Monitoring and assessment of biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international agreements

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511676482.002

2 - Monitoring and assessment of biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010

Ruth MacKenzie

Edited by

Anna Lawrence

Show author details

Anna Lawrence: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The central instrument in international efforts to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity is the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which was opened for signature at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and entered into force in December 1993. The Convention was adopted against the background of an existing web of other global biodiversity-related treaties. These include: the 1971 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance; the 1973 Convention on Trade on Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); the 1979 Bonn Convention on Migratory Species and specific ‘range state’ instruments adopted under its auspices; and the 1972 World Heritage Convention. (Websites for these conventions are listed at the end of the references section of this chapter.) These are supplemented by numerous regional agreements, addressing the conservation and sustainable use of terrestrial and/or marine biological diversity.

The existence of biodiversity-related international agreements reflects a wider move towards treaty-based global environmental governance. The number of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) has increased significantly in the period since the 1970s as the international community has recognized the interconnectedness of global environmental threats (Sands, 2003, p. 127; Desai, 2004, p. 106). Global conferences, such as the UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972 and UNCED, have often provided the impetus for the negotiation and conclusion of new MEAs.

Type: Chapter
Information: Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
, pp. 30 - 48

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676482.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boyle, A. (1996). The Rio Convention on Biological Diversity. In International Law and the Conservation of Biological Diversity, eds. Bowman, M. and Redgwell, C.. London, The Hague, Boston: Kluwer Law International, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar

Chayes, A. and Handler Chayes, A. (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Churchill, R. and Ulfstein, G. (2000). Autonomous institutional arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: a little-noticed phenomenon in international law. American Journal of International Law 94, 623–659.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Convention on Biological Diversity. (2007). Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention on the Work of its Second Meeting, document UNEP/CBD/COP/9/4, 26 July 2007. Available at: http://www.cbd.int.

Desai, B. (2004). Institutionalizing International Environmental Law. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

Ecologic, (2006). The Potsdam Recommendations on the Convention on Biological Diversity, Report of the Workshop on Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Potsdam, Germany, 13–15 December 2006. Available at http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/950–999/998/998-potsdam-recommendations.pdf.Google Scholar

Glowka, L., Burhenne-Guilmin, F., Synge, H., McNeely, J. and Gundling, L. (1994). A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Gland, Cambridge: IUCN the World Conservation Union.Google Scholar

Gross, T. (2005). A Guide for Countries Preparing Third National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations University, Institute of Advanced Studies, UNDP/GEF Unit.Google Scholar

Gross, T., Johnston, S. and Barber, C. (2006). The Convention on Biological Diversity: Understanding and Influencing the Process. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Lawrence, A. and Turnhout, E. (2005). Personal meaning in the public space: the bureaucratisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Available at http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk.

McGraw, D. (2002). The Story of the Biodiversity Convention: from negotiation to implementation. In Governing Global Biodiversity: the Evolution and Implementation of the CBD, ed. Prestre, P.. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 7–38.Google Scholar

Sands, P. (2003). Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2005). Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 3rd edition.

CBD Decision IV/10, Measures for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity (1998)

CBD Decision V/6 Ecosystem Approach (2000)

CBD Decision VI/8 Global Taxonomy Initiative (2002)

CBD Decision VI/19 Communication, Education and Public Awareness (2002)

CBD Decision VI/26 Strategic Plan for the Convention on Biological Diversity (2002)

CBD Decision VII/16 Article 8(j) and Related provisions (2004)

CBD Decision VII/30 Strategic Plan – Future Evaluation of Progress (2004)

CBD Decision VIII/28 Impact Assessment: voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact assessment (2006)

Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Decision, II/4 (2005)

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Resolution VIII.31 (2002)

1992 Convention on Biological Diversity www.cbd.int

1971 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance www.ramsar.org

1973 Convention on Trade on Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) www.cites.org

1979 Bonn Convention on Migratory Species www.cms.int

1972 World Heritage Convention http://whc.unesco.org/

The 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development is available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm (site visited 5 December 2007).