. Ambio 36(7), 593–599.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cunningham, A. B. (2001). Applied Ethnobotany. People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation. People and Plants Conservation Manual Series. London: Earthscan Publications, 300pp.Google Scholar

Devanadera, M. E., Gamutia, A., Hartanto, H., Mallion, F. K. and Villanueva, T. (2004). Philippines Country Report, Year 1. LPF/03/2004, UPLB, CIRAD, CIFOR.

Eder, J. F. (1987). On the Road of Tribal Extinction. Depopulation, Deculturation and Adaptative Well-being among the Batak of the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Evans, K. (2006). Evaluating and adapting future scenarios in forest dependent communities in Hue province, Vietnam. Unpublished report to the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).Google Scholar

Evans, K., W. de Jong, W., P. Miranda, P. and P. Cronkleton, P. (2005). Evaluating and Adaptating Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment in Forest-dependent Communities in the Northern Bolivian Amazon. Bogor: CIFOR, 36 pp.Google Scholar

Groot, R. D. de, Wilson, M. A. and Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and evaluation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41, 393–408.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jum, C. N. and Oyono, P. R. (2005). Building collaboration through action research: the case of Ottotomo Forest Reserve in Cameroon. International Forestry Review 7(1), 37–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kompas, . (2006). Target: Tiga Juta Hektar Sawit. Swasta Perlu Insentif untuk Kembangkan Biodiesel. Kompas (an Indonesian National Newspaper), 26 January.Google Scholar

Lynam, T., Cunliffe, R., Sheil, D.et al. (2007). Livelihoods, Land Types and the Importance of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Developing a Predictive Understanding of Landscape Valuation by the Punan Pelancau People of East Kalimantan. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Murniati, , Padmanaba, M., Basuki, I. and Ploeg, J. (2006). Gunung Lumut Biodiversity Assessment, Socio-economic Study. Balikpapan: Tropenbos International Indonesia.Google Scholar

Padmanaba, M. and Sheil, D. (2007). Finding and promoting a local conservation consensus in a globally important tropical forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(1), 137–151.CrossRef Google Scholar

Philips, O. L. (1996). Some quantitative methods for analyzing ethnobotanical knowledge. In Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual, ed. Alexiades, M.N.. USA: The New York Botanical Garden, pp. 171–197.Google Scholar

Pye-Smith, C. (2005). Biodiversity: a new perspective. New Scientist, 10 December 2005, 50.Google Scholar

Sassen, M. and Jum, C. (2007). Assessing local perspectives in a forested landscape in Central Cameroon. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods 17(1), 23–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sassen, M. and Wan, M. (2006). Biodiversity and Local Priorities in a Community Near the Ivindo National Park. Makokou, Gabon. Research report published online by the Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), available at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/mla.

Sheil, D. and Wunder, S. (2002). The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats and cautions. Conservation Ecology 6(2), 9. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sheil, D., Puri, R., Basuki, I.et al. (2003). Exploring Biological Diversity, Environment and Local People's Perspectives in Forest Landscapes. Bogor: CIFOR. Revised and Updated Edition – also in Indonesian, French and Spanish. Available at http:www.cifor.cgiar.org/mla.Google Scholar

Sheil, D. and Boissière, M. (2006). People may be the best allies in conservation. Nature 440, 868.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sheil, D. and Liswanti, N. (2006). Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights. Environmental Management 38(1), 126–36.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sheil, D., Puri, R. K., Wan, M.et al. (2006). Recognizing local people's priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio 35(1), 17–24.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Steinberg, P. F. (2005). From public concern to policy effectiveness: civic conservation in developing countries. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 8, 341–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoffle, R. W., Halmo, D. B. and Evans, M. J. (1990). Calculating the cultural significance of American Indian plants: paiute and Shoshone ethnobotany at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. American Anthropologist 92(2), 416–432.CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, N. J. (1988). ‘The importance of a rose’: Evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90, 272–290.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meer, P. J., Bairaktari, C., Groot, R. S., Heist, M. and Schmerbeck, J. (2006). Methodology for Assessing Benefits of Afforested Community and Forest Land. Wageningen: ALTERRA.Google Scholar

Fretes, Yance (2006). Menggali Kekayaan Keanekaragaman Hayati Kawasan Mamberamo. Tropika Indonesia 10(1), 8–11.Google Scholar