Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T19:36:47.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Anna Lawrence
Edited by
Anna Lawrence
Anna Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Britain has an exceptional tradition of natural history societies and amateur naturalists who collect data about species distributions, frequency and behaviour (Bell et al., this volume). This chapter examines an attempt to harness the data for a wider range of purposes, and the ways in which different actors have perceived and responded to this. Many of the volunteers have a strong personal attachment to their data, and to the ways in which they hope that it will be used. When powerful organizations become involved in managing the data, the volunteers can perceive threats and opportunities for the value of their data. The chapter considers the need to balance these emotional and political aspects in developing an effective national data management system. It is based on a cross-cutting analysis of research into the processes behind biodiversity action plans and biological recording, conducted over several years in the UK (Gillett and Lawrence, 2003; Lawrence, 2005; Lawrence, 2006; Lawrence and Molteno in press; Lawrence and Turnhout, 2005). The chapter draws on interviews with volunteers and professionals involved in the complex organizational landscape that has evolved around biological data collection and sharing, descriptions of the process on websites and in reports, and on presentations made at the annual National Biodiversity Network conferences.

The supply side: growth of biological recording

Biological recording, or the collection of data about the distribution and abundance of species, has a long history in Britain, going back to the leisure time of country vicars in the eighteenth century (Moss, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
 , pp. 251 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Battersby, J. E. and Greenwood, J. J. D.. (2004). Monitoring terrestrial mammals in the UK: past, present and future, using lessons from the bird world. Mammal Review 34, 3–29.CrossRef
Scotland, Biodiversity (2008). Biodiversity Duty for Public Bodies. Scottish Government. Available at http://www.biodiversityscotland.gov.uk/pageType2.php?id=6&type=2&navID=28
Bowler, P. (2003). Identity crisis. In The Guardian, pp. 8–9. London.Google Scholar
,BRISC (2006). Biological Recording in Scotland: Strategic Business Plan 2006 – 2016. Available at: http://www.brisc.org.uk/StrategicPlan06–16.pdf.
Burnett, J., Copp, C., and Harding, P. (1995). Biological Recording in the UK: Present Practice and Future Development. Coordinating Commission for Biological Recording. Ruislip, England.Google Scholar
,DEFRA (2006a). Biodiversity Indicators – Working with the Grain of Nature – Taking it Forward: Volume II. Measuring Progress on the England Biodiversity Strategy: 2006 Assessment. London: DEFRA. Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn312.pdf.Google Scholar
,DEFRA (2006b). The UK Biodiversity Action Plan: Highlights of the 2005 Reporting Round. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/pdfs/biodiversity/uk-bap-report.pdf#search=%22lbaps%20reporting%20round%202005%22.
,DEFRA (2007a). Conserving Biodiversity in a Changing Climate: Guidance on Building Capacity to Adapt. London: DEFRA. Available at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/Library/BRIG/CBCCGuidance.pdf.Google Scholar
,DEFRA (2007b). Environmental Information Regulations: Exceptions. Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/opengov/eir/guidance/full-guidance/pdf/guidance-7.pdf
,DEFRA (2007c). Guidance for Public Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty. Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/pdfs/biodiversity/pa-guid-english.pdf
Firbank, L. G., Barr, C. J., Bunce, R. G. H.et al. (2003). Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. Journal of Environmental Management 67, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flowerdew, J. R. (2004). Advances in the conservation of British mammals, 1954–2004: 50 years of progress with the Mammal Society. Mammal Review 34, 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, S. and Lawrence, A., editors (2003). Why Involve Volunteers in Biodiversity Monitoring? Summary of the BioWatch UK workshop, 20th October 2003. BioWatch UK Workshop. Oxford, UK. Available at: http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/humaneco/biowatch.php
Gouveia, C., Fonseca, A., Camara, A., and Ferreira, F. (2004). Promoting the use of environmental data collected by concerned citizens through information and communication technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2003). The monitoring of British breeding birds: a success story for conservation science?Science of the Total Environment 310, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, N. and Wood, C.. (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment – implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, G. W. and Freckleton, R. P. (2002). Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 5, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, R. S. (1993). The use of biological records to protect a Thames grazing marsh of national importance for invertebrates. In The Proceedings of the NFBR Conference: Crises and Biological Records, eds. Spalding, A. and French, C., pp. 20–22. Redruth, Cornwall: Institute of Cornish Studies, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2005). Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and participatory environmental governance. Paper presented at the International Sociology Conference ‘Environment, Knowledge and Democracy’ 6–7 July 2005, Faculte des Sciences de Luminy, Marseilles, 2005. Available at: http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/humaneco/downloads/lawrence_marseille.PDF
Lawrence, A. (2006). “No Personal Motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A. and Molteno, S., in press. From rationalism to reflexivity? Reflections on change in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. In Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods, eds. Brousseau, E., Dedeurwaerdere, T. and B. Siebenhüner. MIT Press.
Lawrence, A. and Turnhout, E. (2005). Personal meaning in the public space: the bureaucratization of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. RGS-IBG Annual Conference, London, 2005.
Moss, S. (2004). A Bird in the Bush: a Social History of Birdwatching. London: Aurum.Google Scholar
,NBN (2006). The NBN concept, vol. 2007. Available at www.nbn.org.uk
,NFBR (2002). The Status of Local Records Centres in the UK, 2002. National Federation for Biological Recording. Available at www.nfbr.org.uk
,NFBR (2004). LRCs and the Draft Environmental Information Regulations Code of Practice. National Federation of Biological Recording. Available at www.nfbr.org.uk/html/lrcs.html
Nicholson, E. (1931). The Art of Bird-Watching. London: Witherby.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. (2004). Functions of museums and record centres and how they have changed. Paper presented at the NFBR Conference. National Federation of Biological Recorders Conference, 2–3 July 2004, Cardiff, 2004.
Preston, C. D., Telfer, M. G., Arnold, H. R.et al. (2002). The Changing Flora of the UK. London: DEFRA. Available at: www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/ewd/flora/FlorainUK.pdfGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. D. and Witter, M. S.. (2002). Monitoring trends in bat populations through roost surveys: methods and data from Rhinolophus hipposideros. Biological Conservation 105, 255–261.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×